12-18-2018 08:20:41 AM -0800
12-17-2018 12:30:12 PM -0800
12-17-2018 09:31:43 AM -0800
12-16-2018 07:57:15 PM -0800
12-16-2018 10:25:25 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
X


Live Blog

Here is your live blog for the day.

Heads up:

I don't want to mention any suspects by name, but folks on Twitter are dropping hints by sharing cruise ship emojis.

🛳 ðŸ›³ ðŸ›³ ðŸ›³ ðŸ›³

Emerald Robinson is the Chief White House Correspondent for OAN.

More birthright citizenship.

Interesting quote from Sen. Jacob Howard (R-Mich.), who introduced the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Senate:

[E]very person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2890 (1866). Library of Congress, Brady-Handy Photograph Collection.

Yet Garrett Epps, a constitutional law professor at the University of Baltimore, argued in The Atlantic that Sen. Howard wasn't listing foreigners, aliens, and those who belong to families of ambassadors and foreign ministers, but rather that the reference to "foreigners" and "aliens" only meant those "who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers."

What about the quote from “Honest Jake” Howard? Well, here’s the full quote: “This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.” Anton quietly supplied the word orto make it appear that two different definitions were being offered—either a diplomat or a foreigner. But in fact, what Howard was saying was simple: American-born children of diplomats are not birthright citizens—because they and their parents are immune from American laws.

To be honest, I think Sen. Howard's quote reads more like a list, and that the "foreigners" and "aliens" he referenced were not only meant to refer to the families of diplomats. It seems Epps is reading too much into the fact that Howard didn't include an "or" between "aliens" and "who belong." But what do I know? I'm not a constitutional scholar...

Perfect:

It's both eerie and cool driving by this place on a moonlit night.

Changing the 14th Amendment?

Trump, as president, can reinterpret the application of one part of the 14th Amendment — an amendment meant to extend equal rights to former slaves which has been used to extend citizenship to children of illegal immigrants born in the U.S. (birthright citizenship). The amendment is arguably being used to do something it was never intended to do, so reinterpretation is welcome.

However, there is reason to suggest Congress, not the President, should be the first to reinterpret it.

If Trump issues an executive order to end birthright citizenship, Congress or the Supreme Court can overturn him. It remains an open question whether Trump will issue the order, and what Congress or the Supreme Court will do.