<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Response to Charles Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: False Charges Of Racism &#171; The Underground Conservative</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100812</link>
		<dc:creator>False Charges Of Racism &#171; The Underground Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100812</guid>
		<description>[...] had plenty of people responding on his behalf. First, Stephen Green, the VodkaPundit weighs in: At no time did I see Stacy treat anyone — of any color, creed, whathaveyou — with anything [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had plenty of people responding on his behalf. First, Stephen Green, the VodkaPundit weighs in: At no time did I see Stacy treat anyone — of any color, creed, whathaveyou — with anything [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Diggler</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100717</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Diggler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100717</guid>
		<description>Donna V,

 Eloquently put. I remember you from the old days. Where have you been hiding? 

 BTW, I&#039;m now officially &quot;banned&quot;.

 I&#039;m taking it really hard to. I swear I haven&#039;t been this devastated since Fox cancelled the Chevy Chase Show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna V,</p>
<p> Eloquently put. I remember you from the old days. Where have you been hiding? </p>
<p> BTW, I&#8217;m now officially &#8220;banned&#8221;.</p>
<p> I&#8217;m taking it really hard to. I swear I haven&#8217;t been this devastated since Fox cancelled the Chevy Chase Show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aveen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100701</link>
		<dc:creator>aveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100701</guid>
		<description>re #2 &quot;I used to enjoy Little Green Footballs until Charles Johnson went off the rails about intelligent design vs. evolution vs. creationism.&quot;


The only thing &quot;off the rails&quot; are the cretins pushing creationism/intelligent design &quot;theory.&quot; This is one thing Charles should be congratulated for exposing to a wider audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re #2 &#8220;I used to enjoy Little Green Footballs until Charles Johnson went off the rails about intelligent design vs. evolution vs. creationism.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only thing &#8220;off the rails&#8221; are the cretins pushing creationism/intelligent design &#8220;theory.&#8221; This is one thing Charles should be congratulated for exposing to a wider audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100699</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100699</guid>
		<description>I posted a quite innocuous remark to the effect that Charles was assigning too much importance to a cadre of Bircher lunatics, and that he ought to relax a bit. Banned.

Oh well, he seems to be correct about McCain anyway. Evil can be quite banal. But Charles might bear in mind that evil loves an echo chamber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a quite innocuous remark to the effect that Charles was assigning too much importance to a cadre of Bircher lunatics, and that he ought to relax a bit. Banned.</p>
<p>Oh well, he seems to be correct about McCain anyway. Evil can be quite banal. But Charles might bear in mind that evil loves an echo chamber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna V.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100684</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100684</guid>
		<description>Karmic Inquisitor:

As for the Stacy McCain quote that has got you all in a self-righteous tizzy, well, this is from the introduction of historian Niall Ferguson&#039;s &quot;The War of the World&quot;:

&quot;For there is evidence from the behavior of both humans and other species that nature does not necessarily favour breeding between genetically very different members of the same species,...,Some evolutionary biologists argue that this was a result just not of &#039;genetic drift&#039; but of &#039;sexual selection&#039; - in other words a culturally triggered and somewhat arbitrary preference for eye-folds in Asia or long noses in Europe quite rapidly accentuated  precisely those characteristics in populations that were isolated from each other.  Like attracted and continues to  attract like: those who are drawn to &#039;the Other&#039; may in fact be  atypical in their sexual predilections.&quot;

Is Ferguson&#039;s point that much different from the one Stacy McCain makes?  That ole science is a b*tch; it doesn&#039;t always reinforce the beliefs of politically correct liberals.


I guess somebody needs to  notify Harvard.  It looks like they have a &quot;white supremacist&quot; on their faculty.

And what is it with the obsessive monitoring and  &quot;flouncing&quot; and threats to &quot;flounce&quot; and the juvenile gloating over having banned commenters over there? If you offend Comrade Beria and his flunkies, he might let you stick around if you grovel and apologize.  Being a regular on LGF is so important to these people that adults are willing to put up with that sort of treatment? If you have any amount of self-respect, why would you want to hang out at a blog where you are declared double plus ungood as soon as you express an opinion contrary to The Great Leader&#039;s?  

