Monday's HOT MIC
Speaking of the Great Tarmac Meeting between Loretta Lynch/Elizabeth Carlisle and William Jefferson Blythe/Clinton III -- what is it with Democrats and their penchant for aliases? -- it seems that some
stenographers reporters for the Compromised Media ™ were for some unknown reason averse to covering this story:
Reporters with the Washington Post and New York Times were apparently less than enthusiastic about covering the controversial private meeting between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton just months ahead of the 2016 election. The non-profit American Center for Law and Justice published emails Friday that showed reporters asking Department of Justice officials for details on the meeting.
Mark Landler, a reporter for the Times, is seen in one June 30 email reaching out to a DOJ official to say he's "been pressed into service to write about the questions being raised" by the meeting.
Matt Zapotosky with the Post emailed a DOJ official the same day after several other emails to say that his editors "are still pretty interested" in the story but that he wanted to "put it to rest."
Thus driving home the truth of my pal Iowahawk's famous dictum:
Meanwhile, Arthur Schwartz observes: