How can Obama be 'Good' for the Stock Market if People are Losing Money?
I saw over at Rasmussen Reports a headline that read "49% of investors have lost money over the past year" yet over at CNBC, there is an article stating that Obama has been one of the best presidents for stock investors since World War II. This makes no sense to me. Can anyone explain this?
Article printed from PJ Media: http://pjmedia.com/tatler
URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/blog/how-can-obama-be-good-for-the-stock-market-if-people-are-losing-money