05-23-2018 10:30:41 AM -0700
05-18-2018 12:27:15 PM -0700
05-17-2018 08:38:50 AM -0700
05-11-2018 07:34:04 AM -0700
05-09-2018 10:17:16 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

'Pragmatist' or Not, Obama Is Trying to Remake America

By saying this, I want to make it clear that I'm not joining with the fringe that sees Obama as some sort of Manchurian candidate. I'm not going to encourage those caught up in the Obama derangement syndrome -- something that's as embarrassing as it is politically destructive.

Here, of course, I'm referring to those who continue to argue that Obama is "intentionally" trying to destroy the American economy as part of some sinister plot, or that he really isn't an American citizen. This is simply dumb and dangerous stuff.

It is, however, another matter to weigh in on the argument that tries to paint Obama as some sort of benign, if ruthless, pragmatist.

This ruthlessness could be seen in Obama's testy exchanges with Fox News' Baier. He appeared to be outraged that anybody would have the audacity to question his views.

Obama's comment that he "doesn't care about the procedural rules" tells us at least one thing: this president is an ideologue.

He wants to remake America and doesn't care if his fellow Democrats will pay the price for what he's done at the ballot box. And he doesn't seem to care that every trick in the political book got played by Pelosi and company to pass his plan. He just wanted the victory -- even if it may be Pyrrhic.

We've all heard the argument that Obama can't be an ideologue. "Look at how he's pissed off his left base" they say. And to be honest, he has angered the MSNBC-type leftists -- but not because he's operated as some kind of centrist. They're mad as hell with him because he hasn't moved fast enough to implement the goals and beliefs they share.

Just consider Dennis Kucinich, the wacky leftist congressman, who rolled over and said he'd vote "yes" on the health care bill. He wanted "reform" -- even if it's a weak and watered-down version of what he'd prefer. No, leftists don't oppose Obama's attempt to "reform" health care. What made them mad is that, as Kucinich said, Obama's plan is not radical enough. It's not the full-on, slam-dunk single payer plan they'd like him to impose on America.

In the meantime, while some lamely argue over whether or not Obama's a pragmatist, he's gone to work re-shaping American society.

General Motors has become "government motors," financial institutions are government-controlled, bureaucrats will oversee education loans, and energy use will be dictated by the government if cap and trade passes.

All of this is being orchestrated to the tune of political bribery, threats, and intimidation.

This certainly isn't what a lot of Obama voters had in mind when they embraced "hope n' change."