Bad Day For Holder When He's Lost The Washington Post

Bad breakup.

As the nation’s top law enforcement official, Eric Holder is privy to all kinds of sensitive information. But he seems to be proud of how little he knows.

That was my thought exactly earlier today. Maybe now that Dana Milbank agrees with me it is magically no longer a racist thought.

On and on Holder went: “I don’t know. I don’t know. . . . I would not want to reveal what I know. . . . I don’t know why that didn’t happen. . . . I know nothing, so I’m not in a position really to answer.”

Holder seemed to regard this ignorance as a shield protecting him and the Justice Department from all criticism of the Obama administration’s assault on press freedoms. But his claim that his “recusal” from the case exempted him from all discussion of the matter didn’t fly with Republicans or Democrats on the committee, who justifiably saw his recusal as more of an abdication.

“There doesn’t seem to be any acceptance of responsibility in the Justice Department for things that have gone wrong,” said Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), after Holder placed the AP matter in the lap of his deputy. “We don’t know where the buck stops.”

In the interest of bipartisan outreach, can we put aside politics and just talk business here? This is a failure of management here, plain and simple. The person in charge is either a liar or grossly incompetent. Here in the real world, people lose their jobs for that.

So let's force politics back into reality.