Ambiguity in video captured by officer's lapel camera.
A recent Supreme Court ruling clarifies an important distinction in Fourth Amendment cases.
Plus the LAPD's mistakes in judgement that almost cost two innocent women their lives.
Officers found not guilty. Rodney King redux?
Criminal indictments announced against 18 members of the Sheriff’s Department.
Eleven "bucketheads" sue LAPD for enforced ticket quotas, split $5.9 million settlement.
…And now, the rest of the story.
“Was there any indication,” Justice Ginsberg asked, "why the police didn’t get a warrant?"
If it had been a terrorist attack, the police officers, firefighters, and their vehicles would have made for a fat target for a follow-up attack.
Sometimes life is just awful, and sometimes it’s awful but lawful.
No license? No insurance? No problem!
Bulldog edition: The London Independent blows the lid off the story of the LAPD's "racist" police dogs.
The law deems "reasonable use" must be based upon the facts available to the officers at the scene.
How did the MSM get the D.C. Navy Yard shooting wrong? Let us count the ways.
The Orwellian "Public Safety Realignment" now has a body count.
A 14-year-old boy shot and killed by police in self-defense is a story told far too often: a feral, fatherless child with a gun.
Officers face an absurd proposal encouraging accused cops to sit and chat with accusers.
To watch the news today, it’s as if there never was a trial clearing George Zimmerman.
I was reminded of a chapter from my past when the George Zimmerman-Trayvon Martin controversy exploded into national awareness.
The law of unintended consequences: keypad system makes cops at gate easy marks for shooter.
How well-trained police officers could have spotted and stopped the Tsarnaevs before they set off their bombs.
If you sat next to Ariel Castro in a movie theater, you would never guess how evil he was.
I bet they're asleep at Salon. I bet they're asleep all over "Progressive" America.