<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dolly strengthening rapidly; 100+ mph winds likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/</link>
	<description>Brendan Loy\&#039;s hurricane blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Loy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Loy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>The eyewall didn&#039;t go over Brownsville, so it&#039;s not hugely surprising that the winds weren&#039;t hurricane-force there. As for the NHC, I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re suggesting. It isn&#039;t like this was some sort of made-up hurricane. The reconnaissance planes that repeatedly found hurricane-force winds and barometric pressures weren&#039;t lying. Nor was the satellite... or the radar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eyewall didn&#8217;t go over Brownsville, so it&#8217;s not hugely surprising that the winds weren&#8217;t hurricane-force there. As for the NHC, I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re suggesting. It isn&#8217;t like this was some sort of made-up hurricane. The reconnaissance planes that repeatedly found hurricane-force winds and barometric pressures weren&#8217;t lying. Nor was the satellite&#8230; or the radar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon in tx</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>anon in tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>The Brownsville airport only saw 48 mph winds. A private wx station in Brownsville saw 60 mph winds. I suspect NHC have their amps turned up to 11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Brownsville airport only saw 48 mph winds. A private wx station in Brownsville saw 60 mph winds. I suspect NHC have their amps turned up to 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KEVIN STERN</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>KEVIN STERN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Brenden, thanks so much for this blog. You are doing a great job . I have been waiting for someone sensible to pull all the sources and analysis together for some time. Thanks you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brenden, thanks so much for this blog. You are doing a great job . I have been waiting for someone sensible to pull all the sources and analysis together for some time. Thanks you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan Loy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan Loy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m honestly not sure what&#039;s going on with the eyewall, PMH. I&#039;m looking around, asking around and trying to figure it out. This is one of those times when not actually being a meteorologist is rough. :)

Anyway, let the record show that I just removed this paragraph from my post:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The National Hurricane Center says &quot;SOME INCREASE IN STRENGTH IS EXPECTED...AND DOLLY COULD APPROACH CATEGORY TWO INTENSITY WHEN IT REACHES THE COASTLINE LATER TODAY.&quot; This is a somewhat strangely worded statement, since &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; increase in strength &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; result in Dolly not just &quot;approaching,&quot; but &lt;i&gt;attaining&lt;/i&gt;, Category 2 intensity. The NHC is hedging is bets rhetorically, but I&#039;d say the smart money is on Dolly coming ashore as a Category 2.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For clarity and ease of understanding, I took this out and added the &quot;UPDATE&quot; (indicating the Dolly is now officially a Cat. 2) to the earlier paragraph. I think the article flows better that way. But I wanted to quote the original paragraph here, to be faithful to the historical record of what originally appeared in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly not sure what&#8217;s going on with the eyewall, PMH. I&#8217;m looking around, asking around and trying to figure it out. This is one of those times when not actually being a meteorologist is rough. <img src='http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, let the record show that I just removed this paragraph from my post:</p>
<blockquote><p>The National Hurricane Center says &#8220;SOME INCREASE IN STRENGTH IS EXPECTED&#8230;AND DOLLY COULD APPROACH CATEGORY TWO INTENSITY WHEN IT REACHES THE COASTLINE LATER TODAY.&#8221; This is a somewhat strangely worded statement, since <i>any</i> increase in strength <i>would</i> result in Dolly not just &#8220;approaching,&#8221; but <i>attaining</i>, Category 2 intensity. The NHC is hedging is bets rhetorically, but I&#8217;d say the smart money is on Dolly coming ashore as a Category 2.</p></blockquote>
<p>For clarity and ease of understanding, I took this out and added the &#8220;UPDATE&#8221; (indicating the Dolly is now officially a Cat. 2) to the earlier paragraph. I think the article flows better that way. But I wanted to quote the original paragraph here, to be faithful to the historical record of what originally appeared in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PMH</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>PMH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/weathernerd/2008/07/23/dolly-strengthening-rapidly/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the eyewall&#039;s falling apart simply dry air that was sucked in hours ago, and on earlier revolutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the eyewall&#8217;s falling apart simply dry air that was sucked in hours ago, and on earlier revolutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

