Pity the Postmodern Cultural Elite
I think most of our problems transcend politics, which is increasingly a reflection of an elite, insider culture that is completely at odds with the majority of the country that it oversees.
So what is a cultural elite?
It is a sloppy term that might include the academic class in the university that educates our children in college. The upper echelons that run government departments constitute part of this cultural elite. So does an entertainment cadre that oversees television and Hollywood. Corporate managers are elites as well.
There is no racial, regional, religious, or tribal commonality. One shared allegiance perhaps is to higher education that certifies the cultural elite by diplomas of all sorts from a “good school,” as well as a respectable salary and a nice home with appurtenances. The good life of the elite is defined by both the absence of worry about necessities, and a certain status that accrues from properly recognized advanced education and sensitivity.
How would we characterize the new aristocracy? In a number of ways.
1) Untruth. One requisite to being a cultural elite, unfortunately, is a certain allegiance to untruth, to saying one thing and doing another. Consider the manifestations of falsity from ecology to race. Often exempt from worry over a weekly check, and distanced from the mechanics of how things work, the elite clamors for a green cap-and-trade revolution. It rejects compromise with a fossil fuel near future that would transition us in a half-century or so to renewable energy.
That said, it is hard to find cultural elites who live green lives. Most use their money at times to fly on jets or boat (like the president this weekend). As in the manner of the tastes of a John Edwards or Al Gore, the bigger and more impressive the home, the better to contemplate how lesser others use too much carbon-based power. Usually green sacrifice is to be made by coal miners, oil drillers, and timber men of politically incorrect industries — the distant horny-handed classes whose unmentioned work brings us instant convenience.
On matters racial, it gets complicated since advocacy is one thing, living another. The cultural elite use “pull” to get their kids into college, money to live in a “good” neighborhood, and “networking” to marry and “place” like others from a good background. All that remains unspoken and rarely articulated. Why so? Because otherwise the logical ramifications of such a liberal belief system would be to live in the San Jose or Fresno mixed suburbs, to have their children school with the “other” at Cal State Stanislaus or Indiana State, and to marry their children to Rick Lopez or Tyrone Hiller to encourage “diversity.”
In short, money, privilege, and status create in the cultural elite both a fear of mixing it up with others that might jeopardize position and placement, and yet guilt for that very sense of entitlement and exemption. All that, in turn, only heightens the shrill and sanctimonious rhetorical demands on less blessed others to prove their morality.
Barack Obama was a genius in recognizing all this, and at a very early age no less. The subtext of Dreams from My Father, and indeed Obama’s life from 18 to 45, was to allay elite fears, guilt, and suspicions. And by proving to be a calm, charismatic, minority wannabe fellow elite — who could ipso facto offer instant penance for rather isolated and shamed cultural elite s— Obama in return grasped that the rules simply would not apply to him (elites having few real unchanging principles and values): graduate admission without commensurate grades and test scores (their release to the public could in theory prove my hypothesis wrong), law review without a paper trail, teaching and offers of tenure at law schools without normal publication, community organizing without worry of tangible results, running for office without repercussions from tawdry attacks ranging from suing to invalidate petitions to leaking divorce records.
2) Nature. The cultural elite class tends to romanticize nature, since it has little contact with it. Energy Secretary Steven Chu cheaply announces that California farms will dry up and blow away, with no clue how the tomatoes in his salad or the lamb chops on his plate are grown, cleaned, shipped — and land in his mouth.
The elite like big hiking boots and four-wheel-drive SUVs that can go anywhere, and — once that is exhibited — usually stick to the hallways and freeways. The further the distance from nature, the greater the desire to experience it vicariously, symbolically, or representationally. The more we don’t clean and eat the fish we catch, the more we don’t know an apple from a cherry tree, so the more we idolize something like a three-inch Delta smelt and shut down 500,000 acres of icky distant irrigated land to ensure the minnow-like, but beloved, fish has enough oxygenated water in the California delta.
I think that instead of SAT camp or a summer tutorial in estuary biophysics, it would be far better to assign Jason to apprentice with Mott’s septic service or Wright’s tree-trimming. All during the BP mess, I tuned out the Steven Chus and Barack Obamas, and instead wondered what sort of people can weld, or lift, or hammer these massive derricks, casings, drills into place, and what will it take from them to plug the leak thousands of feet below? We just assumed that once the proper strategy was finally formulated, its implementation was assured. But any military historian knows that even the greatest generals sometimes failed for the lack of one brilliant major or lieutenant to take a hill or calm a shaky brigade and so reify a good plan.







“Untruth. One requisite to being a cultural elite, unfortunately, is a certain allegiance to untruth, to saying one thing, and doing another.”
I think that’s all I need to know Dr. Hanson. Thank you for reminding your readers. I will vote for you if you run for President in 2012.
Postmodern elites do speak out of both sides of their mouths, as I show here: http://clarespark.com/2010/07/18/white-elite-enabling-of-black-power/. They are slippery and yet, if you read the movers and shakers carefully, they make no sense, for they above all seek to impose harmony from above, and coercively. See this blog for examples of prominent white leaders attempting to control the urban riots of the 1960s through institutionalizing cultural nationalism. The result: an increasingly polarized electorate that is supposed to believe that culture arises from distinct racial groups, and that culture is not syncretic. Goodbye to the melting pot: it never existed, they argue.
Alas, CGW – I hav heard it said that in a democracy, we get the government that we deserve. We need, but sadly, do not deserve the likes of Victor Davis Hanson for president. I, too would vote enthusiastically for him, but…. too few would.
Victor Hanson’s latest diatribe against President Obama, carried today in newspapers across the country, conveys anything but truth and repeats nothing but the lies and innuendos of the far right. In a column on the “racial discord” the President has wrought, Hanson lines up Rev. Wright, Van Jones, the New Black Panther Party, Jesse Jackson, and a host of others whose only connection with Obama is skin color. At no point does he acknowledge the daily diatribes of Beck, Limbaugh, Levine and Fox News that has fueled racist feelings and reinforced racist beliefs among their white audiences. The only conclusion I can draw about the man is that he is a tool of the far right and whatever credentials he has regarding his profesion have been sold down the river for a cause that will, to borrow Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s phrase, will live in infamy.
Funny, John, the only conclusion I’ve managed to draw from the “daily rantings” of Beck, Limbaugh, et al., is that Obama is, in the worst case, a Marxist George Soros puppet out to destroy America. They haven’t managed to change my opinion of any other black person one bit, for better or for worse. So please tell me how that is supposed to be racist.
And please! Obama’s ONLY connection to his pastor of 20 years is skin color? His ONLY connection to one of his own appointees is skin color? Now who sounds like a racist?
We are headed toward a second massive cataclysm in this country.
This time it is going to be between the self-styled elites, and the people who make the country work.
We have been carrying the people who don’t want to work for years and now we are having to carrying the people who think they are too smart to work, their princely lifestyles and now come their adolescent demands for their nirvanagraphic cultural imperitives as well.
This is not a situation we will tolerate much longer. The signals are firing out like solar flares from the sun. And they are laughing at us as their time approaches. They think we are fools. We’ll see about that.
Damned spot on, that is.
Elois and Morlocks.
Even milque-toasty elite-wannabe, David Brooks, is starting to get the picture. From his NY Times column today:
The Technocracy Boom
“…Large sectors of the population will feel as if they were subjected to a doomed experiment they did not consent to. They will feel as if their country has been hijacked by a self-serving professional class mostly interested in providing for themselves.
If that backlash gains strength, well, what’s the 21st-century version of the guillotine?”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/opinion/20brooks.html?_r=1
Amazing that Brooks is starting to get it. He’s one of the elites who is too good to actually work and produce, but enjoys the fruits of others’ labors while denigrating and condescending to them. He needs to be held up to ridicule and scorn at every opportunity.
I will gladly pull the lever on these evil bastards. Pick Me!
Get back to us the next time you need open-heart surgery, a computer, a psychiatrist, an economist, or a weapons system more complex than a pointy stick.
I guess you didn’t notice that in this new world your heart surgeon is just some guy who wasn’t smart enough to be a beaurocrat, and the engineers who build weapons systems are considered trained monkeys. The only one on your list who makes the cut for the “elite” is the economist – and look how much good they’re doing us. A few years into Obamacare and that heart surgeon will have retired – or at least that what some of my doctor friends are planning on – and who is going to take their place in a field that requires dedication and training with no potential career?
This comment is fail–you seem to be drawing the line in the wrong place. All the people you list are(or should be) on our side, only a handful out of each are the true blue-blooded “elites” that the article discusses.
Yeah, ’cause the elite consists of engineers and surgeons and double Es and rocket scientists… wait, no…
OK, you got a point about the witch doctors and rain-dancers, I mean psychiatrists and economists.
Uhhh … those are highly paid, productive workers. They’re NOT technocrats, bureaucrats, legislators, litigators, or sit on boards or Presidential committees.
Not only are they NOT who he’s talking about, they’re often unable to morph/hide/shelter income and are getting fleeced worst of all….
The day I need a psychiatrist, and not the Creator of the Universe, to sort things out, is the day I will find a pointy stick and fall on it.
Touche’! pardon the pun
You are going to have to explain your comment because I can see several, and contradictory, ways to take it.
Royalewithcheese: you so totally missed the point. THe point isn’t that the diplomas aren’t needed see the Doctor part of the author, but that they have made civility,among other things that used to admired, quaint and old fashioned…ya know not cool and modern, well post.
I just finished reading Louis the 14th ( in French, Max Gallo’s simple version, but whoever mentioned guillotine in the comments maybe on to something, frightingly on to something, as the French revolution was a classist war where there was a lot of blood and the same idiots ended up running things, as my French grandfather siad the only thing that happened in the French revoltuion is the King lost his head, Louis the fourteenth and his glorious Versailles, and the expenses, he taxed the people into starvation and three generations later, chop!)
& So are we the 3rd generation in America to be taxed to death? When can we start chopping? :):):)…
Can we start with Hillary ? “OFF WITH HER HEAD” :O
royal appears to be slandering the rubes from his position as a proud vacationer in the Ruling Class, but he needs to get his facts right.
There may have been a time when aristocrats were the intellectual elites, but our little dukes and duchesses certainly aren’t in that category. Obama is the prime example. He wouldn’t know which end of the tire guage to use, no matter whether inflating tires could make a measurable difference in the nation’s oil usage.
The people who make the country run, who invent and deliver the services, who design and build the machines, who organize and manage the efforts are the Country Class. The Ruling Class are deadbeats, and dumb ones at that.
proreason: pithy, succinct and on the mark. You nailed it!
Dr. Hanson:
A timely and accurate essay. As a classically trained musician, I know well the people and attitudes you discuss. May I add a bit of supporting insight?
Maverick USAF fighter pilot Col. John Boyd had an insight that changed military tactics and has many civilian applications. Known as the OODA Loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), it describes the mental processes necessary to win in air combat. Like many great and deceptively simple insights, it embodies what the intuitively successful have always done, but distills it, clarifies it, thus making it universally useful.
There may be a similar political/social insight: The PIO Loop. It describes the very nature of Americans, and therefore, of America. Its basic expression is in the individual: Americans are practical, industrious and optimistic. They approach any problem and task logically, practically, and having decided on the best–not the politically correct–thing to do, work hard to accomplish it, knowing that because they are logical and hard working, they will succeed. And each individual success breeds greater optimism, optimism grounded in actual accomplishment rather than theory. These are people who must actually solve, day after day, in little time with little money, pressing problems, using their own hands and resources. It is this essential nature of most Americans that most distinguishes them from the self-imagined elites.
Here are a few examples: Problem: Spending too much money. PIO solution: Quit spending money(!), perhaps work extra hours to make more and save more, know that this will reduce debt. Of course, for the elite, such as liberal economist Paul Krugman–he’s a Nobel laureate you know, if you don’t believe it, just ask him or the New York Times–such solutions are too pedestrian. Taxing, spending and borrowing previously unimaginable sums is the only solution. Why can’t the rabble see that? Problem: Oil spill in the Gulf. PIO Solution: Get people who know what they’re doing and plug the damned thing, fast. Work around the clock to do it. Pull out all the stops to waive any obstructing rule, obtain whatever equipment and personnel are required to contain the oil and clean it up. Worry about assigning blame later. Once that’s decided and the right people are working, there is every reason to believe it will get done, done right and done fast. But for the elite, action consists of endless talking, appointing commissions comprised of people who have no specific knowledge applicable to the task like Dr. Chu–he won the Nobel prize too!–press releases, and engaging every niggling, pencil-necked federal agency possible to dissemble, obstruct and hamstring the people who are actually trying to do the work. Blame and threaten everybody in sight, act macho and threaten to put your expensive, dainty little boots on the well-muscled necks of people who know what they’re doing. Travel to the Gulf and set up photo ops of you, looking concerned while touching and staring at apparently oil soiled sand. Send your wife to the gulf. Be sure that she’s wearing a dress that looks as though it has been soiled with oil (style and theme are important!), and set up a press conference on a beach so the dumber folks understand all the work your advance people went to for the proper, symbolic setting. Then go on vacation and be sure to provide a separate jet for your dog. And the well is finally capped, apparently through the insights of a plumber, a guy who, every day, lives PIO
Those who live and work in the real world, the world that actually imagines, designs and produces things, don’t have the luxury of untruth, for in that world, those who lie are unreliable, they break the loop. They appreciate and understand nature in ways that the elite cannot imagine. They have nothing but disdain for those who despoil nature, but they know that people come first and that impoverishing thousands to save a tiny fish or insect is lunacy. They run, lift weights, ride bikes and do many similar things, but they do it when they can, because they enjoy it, when it doesn’t interfere with work, family, the things that matter far more than image. Practicality and logic are one in the same for them. They know that appeasing tyrants leads to disaster. They know that there is a time for talk and a time for action. They know that war and law enforcement are two entirely different things and that if you can’t tell the difference, you’re likely to end up dead. They believe in themselves and know that Ronald Reagan was right: The most horrifying words in the English language really are: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” They know that there are deep and meaningful differences between men and women, appreciate those differences while understanding their respective strengths and weaknesses and act accordingly. They judge people of either gender on their abilities and their adherence to PIO. If you’re not practical, hard working and optimistic, what good are you in a world that can’t function without those qualities, regardless of gender? They don’t waste any time in posturing.