LGF is indeed &quot;a true internet dictatorship.&quot; We&#039;re supposed to believe that they represent the voice of moderation?

I was a regular there too once. I stopped reading it a couple of years ago.  Going back there now and scanning the comments threads makes me feel like I&#039;ve landed in the alternate universe with bearded Spock at the helm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karmic Inquisitor:</p>
<p>As for the Stacy McCain quote that has got you all in a self-righteous tizzy, well, this is from the introduction of historian Niall Ferguson&#8217;s &#8220;The War of the World&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;For there is evidence from the behavior of both humans and other species that nature does not necessarily favour breeding between genetically very different members of the same species,&#8230;,Some evolutionary biologists argue that this was a result just not of &#8216;genetic drift&#8217; but of &#8216;sexual selection&#8217; &#8211; in other words a culturally triggered and somewhat arbitrary preference for eye-folds in Asia or long noses in Europe quite rapidly accentuated  precisely those characteristics in populations that were isolated from each other.  Like attracted and continues to  attract like: those who are drawn to &#8216;the Other&#8217; may in fact be  atypical in their sexual predilections.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is Ferguson&#8217;s point that much different from the one Stacy McCain makes?  That ole science is a b*tch; it doesn&#8217;t always reinforce the beliefs of politically correct liberals.</p>
<p>I guess somebody needs to  notify Harvard.  It looks like they have a &#8220;white supremacist&#8221; on their faculty.</p>
<p>And what is it with the obsessive monitoring and  &#8220;flouncing&#8221; and threats to &#8220;flounce&#8221; and the juvenile gloating over having banned commenters over there? If you offend Comrade Beria and his flunkies, he might let you stick around if you grovel and apologize.  Being a regular on LGF is so important to these people that adults are willing to put up with that sort of treatment? If you have any amount of self-respect, why would you want to hang out at a blog where you are declared double plus ungood as soon as you express an opinion contrary to The Great Leader&#8217;s?  </p>
<p>LGF is indeed &#8220;a true internet dictatorship.&#8221; We&#8217;re supposed to believe that they represent the voice of moderation?</p>
<p>I was a regular there too once. I stopped reading it a couple of years ago.  Going back there now and scanning the comments threads makes me feel like I&#8217;ve landed in the alternate universe with bearded Spock at the helm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100673</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100673</guid>
		<description>131, you missed climate blasphemy. According to CJ, &lt;em&gt;there is no warming but anthropogenic warming, and Algore is its messenger&lt;/em&gt;. 

And he&#039;ll ban you if you don&#039;t sing &quot;Amen!&quot;.

Atheist, my butt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>131, you missed climate blasphemy. According to CJ, <em>there is no warming but anthropogenic warming, and Algore is its messenger</em>. </p>
<p>And he&#8217;ll ban you if you don&#8217;t sing &#8220;Amen!&#8221;.</p>
<p>Atheist, my butt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100666</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100666</guid>
		<description>Charles Johnson, in his redirected jihad against anyone from the right who mentions God, the South, or gets too mean to jihadis called Robert Stacy McCain a Southern white supremacist yesterday in connection with the DC Tea Party (and threw Stephen Green under the bus too for good measure). CJ was also claiming he &quot;lost count&quot; of Obama = Hilter signs (funny, I watched video yesterday and did not see one).   

In response, R.S.McCain gives one of the best comebacks and defenses of the South and conservatism I have ever read.  Read it all. It has that Jeff Goldstein quality of never give in, never surrender.   

