so true. And MORE:
http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/pastanalysis/2008/0718.html

Since when is the US in Iran??????

well, it is the best describe as a culture,
it was forming since 1917

it is not easy to comprehend

think in terms of a mixture of organized crime and mad science

It is like this:
lets say we have this plan: to make enourmous money and we have no moral or financial or subversion or violent, or any limitations in terms of what could be done outside of magic))

lets say we want american financial system to go down. It is a good example to consider Fannie may disaster

so we sit down and plan

we identify how the system works, we think in terms of creating a bubble, we already did several bubbles in Russia, we know it is doable.

And we do it and succeed. Just like that.

Did you know that Clinton had and have very intimate contacts with key figures in soviet mafia?

Newsweek publishe not long ago a story with pictures of Billy the clinton with Chornomyrdyn an Kuchma in yalta))

they are not even ashamed to be photographed together

Kuchma is known to order contrqct killings

This is the way it is done.

Or take Condoleezza Rice.

She was in the works since i dont know when,
but peole who pushed her in dep of state – and you can check yourself who they are-
they are also a part of their team

It is all the matter of how deep you dig

And it is very frightening – deeper you dig more you will get a feeling that it is so unreal you may start not believing what you learn

Culture is more then a team or organization.

You were told about islamic radicalism, so imagine that THEY ARE ROCKET SCIENTISTS

The nature of educational system in US is very different from soviet, it is not easy to grasp for americans

this is a good link
http://www.jrnyquist.com/media/Andrei%20Navrozov%20Interview.mp3

From the rest of your post i can tell that you don’t have enough info on the subject

and who is igor?:):):)

I was born there, i was exposed to how things are done, to some methods they do it, but still it takes years, dozens of years to connect the dots

It is strategy, it is very complicated.

Would take me years to give you all details so you can start to connect it.

But the sources are out there: just read some books.

enemy is not that simple at all.

May be the best way to understand how they see us here would come from the explanation of say a biochemist who works for some reservour of drinking water or someone like it

But you will have to make an effort and understand that enemy is not like me or you:

the have no remorse or moral restrain

they are serial killers in numbers of hundreds of millions and they did it and this is the way the plan it and the worst thing for them is a thought that we will realize what they are and will put them to justice

People said, ‘I know he’s crazy but I’m voting for him anyway.’

Obama has a lot of voters who, regardless of his positions or flip flops, would vote for Lassie if he wasn’t a Republican. But mostly, I think his constituency is thinking, ‘He’s lying. He’ll always be one of us.’

Decency is foremost. For that, I would risk my security and prosperity for others. Decency is liberating millions of Muslims from tyrants. Decency is executing murderers and child rapists rather than our own babies. Decency is demanding Mexico provide its own citizens with the rule of law and limited government that would lead to enormous, society-wide prosperity and end the exodus of its bravest and hardest working citizens.

Security is secured borders, a larger, replenished military, and an all-out war against Jihadists and their supporters, both at home and abroad, including in Gaza.

Prosperity is the elimination of the entire federal departments (starting with Education) and the severe reduction of many others. Prosperity is free trade and free markets (starting with health care and social security) and much, much lower taxes and deficits. And to ensure we stay prosperous, we should amend the constitution to limit government spending to a fixed percentage of GDP, a limit we can only over-ride with a 75% majority in congress for real emergencies.

Obama writes an Op/Ed in the NYT, gives a long winded speech and makes the interview rounds to proclaim his new national security plan, including his strategy for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — all on his way out the door to ostensibly consult with our commanders in theatre. Did he not want their input first? What’s the purpose of this tax-payer funded fact finding mission if he has already decided on a master plan of action? Well, don’t expect him to reveal any new insights on his return, or acknowledge any of the lessons learned the hard way in Iraq and their application in Afghanistan. Obama knew it all before he went and the Master’s Plan is to be all his.

McCain openly acknowledges who his advisors are and gives credit where credit is due. Never heard Obama do the same. Does anyone think he devised his national security plan himself? His followers appear to believe so, and his campaign actively promotes this impression. Odd that these are the same people who castigated George Bush for not listening to others. We know what books he reads, but who does Obama listen to on national security? As above, the Messiah doesn’t listen to mere mortals.

Obama’s speeches, where he outlines how he will lead this country (or heal it, or whatever), are always full of references to great Americans. Lincoln, FDR, Kennedy, Marshall etc. He loves to associate himself with greatness. Must be galling to McCain that Obama rarely refers to the great country that produced these great leaders. Greatness, apparently, is a feature of men like Obama, not countries.

Arrogant people are usually thin skinned. Obama and his campaign are the epitome of this. The slightest perceived slight, the New Yorker cover for example, is countered without thinking. No one can be allowed to question the Great One with impunity. That’s the message here. He’s got to remain unsullied. So scrub the web site. I hope he talks to the troops while he’s in Iraq. Maybe one of them can ask him why he thought the surge was a failure, without his campaign jumping down the guy’s throat.

The candidate with no experience can have no flaws. Such arrogance must grate on McCain. So far he’s not biting though. Too bad the word hubris has been much overused these past seven years. We may need it come Nov 5th.