Americans don’t have any problem with Barack Obama because he’s black. The problem is that he has no idea what PIO is, or chooses to ignore it. He’s the anti-PIO. He’s not only an elite, but a radical, and a radical of any stripe is a problem. They will ignore what is practical, they will eschew hard work, and they are always focused on the negative because their motivation is entirely their ideology. They are quite unable to do the people’s business, to do the job, because they can’t accurately recognize or diagnose any problem. Instead of doing hard work, they’ll talk it to death or appoint committees and sub committees and panels and blue ribbon commissions that will waste huge amounts of money and time to tell them what they wanted to do in the first place. Because they believe that everything about America is wrong, , they are eternally pessimistic. America can never, in fact, be put entirely right because there will always be those gun and God clinging fools who embody PIO, thus eternal pessimism is, well, eternal.
On a PIO note of optimism, more and more Americans are focusing on this issue and realize that until we, as individuals and a nation, return to the PIO understanding and practice, we’re in very deep trouble, trouble that could plunge the world into a new dark age. We have to be ruthlessly practical, hard working and optimistic to save America. I’m optimistic that we can.
Well done, Mr. McDaniel. I believe your PIO theory is exactly what has given organic rise to the tea party movement. And I also believe that for every tea party attendee, there are 10-20 (or more!) who would be there if they could.
well said Mike.
Well put, Mike.
We’re witnessing very real damage from this administration peopled by academic elites with very little experience in the real world, as shown by the recent chart showing the lack of business experience of Obama’s cabinet members. How do you know what works when you’ve been insulated from the effects of bad decisions?
Pampered, unchallenged, and pompous is no way to go through life. This, unfortunately, describes most of our ruling elite. It’s time we removed the elites from power and replace them with average Americans who possess common sense and practicality.
The Government is not a business!!! Businesses don’t care about people, do not run wars, and do not create foreign policy. Businesses just want to make money. I am glad they do not have as much business experience as the last administration. Also, this article is ridiculous. Of course there are those kinds of people out there. However, just because you are well educated does not mean you are a pompous A**. I am in graduate school and most of my professors farm on the side. This article did make me think you are asking for some kind of Marxist revolution. You are making a Bourgeois vs. proletariat argument. The elites vs. the everyday working man. I find this humorous coming from this site.
> I am in graduate school and most of my professors farm on the side.
What?
In graduate school? Really. You don’t say. Big shocker there. A very deep and analytical thinker thinker too, judging from your post (heavy sigh, eyes rolling)
We are just ranking out these morons faster than we can swat them back it seems.
Do you perhaps have farming confused with gardening?
No. As someone from the Midwest I understand the difference between a garden and a farm. I go to school in Vermont, and my professors have farms.
Brian, are you sure thyey are farms and not just a few acres of land with a cow or two so they can get farm subsuidies? Or does that just work for members of Congress?
“No. As someone from the Midwest I understand the difference between a garden and a farm. I go to school in Vermont, and my professors have farms.”
Most likely they “farm” tax credits and government subsidies.
Brian N,
Hanson calling for a Marxist revolution? You seem to have it a bit backwards, as the “cultural elites” in question are the very ones ironically making note of class, race, and gender differences and “calling” for a revolution (but not against them ,of course). Also, you need to study “postmodernism” a little more.
I think you just made my point for me. It is funny that you do not even realize that you are being brainwashed into becoming the thing you are being taught to despise. The proletariat is the uneducated wage earner. This post is about how the uneducated wage earner needs to rise against the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie here being the educated upper class. Technically it was associated with the people who owned the means of production. As we are a post industrialized society, bourgeoisie would need to take on different connotations. I am making a parallel between the controllers of production and the “cultural elites” that the authors is railing against. It is easier to hate someone with you degrade them and stamp them with a title. It is BS to take the most obnoxious portion of the progressives and attempt to make them the figure head for the movement. I do not accuse everyone here illiterate, inbred and living in a trailer park.
Just a SWAG here Brian, but I’d bet you’re not in a hard science degree program. Something with the word “studies” attached to it, perhaps?
Actually, you are completely wrong. However, thank you for showing me why the right is constantly making horrible stereotypes. I studied biology in undergrad, and now I am going to have something with a doctorate in my title.
Not that it matters, but in fact there is a science in my educational title. Biology one of the hard sciences. My term to guess. You did not go to undergrad.
“…Biology one of the hard sciences.” Epic Fail. Unless you mean biochemistry or biophysics or something that has more math in it than Stat. Plain Biology is just as mushy as the social ‘sciences’, what used to be called studies.
Brian N: You think that businesses don’t care about people, and that governments do? Wow. It’s going to be quite a shock for you if you ever leave school.
I promise you that I have worked more jobs in my life than you ever will. I left school and went back. I am glad to see people on the right do not stereotype and prejudge, I know only people on the left subjugate themselves to that kind of behavior. I have worked for many businesses and they do not care about people. Businesses care about profit. I mean, perhaps a small businesses need to care about the individual, however, most businesses is done by faceless corporations. I have also worked for the government. The people I worked with care about people.
You are confused. Both arguments are working people who own property verses bums and leeches. The latter are the proles/elites
Any business that doesn’t care about pepople soon goes out of business. That’s how you make money, by making people happy.
No govt gives a flying flip about any voter that doesn’t vote for that govt. Just look at the behavior of the current adminstration.
Why do you think that farming on the side, probably with 100′s of thousands in govt subsidies, would make your professors care about anyone?
Would you care to come up with any more marxist vs. the proletariat garbage?
The nasalized voice Dr Hanson may be a western phenomenom. It wasn’t until I arrived in Arizona last year that I wondered
“why do all the young guys sound like they’re on an MTV reality fashion show?”
In graduate school studying, what? Public administration, I bet, or psychology, or social work, or something equally unlikely to contribute to the larger society. I’d be interested to know, Brian, what your professors “farm” — and whether they do their own work, or ‘oversee’ those who do. And, by the way, have they checked the credentials of those they hire? Or would that be too much like following laws they disagree with. Lotta unanswered questions there, Brian. Help us out, now that you’re up there in the ‘elite’.
Brian, you are a great example of an overeducated person – someone who is educated beyond his ability to benefit from it. Further, you are wrong about the “bourgeoisie.” They ARE the hardworking middle class and that is why elites have ALWAYS despised them. There is very little hardworking lower class; most in the lower class in this country do not work. It is also the middle class that defines a country and a culture/society and holds it together – NOT the rich, and NOT the poor. If this regime and the entitled do-nothings in this country succeed in their goal of destroying the middle class, we will have no country left. A movement has sprung up from true grassroots, not fake nutroots, determined to prevent this and to take our country back. You don’t get this and you are working very hard not to get it. Go back to DKos where some idiot appreciates your dead weight.
Well, Brian is probably going to UVM, an bastion of liberal thinking. The one slightly non-leftist political science professor was fired from his job despite being a brilliant man when it comes to the Middle East.
But I have to disagree with you on the label overeducated being slander, to me, the fact that the middle-to-upper middle class is spending more and more time in school is 1. because the elites have pulled the rug out of most blue collar workers and their jobs, forcing cutthroat competition in what is a meritocracy to get decent, if being nebulous in their true value jobs, i.e. a job working for an NGO.
And 2. The boomer generation has both the capital and are the parents of many people seeking degrees, the colleges know this, and are exploiting this fact as well as the fact that jobs have been taken up by the non-retiring boomer class, thus necessitating young people to lay of the job market.
In short, the people seeking education aren’t the bad guys, it again is the multinational owner s of corporations, members born into the elite(sons/daughters of the owners), and those high up in the bureaucracy who make it possible for the elite to dominator everyone.
“Business just want to make money”. Great observation but what do those business do with the money they make? How about paying employees, paying suppliers, paying vendors for advertizing, etc. How about paying local, county, state, and federal taxes? How about the charities that the business supports with sponsorships, donations, etc. How about those organizations that the employees support with their filthy lucre? Maybe I should just tell my 72 employees to pack it up, that the government cares more for them. Then I’ll just hand the keys to the business to the sheriff and he can auction off the assets to pay this year’s taxes and I too can live as a ward of the state. And if enough of us do that, maybe the state can find people who want to build me a place to live, will bring my meals to me, and won’t bother me by sending me a check that I have to cash at an evil bank and go out and buy food from some other evil business that just cares about profit.
Thank you Bert–thank you for providing jobs–it is not an easy thing to be a business owner right now.
> Businesses don’t care about people,
Wow. Just wow. You are truly in for a rude awakening if you think that GOVERNMENTS care about people. Governments care about expanding their own reach and controlling the people as much as possible. That is why we have a Constitution, the goal of which is to LIMIT government power. It’s very telling that Obama’s critique of the Warren court was that it didn’t go far enough in ignoring/supplanting the Constitution.
> do not run wars,
Business is all about war, every day. Against the competition, against regulation… If you ever leave graduate school and actually ever have to get your hands dirty running a business you might someday come to appreciate that.
> and do not create foreign policy.
See the previous. Paraphrasing the famous quotation, foreign policy is simply war by other means. Or vice versa, doesn’t matter.
Well said.
Mike,
That is an awesome response. You should publish it separately. It complements VDH, and takes his article in another direction.
What a pleasure to read this post following VDH’s insightful article.
mikemcdaniel that was a great comment. Your insights and arguements was some of the best I have read in quite a while. I think you should try and do this more often. Good luck to you and keep contributing. We need more clearly spoken writers to defend our great nation.
Terrific answer, Mike. And like another poster, I read David Brooks’ article on the Technocracy boom. (I must be in Bizarro world when I agree with an NYT article).
And for Victor Davis Hanson, your work continues to amaze me. How I would love to be in one of your classes.
Great dicussion, all
Very well said. I think people are developing a craving for competence. I’ve reached a point where can only stand in awe when I witness it.
You are right on. I call them educated idiots. No common sense what-so-ever. I, unfortuanately had the experience of working with some of the educated idiots. They would spend all day telling you how smart they were but could not solve a problem one. I almost had to pity some of young ones as they really thought they were so supporior to the rest of us. These dolts got out school and had their first job and I seriously doubt that none of them even knew how to screw in a light bulb. These are the people we are putting in government, how scarry is that?
about as scary as your spelling
Personally, I’d prefer to drop the “elite” label and call them that which they truly are: pretenders. In this case, uncultured pretenders.
“Poseur” comes to mind:
Main Entry: po·seur
Pronunciation: \pō-ˈzər, ˈpō-zər\
Function: noun
Etymology: French, literally, poser, from poser
Date: 1869
a person who pretends to be what he or she is not : an affected or insincere person
(http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/poseur)
Can’t help but think of the P.J. O’Rourke line, something to the effect, “Everybody wants to help save the world but nobody wants to help mom do the dishes.”
And the scariest words in the language, ANY language: “We’re from the government and we’re here to help”.
Right on JoJo And the scariest words in the language, ANY language: “We’re from the government and we’re here to help”. I’m an anarchist too and we need to take back our country. Corporations do whats best for the people, see Walmarts low, low prices. They take care of me now. I lost my job, company moved it over seas. Good for them. They’ll make more money. Cheaper labor, no dam job killing government rules like minimum wage or 40 hr work week or safety codes or child labor laws like our “government burdens us with. If we didn’t have these stupid laws there would be no need to send the jobs away. It’s the governments fault. Who the hell is the government anyways? Who asked them to bring civilization and order to 360 million people in the U.S.? Don’t want or need no government. Let’s start by eliminating the:
Dept. of Defense, all we need is a strong second ammendment and a well regulated militia to deal with world threats.
Food Inspectors, I grow and kill my own food.
Safety Inspectors Use common sense.
The Federal Aviation Admin. I don’t fly, but common sense tells me the pilots will be careful without rules and someone telling them when and where to land and hows the weather etc. Did the Wright Brothers have a hard time without the FAA. I think not.
Center of Disease Control Take precautions.
Department of Agriculture, I don’t get no crop subsidies like all the liberal elites
Especially the “Ecology Departments that have job killing laws that won’t let me pollute the river up stream from where you live.
This is to name but a few.
Jojo, we can take care of ourselves, and anyone who gets in our way or threatens our survival.
Signed, Road Warrior.
There are not enough superlatives to describe this article!
What about Ron Paul and Victor Hanson running for Pres/VP together in 2012?
I am sure Prof. Hanson would never consider partnering himself with a man who considers Hamas to be a legitimate government.
Unfortunately, were he to run for President, we would be the poorer for not having the benefit of his thinking. There is no way any political “advisors” and “aides” would permit his freewheeling thoughts to be expressed/published. He would be in a straitjacket.I would not think he would appreciate this.
Are you kidding?
I’m sure there are people out there who are allied to “untruth,” romanticize nature, are muscular (??), have prissy voices, and are illogical, but this guy makes it seem like there are masses of them. Am I really supposed to believe that office buildings across the country are filled with such people and that they’re controlling us all? Or this guy fantasizing?
If he can create straw men about the “elite,” then I’d like to propose some straw man characteristics for “values conservatives:” They complain about fancy lefties and the decline of family values and then run off with hot young internet studs, pockets bulging with pundit cash.
Those with a “mental disorder” often exhibit self destructive behaviour!
Sometimes this is caused by rebellion because maybe they perhaps resented their mother…or resent their financial lack of status…
Those with a “mental disorder” have a propensity to “believe”/worship all sorts of rubbish (jiberalism/progressiveschism)…particularly if they are “religiously secular”… or “ultra religiously secular”…
I’ve been arguing for years that one of the reasons we hear so much in the way of untruth and just plain ignorant nonsense from politicians is that few of them have ever had to bear the burden of the actions. Few have had to experience the consequences of their economic and social legislation, except in the rare instance when one of them is caught in a financial or romantic scandal, and then that happens only when the scandal is exposed in a venue other than the MSM. Most politicians are as distant from reality as they are from work-a-day Americans, who actually produce wealth in contrast to politicians siphoning it off and erecting a multitude of obstructions. They can always count on Americans to “do something” to offset the destructiveness of political irresponsibility. Well, the day is coming when more and more Americans will simply refuse to “do something.” They will go on strike against the government and the cannibalistic philosophy that is eating us all alive.
Who is John Galt?
