The First Lunch Lady: Barack Crowns Michelle Fat Czar

Last week, President Obama signed an executive order aimed at childhood obesity and placed his wife, Michelle, in charge of the effort.  Apparently bored with giving first lady-type speeches, and digging up turnips and spinach in the White House garden, Mrs. Obama will head up a national campaign tabbed “Let’s Move.”

To be clear, fat kids are nothing to be celebrated. Obesity among children is connected to all sorts of aliments, including heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer, asthma, and diabetes. There is little disagreement about this.

But beyond encouraging healthy behavior, what is the government’s role in decisions that rightly belong to families? I argue there is none.

In announcing the White House initiative, the first lady described how she dealt with her own children’s supposed weight issues, which included making sure her daughters ate more vegetables, drank more water and milk, and viewed less television. So, by her own admission, the solution for her family’s issues was more parental responsibility for her children’s food choices. What her approach didn’t include was the involvement of the government.

But that’s exactly what Mrs. Obama is suggesting for the rest of us, since she seems to think the unwashed masses are unable to do what she did -- step up, accept parental responsibility, and make the right decisions for our families.

At her press conference, the first lady lectured us about the importance of her “Let’s Move” initiative, saying:

It’s going to require us working together … not just the administration, but Congress, governors, mayors, parents, teachers.  Anyone who has access to children in their lives is going to have to work together. And one of the things that’s also very clear is that this problem won’t be solved by any single federal solution. This is going to require national action.

One of the things the first lady said she wants to do is “empower” parents to make better food choices.  But what tha’ hell does that mean? Short of the notion of a “food police” -- who might snatch French fries and cans of Coke from youthful hands -- why should the government insert themselves into choices, good or bad, that Americans make about the foods they consume?