Obama's 'Shocking' Recess Appointment

PJM alum Jennifer Rubin exposes what may be President Obama's most shocking move of the holiday season: the recess appointment of James Cole to become deputy attorney general. In that position, Cole will have great responsibility for conducting the war against al-Qaeda.  But Cole belongs to the school of thought that would have the United States treat the heinous acts of 9-11 as a criminal matter, as opposed to a war.  He expressed those views in a 2002 op-ed:

[T]he attorney general is not a member of the military fighting a war -- he is a prosecutor fighting crime. For all the rhetoric about war, the Sept. 11 attacks were criminal acts of terrorism against a civilian population, much like the terrorist acts of Timothy McVeigh in blowing up the federal building in Oklahoma City, or of Omar Abdel-Rahman in the first effort to blow up the World Trade Center. The criminals responsible for these horrible acts were successfully tried and convicted under our criminal justice system, without the need for special procedures that altered traditional due process rights.

Our country has faced many forms of devastating crime, including the scourge of the drug trade, the reign of organized crime, and countless acts of rape, child abuse, and murder. The acts of Sept. 11 were horrible, but so are these other things. (emphasis added)

It is these views which have kept Cole from being confirmed by the Senate.  To put it simply, they show that he is unfit for the job and make him unconfirmable, as they should.  But President Obama installed him anyway.  No one is quibbling with his authority to do so.  The quibble is with his judgment.

NY Rep. Peter King calls Cole's recess appointment what it is: absolutely shocking:

King called Cole’s appointment “absolutely shocking” and said it might be one of the worst appointments Obama will make during his presidency.

“I strongly oppose the recess appointment of James Cole to lead the national security team at the Department of Justice,” King said in a statement. “The appointment indicates that the Obama Administration continues to try to implement its dangerous policies of treating Islamic terrorism as a criminal matter.”

King will likely chair the Homeland Security Committee in the new Congress.  As such, he will have subpoena power, and he should use it to investigate Cole and expose his views, and force President Obama to explain why he believes Mr. Cole is right for this important post.

When Cole is brought up to the House to explain himself, the committee must confront him with the timeline and scope of al-Qaeda attacks against the United States and our allies.  Such a timeline demonstrates that al-Qaeda is a transnational terrorist enemy with political goals, not a mere criminal enterprise.  For the purposes of this list, I didn't include any of the dozens and dozens of al-Qaeda-related attacks against U.S. forces and civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan.  These are attacks primarily on civilians, outside the designated zones of war:

1993 World Trade Center, New York

1994 Bojinka, Philippine Airlines Flight 434 (failed precursor to the 9-11 attacks)

1998 U.S.-embassy bombings, in Kenya and Tanzania

Oct. 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole, Yemen

September 11, 2001, attacks

November 15 and November 20, 2003, Istanbul attacks

March 11, 2004, Madrid train bombings

2004 Khobar massacre

July 7, 2005, London transport bombings

November 9, 2005, Amman hotel bombing

2007 Algiers bombings

2008 Danish-embassy bombing

2009 Little Rock recruiting office shooting

2009 Northwest Airlines Flight 253

Nov 2009 massacre at Ft. Hood, Texas (linked to al-Qaeda via the killer's imam, Anwar al-Awlaki)

2010 cargo plane bomb plot

Does this trail of atrocities look like the work of a criminal enterprise, or a militant group engaged in acts of war?