Our world is certainly richer because we have Steven Chu and curators at the National Gallery and miltary historians. I have never been envious of people with special talents. I don’t even mind that some of these people tend to have their heads in the clouds so long as they recognize their limits and appreciate the talents and wisdom of the less glamorous. What does bother me is that rather mediocre people can now conspicuously consume their way into what they define as elite and bar the talented from entry on the basis of status symbols and a PC outlook.
I remember from my school days, civics classes and text book chapters on how a bill becomes a law. Perhaps now we need books for the priviledged young on how a calf becomes a $5000 designer handbag, fully illustrated with pictures from the slaughterhouse and tannery. And the first 500 subscribers to the book series will receive an exclusive set of fragrances from the locales pictured.
Absolutely correct.
Hypocrisy – a life based on lies – causes its own demise and it certainly looks as if we are heading towards a severe reckoning.
Unfortunately the elites hang on longest because they are the crooks and conmen that have elevated themselves to the top of the pack. But ultimately they, too, must sink.
It is all terribly sad.
Don’t you just hate that liberal elites always know, they just “know,” what’s best for everybody? You sir MUST have universal healthcare. Madam, you just have to have Cap and Trade to save the planet. It’s what the “enlightened” Europeans do, so we have to be as “sophisticated” as they are and copy them, regardless of the fact that their social policies have bankrupted their nations and flung them into indebtedness. No matter, the elites know what’s best for us. No use for common sense here, let alone people with more experience who probably know better.
The elites are so very, very, smart and have graduated from the “best” universities, like our president, so they just have to know what’s best for us, right? No need for any political experience here. A “top-notch” university diploma is all you need, right? Say, how’s that Harvard-educated president of ours doing these days? Isn’t that Law Review credit on his thin resume going a long way in dealing with the Iranians?
Like I said, God save us from those elites who know what’s “best” for us. It’s the rest of the world that gets stuck picking up the pieces for their mistakes.
I certainly agree with the general critique of the lifestyle of upper middle class America and their tendency to hire other people to cut their lawns and trees so that they can go to the gymn and ride their bikes, but the clever sleight-of-hand here is to conflate this with “liberalism” rather than modern culture. How many people have graduated from let’s say, the top 100 colleges in the last fifty years? Are these the cultural elite…or just the one’s whose politics VDH does not like? Should we admire the manly calloused hands of union “thugs?”
If conservatives believe in results, and these elites have achieved “success,” (as opposed to others who haven’t) are they valid examples of “making it in America,” as opposed to the farmer, who has just lost his water or the skilled factory worker whose job just went to China? How about the fact that with modern agriculture, we simply don’t need nearly as many farmers? Sigh.
Alas, the route to success in our culture is a little more complicated than having broad shoulders, a deep voice, and an ability to fix a leaky toilet, although the latter seems to be a fairly reliable way to make a living and being tall is clearly linked to the likelihood for higher income. I’m sorry that poor VDH has to deal with snotty Stanfordites and exacts his pond of flesh here, because I actually believe in many of the ways of life and virtues he espouses.
The sad fact is that the worker/non-elites portion of society has its own share of idiots, abusers of every one and every thing, with all the (strongly) male and female virtues and vices. Or we could talk about the military, but will save that for another day.
Hey, our society chose an ex-wise ass, quasi-oilman, silver spoon-in-mouth fraternity boy from our cultural elite for its President for eight years, then chose Obama, from evidently, a different element of the cultural elite, given VDH’s take on things. This seems to me to be a reasonable rhythm in American elitism. But the sad fact is that few have any good ideas on how to strengthen our economy. It is global free trade and government regulation that has gotten us to this point, but it is not likely that we are going to go backwards on health and safety standards, one’s that China has yet to deal with at all. Can we hold out and maintain some semblance of a successful society until China’s engines begin to overheat and throws a rod?
Let’s face it, our society has not been the same since we realized that tobacco was killing us and began the massive societal shift toward health regulations, damaging terribly one of our most profitable industries…and making us all worry about we smokes, ate, drank, and breathed. Damn those progressive wussies; they have spoiled everything. Once the genie was let out of the bottle and the manly Marlboro man predictably got his lung cancer (I will probably die of it as well) and women decided that they wanted a share of the pie that was rightfully theirs, and if they had to redefine reproductive rights, then sobeit…society changed. Along with this shift came millions of unintended consequences as they always do.
Hey, some people don’t mind progress, it’s just change that they can’t stand.
There are idiots in all groups of people; most suffer the results of their idiocy. The new aristocracy is immune and that is the insanity.
The progress and change most of us don’t like is rolling in from the current aristocracy. This includes the odious “progress” of ignoring the rule of law, the equal protection under the law for all Americans. This includes the “progress” of ignoring laws they don’t like. This includes the “progress” of edicts of regulations that are unconstitutional but oh so much easier than actual laws debated before the country. This “progress” includes the hamstringing of states trying to protect their boarders and their people from oil coating their beaches or the invasion that brings drugs, kidnappings, robberies and murders at a dizzying rate (and quite possible hundreds of terrorists).
That is the kind of change and “progress” we can do without.
Real progress doesn’t make the majority of Americans scratch their heads and wonder “what the hell?”
The Ancien Regime of France in the late 1700s was equally removed from the people as are ours today and today’s aristocrats risk the same result.
I am happy to have change but I would like a few bills, too. Bush was certainly a member of the elites but we knew his grades and he did some work with his hands. I was unhappy about the spending on his watch but the magnitude of his failures pale in comparison to the present runaway train we are trying to stop.
“…but the clever sleight-of-hand here is to conflate this with “liberalism” rather than modern culture.”
I don’t think that was the intention at all. At least it’s not how I interpreted it. The “intention”, as I understood it, was to show that those who are just about the furthest disconnected from the type of life that demands you know how to fix a toilet because you can’t afford someone else to do it, are the very ones who want to tell you what the seat has to be made of, how much water it’s allowed to hold in the tank, that it be manufactured by union workers and then top it all off with suggesting you pee in the shower instead, to save the water.
Not all liberals (nor all conservatives) are in a position to dictate to the rest of us. That the ones described above identify themselves as “liberal” or “progressive” is their choice, not ours.
Dwight, you are all over the place with your response – struggling hard to justify the illogical as with most liberals. But you do hint at a problem here.
The progressives can indeed point to positive changes over the years that align with their current talking points and also to a lot of Republican abuses of power. This allows them to maintain the allegiance of so many people who will ironically be badly hurt by their massive ascendency to power.
The only real evil in our society is unchecked power. Government must remain limited and its focus must be on protecting our liberty, providing only the most basic services that cannot be reasonably performed by free people in a free market and preventing monopolies, cartels and control freaks from tilting the playing field in one direction or another.
Progressives and the liberal elite are creating their own monster cartel consisting of people in government, universities and unions – aided and abetted by Hollywood and the MSM. But unlike US Steel of old, they can do much more than underpay and overcharge us. They can create laws that steal our rights and resources in order to maintain and increase their personal wealth and power. This is always done for the collective good of course – as determined by them.
Obama-Pelosi-Reid and their Progressive minions are far more dangerous to the average American than a “wise ass fraternity boy” and his friends. Don’t think so? Watch and see.
I think it was William F. Buckley who said he would rather be governed by the first 200 people in the NY phone book than by Congress. I would add that I would take a fraternity boy (or sorority sister)selected at random over Obama or Bush – so long as they believed in freedom and the free market principles that have made this country great.
I’ll second that
Great post. It was William F. Buckley who said that he would rather be ruled by the first two thousand names in the Boston phone book than by the faculty of Harvard College. I think we all know why.
If conservatives believe in results, and these elites have achieved “success,”
—
I don’t consider getting oneself elected or appointed to a high paying office to constitute success.
“Should we admire the manly calloused hands of union “thugs?”
What a crock. The “manly calloused hands…”? All that heavy manual labor at the DMV? Or Child Protective Services? Or the Dept of Revenue? Since the Teamsters last great strike of 1973 (when they actually had a real influence on the economy via refusing to work) & Reagan’s repudiation of PATCO in ’81 – unionism – once recogignized as the salvation of the middle class – has been competely dead.
There hasn’t been any semblance of a labor leader in this country since Lane Kirkland – AND HE WAS AN ALLY OF RONALD REAGAN!
If Kirkland was alive today HE WOULD BE FIGHTING AGAINST LABOR SECRETARY SOLIS at virtually every turn! Because she is the typical left leaning stooge – claiming solidarity with ‘working people’ because she was raised in a working poor hispanic household…before she plugged into the very protected class VDH elequently describes to get the promotion to be mook in charge as she is today.
Unions folded – then festered – into big government – state & federal. They are a boil on the ass of the American Economy. Go back to your cave Dwight and study american history in the heady decades of the Guilded Age – circa 1880 through the end of the century. Then it was called the ‘civil service’ – exemplified by the political corruption of the port of New York, New York.
The political extortion we are dealing with as a country today – led by such states as California, New York, Ill., New Jersey – NOTABLY ALL STATES WHERE DEMOCRATS HAVE LONG HELD MAJORITY IF NOT GENERATIONAL ONE PARTY RULE – AND ALL STATES WHERE PUBLIC UNIONS HAVE BEEN DOING THE EXTORTING – such extortion is nothing new to our politics.
Unions helped rebuild the american middle class in the postwar 40′s, 50′s, & 1960′s. But that trade unionism has been dead for a generation. At it’s core was a true protestant work ethic, coupled with on-going education absorbing state of the art technology(learned and applied on the job), and, Father to Son nepotism.
It all dove-tailed nicely in a manufacturing dominated economy back in the day. And besides the American Military taking over most of the old trade school dominated skilled labor ‘schools’, divesting unions of a duty they no longer cared to pretend to offer, the nature of the workplace dramatically changed from it’s once male dominated union friendly complextion.
Working people today have little party affilitaion because they have so little representation. Arguably it helps explain the diffuse nature of the anger in our politics. They know they are getting screwed, and that they are on their own.
They ignore the dimwits like Dwight. Because they are too busy pursuing their happiness via mikemcdaniel perscription. PIO bro.
Why look for the Union label when it’s on the boot (MADE AT THE DMV) at your neck?
The only people who have ever benefited from unions are the people who run them.
The gains claimed by the union apologists were either acheived before unions came into being, or were the result of other forces.
The only thing unions have ever been any good at are enriching those who run them, and pumping out propaganda.
Most of those attracted to government work or politics become somewhat collective in their approach to social problems if not vehemently so. It helps to come by it naturally (liberal family) rather than acquire it through osmosis (Bush family compassion/cronyism/liberal-light).
What the workingman is concerned with are his results, his individual successes- not that of others. What the soft-handed, Metro liberal is concerned with are the results they think can be achieved by the many with a few nudges and pushes to guide them, even if it means stepping on a few liberties along the way. As time progresses though, more and more liberties are trashed in the name of ‘progress’ toward this collective utopia.
The mayor of my very small town is a collectivist. My state representatives and state senators are collectivists, as are my US Senators and my Hollywood governor (whose family has direct ties to the Kennedy Clan).
There is no one representing the individual, from my town to Congress. Nobody to stand between me and the government where communitarianism trumps every act when any, and I mean any, public interest, no matter how infinitesimal, can be found to exist, much the way our Commerce Clause is stretched and molded to include every act humanly possible.
I don’t begrudge civil servants or elites who are just trying to do a job that doesn’t require knowledge of plumbing or construction. What concerns me is that their ‘public’ employment somehow becomes a collectivist mission. ‘Public’, in this case has been redefined. What public really is, is a collection of individuals with varying skills and ambitions who need protection from overbearing regulation/government when it reduces liberty at the slightest provocation.
The woman’s vote is a blessing today. We’ll see mothers, wives, and daughters voting their family’s best interests- presumably shared by government, but, through every fault of their own, having a desperate impact on families while boosting the ‘communities’ share of bounty ever so negligently. A correction is coming, best for some to bone-up on some skills they probably wouldn’t have considered complimentary to their Masters Degree. Raising food and canning it is one that comes to mind.
“What the workingman is concerned with are his results, his individual successes- not that of others.”
OK I got it me, me, me is clearly good.
“What the soft-handed, Metro liberal is concerned with are the results they think can be achieved by the many with a few nudges and pushes to guide them, even if it means stepping on a few liberties along the way.”
Yes, yes, got it again, recognizing others is bad because it goes against the afore mentioned me, me, me.
“The mayor of my very small town is a collectivist.”
I too wish that my mayor only represented me, me, me and not everybody in town.
“My state representatives and state senators are collectivists”
They just don’t realize that my wellbeing is more important than everybody else in the district.
“as are my US Senators and my Hollywood governor.”
They all need to get their heads on straight that there is only one person in this entire state that matters. Me and I don’t care about all the other people. As i said at the beginning of this post, the only thing that matters to me are “my individual results, individual successes – not that of others.”
The reason I trust me, and not you, to make decisions about me, is that I know more about me than you do. And likewise, since you know more about you than I do, you should trust you and not me to make decisions about you. When people presume to know more about others than those others know about themselves, they generally proceed to make ill-informed decisions — and it is so easy to do when only the others, and not “me”, are negatively affected by those decisions. That is why “me” is so important to the concept of liberty. All liberty is personal — the freedom of me to act for me, as long as nobody else is injured by my actions. Today’s cultural elites are dangerous precisely because they know so little about themselves and presume to know so much about everybody else.
What really defines the “enlightened elite’” is the commonality of their “experiences”.
A rather obscure poet (whose name I forget, that’s how obscure he is) once commented that two people who meet in a bar find out that they’ve both read his work, and immediately decide that they constitute an aristocracy. This is more-or-less how the “elite’” decide who is or isn’t “part of the club”. And by extension, who is therefore qualified to run everything.
The government panel set up to decide about what to do re offshore drilling after the Deepwater Horizon disaster is a case in point. There are no experts in oil drilling, deepwater ops, or even energy production of any kind on the panel. However, there are several people from various “ecology” groups who are implacably hostile to “Big Oil”, not to mention nuclear power, hydroelectric power, and indeed technology in general. Exactly what they will decide (since they have the authority to order a permanent ban on offshore drilling) is pretty much a foregone conclusion.
Never mind that their “shared experience” is rather like those two poetry mavens in the bar.
