<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2006/10/01/cool-5/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:56:46 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Cool</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[High-tech detective work apparently has found the missing &amp;#8220;a&amp;#8221; in one of the most famous phrases ever spoken.
Astronaut Neil Armstrong&amp;#8217;s first words from the surface of the moon on July 20, 1969, now can be confidently recast, according to the research, as, &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8217;s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.&amp;#8221;
&amp;#8230;
The discrepancy has been widely debated for years by historians, academics and fans of space travel, with the &amp;#8220;a&amp;#8221; sometimes appearing in parentheses in government documents and Armstrong being listed on unofficial Web sites as being guilty of a momentous flub.
The missing one-letter word was found this month in a software analysis of Armstrong&amp;#8217;s famous phrase by Peter Shann Ford, a Sydney, Australia-based computer programmer. Ford&amp;#8217;s company, Control Bionics, specializes in helping physically handicapped people use their nerve impulses to communicate through computers.
On Thursday, Ford and Auburn University historian James R. Hansen, Armstrong&amp;#8217;s authorized biographer, presented the findings to Armstrong and others in a meeting at the Smithsonian Institution&amp;#8217;s Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. They repeated the presentation at NASA&amp;#8217;s Washington headquarters, which has long backed Armstrong&amp;#8217;s version of the phrasing.
&amp;#8220;I have reviewed the data and Peter Ford&amp;#8217;s analysis of it and I find the technology interesting and useful,&amp;#8221; Armstrong said in a statement. &amp;#8220;I also find his conclusion persuasive. Persuasive is the appropriate word.&amp;#8221;]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:53:46 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Will Collier]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/will-collier/2006/10/01/cool-5-n227661</link></item></channel></rss>