» 2010 » September


Monthly Archives: September 2010

Pardon the Language

September 22nd, 2010 - 10:30 am

VIDEO: Remember, the hate is all on the right.

Lights Out for Ahmadinejad?

September 22nd, 2010 - 9:26 am

Does the West have the ability to paralyze Iran — without firing a shot? Trevor Butterworth reports on the “Stuxnet” worm which infests Iran’s electrical grid:

Computer World magazine recently pronounced Stuxnet, “a piece of malware so devious in its use of unpatched vulnerabilities, so sophisticated in its multipronged approach, that the security researchers who tore it apart believe it may be the work of state-backed professionals.” And according to the latest article in the magazine, speculation is rife that Israel may have been behind the worm – and that it was designed to sabotage or even take control of the operating systems for Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor.

Whether that is what really happened is beside the point. The reality of Stuxnet (and more to the point, its next incarnation) is that critical state infrastructure can be commandeered and destroyed without anyone firing a shot. The very prospect that Israel – or whomever – could shut down Iran by destroying its electrical grid through causing every generator to overload in a matter of minutes is a powerful signal: the signal that cyber war has physical consequences that make conventional air strikes look quaint and maladroit, so 20th century.

But who’s willing to throw the switch?

Fighting the Meh Fight

September 22nd, 2010 - 8:49 am

Pretty much everybody has probably read the NYT writeup of Bob Woodward’s new book. But this is the graf that stuck out for me:

The president concluded from the start that “I have two years with the public on this” and pressed advisers for ways to avoid a big escalation, the book says. “I want an exit strategy,” he implored at one meeting. Privately, he told Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. to push his alternative strategy opposing a big troop buildup in meetings, and while Mr. Obama ultimately rejected it, he set a withdrawal timetable because, “I can’t lose the whole Democratic Party.”

Something here doesn’t add up. President Obama campaigned on the assertion that Iraq was a “distraction” and that Afghanistan was “the necessary war.” And yet he can’t even sell his own party on the necessity of it? Either there’s something wrong with the Democrats as a whole, or with our Democratic President in particular.

Or both.

Con We All Just Get Along?

September 22nd, 2010 - 8:28 am

Trifecta: Social Conservatives and Fiscal Conservatives — can we really fit under one big tent?

Well, President Obama has lost Kathleen Parker. Here’s the damning bit from her column today:

Is it true? Is Obama responsible for our near-dire circumstances?

I have never been a fan of presidents who place blame on their predecessors or who accept credit for events that couldn’t have been engineered so soon in their tenure. Politicians will always massage the data to tell the story their way. Bill Clinton’s happy economy surely owed some credit to Reagan. George W. Bush’s ill fortunes surely had at least some of their roots in Clinton’s lack of attentiveness. Obama clearly inherited a load of fertilizer, but his policies also have exacerbated those effects. Obama’s successor most certainly will benefit or suffer to some degree from seeds the current president planted.

Nevertheless, it is probably fair to say that Obama’s ideas were too big for America’s appetite. It would have been nice had he made a few incremental repairs to the economy and left the transformative events for a less stressful time.

Parker’s handwringing was brought on by this very clever “Mourning in America” ad by Citizens for the Republic. But the question is: Where were you two years ago, Kathleen?

The American public was sold out by Parker, David Brooks, Peggy Noonan and Chris Buckley — all those conservative commenters who helped Obama pass himself as a moderate. Look, the Complicit Media was 100% in the bag, which is why we needed those “moderate” conservatives to help blow the lid. Instead, they joined the game.

So, Ms. Parker, I know you don’t like Presidents who “place blame on their predecessors.” But we’d respect the hell out of a columnist who can voice the occasional mea culpa.

We’re waiting.

Here’s Where the Fun Begins

September 22nd, 2010 - 8:14 am

Headline: 15 Bone Chilling Signs That Part Two Of The Double Dip Housing Crash Has Begun.

Fifteen? We might be doing better than I thought.

There They Go Again

September 21st, 2010 - 8:55 pm

Trifecta: It’s another special show, just for PJTV subscribers. Topic — Does the GOP finally get it, and how should they go about doing it? And we don’t get even a little bit dirty.

C’mon, pony up five bucks and you’ll get one of these each and every week. It’s in my new contract that I don’t get my first cocktail until 5:15 now on Tuesdays, so now we have time to do one special one each week.