When decisions affecting everyone are made by a small group of ideologues solely on the basis of their own dogmas, you have an elite’. You also have a recipe for catastrophe.
clear ether
eon
Great comment. Thanks for the contribution to our understanding.
“…various “ecology” groups who are implacably hostile to “Big Oil”…”
I hate the ecology groups who spilled oil all over the gulf of mexico!!!! How dare they want this kind of stuff not to happen. Don’t they know that the responsible oil companies would do it the right on the honor system alone. Clearly the ecology groups are all wrong.
“The government panel set up to decide about what to do re offshore drilling after the Deepwater Horizon disaster is a case in point. There are no experts in oil drilling, deepwater ops, or even energy production of any kind on the panel. However, there are several people from various “ecology” groups…”
Gosh you are so much smarter than the people who actually did call in experts on oil drilling, deepwater ops, energy, and ecology to discuss alternate options to the issue. If they had called you too, would you feel better?
“When decisions affecting everyone are made by a small group of ideologues solely on the basis of their own dogmas, you have an elite’. You also have a recipe for catastrophe.”
Wait, wait, i don’t get it who do we hate? Cuz this sure sounds like it applies to every parent, principle, dean, boss, mayor, governor, president or alpha male/female you and I have ever known. Is it that we just hate authority?
Man up – be the authority.
Wuss
>“…various “ecology” groups who are implacably hostile to “Big >Oil”…”
>
>I hate the ecology groups who spilled oil all over the gulf of >mexico!!!!
Nor did BP want this to happen. They were negligent.
“Shit happens” ~Aristotle
>“The government panel set up to decide about what to do re >offshore drilling after the Deepwater Horizon disaster is a >case in point. …”
>
>Gosh you are so much smarter than the people who actually did >call in experts on oil drilling, deepwater ops, energy, …
Is he calling for that? Or is he pointing out that NO panel in Washington is solving the blowout over weeks, no, they’re deciding hmmm what should we do about oil? I know, tax it! Then they’ll hop on their government jets and go home….
>“When decisions affecting everyone are made by a small group of >ideologues solely on the basis of their own dogmas, you have an >elite’. You also have a recipe for catastrophe.”
>
>Wait, wait, i don’t get it who do we hate? Cuz this sure sounds >like it applies to every parent, principle, dean, boss, mayor, >governor, president or alpha male/female you and I have ever >known. Is it that we just hate authority?
Some people do hate their parents; all of us are under their complete legal authority until the age of majority.
As for the others — change schools, ditto, quit, move, move, move, stop answering your phone.
The “moves” I’d like to signal out — with the exception perhaps of principal, YOU choose them, they are not chosen FOR YOU. So YOU have to move???
So much for passive rights trumping active rights…. Perhaps THAT injustice (in the Scottish Enlightenment sense) is why so many, including the author, are PTFO…!?!
>Man up – be the authority.
>
>Wuss
No comment necessary.
Ah yes, the Übermenschen among us… too bad they can’t be sent to the countryside for re-education…
Lenin/Stalin: Class-based International Socialism
Hitler: Race-based National Socialism
Obama: Class- and Race-based Post-National Socialism
“Ah yes, the Übermenschen among us… too bad they can’t be sent to the countryside for re-education…”
Lenin/Stalin: Class-based International Socialism
Hitler: Race-based National Socialism”
NEWSFLASH!!!!
“Class-based International Socialism” = CONSERVATIVE
“Race-based National Socialism” = CONSERVATIVE
Ethnic Cleansing = CONSERVATIVE
Book Burning = CONSERVATIVE
Apartheid = CONSERVATIVE
What happened to the era of Harvard and Yale men lined up to join TRs Rough Riders as enlisted soldiers?
Excellent article Professor Hansen; it shows much insight to what we have now. The ruling elite are exactly as you portray them but also they are extremely unhappy; even they know that they are frauds and they are the ones keeping the drug and porno industries in America booming. It is also evident that the elites have distorted our language and they speak a language which is becoming almost incoherent. Just listen to the tv commercials that permeate our airways and ask yourself the question what are they trying to sell. Listen to a speech by a noted scholar or University professor and ask yourself what is he saying. The products of our educatonal system speak a language which can best be described as nasal tweets. The corruption of language is the first goal of a totalitarian regime, as Karl Kraus the early 20th century Austrian wrote.
yawn
a desire to find nothing commendable in the lives of ‘elites’ is inverse snobbery
the antipathy these cloistered forums breed worries me
like the aversion to ‘nasal’ accents
and it’s still a democracy
live and let live
I would be interested in reading what you think the commendable aspects of the elite are. I’ve tried to come up with a few, just to get the ball rolling.
1) Strong desire to look younger and sexier than they in fact are.
2) Strong desire to avoid direct association with anything having to do with raising children.
3) Strong desire to get as much media time as is consistent with their day jobs, with the goal of quitting said day jobs and becoming celebrities.
4) Strong desire to avoid doing any sort of arithmetic in public.
.
.
.
Anything else?
Actually, there is an interesting sociology experiment going on right now. Highly educated couples from the “right” schools marry and have a couple of children. Then the mother turns her eugenically selected children over to a barely literate nanny to raise. I wonder how it will turn out ?
Yes, you and Dr. Hanson fail to realize the most obvious flaw in the ointment. Their sex lives. Such phoney men can’t fall in love with a women only the image. Their drug of choice is Viagra. It helps them fake reality.
I don’t doubt that many would be jolly guys to hang out with, if they would do so. Actions speak louder than words however. The actions we are seeing are just odious and destructive.
The difference lies in the live and let live part. The ruling elites currently do not share your sentiments of live and let live. Whatever reverse snobbery might exist doesn’t have as its goal the acquisition of wealth and power gained by sacrificing the welfare of others. Indeed, the entire excersise of power as envisioned by todays opposition to these elites lies in their desire to not use it. THAT’S live and let live.
“Live and let live” is a great motto. It seemed to work pretty well when it was tried before. Let’s give it a try again.
When exactly was that? Before the civil war?
When did the “inability to find anything commendable” warp into the “desire not to find anything commendable”?
Your desire to defend the indefensible has caused you to warp your mind beyond recovery.
Sir:
US taxpayers assumed our ruling class was motivated by a shared love of country, and a superior intellect. Since 1960 that trust has been abused like a rented mule by a ruling class–with or without nasal accents–that exhibit neither.
Effete pundits celebrated the collapse of our manufacturing base for a cleaner, safer “service economy,” thinking the entire US would be better off if modeled after their favorite college town.
NAFTA opened the US to sales in return for access to markets too poor to buy much of what we sell. In Northern california, large areas of once productive land are idle to protect a small fish of no value to anyone except officials in Washington D.C., who would resent human beings, and their damnable carbon footprints.
Our business schools eschew manufacturing experience and worship statistics and finance, the betetr to serve the new manufacturers whos end their profits back to China or India. Shop classes in high school were replaced by deadly boring math exercises that would have driven Henry Ford, the founders of US Steel and William Boeing to drink.
Large school districts have become unionized fiefdoms where the interests of the children come last, while lustily cheered on by liberal-minded big city newspapers and the “better people,” that cannot grasp how literacy was higher before unionized schools (I must credit Obama-he has tried a bit to break the strangelehold of the unions).
In Los Angeles, the city is doing exactly what the “neanderthals” said it would have to do if spending was not controlled: the chattering classes who said spending was a mere neurotic obsession of the right wingers now see the libraries closed, hospitals curtailed, etc., all to better fund the pensions and benefits of thousnds of retired union employees.
ON the state level, California is even worse off. Its total collapse barred only by the “neanderthal,” “backward,” “mean” part of its legislature that knows handing over MORE tax revenue to the feckless legislature is like handing a bottle of vodka to a Los Angeles actress in a substance abuse clinic.
As my minute minion, markthegreat, notes above, our view is not based on a “desire” to see no good in this class. Rather it is based on decades of watching the good-hearted and trusting voters–good and decent people–defer to those they assumed and were told were smarter. We can see the results.
Our manufacturing base never collapsed. It is still there. The US manufactures as much as ever, they do it with fewer workers.
NAFTA has benefited millions by giving them access to less expensive products so that they have money to spend on other things. As to other countries being too poor to buy our stuff, that’s easily refutable by pointing to all the stuff bought by people in other countries.
Japan was once a poor country, they are now rich.
Korea was once a poor country, they are now getting rich.
Taiwain was once a poor country, they are now rich.
Learn to look beyond the populist nonsense and visit the real world.
What crap. All it takes is a visit to the mall to see how little is now made in the US. Most clothing and other items are made in China or other Asian and/or Eastern countries. I spent all day shopping today in North County San Diego and found not one item I wanted to buy. The quality sucks. Time for a reemergence of American manufacturing.
Are you s__tting me, Pyle? Japan is not rich, they’re God damned broke — their national debt was about 105% of their GDP, last I checked. Come up with a better example.
There’s an aspect of this you haven’t touched on; some substantial number of people who won’t ever be part of this elite identify with it and adopt its ideas and attitudes. I think it’s OK that you haven’t touched on it, since I think it’s a separate topic, but it is important, because the only way of making it unimportant is to say that these non-elite people are the same fools the elite take the non-elite to be; one would seem to be undermining one’s own claim that the non-elite are worthy. Anyway, I find these people disgusting. I’m not sure what more I can say.
You make an excellent point, Smoking Frog. One of my closest friends from childhood never finished community college, but he is very skilled with mechanical things and he has his own business. Although he is very bright and capable, and although he has a good knowledge and understanding of very many subjects, he has also bought fully into the postmodern narrative which informs the thinking of so many of our cultural elites. Although I and another close friend of his both attended elite universities and have rejected the kind of thinking so popular among our classmates, our friend the small businessman is a big watcher of PBS and the mainstream media and regards with suspicion any alternative sources of news and information.
I’ve noticed this as well, and you’ve opened up a whole new topic here.
My feeling is that this class of people may make up a sizable minority of people in this country and a majority of middle-class and upper-middle-class people between 16 and 40.
They have swallowed, hook, line and sinker, all the premises for the elite’s right to rule and they ape elites as much as they possibly can, but, though they aspire to it, most will never join the ranks of the elite.
In fact, after they’ve graduated from just-slightly-less-than-elite universities like LSU and Western Michigan, they’re now having lots and lots of trouble finding jobs that don’t make them feel that they’re settling for something beneath them.
There are millions of these people out there. Who knows? After a decade or so of struggle and failure for the vast majority of them, they may get angry and turn against the elites. Or, after having “settled” for more useful, but less “elite” careers, they may decide they no longer care.
Oh, come on man! Why’d you have to trash LSU??? GEAUX TIGERS!!!
I’m certain VDH sees much more of the “new castrati” in California than we do here in Ohio. Don’t you worry Dr. Hanson, we are still growing men who can shovel snow and dirt here in the midwest.
Once again, a home run!! Having been a stonemason (Blucasstoneworks.com) albeit one with a college degree,for over 20 years, I could see this elitism coming for some time. I can’t begin to tell of the times I got the “you must be doing this because you aren’t smart enough to do anything else” line. Many of the “upper class” are poorly educated and unable to discuss music, classical literature, or even how to plant and grow a garden. There are plenty of the “green” types out there that will run to Whole Foods for their organic produce, but look at you in disbelief if you suggest to them that they try planting their own veggies.If the country does slide into the crapper, these elites and their ilk will get a good slap in the face. . . .it will be quite the shock to see the working man, with his strength, guns and common sense, rise to the occasion,taking care of business, while they whine in the corner,waiting to be helped once again. I would love to see the “o” actually do some physical work. . . I bet my 11 year old son could outwork him without even trying.
This is an excellent description of a class of people removed by several degrees from direct interaction with the real world.
They have achieved this move into the far depths of the Platonic Cave by the protective walls of, for example, postmodern verbiage where words operate solely within the voice, unreferenced to and unrelated to any real objects or events. Academia and political domains are the two chief sites of this verbiage.
Their refusal to connect directly to reality means that their words to you are also an authority, an order – because you cannot dispute and question a reality that doesn’t exist. Therefore, when Obama declares that his ‘stimulus’ worked because, despite his promise that unemployment would not rise above 8.5%, and it has, his new rhetoric is that we must be grateful because it isn’t 15%. How can one question such a statement? One shows one’s lack of gratitude by so doing.
Then there’s money, derived not from direct acts but from indirect sites such as the government that takes its money from the genuine hands-on worker. This means that for this elite class, there is no accountability for their acts and words. Bad decisions that they make in the seminar room and in govt boardrooms don’t stop their income and power; their rhetoric and those walls can always Blame Bush, so to speak.
As for logic, it cannot exist in this class because they have removed their words and actions from direct reference to reality. Their logical statements that, for example, are set up in the IF-THEN framework have that important real connection between the two phrases totally cut and disconnected. The ‘then’ phrase becomes virtual, it exists only in the imaginary.
Again, as Obama said, IF you don’t pass my stimulus, THEN…a major economic depression will occur’. This second part is untestable, it’s imaginary, it’s apocalpytic.
When logic is removed from its requirement to ground its general axioms in particular reality, statements fly to the moon, so to speak; they become totally imaginary and untestable. So, Obama can claim that ‘doctors cut off limbs to get money’, or that ‘the Arizona illegal immigration law means that someone with dark skin eating an ice cream can be grabbed by the police’ or that Islamic jihadism doesn’t exist and all we have are ‘man-caused disasters’.
As an additional concern by this intentional removal of a class of people, empowered by govt money, from direct contact with reality – this lack of grounding also means that this class lacks morality and ethics. That’s because morality and ethics is grounded in a direct contact with reality. If you remove an individual from direct contact with the real results of his acts – then any act is possible, any act becomes justified within the isolate world of his words. Reality no longer exists against which to measure one’s behaviour and thoughts.
A class, operating as the authority in our society – authority in our educational system, in our government -which is disconnected from reality, from morality, from reason and which lives only within its own rhetoric – that’s dangerous. That means that justice, the rule of law, reason – none of it exists anymore.
“And who any more would take a look at the boy’s shoulders in comparison to his behind..”
No one in the liberal Democrat world for sure..
Take a look at Obama the next time he prances on the stage or across the south Whitehouse lawn towards Marine 1.
That was a salute..?
Our Commander in Chief..?
#4- Russ, you are quite correct.
I worked in the advertising and entertainment world for 30 years.
