Don't Cry for Me, Syria
At the announcement of his meaningless executive orders on gun control Wednesday, the president appeared to get emotional, tears welling in his eyes at the thought of innocent children being wounded and killed. It seemed out of character for the supposedly “No Drama Obama,” and some questioned his sincerity, provoking the usual outrage from the left.
People who say Obama fake-cried are essentially accusing him of being as indifferent to mass killings as they are. #StopGunViolence
— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) January 5, 2016
Note the false premise in that tweet, and (as usual) inability of leftists to grant any sort of good faith to their political opponents. As it happens, it is, in fact, possible to both be horrified at mass killings, and still disagree about the proposed solutions to them.
Louise Mensch says that he was in tears because, in the last year of his presidency, he has gone from magic to toxic: “…the public sobbing over something he did nothing to fix just strikes America as the tears of a clown.”
But I’m actually willing to grant him sincerity here, which is a problem in itself. The interesting question to me is not what he cries about, but what he does not, and why.
For instance, I don’t recall reports of him shedding any tears when, after he declared a “red line” over Syria’s use of chemical and biological weapons, Bashir Assad gassed children to death with chlorine, but perhaps I missed it.
Did he get all weepy when children were being literally crucified by ISIS for not properly fasting during Ramadan? If so, it went unreported.
In fact, a Google search of “Obama tears” reveals no other reported instances of presidential lachrymosity. It’s all about Sandy Hook.
This sort of thing isn’t new, of course. Many have noted that when talking about the terror attacks in Paris, or about the Syrian refugee crisis, the only time the normally phlegmatic president seems to show any anger or emotion is when he discusses not the terrorism, but what is, in his mind, the true enemy: Republicans:
Obama talks tough or at least talks about the concept of being tough. But not with terrorists or ISIS. Just the other day President Obama mocked the idea of bellicose speech when it comes to those bad guys. No, only one set of bad guys elicits strong emotions from Obama: his critics. And among them, most especially Republican ones. Because the only real enemy he’s aware of are enemies of his precious legacy.