Thousands of Christians gathered for an outdoor Easter Sunday service in San Francisco to publicly mock gays and humiliate gay heroes.
The flagrant attack, which included skits, obscenities and impersonations satirizing gays and gay stereotypes, sent shockwaves of outrage and disgust throughout the region and across the nation.
This report features photo and video documentation of the free public Easter service, which was attended by a majority of Christians in the city, who laughed at and insulted gays and the homosexual community.
Thousands of Christians make fun of gay stereotypes by dressing up as gays in Mission Dolores Park as they watch an anti-gay religious service and performance.
One of the Christian performers paraded around nude on stage, in an attempt to make gays look bad.
Another Christian satirized gay behavior by standing on his head and displaying his anus to the crowd.
This 12-minute (NSFW) video shows highlights of the shocking Easter service:
Furthermore – - -
THIS HAS BEEN A TEST OF THE
EMERGENCY DOUBLE-STANDARD SYSTEM
If this had been an actual case of Christians mocking gays, you would have heard about it in the mainstream media.
As you’ve undoubtedly noticed by now, everything in the report above is the exact opposite of true. Yes, there really was a huge public event in San Francisco on Easter Sunday involving Christians, gays, mockery and humiliation. But it was gays mocking Christians and it involved thousands of people laughing at the Christian “hero,” Jesus.
The event in question is known as the “Hunky Jesus” competition, a semi-serious annual male beauty contest seeking to crown the “hunkiest” — i.e. most sexually appealing — gay (preferably half-nude) Jesus lookalike in San Francisco. Actually, Hunky Jesus is only part of the story; it’s the culmination of a day-long Easter Sunday festival in the city’s Mission Dolores Park. The massive public party/picnic is the closest thing San Francisco has to a municipal Easter celebration, and features several events including an Easter egg hunt for kids, burlesque shows, a campy Easter bonnet contest, musical groups and so on, with Hunky Jesus as the headlining final performance.
As you will soon see in the report below, Hunky Jesus is intentionally as blasphemous as possible, an over-the-top religious-themed sexual beauty contest steeped in mockery of Christians and Christian beliefs.
Now, you might think, considering how I started this report, that I’m opposed to the Hunky Jesus contest and everything it stands for. But you couldn’t be more wrong.
I actually like Hunky Jesus; I’m not a Christian, nor am I religious in the slightest, so the “blasphemy” doesn’t bother me one bit.
No, what bothers me is the double standard. In San Francisco (and places like San Francisco, including most newsrooms and TV studios), it’s perfectly acceptable to mock Christians. But to turn the tables and mock gays in a similar way is considered totally beyond the pale; a hate crime; bullying; bigotry and oppression of the worst kind.
If the story as I originally titled it was true (“Christians mock gays at shocking Easter service“), it would indeed have been national news. But when the reverse happens — silence. And what this tells me is that our society is currently enduring a condition of mass rank hypocrisy.
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Since the gay community has carte blanche to mock Christians (as proven here), then the reverse should also be true — Christians should be free if they so choose to publicly mock gays or the stereotypical gay lifestyle. Why not? Neither side may like the mockery, but fair is fair.
To be consistent, we should either allow even-handed free speech for (and against) everyone — or ban all critical speech whatsoever. And that second option is the road to totalitarianism (not to mention being unconstituional), so Option 1 it must be: free speech for all.
As you will see in the photos and videos below, the gay community is very, very good at dishing it out. But can they take it? The moment anyone attempts the slightest mockery or put-down of stereotypical “gayness,” an entire class of professional victimologists and whiners and lawyers go apoplectic; no criticism or mockery is allowed!
This double-standard (and similar double-standards — take your pick) is destroying our national soul. I demand equal rights for all — the right to mock the target of your choice. The gay community wants to mock Christianity? Fine. Go for it. But then you necessarily must be prepared to take it on the chin uncomplainingly when it’s time to turn the tables and you are on the receiving end of the mockery.
Sound fair? Sounds fair to me. Now let’s have some apolitical fun at the Hunky Jesus contest!