They are not culturally elite, nor elite. They are pretending for acceptance into an imagined ruling class.
Up to now, the American people humored such pretensions.
But now the pretenders are threatening our freedom and safety for their continued status.
I think this will come to a head in our lifetime.
I always said that had Rabelais, Swift, Moliere, Montesquieu or Twain been around in our times’ America, they’ve nailed liberals and lefties big time for their glaring hypocrisy, pretensions, arrogance, group-think and overall obnoxiousness – this sector of the American demographics is an El Dorado for an authentic satirical writer -
Yet, some cultural implosion reasons, the satire in America has a Soviet official style, where assigned writers – Maher or Colbert – deliver boring lines and crowds obediently applaud them -
Very astute essay, Doc, and once again right on mark.
@ #3. mikemcdaniel, well said.
and once again right on mark
—
Ouch.
Don’t forget that when the results from working out don’t quite meet one’s expectations, there’s always cosmetic augmentation.
A very good essay, Mr. Hanson, but it has a very bad title. I don’t pity our “elites” any more than I pity a cockroach because the poor creature does not have health insurance.
“PRETENDERS”???? How about “PREDATORS”? Sucking the blood out of those they discount as stupid fly-over racists.
Regarding voices and the sound thereof:
Relativists believe that “Man is the measure of all things…” However, old Plato stated that “God is the measure of all things…”
If God breathed His Spirit in us, and God is truth… when we speak… out comes either: Relativist’s “untruth and untruth’s spirit” or… God’s “truth and truth’s spirit!:
So you have reawakened in us ancient principles about how to know who is saying what! Fools will ever sound like, well, fools… if we can keep from being fools ourselves!
This is why we appreciate your reconfirming truths. Thank you, professor Hanson.
Brilliant!Sadly, such insights should be everyday common sense.RE the men’s voices (notes from a fan of old movies) — it’s interesing to contrast the conflicted male actors of today with those in the Audie Murphy Universal studio westerns of the 1950s. They were grown-up, war veteran men, not boys or eternal Peter Pans — not pretty but you knew they could get the job done.
Remember the “higher truth” meme? When a lefty gets caught in a lie they will always claim they are speaking about a “higher truth.” Thus when a story about an adolescent drug addict finally is unmasked as having no factual ground, the alleged journalist claims she’s speaking about a “higher truth” that there are inner city adolescent drug addicts — which may be true, but as there are no actual reports on them I can’t state a definite opinion.
Also, these elites, and the whole socialist/communist/fascist theology (it replaces God with The State) is nothing more than an updated feudalism. It is totally anti-Enlightenment. No more will Adam be allowed to touch the finger of The State.
And in order to get rid of these elites, the people have got to stop voting for those who attended Ivy League schools.
Cornhead:
And lawyers, and corrupt inside the circle politicians, and media propagandists, and Bush offspring and Clinton like and Clinton lite, and those whose highest qualification for high position is gender or sexual orientation.
The problems we face as a country have been identified and regurgitated over and over and over. But the question remains, who on the scene today has the knowledge, patriotism, courage and the willingness to stand up and raise an army of voters who are dedicated to ridding us of our Marxist Dictator without splitting the conservative votes in the 2012 primaries in 15 different directions. Someone whom those of us who believe in a Constitutional Republic can rally around and get the hard work done. It will not be simply another professional politician. That’s way too easy. The job we face now requires some extremely heavy lifting.
It’s time to name names and start to build a concensus for a candidate for America rather than a condidate for self. Talk and BS walk but money still talks. The RNC will never offer up a candidate who can compete with the global Marxist machine.
The reality is that Obama and his Teleprompter can put millions of “Americans” in the streets any time he chooses to do so. Gray hair and Tea Bags don’t concern him a bit. He’s willing to go over the edge of the cliff. He demonstrates that every day in every way in every move he makes.
Time is of the essence. Who is He or She?
Not yet. Things will be clearer after November 2. That will give us control of pacing, timing etc.
Gylippus:
Thank you for a substantive response, one of the very few. You may well be right. But fleeting hope is all that remains in my toolbox. This is a place we’ve never been before in this country. No maps, no charts and no visible uncorruptable leadership coming over the mountain as far as I can see.
Three possible leaders: Tom Coburn, Mitch Daniels and Tim Pawlenty.
Long shot: Paul Ryan.
Ruled out: Sarah Palin (too little experience and she’s not tested).
What about:
Bob Riley? (Current governor of Alabama)
Sonny Perdue? (Current governor of Georgia)
Mitch Daniels? (Current governor of Indiana)
It’s looters verses the producers.
Atlas Shrugged…
One thing for sure, whatever you call the elitists, they sure got it out for everyone not of their station in life.
They have basically robbed the America they abhor clean of everything of value in terms of prosperity earned by the sweat of the brow and the callus of the hand in pursuit of an elite privileged existence.
Look all around, the only prosperity and wealth in America is in the hands, and under the control of this class of special privilege.
And it is getting worse by the day.
The old question of what do men with power and money want? More power and more money.
This is in a nutshell is the Truth of the elite ruling class. All the rest is The Big Lie.
VDH: you seem to have said all that needs saying on the subject.
Now how do we ensure that all who need to hear it actually hear it?
#34: how do we ensure that all who need to hear it actually hear it?
Why bother? Those who need to hear it won’t believe it anyway.
FDR, for all his progressivism, was a uniter who was able to demonstrate sympathy for the common American (regardless of how much he might have really felt it). Today’s progressive elites show unmasked contempt for a large portion of the populace. I do not think there has been such a stark division among the citizenry since the Civil War. The country is straining under the tension between two political visions–the transnational socialism of the elites against the more self-reliant, traditional, and exceptionalist convictions of “common” Americans. Something has to give, but I doubt that I shall live to witness the Aufhebung of this particular dialectic.
Several humorous cartoons related to this topic
See the left’s lack of logic at http://drawfortruth.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/compalinsons-comparing-sarah-to-other-politicians-2/
And their acceptance and/or promotion of “untruth” at http://drawfortruth.wordpress.com/category/truthfulness/
The “elite” are often victims of deceit from riches. Only the hard working and the generous have the proper respect for money and are not deceived by it. The Washington/Hollywood elite find themselves under the principality of deception because of greed. Show me the politician who has not or will not feather his or her nest by finding a way to spend other peoples money in the favor of a few at the expense of the many and you will have found a public servant.
So the lies and self deception of the “elite” continue to grow exponentially as the greed increases. Washington D.C. has become a principality of deception where the very atomsphere is one of self deception. Hollywood is all about deception (fiction on film) so it is no surprise that the deceivers are themselves deceived but for the same reason, the deception of riches not earned with honest hard work. It should be no surprise that all of this current greed happened to coincide with the greatest economic expansion in history. Watch and see what happens when the money dries up. Does anyone think that the “elite” are now so deceived that they will take everything they can get their hands because they now believe it’s theirs to control.
Hang up your phone.
I stopped when I read “Barack Obama was a genius …”
Sorry, but you jumped the shark.
Have to agree. Hanson’s eloquence can also be seen as a reliance on endless verbosity to compensate for calling the Obama Presidency for what it really is. Do that, and you have to support immediate impeachment. VDH and most of the regular contributors simply refuse to admit how far things have gone.
There’s quite a bit of insight to be gained into our cultural-elite phenomenon in Arnold Mitchell’s The Nine American Lifestyles (1982). In the mid-80s, I was convinced his Societally Conscious lifestyle (your cultural elite) would be the salvation of the country. Five years later I was having doubts. Ten years later, I’d concluded that it represented a wannabe mandarin class that if not re-routed would pose enormous cultural/political risk to this country, along the lines you have outlined here.
The United States is resembling France in 1789 more each day.
We’ve got an “elite” running the country that are inferior morally and mentally to the people paying the bills. And yes, I said mentally. Kindly note the almost total absence of the hard sciences or engineering among the “elite”. No, those fields require WORK…and the “elite” can’t handle that.
When the French Revolution started, it was in large part a matter of the middle class – the people paying most of the taxes – concluding that the ruling elite was no longer competent and demanding power proportionate to the contributions they made to the nation.
We’re seeing the same events happening today. We’ve got a political leadership in which the primary qualification for office is one’s pedigree. We’ve got a tax structure that puts the heaviest burdens on the middle and upper middle class, and penalizes quite harshly any attempt to better one’s lot in life. And we have a ruling “elite” that is clearly incompetent to rule.
It’s a recipe for revolution.
I worry about this. A lot. The elites don’t realize how far they have drifted away from the body politic. They avoid intellectual curiousity because they like the situation the way it is now just fine. They think, because they have no sense of real world challenges, that we will endure it like milk cows. Because we are docile, easily duped, managed. Or so they think.
But, having lived in various parts of the world, what they don’t understand is that Americans truly are different. They won’t stand for it. And it has gone too far to just throw more trinkets out of the back of the limo…
I worry. But then there is November. And that gives me hope.
Well, as long as they let us eat cake.
Beautiful and encouraging, as I’ve come to expect. Thank you, Mr. Hanson.
When you and family are next in the San Diego / Santee area, I’d be pleased to buy you all a meal as a thank you. Or make one! Your choice.
One can’t help but think the moment we live in is quite illusory. You’ve got to to hope at some point physical strength and mental toughness will once again count as desirable attributes. People who can grow things, make things, fix things and build things will be the folks who are valued rather than the paper shuffling parasites of the FIRE economy. Don’t get started on gender Doc. You think the condemnation you get over illegal immigration is bad? You left out the part about Hollywood’s chic endorsement of our lesbian youth. What wonderful role models… Never mind the wimpy young men. Yup, a couple years of military or public service might do the trick. Did you ask the poor white tree trimmer about his workman’s comp rates plus everything else the Nanny State extracts out of his hide? Meanwhile the hedge fund guy complains about his 15% marginal tax rate.
“Why can’t any of our actors talk like a Humphrey Bogart, Glenn Ford, Lee Marvin, Henry Fonda, James Stewart, Bill Holden, or Gregory Peck?”
No John Wayne? This just shakes my belief in Dr. Hanson as the most savey writer around to the roots.
Years ago I discovered that elites — even relatively lowly office workers — are exposed to a different moral environment than blue collar and ag workers. The realization came after I bought a working ranch in central Texas. It was easy to discern a different attitude in the ranch hands and ag workers I was around on the weekends and the executives and professionals I encountered weekdays in my job as a corporate lawyer in the big city.
After puzzling over the difference and what the reasons might be, I realized that for the country folks, there is a direct and obvious correlation between hard work, thrift and good management with their economic and social success. The village slacker not only has no job and no money, his reputation suffers as well.
Contrast that enviroment with the corporate bureacracy. Often it difficult to judge performance in certain corporate job titles, lawyers among them. if you’re clever often you can deflect blame for poor results and take credit for somebody else’s work. If you have a “friend” in the right place, sometimes you don’t have to work at all. And padding teh old expense account is commonplace.
The values formed by these differing environments are starkly different, with all manner of ramifications for political preferences. The urban worker types would be much more likely to identify with Bill Clinton or barack Obama than with George Bush or Sarah Palin.
So what’s the point? It seems to me there are similar differences between the “elites” as Dr. Hanson has referred to them, and us ordinary folks. The elites are much less likelty to be sensitive to the connection between hard work, good moral character, and prosperity. For them there is little of such connection. Can anybody imagine DiCaprio having to worry about the mortgage?
In the business world, and I assume the academic world as well, the higher you go – the more “elite” you are – the more your job is about wheeling and dealing, schmoozing, influence, negotiation, who’s in and who’s out, who can get you what you want, mutual back scratching, informal deals, etc. It’s more personal, more subjective, less bound by rules. Fuzzier. And of course, you’re better-insulated from the consequences of bad decisions. I imagine most people, in that situation, would lose sight of basic rules and necessities, simple principles, straightforward answers.
Also, bureaucracies tend to be self-perpetuating. A farmer dicks around and loses his crop – he loses the farm. It’s a disaster. A middle-manager dicks around – nothing much happens, at least not immediately. The organization may be able to tolerate his poor performance without too many negative consequences. He can (if he has that sort of personality) balance work with slacking off in a way that may not advance him but that also doesn’t get him fired.
Working like this isn’t a job or a task or especially a duty. It’s just an existence. You go through the motions, somebody pays you. You’re making a living, but your it’s not really your *living*.
Engineers and other applied scientists share, at least in part, in that blue-collar/agricultural environment you describe … for like the blue-collar worker and farmer, our ideas are measured against objective reality on an almost daily basis, with commensurate consequences based upon that measurement.
When the decision/consequence loop time lag can be measured in years and/or multiple election cycles, as it is for many of our elites, the feedback of consequence is insufficient to prevent serious departures from rational thought … which is the intellectual dishonesty we are seeing among our elites today.
Re-, er, Progressivism has elevated the mere appearances of intellect and success to the level of icons in a new religion … replacing principled respect for intellect and wisdom with the blind worship of the icons, led by elites who operate as a “priesthood” that is above challenge by the “laity” … and driven by a fundamentalist zeal that makes the late Rev. Jerry Fawell look downright laissez-faire by comparison while mocking rational thought.
However, reality bites. That is why the tradesman, the farmer, and the engineer often exhibit wisdom … they have the timely feedback of that reality. The elites do not … and their folly in not seeking that feedback out gives the lie to their presumptions of superior intellect … and the assumptions of omniscience that lead them to believe that they have the answers for everyone else.
More and more, the elites are being exposed as poster children for Romans 1:22 …
Despite their erudition …
And academic pedigree …
The Best and the Brightest look instead
Like a box of dim bulbs to me …
OK, but aren’t you talking about at least two different kinds of intelligence? There is a whole class of people, even if not huge, which makes their money from a decision about whether to buy or sell at a given moment. The “work” they do has to do with research, information gathering, and sometimes people skills as in what a salesman has.
Your point would probably be that you can succeed in some areas with very little intelligence and very few skills, but everyone is competing for those positions too. What are the skills which our society rewards with the big bucks? Sports and entertainment can yield a lot to a relative few super-stars. Teachers, police, firemen and government bureaucrats can make decent, but not big money. The problem for so many is that they have good skills and intelligence within their job sphere/skill set, but that sphere is shrinking, no longer pays much money, or a string of circumstances has screwed them. Their intelligence does not extend far enough to go into an area where they could do better, and many others have gotten a head start on them. The military pays decently if one can advance up the ranks, but one never does it starting as a grunt and getting blown up is an unpleasant possibility.