She Can’t Say That on Television

September 21st, 2010 - 8:45 pm

Renee Ellmers — you might remember her as the opponent of Bob “The Manhandler” Etheridge — is running her first TV ad. You can see the internet version here.

Tea Party Feud!

September 21st, 2010 - 8:28 am

Hair of the Dog: Because nobody could think of a way to talk me out of it, this week’s show is… different.

Follow the Money

September 21st, 2010 - 7:58 am

The Wall Street Journal reports that corporate donations have shifted in favor of the GOP for the first time since the fall of 2006, when it had become painfully clear that the Democrats were about to retake the House.

Don’t Tell SPCA About DOA GOP Plan

September 20th, 2010 - 4:27 pm

Johnathan Chait: Republicans have nothing to replace Obamacare.

VodkaPundit: They could replace it with a one-line bill mandating everyone keep dead cats in their pants pockets, and it would do more to improve America’s health.

Advantage: VodkaPundit.

From “I feel your pain” to “It’s all in your head” in just eight years.

It’s all Bush’s fault.

The Safety Dance

September 20th, 2010 - 2:20 pm

What’s the secret to getting reelected as a purple-district Democrat to Congress this year?

Having voted against Obamacare.

Yesterday Once More

September 20th, 2010 - 12:50 pm

The GOP is set to reveal an all-new for 2010 “Contract with America” on Thursday. And while I haven’t seen the thing, they’d probably be better off simply endorsing the “Contract from America,” which we covered a while back on Coast to Coast Tea Party.

For the Baseball Loving Geek

September 20th, 2010 - 11:52 am

MLB uniforms — and players — rendered in pixel art.

(Hat tip, Gruber.)

The Last Word

September 20th, 2010 - 11:26 am

Ed Driscoll on Christine O’Donnell: “She’s not Joe Biden, whom Delaware voters also thought was somehow qualified to be a senator.”

I’ll say this right up front: Your friendly neighborhood VodkaPundit has lots of secondhand — and even a little firsthand — experience with modern witchcraft. That’s right: I’ve broken bread with witches, suffered them to live, and lived to tell the tale.

But first you need to know that “witchcraft” is a loaded word, and an inaccurate one, too. Ask your modern witch what she (or he) calls herself, and most likely she’ll tell you: Wicca.

During my northern California days, and even here in conservative southern Colorado, I’ve known quite a few Wiccans. And way back in the day, I even participated in a Samhain ritual — mostly out of curiosity, not conviction. I’ve also been to Catholic mass, Jewish passover seders, and more.  So, from the frontiers of religious exploration, I can report to you that Samhain was quite lovely, and that Satan was never once observed, not even in the breach.

But I know what some folks reading this must be thinking: Satanism! Devil-worshippers! Witches!

Well, no — and I say that gently.

Modern Wicca has nothing to do with Satan. To look at a Wiccan ritual and see any kind of Satanism is to go to Wimbledon for a pro-wrestling fight. Sure, tennis and wrestling are both sports — but neither takes any heed of the other. It’s the same with Wicca and Satanism. Or to be more accurate: it’s the same with Wicca and Christianity. Wiccans neither worship nor recognize the Christian pantheon. So you can call Wicca “pro wrestling,” if you like. But it’s still tennis, and usually just as genteel.

For the uninformed, Wicca is a modern medley of ecology, herbalism, and somewhat squishy spiritualism, all wrapped up in the divine feminine mystique. (Yes, I’m cutting corners here, and my old Wicca friends and acquaintances would shudder at my description — and to them I apologize.) Inwardly, Wicca is ancient folk wisdom combined with modern touchy-feelyness. And outwardly, in my experience, Wicca is entirely harmless — except maybe to those looking for witches to burn.

Pages: 1 2 | Comments bullet bullet

Running Up That Hollywood Hill

September 20th, 2010 - 8:17 am

Coast to Coast Tea Party: Funnest one yet. I got to talk with Merlin Froyd, going up against Hollywood’s pet congresscritter, Howard Berman. Also, Froyd put together the best campaign commercial I’ve seen this cycle — check it out on the show.

Froyd himself is sharp, smart, funny, and has a future in politics if he wants one. Keep your eye on this guy.

They’re Here…

September 19th, 2010 - 9:20 pm

OK, so it’s just one poll, but if John Dingell is really in trouble in Michigan, then no seat is safe.