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/09/point-one-charles-johnson-doesnt-know.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Point I&lt;/a&gt;.  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/09/point-two-charles-johnson-is-prejudiced.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Point II&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/09/point-three-charles-johnson-will-regret.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Point III&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Johnson, in his redirected jihad against anyone from the right who mentions God, the South, or gets too mean to jihadis called Robert Stacy McCain a Southern white supremacist yesterday in connection with the DC Tea Party (and threw Stephen Green under the bus too for good measure). CJ was also claiming he &#8220;lost count&#8221; of Obama = Hilter signs (funny, I watched video yesterday and did not see one).   </p>
<p>In response, R.S.McCain gives one of the best comebacks and defenses of the South and conservatism I have ever read.  Read it all. It has that Jeff Goldstein quality of never give in, never surrender.   </p>
<p><a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/09/point-one-charles-johnson-doesnt-know.html" rel="nofollow">Point I</a>.  </p>
<p><a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/09/point-two-charles-johnson-is-prejudiced.html" rel="nofollow">Point II</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/09/point-three-charles-johnson-will-regret.html" rel="nofollow">Point III</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irresistible force vs immovable object: Johnson vs McCain &#171; DaTechguy&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100662</link>
		<dc:creator>Irresistible force vs immovable object: Johnson vs McCain &#171; DaTechguy&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100662</guid>
		<description>[...] Pundit responded in a post here stating: Now, I’ve worked with Stacy in person a couple of times, at the DNC last summer and at CPAC in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pundit responded in a post here stating: Now, I’ve worked with Stacy in person a couple of times, at the DNC last summer and at CPAC in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100650</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100650</guid>
		<description>And to all you former and banned LGFers. I was one of the very earliest fans of LGF (I was there for the first 100 comment post). Got sent there by Sully. Now I don&#039;t go there any more. Either place. Except through linkages.

I even got invited by some one to defend a bit of fusion science (The Polywell Fusion Reactor) and just couldn&#039;t bring myself to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to all you former and banned LGFers. I was one of the very earliest fans of LGF (I was there for the first 100 comment post). Got sent there by Sully. Now I don&#8217;t go there any more. Either place. Except through linkages.</p>
<p>I even got invited by some one to defend a bit of fusion science (The Polywell Fusion Reactor) and just couldn&#8217;t bring myself to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100647</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100647</guid>
		<description>As I understand it Palin&#039;s husband was once a member of a libertarian oriented sucessionist party. They didn&#039;t like the Federal over reach. 

And of course you have all the Tenth Amendment States. Passing laws limiting Federal reach. 

I dunno. Seems like a respectable possition to me. Now I&#039;m not a succesioinist myself. But the Feds have gone way too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it Palin&#8217;s husband was once a member of a libertarian oriented sucessionist party. They didn&#8217;t like the Federal over reach. </p>
<p>And of course you have all the Tenth Amendment States. Passing laws limiting Federal reach. </p>
<p>I dunno. Seems like a respectable possition to me. Now I&#8217;m not a succesioinist myself. But the Feds have gone way too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100644</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100644</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I embrace Thomas Sowell’s nurture over nature position regarding I.Q.&lt;/i&gt;

There is probably some of that for sure. But then you have to explain Ashkenazi Jews. 

There is DNA when it comes to many body characteristics. I don&#039;t see why brains would be an exception. I wrote a bit on the topic:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/inequality.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Inequality&lt;/a&gt;

===

BTW I have never found VDARE to be bigoted. Their premise is that large population shifts will change the culture. Which it will. I&#039;m OK with that. The VDARE folks don&#039;t like it. Which I think is a fair position. 

But I do have problems with Lew Rockwell. And have told him so. Although I like his stance on many issues other than race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I embrace Thomas Sowell’s nurture over nature position regarding I.Q.</i></p>
<p>There is probably some of that for sure. But then you have to explain Ashkenazi Jews. </p>
<p>There is DNA when it comes to many body characteristics. I don&#8217;t see why brains would be an exception. I wrote a bit on the topic:</p>
<p><a href="http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/inequality.html" rel="nofollow">Inequality</a></p>
<p>===</p>
<p>BTW I have never found VDARE to be bigoted. Their premise is that large population shifts will change the culture. Which it will. I&#8217;m OK with that. The VDARE folks don&#8217;t like it. Which I think is a fair position. </p>
<p>But I do have problems with Lew Rockwell. And have told him so. Although I like his stance on many issues other than race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100630</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100630</guid>
		<description>120., Loppy??? The talking bra from Boston??? Somebody needs to find that aardvark that bit CJ.