Some fantasize about the rough days ahead when things break down and how those who can garden, hunt, fix things, do physical labor etc will thrive. But even these types rely heavily on gasoline, electricity, and things made in China.
Finally, if you can’t beat em, join em, or keep a foot on both camps. Conservatives are getting caught here wavering from their “the best will succeed” meme because they see people succeeding whom they consider far from the best. Hmmmmmm.
“The problem for so many is that they have good skills and intelligence within their job sphere/skill set, but that sphere is shrinking, no longer pays much money, or a string of circumstances has screwed them. Their intelligence does not extend far enough to go into an area where they could do better, and many others have gotten a head start on them”
Its not intelligence that does not extend, its knowledge that precludes the consideration. Especially during the last two decades of downsizing and offshoring. A wise Engineering manager long retired recently told me that in his day the best candidates were generally those that, although did not have knowledge specific to the job, showed a track record of creativity and results in their previous job…As having been in and out of the job market over the last few years, it has become abundantly evident, that the ‘elites’ measure to a standard of credentials that generally don’t mean much in and of themselves. Like mindedness becomes the measure. Inevitably, progressivism will succumb to the law of diminishing returns, based on this bias in thinking among the new aristocracy…Global warming research is a case in point.
The material success of the cultural elite is based upon the rest of us deferring to their “superior” intelligence … and based upon the results, those who encourage such deference are as guilty of fraud as the formerly-materially-successful Bernie Maidoff.
I once listened to experts who said to me
that livin’ large would be so easy
Go buy that McMansion with zero down
Grab this credit card and burn up the town
But when bills came due, and ’twas time to sell
Those bums had led me to financial Hell
They’re bailed out, I’m left in the red
Misleading me about my ri–ii–ight
To get ahead.
Now our leaders are experts who’d “guarantee”
My “right” to get by irresponsibly
Get drunk get stoned get high on crack
And jump with anyone into the sack
And then go see the doc for “free”
To cure that hangover and STD
Pick up a check and go back to bed
All they ask is my ri–ii–ight
To get ahead
But history’s led me to a better view
Responsibility starts with me and you
No one but you can take your place
in solving most of the problems that you will face
And if we need to, we can help each other
Without some bureaucrat acting like our mother
Everything is better, the truth be said
When we protect our ri–ii–ight
To get ahead.
This is why I’m here, you see
It’s about a lot more than dumpin’ tea
It’s about the lie that’s led to hurt
That life should be left to only trained experts
Instead of pourin’ money down’ their ratholes
The ordinary people now will take control
Government is best when it’s limited
so it simply protects our ri–ii–ight
To get ahead.
There always are and always will be “elites” in any country – any group of people – no matter how democratic the system is in theory. There’s no way to “get rid of” a society’s elite class. It will always be there, whether it’s our supposed meritocracy, a self-perpetuating aristocracy, or members of the Party. The only question is, “How do the elites treat everyone else?” Like fellow citizens? Like children? Like slaves? Like animals?
Actually, you might also ask whether right-wing elites treat people any better than left-wing elites.
There’s an increasing and disturbing trend among our elits – a growing belief that most Americans aren’t “qualified” to participate in the country’s politics. Unless we have college degrees, graduated top of our class from the best schools, we’re simply too dumb to understand the complex issues involved in running the country. I think the left is most guilty in this regard. Any criticism of their social programs is taken as proof that we’re too stupid to know what’s good for us. Some believe our votes are wasted.
Enough already! Dr.Hanson and others have written many tracts on the elite, left/progressives/marxists, black radicals, and the destruction of our culture, values and traditions.
What I have not seen is anyone speculating about what we need to do to take back America. We all know elections-the next two-will be frought with fraud by the left; we all anticipate that the left-elite left- will not willingly nor by law give up their positions of power without a fight. And I mean a post-electoral fight-if in fact, despite the fraud, we win the House and Senate.
As long as the elite have the MSM, entertainment, university positions of power, many seats in state and federal bureaucracy and duped minorities, they will never give up their power.
I see only two ways this will end: Secession or civil war.
Agree with Blotto 1005. I love PJM but so often the articles are all about how bad it is. I GET IT! It is bad , and getting worse.I GET IT! There is total disconnect between the elite and the common man. I GET IT!
So, what do WE do about it? I think action is all that matters anymore. ACTION is the only hope we have for reclaiming our country.
It has been a while since I’ve put in 11 hours on the John Deere, but I remember the numbness. At the same time I have a confession to make. I went to an Ivy league school – and graduated to boot. It’s a funny perspective to have. To know real work and your Aristotle from a hole in the ground.
Great essay and spot on. In grad school I studied a variety of late 18th and early 19th French intellectuals and many of them traced their thinking back to a revolutionary school of thought that based its outlook on class struggle — but it was a very perceptive view of that struggle. They divided society into what they called the parasitic classes and the industrial classes. Everyone who generated real social value as judged by the marketplace was deemed to be a member of the industrial class — everyone else was a parasite.
One person influenced by this analysis was a gentleman by the name of St. Simon. He was a bit of a wacko and later wandered off into utopian socialism — but he did during his classical liberal phase write a brilliant satire known as St. Simon’s Parable. In it he posits the unfortunate deaths of about a few thousand fellow citizens — in the first case that of the hundred best enginees, the hundred best mathemeticians, the hundred best farmers etc. In the second case, the hundred most noble aristocrates, the hundred highest ranking bureaucrats, the hundred ranking bishops of the established church etc. In the first case, French society would be crippled and reduced to a far more primitive level of civilization. In the latter case, the French would be distraut of course, because they are a humane people, but life otherwise would go on as normal. After all, there were many individuals who could do the job of M. the brother of the king just as well as the incumbent.
Needless to say the police were after him immediately. Modern Americans might find reading this parable inciteful today.
What is going on in Washington and many state capitals seems to me a veritable totentanz of corrupt and decadent statism. The parasites and the leftist along with their political enablers in both parties seem to be engaged in a frantic effort to grab whatever power and wealth they can before the whole byzantine structure comes crashing down. They are literally driving this country towards disaster — perhaps even revolution and civil war and have no incling of the consequences of their behavior. To borrow the words of HL Menken, our so-called elite seems to be a unique class of professionally un-educated people with no knowledge of history, economics or of any field of knowledge related to what actually makes a functioning society work.
Mark
The biggest problem with those who decided to divide workers into the productive vs. parasite class, were all members of the parasite class, but failed to recognize it.
The second biggest problem was that they tended to class all managers as being part of the parasite class. While many managers aren’t worth their pay, most are. The guy who provides the organizing that helps the company run efficiently provides a very valueable service, even if he never gets his hands dirty.
You can think of our economy as a big pot into which we all place the goods and or services that we individually create. Any money we come by – however we get it – is used to buy those goods and services. I don’t concern myself that someone in an open and free market may be putting in less than they are taking out. By and large, a free market does a good job of making all of that pretty fair.
But just think how badly our out-of-control government perverts this system. First of all, they are forcing us to collectively to put all kinds of expensive services into this pot that no one really wants or needs. The “Assistant Secretary to the Deputy Director for Community Redevelopment and Empowerment” in your town probably does not put much into the pot that anyone wants and does more harm than good to the local economy. But he or she will show up with $100,000 or more to buy refrigerators, cars and food that you have worked hard to produce.
Furthermore, the government works constantly to alter the natural valuation of things by subsidizing favored industries and corporations, artificially boosting the bargaining power of unions, regulating products and industries such that their prices are inflated well beyond what they should be and raising taxes on businesses that are always passed on to the consumer. I won’t even get into the whole entitlement thing.
Next time you vote for a progressive, just think about all of those people shopping in the supermarket who produce nothing of any real value (as determined by what people are willing to pay ) but have effectively elbowed you over to the cans of Spam as they purchase steaks for the “Diversity in Government Studies” cookout at the local University or for the East Podunk Stimulus Distribution Team summer picnic.
Very true typically — but the French intellectuals who developed this early analysis based their economic thinking on that of J.B. Say — a very market oriented economist and far more sophisticated that some of his British colleagues such as Ricardo. The French did not drink the labor theory of value kool aid and had a real appreciation for the role of the entrepreneur — which is why we use their word for it. As I initially noted: they generally held that it was the market that sorted out and rewarded social value — not the madarin class.
Schumpeter has said in his History of Economic Analysis that translations of Say’s texts were the most popular economic textbooks in the US during the entire 19th century. I wonder if that has something to do with the general immunity of the American educated classes from the virus of socialism — at least until the Progressive era.
Regards
Mark
Reminds me of Rudy Boschwitz. He founded Plywood Minnesota, a rather successful business, and then went off to be a Republican Senator for Minnesota. After a number of terms in the Senate, Wellstone ousted him, and Boschwitz went back home to run Plywood, Minnesota. And it is said that after he got back in the swing of things, he lamented “I didn’t know we were doing this to business”.
That said, it is hard to find cultural elites who live green lives. Most use their money at times to fly on jets or boat (like the president this weekend). As in the manner of the tastes of a John Edwards or Al Gore, the bigger and more impressive the home, the better to contemplate how lesser others use too much carbon-based power. Usually green sacrifice is to be made by coal miners, oil drillers, and timber men of politically incorrect industries — the distant horny-handed classes whose unmentioned work brings us instant convenience.
There are those to talk and those who actually do things. Liberals spend so much of their efforts on “raising awareness” of perceived problems instead of actually working to solve them. They believe that if they can raise awareness of the proles to conserve energy or reduce their carbon footprints, then it’s ok for the self-proclaimed “elites” to live in mansions and fly in private jets. Rare is the liberal who actually lives the life he proclaims the rest of us should live (Ed Baggley comes to mind but not many others).
Perhaps it’s for the best that they don’t directly try to fix problems. They aren’t grounded in reality. Here’s a hint: food does not originate in grocery stores. It comes from the hard work of many people that should you dare to shake their hands, you’d immediately want to apply large doses of hand sanitizer. The people who produce our food work hard in places that often feature by bad smells.
This alienated and isolated-from-reality class isn’t a new phenomenon. All societies have had this parasitic class at one time or another. By parasitic I mean that they live off the work of others.
In Europe in the 18th-19th c, it was the Landed Gentry who lived off the rents from their lands and viewed with contempt to merchants and tradesmen. France has long had a tradition of an elite government bureaucracy. What has been unique about the US is that it was founded on an expressed and open rejection of class, of elitism, and an insistence on equality. That is, the US was founded as a ‘middle class’, which is a class that you enter or exit by merit rather than birth.
What has happened now in the US is the gradual development of an isolate and elitist class that rejects the very basic axioms of the US; namely, merit, individual hard work and individual responsibility and direct accountability for one’s actions. This is a parasitic class because it lives off the work of others, the taxpayer, and because, importantly, it is isolated from the effects of its decisions.
Raise taxes? This class will then raise its salaries and benefits. Impose a penalty on one sector of the population? This class will exempt itself (eg, Congress and health care).
This class, as I mentioned, has no morality or ethics and functions within the relativism of its rhetoric. Objective reality doesn’t exist. Words swirl around in the dust and never touch ground. Just consider a few of Obama’s endless sophistry: no such thing, Obama says, as ‘Islamic jihadism; the economy is great- aren’t you glad it’s not 15%; doctors cut off limbs for money; if you have money then you are greedy; Arizonans are racists…And there’s Hodder, Jarrett..and the rest.
Dwight #11- you totally and completely missed the point of VDH’s article. It isn’t about ‘the man who works with his hands’ is the best. It’s about alienation from the results of decision-making. A biochemist who comes up with a formula for a drug and doesn’t test it properly and still touts its value, is an example of someone alienated from reality. The AGW people who promote their views, and reject the reality of hard evidence against it – are alienated from accountability.
You are also totally mistaken that ‘global free trade’ is the cause of current economic travails in the world. And ‘progress’ is an amorphous word…held dear by the left..and empty of any bond with reality.
Again, the key problem now is the development of an elite class in the US, a set of people alienated from objective reality, unaccountable to that reality for their acts, making decisions unconnected to reality that they isolate themselves from..and insisting on being in power via their control of: government, academia and unions.
ETAB # 52 “It isn’t about ‘the man who works with his hands’ is the best. It’s about alienation from the results of decision-making”
Just out of curiosity, do you consider the traders at Goldman Sachs part of the elite? The one hundred best paid employees of BP? Warren Buffert, Bill Gates, Ronald Reagan?
You say that free world trade is not part of the problem, but I would argue that things have been outsourced so fast that a number of the people you feel for and admire have been left in the lurch.
Of course left and right can agree that the multi-millionaire CEO’s who get huge salaries and buyouts are part of the bad elite. Oops, wait; sometimes righties defend their obscene salaries as what the market will bear. Half of the discussion here sounds like a Marxist critique of capitalism in its final stages…with a good dose of class envy mixed in. I think that this thread has turned some of you/us inside out. It is also ironic that lefties bashed GWB and Chaney for sending us to war, when they had no personal consequences to their family…or even their social class. This elite thing cuts a lot of different ways.
Who was the sociologist who wrote the critique of the “power-elite?” C Wright Mills, maybe?
If a CEO is making an obscene salary unrelated to his/her value to the enterprise, then something is wrong in that instance and the stockholders are being robbed. In most cases however, large stockholders are very aware of executive compensation and can do something about it. Smaller investors tend to ride on their coattails in such a matter. Such abuses will right themselves in a free and open system – or at least remain minimum. And if you are not a stockholder why would you care. just don’t buy their overpriced products.
But victims of government waste and fraud have no such options. The system is too easily gamed and no one person can do anything. A single, bad, self-serving action by even a city-level politican can cost the taxpayers many times any possible overpayment of a corporate CEO. Government is not accountable and not held to any performance standards like those demanded by a free market. To see this clearly, one only has to note that Medicare loses to fraud each year, more than 5 times the total annual profitability of the top 10 health care providers.
Dwight – I don’t get your point. This elite class that VDS is referring to isn’t defined by income but by alienation from the results of their decisions and actions.
If someone is making a large salary in a private corporation then, the shareholders have the right to object. Furthermore, that CEO is accountable; he can be fired. In the public domain, the individual isn’t accountable; if he’s doing badly, he’ll simply be shifted to another position.