On April 20, President Obama arrived for yet another whirlwind wham-bam-thank-you-ma’am through the the S.F. Bay Area (the “S.F.” in this case an abbreviation for “Slush Fund”). He comes here for fundraisers so often now that locals have started referring to San Francisco as “the president’s ATM.”
Obama Schedule || Wednesday, April 20, 2011
1:30 pm || Arrives in San Francisco
1:45 pm || Participates in Town Hall on bringing down the deficit
6:15 pm || Delivers remarks at DNC fundraiser – private residence; San Francisco
8:30 pm || Delivers remarks at second DNC fundraiser- Nob Hill Masonic Center; San Francisco
These events were to be followed up with yet another fundraiser at the city’s St. Regis Hotel the next morning.
This report will cover each stop on Obama’s visit to the Progressive Piggy Bank.
Stop #1: Facebook HQ, Palo Alto
This was the headline event which got most of the press coverage. Obama had some kind of “townhall” meeting streamed live from Facebook headquarters which he billed as a “discussion with the voters” rather than just a one-way dictation from The One to us peons. Problem is, it turned out to be such a boring, staged event with softball questions and a brown-nosing host that it had basically no effect on the culture or on anyone’s perception of the president.
Afterward, employees were quickly shuttled out as they rebuffed reporters’ attempts to interview them. Facebook is known for its rigorous effort to control its media image, and Zuckerberg seldom grants interviews.
An employee offering a glowing review of his employer and Obama’s visit was interrupted by a company spokesman, who declined to give media access to audience members.
It was a stark contrast to Obama’s easygoing introduction…
Wow. Even the guy who was lavishing sycophantic praise on his bosses was shut up and probably later admonished for speaking without permission. One word summation: Control.
There was also a multifaceted protest outside the Facebook townhall, including a Tea Party contingent, but I skipped the event myself, so instead I’ll present here a couple of snaps from dinab’s Flickr set and from Nina Pelligrini covering the protest:
But to get the real flavor of the Facebook protest, watch this fascinating 6-minute video, featuring interviews with Obama supporters who seem to have no clue about his policies or how the economy works:
Pay especial attention to the segment starting at 2:05, in which one Obama voter proposes, in all seriousness, her solution to the U.S. going into debt: “That’s an absolute shame. And I don’t think we need to borrow any money. We print the money. So why do we need to borrow the money? Just print some more!” Why didn’t I think of that? Economics 101!
The final segment of the video is also chilling, when Facebook commands the Palo Alto cops to keep Obama skeptics off its property, but allow Obama fans to approach freely. As the videographer points out: Facebook is now a vital communication tool in the U.S. and worldwide — and yet its management has an obvious pro-Obama bias. How does that reflect on their policies for allowing or forbidding certain political content on its site?
Stop #2: $35,800/plate dinner, Marc Benioff’s home, San Francisco
After satiating the hoi polloi with his Facebook stagecraft, Obama set off for some hardcore fundraisin’ — the real point of the visit. The first, and swankiest, of his three whirlwind back-to-back-to-back fundraisers was a $35,800/plate (not a typo) dinner at the Presidio Heights home of billionaire Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff.
This time I was waiting for him. But here there were no large crowds, no organized protests — because the exact location of the fundraiser had never been released. I myself uncovered it through a bit of detective work, but just about everyone else there were passersby who stumbled on the event by accident.
At first, the only people on hand were a TV news crew, a schoolgirl on her way home, and a couple neighbors.
Behind barricades, an “arrival tent” had been set up in front of Benioff’s home to receive the president’s limousine.
I saw a mini-flurry of activity down the block. Turns out there was a second barricade where they were letting guests into the back of the house one intersection further north. I went over and encountered a lone Obama fan displaying her sign to arriving dignitaries. A small cluster of people there said Obama had been spotted getting off a helicopter down at Chrissy Field, a former military runway turned into a park nearby in the Presidio. So they expected him to show up here sometime soon. The girl with the sign said she had just made it on the spur of the moment when she heard from a friend that Obama was arriving.