Banning Zombie will be suicide. I think it&#039;s going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>120., Loppy??? The talking bra from Boston??? Somebody needs to find that aardvark that bit CJ.</p>
<p>Banning Zombie will be suicide. I think it&#8217;s going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100629</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100629</guid>
		<description>110. arhooley, ditto. Carl in Jerusalem??? Johnson must have been bit by a rabid aardvark when he was out biking. He does wear a helmet, doesn&#039;t he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>110. arhooley, ditto. Carl in Jerusalem??? Johnson must have been bit by a rabid aardvark when he was out biking. He does wear a helmet, doesn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100628</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100628</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;101. Ezekiel:

So writers act of racism in the NY Press article was to postulate that there is a basic and inherent fear in humans of those that look different from themselves or their community?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As I said in 62, Stacey didn&#039;t say anything that Obama didn&#039;t say. But that&#039;s different, isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>101. Ezekiel:</p>
<p>So writers act of racism in the NY Press article was to postulate that there is a basic and inherent fear in humans of those that look different from themselves or their community?</p></blockquote>
<p>As I said in 62, Stacey didn&#8217;t say anything that Obama didn&#8217;t say. But that&#8217;s different, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess who?</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100626</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess who?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100626</guid>
		<description>Kirly, incoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirly, incoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el polacko</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100625</link>
		<dc:creator>el polacko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100625</guid>
		<description>i got banned at LGF a few days ago just for giving an up-ding to a comment that van jones needed to go ! i used to enjoy that charles would call out the nuts on the right as well as the left, but lately i haven&#039;t been able to tell if i was posting on LGF or on huffpo.. and even huffpo won&#039;t ban you for disagreeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got banned at LGF a few days ago just for giving an up-ding to a comment that van jones needed to go ! i used to enjoy that charles would call out the nuts on the right as well as the left, but lately i haven&#8217;t been able to tell if i was posting on LGF or on huffpo.. and even huffpo won&#8217;t ban you for disagreeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arhooley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100619</link>
		<dc:creator>arhooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100619</guid>
		<description>Wow. Thank you very much. -- Dirk Diggler

-----------------

Heh. I remember you saying on some thread about some race hysteria (maybe during the Jeremiah Wright scandal?) &quot;I&#039;m a person of color.&quot; I hope to see liberated former LGFers posting at conservative and libertarian blogs.

I also see doom on the horizon for zombie. The execrable Sharmuta writes tonight: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m wondering if I should question what I&#039;ve seen of leftist protests for the last 8 years, because I&#039;m pretty sure similar amounts of &quot;cherry-picking&quot; could be said to have occurred, and probably did.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Turning on zombie? As CJ would say, bad craziness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Thank you very much. &#8212; Dirk Diggler</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Heh. I remember you saying on some thread about some race hysteria (maybe during the Jeremiah Wright scandal?) &#8220;I&#8217;m a person of color.&#8221; I hope to see liberated former LGFers posting at conservative and libertarian blogs.</p>
<p>I also see doom on the horizon for zombie. The execrable Sharmuta writes tonight: </p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m wondering if I should question what I&#8217;ve seen of leftist protests for the last 8 years, because I&#8217;m pretty sure similar amounts of &#8220;cherry-picking&#8221; could be said to have occurred, and probably did.</p></blockquote>
<p>Turning on zombie? As CJ would say, bad craziness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spidly</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100618</link>
		<dc:creator>spidly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100618</guid>
		<description>dirk:
banned after 8 years. my offense as far as I can tell, was disgust at Holdren having any position esp. science czar, and fear of having state run medicine with that freak anywhere near it, or with the cold calculus of Zeke &quot;complete lives system&quot; Emanuel - at least that was the gist of my last days&#039; posting before I was disappeared.

