Obama: Tax 'The Rich' — Again

During the 2008 presidential campaign the Republicans attempted on more than one occasion to make something out of the seemingly large number of times Barack Obama voted “present” while a member of the Illinois state Senate.

The argument never really took root -- but it certainly helps explain the president’s behavior, if that’s what you can call it, over the course of the impeding crisis over the debt ceiling.

Obama has failed to take charge, refused -- until earlier this week -- to use “the bully pulpit,” and has, instead, been something of an invisible man, preferring to leave the whole messing business to surrogates like Vice President Joseph Biden and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner.

It’s not like he wasn’t warned well in advance that something needed to happen. As Rich Galen points out in his invaluable Mullings.com cyber column, “The Treasury Secretary had warned us last January that the world was going to end far in advance of the conclusion of the Mayan calendar when the U.S. hit the debt ceiling on March 31 of this year. ... Except Geithner couldn't keep his mouth shut and said he could juggle the books to keep paying on the $14 trillion debt until August 2.”

Well, August 2 is rapidly approaching -- with both sides digging in.

The sticking point, almost everyone agrees, is the issue of new taxes. Obama and the Democrats say they have to be part of any deal on the debt limit. The Republican position on that is a firm “No.”

As this isn’t a television game show, where you get a hearty “thanks for playing” and a lovely consolation prize -- including a version of our home game -- when you lose. Someone is going to have to move. Right now the GOP is betting heavily that it’s going to be Obama.

A group of them have gotten behind the Cut, Cap and Balance Pledge as a precondition of any vote in favor of an increase in the debt ceiling. The pressure they’ve applied has been enough to force the leadership in both the House and Senate to commit to the first votes in over a decade on a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Right now, the idea of Cut, Cap and Balance is driving the train. All the White House and congressional Democrats have to offer in response is the suggestion, the argument, the plea that what America really needs is more revenue flowing into the federal coffers.

Admittedly they are trying to be clever. Obama and his cohorts are, for example, talking about closing so-called corporate loopholes without a corresponding reduction in rates which, to them, isn’t a tax increase. In fact, it’s only a tax increase to the people who pay taxes (note to Tim Geithner: call your office).

In his Thursday press conference, Obama talked about eliminating the tax deductibility of corporate jets -- no fewer than six times, says the Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto -- in an obvious appeal to the “hate and envy crowd” that you see at, say, your local Democratic committee precinct workers’ meeting.

To Obama, it’s the tax deductibility of corporate jets or grandma’s Social Security check. “Okay Republicans, now choose.” They think it’s a winning argument, except that it isn’t.