A lone counter-protester came prepared with a pre-printed sign that said “Fund Schools Not War!” As far as I could tell, she was the only other person (aside from me and two TV crews) who figured out ahead of time the location of the fundraiser. She was joined by a passerby who scribbled her own quickie sign that seemed (???) to call for a primary challenge against Dianne Feinstein: “Save Social Security, Primary Feinstein 2012.” (Since California confirmed its status as a solid blue state in the 2010 elections, the only way now to unseat Democratic incumbents is to defeat them in the intra-party primaries.)
An explosives-sniffing dog checked out every single arriving vehicle, no exceptions.
A White House staffer checked every arrival against an official guest list.
Even if you arrived on foot, you still had to be on the list, and were given a once-over by the Secret Service.
I began to notice that the White House staffer was being very lackadaisical about protecting the list. She often stood just a few feet from us rubberneckers with the list dangling in plain view. Could I resist snapping a couple pictures of it? Of course not!
The guest list
I already made a separate blog post about the guest list; click here if you want to read it or link to it as a stand-alone entry. Otherwise, just keep reading below since I’ve pasted that separate post in its entirety here. (And if you’ve already read it, then skip the next few photos and scroll down for the continuation of this report — there’s plenty more!)
Obama’s $3 million S.F. dinner — the complete guest list
Craig Newmark, Cissie Swig, Steve Westly and will.i.am each happily dropped $35,800 to dine with President Obama at billionaire Marc Benioff’s San Francisco home Wednesday evening. These are just some of the 85 famous names on the fundraiser’s guest list which was plainly visible to rubberneckers as attendees checked in. Combined, Obama’s take for the 90-minute event was a cool $3 million — or $3,043,000 to be exact (85 guests x $35,800 each).
A small cluster of onlookers — a few Obama fans, a few protesters, but mostly local residents who happened to pass by — watched and waited on the sidewalk at the intersection of Presidio and Pacific avenues for the President to arrive. While his motorcade was delayed for hours, a steady stream of well-dressed guests showed up and were let in one by one. Each name was checked on a master list of attendees held by a staffer who (unintentionally, one presumes) allowed nearby rubberneckers to get a glimpse of it as she flipped the pages.
The photographs below were taken of the fundraiser’s official guest list as the staffer checked the ID of each arrival. In total, 85 entries are visible on two different pages, though only about 50 of the names are fully legible.
Craig Newmark is the founder of craigslist and is a well-known internet entrepreneur. Cissie Swig is a wealthy philanthropist and a member of San Francisco’s famous Swig clan. Steve Westly is a California politician, candidate for governor, venture capitalist, and ardent Obama supporter. And will.i.am is a musician and producer, best known as the leader of the Black Eyed Peas.
Several other famous names are on the list. Readers interested in seeing who can afford to spend $35,800 for a 90-minute dinner can scan the photos below.
The full list of legible names (and the rest of this report) is presented after the photos.
[Click on each image to see it in higher resolution.]
List of attendees at Marc Benioff’s $35,800/plate Obama fundraiser:
The press corps was ushered into a large tent set up in the courtyard in the middle of Benioff’s block-wide residence, to find Stevie Wonder entertaining the crowd; his final song was a new one composed for the occasion, entitled “Ten Billion Hearts,” about joining together to heal the world.
The President was seated at Benioff’s table; Wonder returned to sit at the President’s side as Benioff introduced POTUS, saying that in a time of many crises, “we have the right person to lead us here.” Recording artist Will.I.am was seated at the same table.
…and the rest seemed to be not much more than a boilerplate stump speech. But…will.i.am at the table of honor?
Amongst the celebrity names, I personally only spotted one arriving — Craig Newmark, founder and namesake of craigslist.
He may not be that well-known in the rest of the country, but around here he’s an A-list celebrity. As he first arrived (on foot), a woman screamed “Oh my God — it’s Craig!” Down-to-earth guy that he is, he came over and chatted to her, and as you can see, she was absolutely starstruck.
Even the cops wanted to shake his hand. Of all the billionaires and celebrities showing up, Craig Newmark was the only person the police acted like fans around.
