Lawmakers Split on President's 'Year of Action,' Hope for 'Thaw' in Congressional Gridlock
WASHINGTON – Reaction to President Obama’s speech to Congress fell along partisan lines as Democrats cheered the president’s willingness to use his executive powers, while Republicans reacted wearily to what they see as a move that will do little to bring together a divided legislature.
Following Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night, the National Journal and the Atlantic hosted a panel of lawmakers Wednesday to discuss the president’s speech.
The president told lawmakers that he was “eager to work” with them on proposals that would need congressional approval, but his message was clear: “Wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that's what I'm going to do.”
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said he welcomed the president’s use of executive action to push regulations necessary to implement certain laws.
“You can't enforce a law when the regulations haven't been promulgated, because the courts will say well, you know, the law hasn't been fully written yet. The regulations are necessary to spell out the law so it can be filed,” Blumenthal said.
Blumenthal said he had no concerns about the president using his executive authority.
“The president is not in any way seizing legislative authority. He's not legislating. He's using authority that the legislature has given him. In fact, I'd make the argument he should have done this a lot sooner,” Blumenthal said.
Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) said she disagreed that Obama should work around Congress, as Blumenthal suggested.
She said the president took a gamble by threatening to take unilateral action.
“The president needs to work with Congress – that's the way this country works. And to double down on healthcare; to throw down a gauntlet saying if you don't agree with me I'm going to go around you. I don't believe that's a good start…trying to move forward on important issues,” Fischer said.
The Nebraska Republican urged her Senate colleagues to take action on important issues like approving the Keystone XL pipeline.
“When it comes to energy, the majority of Nebraskans support the Keystone pipeline. My legislative district covered much of the area that the Keystone pipeline's going to be going through in the state of Nebraska,” Fischer said. “Yes, there are concerns. But Nebraskans, as most Americans, understand the need for that pipeline and the need to look at different sources of energy, so that we're able to move forward with the needs that we have in this country.”
Fischer said there are many issues where the two parties can work together “and for the president to set that tone at the beginning of a session of Congress that if you don't agree with me, you don't have a voice” is “not the way the system of our government is supposed to work.”