06-17-2018 08:12:25 AM -0700
06-15-2018 09:37:33 AM -0700
06-14-2018 04:17:55 PM -0700
06-12-2018 02:13:25 PM -0700
06-12-2018 07:48:34 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Obama Tax Plan a Frontal Assault on Entrepreneurs

Who are these angel investors?  They are the people that Obama considers wealthy.  The federal government's tax code has rules about who can be an angel investor. Not only do accredited investors have to pass an income test, but they have to pass a wealth test too.  The angel investor is precisely the person that Obama targets through his tax plan.  His "soak the rich" philosophy will drain them of some of the risk capital they would normally use to make investments in new technology and ventures that could strengthen the American economy.  This is not trickle-down economics; it's a business fact.

The new venture has a predictable path when it comes to funding.  First, a person has an idea.  He spends a little money on it.  Eventually, he goes to friends and family.  Once that money is used up, he goes to angels.  At the angel level, investments run from as low as $100,000 all the way up to $3,000,000.  Venture capital firms do not get interested in companies until they get to at least $5,000,000 in valuation. The company must have some economy of scale and track record before the venture community takes risk. Capital gains taxes only come into play when there is an exit or you are able to take money out of the firm.  Obama's tax plan puts the cart before the horse.

Secondly, health insurance has hamstrung the entrepreneur.  Currently, it is very expensive for entrepreneurs to get insurance because they can't take advantage of large corporate plans.  Many businesses are underinsured or not insured at all.  Angel investors want the entrepreneur to get insurance because it protects their investment.  Insurance adds to the cost and raises the amount of return needed to invest.  Obama and the Democrats' answer to this problem is socialized medical care.  This has been a disaster in Canada and virtually any other large diverse country it has been tried in.  Only the Scandinavian countries have had any success with socialized medical care.  What should we do?

The one thing that we can't do is waltz down the path we are currently on.

Health care costs encumber entrepreneurs because they make it expensive to hire needed employees. The way out is to make the market more competitive and to use tax policy to encourage people to get insurance.  Current market conditions are anti-competitive.  Insurance companies have virtual in-state monopolies.  We need to end border-related restrictions on insurance.  Secondly, we need to untie insurance from your job.  Instead, we need to make health insurance premiums tax-deductible for everyone.  If you are indigent or below a certain income level, the government should issue vouchers to you for basic coverage and catastrophic coverage.  This will cause virtually everyone in the U.S. to be covered.  It will be far cheaper than the Obama socialized medical program.  Competition will cause insurance companies to drop price and increase service.  Innovation will come to insurance and new and different types of policies will enter the market, making it even more competitive.  Consumer behavior will cause people to shop for insurance and minimize costs while trying to increase coverage.  Once we embrace the free market, we can take on doctors -- and the attorneys that sue them!