(Hat tip, Melissa C.)

It’s a Helluva Party

September 19th, 2010 - 8:53 pm

First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then then they fight you. Then you win.

-Mahatma Gandhi.

I’m still waiting on a link for that last bit. But I don’t expect to wait much later than November 2.

Spot the Gratuitous Bill Murray Reference

September 19th, 2010 - 10:07 am

See the erotic Islamic center logo, find out where the ACORN is hidden, and learn the chilling 13-word secret behind modern politics — all on another exciting episode of… The Week in Blogs!

Change You Can’t Believe In

September 19th, 2010 - 9:46 am

President Barack Obama, defender of the status quo:

President Barack Obama, seeking to fire up an important part of his support base ahead of November’s elections, told black leaders on Saturday he wanted their support to “guard the change” he was delivering.

Margaret Thatcher called it “the ratchet effect.” Once a lefty policy was enacted, no matter how awful or unpopular, it proves nearly impossible to repeal. It’s also sometimes been known as “the Brezhnev Doctrine.”

Lisa Murkowsky will launch a write-in bid to keep the Senate seat she inherited, and to which she apparently still feels entitled.

I know it seems impossible, but the Stupid Party just got a little more stupid today.

It’s the Magical Multiplier

September 17th, 2010 - 10:45 am

I’ve always argued that the “multiplier effect” of government spending was a myth, and a stupid one at that. But then you read that the “stimulus” requires $111 million to create just 55 jobs in Los Angeles — and you’re forced to realize that government spending must have a “divisor effect.”

You can’t get rich flushing wealth down the toilet like that. You can’t stimulate with borrowed money. It’s very simple: Spending is the opposite of wealth creation. The creation must, by definition, come first — but we have an Administration loathe to get out of the way and let the economy do its thing, and ecstatic about the spending.

It’s failed New Deal thinking all over again, but at least in the 1930s, nobody knew any better. Today, we have no excuse.

Two For the Price of None

September 17th, 2010 - 10:33 am

Forgot to link yesterday’s Trifecta, a look at how to get rid of the income tax. It might be easier than you think, except for the little part where it’s politically impossible. Although I get the feeling that “politically impossible” doesn’t mean what it used to.

And on today’s episode, Bill Whittle examines the secret connection between President Obama and… Justin Bieber?

Yes: Justin Bieber.

Change That Matters

September 16th, 2010 - 10:19 pm

I’m a Tea Party guy. I don’t just go to rallies, I speak at them. And I believed in this less-taxing/less-spending/small-government stuff waaaaay before it was cool. Like, I made Reagan look squishy.

Please keep all that in mind when I say: Christine O’Donnell might just be about 17 different kinds of crazy. Now about 11 of those ways are the exact kinds of crazy I think Washington needs big tons more of — but the other six just leave me scratching my head and wondering how the hell she happened in Delaware. That’s like hearing a DJ spin up “Stairway To Heaven” in a gay club, or that Larry King got picked up on an indecent exposure charge.

But let’s get back on topic with a recap:

1. I’m nuts, always have been.

2. O’Donnell is nuts, even more so than I am.

And yet — O’Donnell raised half a million dollars yesterday.

Half a million bucks.

The woman too crazy for me, even when I was making something of a career out of dating the crazy ones, got half a million dollars in a single day. All so that she can continue to wage a campaign which everyone agrees is just hopeless.

So what happened? Did the United States go insane?

Well, no — not exactly.

It’s just that we’re governed by Democrats.

That can do things to a country.

Just Sayin’

September 16th, 2010 - 5:02 pm

Memo to Proto Speaker John Boehner: Quit blinking first, while the Democrats are proving so eager to do it for you.

No Tie? Obviously an Impostor

September 15th, 2010 - 11:44 am

Was last weekend’s BlogCon made of awesome? Yes it was — and there are pictures to prove it.

Members Only

September 15th, 2010 - 9:56 am

We shot a bonus Trifecta this week, just for subscribers — and we’re going to try to do this every week from now on. Just to say thanks. And because working with these guys is a blast.

Anyway — on this week’s exclusive, we take a look at that Dinesh D’Souza from Forbes the other day, called “How Obama Thinks.” It’s scary stuff, kids.

You Say You Want a Revolution

September 15th, 2010 - 6:34 am

Trifecta: What is the Tea Party — a protest, a revolt, or a fully-fledged revolution?