&quot;The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being. Where any of these essential elements is lacking, the resultant individual will be deficient in some respect.”

Pointing out the sick views of that stain is &quot;manufactured outrage&quot; at LGF, and his eugenicist views are somehow are not allowed to reflect on Obama, or LGF who appears to defend them. You want guilt by association over there? There you go.

good times</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dirk:<br />
banned after 8 years. my offense as far as I can tell, was disgust at Holdren having any position esp. science czar, and fear of having state run medicine with that freak anywhere near it, or with the cold calculus of Zeke &#8220;complete lives system&#8221; Emanuel &#8211; at least that was the gist of my last days&#8217; posting before I was disappeared.</p>
<p>&#8220;The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being. Where any of these essential elements is lacking, the resultant individual will be deficient in some respect.”</p>
<p>Pointing out the sick views of that stain is &#8220;manufactured outrage&#8221; at LGF, and his eugenicist views are somehow are not allowed to reflect on Obama, or LGF who appears to defend them. You want guilt by association over there? There you go.</p>
<p>good times</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BottledSunshine</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100613</link>
		<dc:creator>BottledSunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100613</guid>
		<description>Dirk Diggler,
&quot;I figure alegrias, zombie, and Occasional Reader are all on borrowed time.&quot;

I think you&#039;re right, at least when it comes to zombie. Zombie&#039;s been on the list since the Jones fiasco. The move to discredit zombie&#039;s work is advancing. This was a comment made earlier today by one of the chief suck-ups.

{150	Sharmuta
9/12/2009 9:24:35 pm PDT	1
down
up
report


&quot;re: #35 noshariaincanada

my own take from viewing coverage of the event from different sites is similar to yours. You can always cherrypick images if you want to make a point, but the sheer number of people reported makes it unlikely (imho) that the above images are actually represenative of the event [with all due respect to the lizard master]&quot;

Interesting theory. How do we know if the protest events of the last 8 years weren&#039;t similarly &quot;cherry-picked&quot;? If other people&#039;s work was indeed &quot;cherry-picked&quot; is it acceptable to do the same now, or should we question what we&#039;ve been led to believe about leftist protests for the last 8 years?

Just wondering.}


Looks like they are getting ready for an under the bus toss over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk Diggler,<br />
&#8220;I figure alegrias, zombie, and Occasional Reader are all on borrowed time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right, at least when it comes to zombie. Zombie&#8217;s been on the list since the Jones fiasco. The move to discredit zombie&#8217;s work is advancing. This was a comment made earlier today by one of the chief suck-ups.</p>
<p>{150	Sharmuta<br />
9/12/2009 9:24:35 pm PDT	1<br />
down<br />
up<br />
report</p>
<p>&#8220;re: #35 noshariaincanada</p>
<p>my own take from viewing coverage of the event from different sites is similar to yours. You can always cherrypick images if you want to make a point, but the sheer number of people reported makes it unlikely (imho) that the above images are actually represenative of the event [with all due respect to the lizard master]&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting theory. How do we know if the protest events of the last 8 years weren&#8217;t similarly &#8220;cherry-picked&#8221;? If other people&#8217;s work was indeed &#8220;cherry-picked&#8221; is it acceptable to do the same now, or should we question what we&#8217;ve been led to believe about leftist protests for the last 8 years?</p>
<p>Just wondering.}</p>
<p>Looks like they are getting ready for an under the bus toss over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheCrazies</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2009/09/12/a-response-to-charles-johnson/#comment-100610</link>
		<dc:creator>TheCrazies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/vodkapundit/?p=13702#comment-100610</guid>
		<description>Goodness, if you&#039;re going to trash talk us, at least have the courtesy of leaving a link. It&#039;s http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness, if you&#8217;re going to trash talk us, at least have the courtesy of leaving a link. It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