As the minutes passed, the crowd began to swell — a little. From 10 to maybe 20 people. The girl with the pro-Obama sign became a prop used in souvenir photographs by passing tourists. (And notice the teenagers in the background mugging for the camera.)
A dour-faced single-payer advocate showed to up express her displeasure with Obama’s half-measure health care reform.
Another passerby came over to investigate the hubbub, and I have no real reason to post her picture except to lure in as much male Web traffic as possible. In fact, I might as well not even write a caption for this picture, because I know you’re not reading it.
I waited as long as I could for Obama, but from overhearing snippets of conversations between the Secret Service and police, I scried that he wasn’t going to show up anytime soon, despite being just a short distance away. It never was explained how he spent the intervening three hours between landing at Chrissy Field and showing up at the Benioff residence which is only a five- or ten-minute drive away.
Anyway, I bailed out before the president showed up (not that there was going to be much to see anyway — I knew from experience that his limo with tinted windows would just drive into the tent and we’d never even get a glimpse of him; the spectacle surrounding the president is the point, not Obama himself), and headed over to the site of the main protest action — the Masonic Auditorium on Nob Hill, which was the public event next on Obama’s schedule, after the private dinner.
Compare and contrast. That’s how my seventh-grade English teacher introduced us to the concept of “the essay.” Write a “compare and contrast essay” about two different members of your family, she used to say.
I never had much use for the “compare and contrast” essay — until now. Because in San Francisco on April 15 I noticed that there were two different protests coming from opposite ends of the political spectrum happening at the same time just a few blocks away from each other — and neither seemed aware that there was a competing event nearby.
Aha! Time to resurrect my old seventh grade comparing-and-contrasting skills.
The first event was what you’d expect on Tax Day, April 15 — which has in the space of just three years become the traditional day on which Tea Party rallies are held all over the country. The San Francisco Tea Party’s themes were to be “Reduce spending and taxes; Reform public pensions; Revive the business climate.”
When the Tea Party first emerged, the pro-big-government left at first tried to ignore it.
When that didn’t work, they tried to discredit it.
When that didn’t work, they tried insults.
When that didn’t work, they tried mockery.
When that didn’t work, they tried to undermine it.
When that didn’t work, they tried to discredit it again.
But after the Tea Party swept the 2010 elections, the left realized that none of these strategies had any effect. So they adopted a new one:
The big-government advocates are now trying to co-opt the Tea Party. Which seems patently absurd. Yet the progressives are operating on the naive assumption that “populist anger” is itself a politically neutral energy, and that the Tea Party was just lucky to catch the wave and funnel that anger rightward. The big-government advocates now imagine they can seize the reins and funnel that exact same populist uprising toward the left side of the spectrum.
To that end, progressives recently launched US Uncut, an American version of the new British leftist movement which uses “street actions” to demand more funding for the Welfare State. This article in The Nation sums up how they seek to siphon off the Tea Party populist energy:
Imagine a parallel universe where the Great Crash of 2008 was followed by a Tea Party of a very different kind. Enraged citizens gather in every city, week after week—to demand the government finally regulate the behavior of corporations and the superrich, and force them to start paying taxes. The protesters shut down the shops and offices of the companies that have most aggressively ripped off the country. The swelling movement is made up of everyone from teenagers to pensioners. They surround branches of the banks that caused this crash and force them to close, with banners saying, You Caused This Crisis. Now YOU Pay.
As people see their fellow citizens acting in self-defense, these tax-the-rich protests spread to even the most conservative parts of the country. It becomes the most-discussed subject on Twitter. Even right-wing media outlets, sensing a startling effect on the public mood, begin to praise the uprising, and dig up damning facts on the tax dodgers.
Instead of the fake populism of the Tea Party, there is a movement based on real populism. It shows that there is an alternative to making the poor and the middle class pay for a crisis caused by the rich. It shifts the national conversation. Instead of letting the government cut our services and increase our taxes, the people demand that it cut the endless and lavish aid for the rich and make them pay the massive sums they dodge in taxes.