Free trade, by which I mean exactly the term, is not the same as ‘outsourcing’. But a major cause of outsourcing is the demands of the unions for life-long jobs, benefits, pensions – all unsustainable in an open market and kept in place only via govt intervention. The public service unions, for example, have wage increases two to three times that of the private sector, and benefits and pensions unknown in the private sector. These demands set up a huge fiscal gap between production costs in the US and costs elsewhere.
I don’t know what your reference to Mills is supposed to mean.
It’s amazing how frequently Dwight lets his professors opinions of those who don’t go to Ivy League schools color his opinions of those who don’t go to Ivy League schools.
For his example, he honestly believes that we think it is all about money.
He defines elite vs. non-elite based on how much money someone makes.
His jealousy towards those who make more than he can ever dream of continues to color his opinions towards the worth of all those individuals.
I guess my question is, why do you trust the government more than you trust “Big Business?” Goldman Sachs screwed over a lot of investors. It didn’t put a gun to their heads and say “give us your money or we’ll throw you in jail” and THEN screw them over. Business – the market – is voluntary. Wal-Mart can’t *make* you buy anything. Government can make you do whatever you give it the power to make you do. And there are just as many crooked politicians as there are crooked businessmen. We should know – we elected them.
I gain as much from the insightful comments to VDH’s wonderful essay as I do from the article itself,,, thank you commentator’s.
It reminds me why I read here.
As do I. Thoroughly excellent comments. Dr. Hanson provokes thought. If more educators did that instead of pushing failed and abstract political philosophy, we would be in better shape as a nation.
Geokster: I’ve long maintained that the comments make more stimulating reading than the column itself
It [a taxi] was a ten-dollar ride each morning, but what was that to a Master of the Universe? Sherman [McCoy]‘s father had always taken the subway to Wall Street, even when he was the chief executive office of Dunning Sponget & Leach. Even now, at the age of seventy-one, when he took his daily excursions to Dunning Sponget to breathe the same air as his lawyer cronies for three or four hours, he went by subway. It was a matter of principle. The more grim the subways became, the more graffiti those people scrawled on the cars, the more gold chains they snatched off girls necks, the more old men they mugged, the more women they pushed in front of the trains, the more determined was John Campbell McCoy that they weren’t going to drive him off the New York City subways. But to the new breed, the young breed, the masterful breed, Sherman’s breed, there was no such principle. INSULATION! That was the ticket. That was the term Rawlie Thorpe used. “If you want to live in New York,” he once told Sherman, “you’ve got to insulate, insulate, insulate,” meaning insulate yourselves from those people. The cynicism and smugness of the idea struck Sherman as very au courant. If you could go breezing down the FDR Drive in a taxi, then why file into the trenches of the urban wars?
====
The Bonfire of the Vanities
Tom Wolfe
This article at the American Spectator is similar.
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/16/americas-ruling-class-and-the/print
I’ll pity the post-modern elite after I’m finished dancing and spitting over their graves.
“Untruth” has two functions, neither having much to do with objective reality: One is to demonstrate allegiance to the elite class, using a range of symbolic code-words. This is how they identify each other. Two is to sow confusion in order to mask their subversive power grabs.
The rest of the gender-race-class narrative / lifestyle described by VDH is pumped out by media-academia in order to sever us from the values that have made America strong and free. Hard work, confident men and women, citizens proud of who they are and what they can do. The goal is to eliminate America as the only obstacle to world autocracy.
Ultimately they are the result of subversive revolutionary techniques that were deliberately spread by Communist agent-provocateurs going back to the 50′s & 60′s. The fruits of their efforts were elected by a deceived citizenry in 06 – 08 and now control the US government. Fortunately, the sleeping giant has awakened.
Maybe someone else has brought this up already, but this week authors I admire are on the same wavelength. Yesterday I read a long article from The American Spectator entitled “America’s Ruling Class and the Perils of Revolution” by Angelo Codevilla. I’m certain I’ve read other articles relating to the elite ruling class recently. It’s almost like a convergence of thought to prepare those of us non-elites. I also thought of what Ted Nugent recently said about how so many in the US are helpless and can’t repair or make anything and that if there is ever a collapse they will be without hope because they have no hands on skills.
The question of how capable the elites really are has been explored in some movies. For example, in King Rat those who are elite in the regular world do not do well in the POW camp where a new elite emerges. On liberation that new elite gives way again to the old. I cannot see modern Hollywood much interested in this theme today. However, the theme sometimes emerges on reality shows such as Survivor, where those with the best credentials are outwitted and outsmarted by people they would consider their social inferiors in regular society. That leveling of the playing field, where credentials do not matter but ability does, is one of the charms of Survivor.
Much respect to VDH, and maybe I’m revealing too much of my own weaknesses here, but I have to ask:
Must we all be construction workers and farmers or else be consigned to the ranks of the hated postmodern elite?
For those of us whose talents in making a living involve sitting in front of a computer for most of the day, are we wrong to spend our spare time at the gym to try to salvage what’s left of our physical dignity?
Would we be more authentic and less elitist in VDH’s eyes if we let ourselves go?
Can anyone imagine their grandfather working
Can anyone imagine their grandfather leaving the family to work out in the gym? Where are our priorities?
It’s nothing short of astonishing what we do in this culture. Paying a gym to do work on useless tail chasing equipment in a dirty stinking gym while at the same time we pay illegals to come to our houses to tend our gardens. Try doing the yard work yourself. Push a hand mower, use a broom instead of a leaf blower with enough thrust and noise to launch a Boeing 747. True there are no mirrors or overweight fanny’s to look at, only fresh air and sunshine. Try walking to Walmart. You can bet the Chinese who provide the stock for that Walmart don’t have the time to flex in front of the gym mirrors. Most of us can benefit by pushing ourselves away from the table too. Just get out and walk or ride the bike. Have you ever heard of anyone getting sick because their deltoids and pec’s were too weak?
Thanks.
This is a touchy subject for me, so I have to point out that in fact I do do my own yardwork… with a push reel mower.
But you do make a good point.
Dr. Hanson -
Extremely good and timely article.
Not mentioned was the recent origin of the elitist attitudes described. To illustrate, Hubert H. Humphrey was a leading liberal just forty years ago. HHH had made his reputation fighting communists in Minnesota during the depression. Now the only liberal in the senate is Joe Lieberman, and he had to run as an independent. Where did this current crop of anti-liberal elitists come from?
Antonio Gramsci was a Marxist theoretician from Italy before WWII, and became an associate of Comrade Stalin in the Soviet Union. Gramsci recognized that the workers were not supportive of the actions that Lenin and Stalin took in their behalf, and that workers were therfore irrelevant to the great inevitable Marxist utopia to come.
Gramsci then formulated a “cultural communism” perversion of Marx’s inevitable future, wherein cultural elites captured cultural institutions as a means to power. Targeted institutions included the academy, media, churches, courts, etc. This view has become widespread in the elitist schools on both left coasts since the time of HHH, and can be verified by looking at the faculty rosters where “Marxist studies” and “critical studies” (same thing) are prominently displayed among the academic specialties.
So, current Marxist thought requires the destruction of the values and the material well-being of the workers, while the elitists reap the benefits. Time for a new American Revolution.
“Can anybody imagine DiCaprio having to worry about the mortgage?”
Yes, yes I can.
While I would largely agree that the life of the entertainer seems like one that is often very distant from reality, that life can change and change quite quickly. How long do you think that the likes of DiCaprio will continue to get huge paycheques if their movies start tanking?
Billy Joel put this very well in a song called The Entertainer which he wrote early in his career (ironically BEFORE his biggest success with his hugely popular album “The Stranger”). I’m not sure if copyright law – and the rules of this website – allow me to copy and paste the lyrics so I’ll give it a try. If you don’t see the lyrics, I assume the moderator has removed them. I’ll also supply the link at which I found the lyrics; hopefully that won’t run afoul of any rules. By the way, I think the second-last verse is particularly relevant to the point I am trying to make.
The Entertainer – Billy Joel
I am the entertainer,
And I know just where I stand:
Another serenader,
And another long-haired band.
Today I am your champion.
I may have won your hearts.
But I know the game,
You will forget my name,
And I won’t be here
In another year,
If I don’t stay on the charts.
I am the entertainer,
And I’ve had to pay my price.
The things I did not know at first,
I learned by doin’ twice.
Ah, but still they come to haunt me,
Still they want their say.
So I’ve learned to dance
With a hand in my pants,
And they rub my neck,
And I write ‘em a check,
And they go their merry way.
I am the entertainer,
Been all around the world.
I’ve played all kinds of palaces,
And laid all kinds of girls.
I can’t remember faces,
I don’t remember names.
Ah, but what the hell,
You know it’s just as well.
‘Cause after a while
And a thousand miles,
It all becomes the same.
I am the entertainer,
I bring to you my songs.
I’d like to spend a day or two.
I can’t stay that long.
No, I’ve got to meet expenses.
I got to stay in line.
Gotta get those fees
To the agencies.
And I’d love to stay,
But there’s bills to pay,
So I just don’t have the time.
I am the entertainer,
I come to do my show.
You’ve heard my latest record,
It’s been on the radio.
Ah, it took me years to write it,
They were the best years of my life.
It was a beautiful song.
But it ran too long.
If you’re gonna have a hit,
You gotta make it fit–
So they cut it down to 3:05.
I am the entertainer,
The idol of my age.
I make all kinds of money,
When I go on the stage.
Ah, you’ve seen me in the papers,
I’ve been in the magazines.
But if I go cold,
I won’t get sold.
I’ll get put in the back
In the discount rack,
Like another can of beans.
I am the entertainer,
And I know just where I stand:
Another serenader,
And another long-haired band.
Today I am your champion.
I may have won your hearts.
But I know the game,
You will forget my name,
And I won’t be here
In another year,
If I don’t stay on the charts.
I found these lyrics at http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/The-Entertainer-lyrics-Billy-Joel/2F682FB74483AC17482568700023122A
While entertainers like DiCaprio may not work with their hands in the way that a plumber or farmer does, they DO still work. They also take the same chances of success and failure as people who work with their hands. That’s Free Enterprise in action.
It is the bureaucrats that stand almost no chance of losing THEIR jobs. I’m currently re-watching Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose series (the original one from 1980) and in one of the episodes, he shows a chart that illustrates all the steps necessary to fire a government employee. It is IMMENSE, containing dozens of steps and requiring months of effort to complete. I saw a much more recent example in a John Stossel special report on education. That report showed a flowchart describing all the steps needed to fire a public school teacher. He cited a case of a male teacher who had sexually propositioned female students via email and the students had kept and printed those emails. If I remember correctly, it still took six YEARS to fire that teacher, even with the “smoking gun” of the emails in evidence. No wonder the civil servants in this world are detached from reality! They are effectively above the law!!
I’m a government employee and feel far from out of touch. I do see some pathetic workers promoted in order to get rid of them, but for the most part the DoD employees are working stiffs too.
Our elite is every bit as much a nomenklatura as the Soviet Union’s, though the mechanism for becoming a member here is, in most cases, more informal. But the patron-client relationships, the nepotism, and, especially, the desire to maintain (at all costs) the status quo of the system that gives them their privileged status is the same.
BTW, why isn’t Clark Gable on your list?
As our country edges closer and closer to the confrontation that irreconcilable differences between the ruling elite and the rest of us portend, I hope that the outcome is determined in our favor by the very nature of Americans – that rugged individualism – that once defined this country. The ruggedness of this individualism may have diluted over the centuries but I think the essence of it remains. It is that essence that to this day draws people stuggling to our shores. Some come for the wrong reasons and will not assimilate but I think enough do come for the right reason – the opportunity for self determination. And those will band together with the rest of us who have resisted the relentless brainwashing and propaganda and can still call the elites out on their bullshit.
The elites are largely out of touch with reality and while ostensibly educated, they don’t possess the wisdom to realize that they are out of touch. They richly deserve an introduction to reality and I think that day is coming soon, courtesy of the rest of us.
On another note, I would not pity the cultural elite. I may have been inclined to pity if they had restricted their influence to their own cocktail parties and inner circles. But they have taken their ignorance and lack of perspective and wisdom and thrust it on the rest of us, literally insisting on ruling us. And we let them because we are too busy actually doing the work of America and making it run. While they in their leisure tinker with the very principles that made this Republic great. No, I do not pity them. I despise them. Their ignorance is dangerous and they should be allowed nothing more serious than managing foam rubber production. Give them the Ministry of Nerf. Nothing else. And inmpose safety restriction even there because the pointy end of the nerf can still hurt one’s eyes. Rounded nerf only.
Great article. Liberalism sees itself as being “for the people, but not of the people”– uncooth and unlettered as they are. Another point of distinction, maybe a subnote under “logic”: attributions of causality.
Elites tend to assume that the only real decision-makers in a culture are their fellow elites (the governing class, senior business leaders, academia, and the media). Everyone else marches deterministically from cause to effect.
Ann Althouse brought this up over the weekend by talking about Barry Schwartz’s work, and of course we’ve all been talked to death about Cass Sunstein’s nudges (which, now that he’s actually in a position of authority, have mutated into old-fashioned shoves). But it bears mentioning that for most liberal social scientists, the only people who really make any decisions are the elites. Everyone else’s life follows the ballistic trajectory set by their betters.
So liberals bash corporations and Fox News and religious leaders and the republican party as being secret puppet-masters. The restaurant industry makes people eat unhealthy food, advertisers create a consumer culture, evil bankers forces people to sign mortgages they can’t repay, religious leaders (at least, the ones it’s PC to criticize) foster intolerance and hate, and bullying US politicians make 3rd world dictators anti-American. The rest of us respond to stimuli, we’re really helpless to resist, victims really, and in fact our choices are really illusions anyway.
You see the advantage of this. Once you claim that freedom is an illusion (as liberalism’s marxist tutors taught them), then you’re not taking away freedom, you’re simply replacing one set of restrictions with another, more “moral” set.
What they don’t do, can’t do, is ever acknowledge that individuals in the hoi polloi have freedom to succeed and to screw up, and that some will always choose the latter, but that that’s a necessary condition for the choice to exist in the first place. And the Elites can’t ever acknowledge that they, too, make good choices and bad, and are often quite predictable in their decision-making.