This may sound like a fantasy—but it has all happened. The name of this parallel universe is Britain. …
Can this model be transferred to the United States? Remember that a few months ago, Brits were as pessimistic about the possibility of a left-wing rival to the Tea Party as Americans are now. …
UK Uncut has just shown Americans how to express real hope—and build a left-wing Tea Party.
The mission statement of the S.F. Uncut protest was, “Let’s tell corporate tax dodgers (who avoid up to $100 Billion in taxes every year) that we’re not going to stand for these budget cuts. They caused this crisis, now THEY need to PAY UP.” Positioning themselves as populists, they continue, “Bring friends, neighbors, grandparents, teachers, union workers, students, and all others who want to demand a halt to these cuts in the name of a fair and just society.”
So we have the real Tea Party at the Embarcadero starting at 4pm, and the new anti-Tea Party, US Uncut, a few blocks away in the Financial District starting at 5pm.
Ready, class? Now compare and contrast.
The San Francisco April 15 Tea Party
I actually had low expectations for the 2011 Tax Day rally — the mid-term elections were over, and this is an off year, so there was really nothing specific to protest for or against, except just a general re-affirmation of Tea Party principles.
Even so, I was pleasantly surprised — the turnout was substantial, especially taking into account that this is the heartland of liberal America.
My favorite sign: “Serf’s up!”
Reminds me of the old joke:
“Your Majesty — the peasants are revolting!”
“I know — and they smell awful too.”
The Tea Party populist narrative is: We taxpayers have become like serfs, the workers who labor all day only to see the fruits of our labor confiscated to support the entitled and the idle.
The progressive big-government narrative is: The employed and the business owners have a moral responsibility to help the non-employed, with government taxation the mechanism through which your money is given to the needy.
This sign riffs effectively on the progressive narrative. “I am the parent.” Precisely. If the left is going to frame the employed and the well-off as the breadwinners for a dependent national family, then along with that support comes the privilege accorded every parent: We get to make the financial decisions for the household. Clear enough?
In fact, the “parent/child” theme is growing in popularity at Tea Party events, including this one, a development I encourage. Grow up, the taxpayers are saying to their dependents.
Bay Area Patriots ringmistress Sally Zelikovsky knows how to turn the tables on Tea Party detractors. Here, she kicks off the rally by unveiling some Astroturf on stage, skewering the absurd and self-evidently false accusation that the entire Tea Party movement is fake, and that all the activists and voters are somehow paid shills of evil corporations and billionaires. Sally instead announced it was an open mike, and invited any and all citizens to come stand on the Astroturf and speak from the heart on any topic of their choosing. Several took her up on the offer.
This guy got it exactly right. The amount of federal spending will always expand to match (or, these days, exceed) the amount collected in taxes. So you can’t solve the deficit problem by raising taxes; all that will do will give a green light to more spending. No, the only way to get us out of debt is to cut spending. So obvious, so simple. And I think the majority of the country now gets it.
This being the Bay Area, a few of the Tea Party signs had uniquely northern California sarcastic references. Cars around here, for example, often sport “Visualize World Peace” bumper stickers; this Tea Partier has her own recommendation.
Bay Areans of all orientations often rationalize their promiscuous escapades as an endless but invariably fruitless quest for “Mr. Right”; and suddenly, “Mr. Right Wing” appears as the ultimate forbidden fruit.
You can’t go two steps around here without seeing one of those ubiquitous recycling symbols; but this Tea Party version makes more economic sense!
Hey lady — stop making sense! Get back in the stereotype box the white liberals have built for you!
Oooooh, you called Obama a communist — you must be a racist!
Warren Harding and James Buchanan are breathing a sigh of relief.
Concision is the soul of wit.
One of the things I like best about the Tea Party is that people are finally unafraid to be blunt in their truth-telling.
But not all messages were so grumpy.
The Tea Party was just getting started (I presumed correctly that people would come down and join the action at the end of the work day around 5pm — the event was announced to run from 4pm to 7pm), but I needed to bail out at about 4:40pm and dash up to the US Uncut rally and see what they were up to.