All they see are a few very special people (Herman Hesse called it “the mark of Cain”) who are endowed with real freedom and power. Some only want to help their poor, ignorant, befuddled brothers. Others are evil vicious predators who must be stopped by any means necessary.
Of course, it’s trivial to set this up. Any chain of causality eventually includes everyone if you work backwards far enough. All you have to do is make sure you stop identifing the causes when you get to the chic Enemy du jour, and fix your five minutes of hate on them.
Everyone who isn’t on their team is either a befuddled automaton or an enemy. That’s why there are never any enemies to the left, or any real respect for the people they’re claiming to be helping. As the left-wing icon Roger Waters put it, in the liberal mind the world is made of dogs, sheep and pigs.
It’s been true for some time. Not just the members of Congress, but in State Legislatures as well (California and New York are the prime examples), far too many elected officials are largely invulnerable to removal. They can accumulate campaign funds quickly once elected (free of income tax if sequestered), Once an incumbent they become almost invulnerable to challenge, absent some egregious misconduct which makes the headlines. The rule should be in the forthcoming election: “Anybody but an Incumbent”.
Jack M.D. wrote: > What about Ron Paul and Victor Hanson running for Pres/VP together in 2012?
Do you mean the Ron Paul who, last presidential election, voted for Chuck Baldwin of the so-called Constitution Party, the platform of which reads, in part:
The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.
Please. For those who believe in actual liberty (as opposed to theocracy or socialism), Ron Paul is almost as big a joke as Barack Obama.
On a more sane note, an awesome article on postmodernism, with must-read comments, can be found here:
http://rayharvey.org/index.php/2009/11/postmodernism-the-destruction-of-thought/
Merely acknowledging the existence of a create means that a person wants to create a theocracy????????
Jack M.D. wrote: > What about Ron Paul and Victor Hanson running for Pres/VP together in 2012?
Do you mean the Ron Paul who, last presidential election, wound up voting for Chuck Baldwin of the so-called Constitution Party, the platform of which reads, in part:
The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.
Please. For those who believe in actual liberty (as opposed to theocracy or socialism), Ron Paul is almost as big a joke as Barack Obama. Almost.
On a more sane note, an awesome article on postmodernism, with must-read comments, can be found here.
Take it up with President John Adams, “Our Constitution was made only for the government of a moral and religious people; it is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.”
Many years ago while working through college in a paper mill I came to really respect the hard-working shift workers who migrated from appalachia for a better life. These guys could fix anything, mainly because they had to to get by. During those times I had to use duct tape and bailing wire to keep my old chevy going and I learned how to fix things too.
Back at my elite eastern university I was traveling with one of the chosen in his nice car. The car stopped running. He said, “now what do we do?” I said, “open the hood and lets take a look.” He said, “how do you open the hood?”
I think this guy now works for Obama, probably helping to run GM.
Arrogance is surely a component of elitism: the feeling that getting your hands dirty is something that only the working classes do. That’s probably why your “friend” didn’t know how to open his own hood: working on the car was the job of hired help, like mechanics, and not something “gentleman” should be expected to know about.
Or maybe it was the same estrangement from reality that so many younger people experience. For example, if you ask the average young person where milk comes, I’ll bet that a staggering proportion of them fail to mention cows at all: they think it comes from the supermarket or is made in factories. Our society is increasingly distant from how things actually work that we don’t understand even basics like milk coming from cows (or other mammals).
Professor Hanson with his usual erudition understands the nature of our “elite” class. What’s uncanny is that the same ideas were expressed yesterday by Angelo Codevilla in an essay at the American Spectator. Only Codevilla takes it the next step by defining the struggle in terms of the elite ruling class vs. the “country class” (the rest of us). Earlier this morning Rush abandoned his prepared program and devoted most of his show to Codevilla. I’ll take the next step and go out on a limb. The Codevilla essay will someday be recognized as the founding document of the second American revolution. Read it.
I agree. We’ve always known Washington was out of touch with the rest of the country. Similarly, for years many of us have complained about ineffectual governance and progressive incompetence displayed by our political class. That was the wrong take. A conclusion to be drawn from Codevilla is that our politicians, in both political parties, have been neither ineffective nor incompetent. They have been quite successful in constructing an elitist aristocracy which works full time to promote their interests, not ours. Time for the Helots to revolt.
~Paules
Victor Davis Hanson for President in 2012 and you’ve just explained why in support of my case. The Codevilla essay should be required reading as the price of admission to PJ Media commenters. Perhaps it would start to open the eyes of some of those who simply will not see. Congratulations on hitting the target dead center.
“Professor Hanson with his usual erudition understands the nature of our “elite” class. What’s uncanny is that the same ideas were expressed yesterday by Angelo Codevilla in an essay at the American Spectator. …I’ll take the next step and go out on a limb.
The Codevilla essay will someday be recognized as the founding document of the second American revolution. Read it.”
VDH:
As you have described, elitism involves a detachment from nature. It is common for the elite to separate themselves from the world as if they are not a member, as if they have better and wider perspective than everyone else.
A problem is that the modern world considers this separation of reality as a form of creativity. Unfortunately, it is the same creativity that is found in absurd and abhorrent art that many elitists consider to be art as opposed to orinthoscalismata. In many ways elitism and these sensational ‘creative’ artists are birds of a feather that flock together.
What drives the urge to be ‘creative’, but more specifically, to be different? It is a rather basic case of inferiority. The elitists believe they are inferior if they do not separate themselves from the mundane world. It is an addiction that cannot easily be cured, because the temptation to be different is so strong for these individuals. Vincent Van Gogh is admired, and even more so when he decides to sacrifice his own ear. This is the sort of creativity that elitists aspire to, absent any point of reference or logic.
In the end, elitists are quite common and boring, and that is proven by the homogeneity in their own groups. Even MENSA members share certain traits. For elitists, a common trait is an inability to honestly communicate with others. They cannot communicate honestly because to do so would make them identify with a member of the inferior group — their audience. Honest communication requires an understanding of the audience’s perspective, not the speaker’s.
Using Obama as an example, details are irrelevant not only because he does not have them, but because the details would force him onto the same level as others. He would be forced to confer information as anyone else would — a congressperson, a lawyer, or even worse, an opponent. Indeed, Obama’s only goal is to make himself appear different from his ‘competition’, and because of that, he is one of the biggest elitists this world has known.
In addition to your list of elitist traits above, you should consider adding the desire for fame — or infamy.
“A man’s just gotta know his limitations”
… Harry Callahan (Clint Eastwood), in Magnum Force
The problem with our elites, is that they refuse to acknowledge theirs …
… they believe that thinking “right” and going to the “right schools” and schmoozing with the “right people” makes them omniscient and therefore worthy of making the decisions and allocating the resources FOR everyone …
… until, like the subject of Harry’s commentary above, the (clown) car they’re riding in blows up under them.
It seems to me one key thing that those here labeled “elites” share is not so much education or income or social-status of jobs but rather the degree to which they think the State is the best provider of answers to the fundamental challenges to human society. Statists are less interested in persuasion now than they are in just raw power — they are through trying to recruit those who disagree and have decided the best step is to first blame them for societies ills and then to bull-doze those who don’t leave the public square.
In contrast, it’s interesting to note the blend in sources such as Scripture: Paul was well-read, educated, spoke multiple languages and was a tent-maker, a decidedly blue-collar (i.e., non-scholar) job; Amos spoke to the King and was a goat herder from down South; Hosea married a prostitute; David was a keeper of sheep, a musician, an army vet, a King and a poet, married to (though not uniquely) the wife of a local vineyard owner, and on.
In fact, Eastern philosophers looked with some disdain at Scripture because it is so capitalistic in orientation: get a return on talents, be fruitful and multiply, wear the armor, make the vineyard produce, run the race to win, … A bit performance oriented. And the State gets some reference — render to Caesar — but it isn’t at the top of pyramid.
Nothing sums this article up better than the fact that a plumber – an anonymous plumber – has been reported to have designed and created the cap that is keeping more oil from spewing into the Gulf. All the law degrees, all the sophisticated elites with their escrow account and the power of the US Coast Guard behind them could not do what a simple plumber who wishes to remain anonymous could.
tough to add any here. but my wife tires of me voicing this same sentiment (a bit more crudely). i’m fond of watching these tv programs on how things are made.
it is a pity that a culture of innovation, hard work, and just awfully clever people has to be brought down by th e small minded, sycophants…with their narrow minded snarky condescension
the US produces so much extra food stuffs that we ship them overseas for poor people. Obama et al. could not in a lifetime create the machines and industrial processes that do this…but he/they can be petulant..or even take credit for the work of others if need be.
the wizards of smart have computer models that debuted with LTCM, and almost brought down the financial industry, then they were back with the tranches of MBS. and of course they have their global warming models.
the elites are too clever by half…and the rest of us are paying the price
Do you think our elites have the stones to keep the Union together should the Elites/Normals come to blows? Would they fight and sacrifice to keep us a Nation?
Or will Barack Obama’s greatest accomplishment be the dissolution of the country he obviously detests?
I wager they wouldn’t know what hit them. They cannot comprehend that scenario, as the idea of the proles rising up against THEM is anathema to them. They won’t know until it’s too late that the revolution is targeting them, and not those they are trying to scapegoat.
Dr Hanson,
On the off chance that you actually have time to review comments:
Arnold Toynbee made an argument some 60-70 years ago concerning the rise and fall of civilizations thru history. Does his theory of Genesis-Growth-Breakdown-Disintegration, along with the degeneration of a creative minority into a dominant minority with an external and internal proletariat, universal state and universal church, actually apply here?
I’m hardly an expert on such analysis, but I can’t help but get the feeling that we – and western civilization in its entirety – is going thru the worst/final parts of that cycle. I dearly hope I’m wrong and we are simply at a challenge stage that’s part of the continual set of new challenges for a society/civilization still in its creative/growth phase.
If you have any thoughts on the matter, or if you can point to some work that has explored this, I would be greatly in your debt.
:-)
Dr. Hanson: I don’t know if you have gotten to the bottom of this yet but keep working on it.
“Today’s male’s voice is often far more feminine than that of 50 years ago. Sort of whiney, sort of nasally, sort of fussy. Being over exact, sighing, artificially pausing, all that seems part of the new elite parlance. In terms of vocabulary, the absolute (“he’s no damn good,” “she’s a coward,” “he ran the business to hell”) is avoided. Pejoratives and swearing resemble adolescent temper tantrums rather than threats that might well presage violence.”
Barack Obama has a deep voice but he is always lying so is his father the Devil? So maybe it’s not the voice but the behavior.
To watch Barack throw a baseball or do some other things you might conclude he is effeminate, but it could be the he just never had a daddy who cared. However Barack Obama does act very childish in his rants against Bush, Republicans and the American people who don’t agree with his crap. He sounds whiney and petulant, sighs a lot, pauses a lot and stumbles.
Patton supposedly had a high pitched voice and was maybe even a momma’s boy growing up but it seems like he overcame those limitations and was a man who commanded respect probably because he was not effeminate.
Janet Daley has an interesting piece along these lines in the UK Telegraph:
She ends thusly:
Quite so. Time in both countries for the “elites” to find out just who this fellow John Galt is.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/janetdaley/7896446/American-politics-has-caught-the-British-disease.html
VDH has good strong points and gives us something to think about. The reactions are so varied, as are those that write them, I’m assured. It is difficult to respond to a problem though, when that problem is not clearly identified. I think attributing a cultural evolution to and decrying its detrimental effects to a group termed “elites” drives us in the wrong direction. An elite in reality could easily be politically neutral, as well as liberal, or conservative. The real cultural worm that has eaten not only at the best parts of our American identity, but also infest the world, is Marxism. Left and Right as defined at the inception of this country, by the Federalist, Washington and Adams, and the newly minted Jefferson and Madison Republican party, was the battle between a strong central government and those that believed in the supremacy of the Sates. I think it would do us all some good to educate ourselves on the impact Marxism had made on the world since it first entered that famous stage, and see how that ideology has corrupted all it comes in contact with. We will all be able to discern the pattern it takes, how so many of our institutions are populated by those who hold this world view, and hopefully defend against it using our best OODA and PIO loops.
I’ve long said that civilization trumps natural selection. I’d like to now add that persistent affluence reverses it.
These people are as they are precisely because they have not had to deal with reality. They are victims of our nation’s economic and material success. They receive all of the benefits that affluence bestows, without ever having to manifest any of the virtues that made that affluence possible in the first place.
Our nation is DOOMED because our culture has decayed from within. Character is destiny, and the character of a nation is its culture.
It won’t matter who gets elected this fall, or in 2012, because both the voters and the candidates will be cut from a fraying and substandard cloth that grows thinner each day.
If you’ve ever wondered how great civilizations decline and perish, take a look around. You’ve got a front row seat.
Do not all advance civilizations go through this? We all collapse under our own softness and laziness; look back to Egypt, Rome, China, etc. Have we not yet learned from history, or are we willfully ignorant?
I love to work with my hands and my mind, and I have found the military to be the right spot for such endevors. I believe the military is a place where men could serve to satisfy human need for might, greatness, and intellectualism.
Good to hear such comments, and thanks for your services.
The challenge for great powers, or any complex society has always been finding balance in an ever changing world. How to stay integrated without becoming rigid; how to unite during crisis without surrendering our freedom, how to empower optimize for individual liberty without losing sight of founding values…
It is not easy, and corruption sets in over time. However the US is still uniquely positioned to respond effectively to any kind of challenge. As the good Dr. never tires of reminding us, at this stage decline is more psychological than inevitable.
Our best days lie ahead (it is all a matter of us deciding it is so). Overcoming leftist power grabs, economic turmoil, religious assault, great power rivalry… All in a days work for the sons and daughters of freedom.
Meanwhile, what have you done to defeat a Democrat today?
That is correct. Barbarians have always found it easier to invade, colonize, and impose on the soft-civilized. May be America can wake up and show rest of the world that developed nations can and should maintain their edge instead of just giving up to self-imposed softness and degeneration.
In his book The Making of the Atomic Bomb, Richard Rhodes describes J. Robert Oppenheimer in a way that illustrates that the cutural elites have been around a long time. Rhodes writes,”Along the way he convinced himself that ambition and worldly success were vulgar, a conviction bolstered nicely by trust funds earnings to the extent of ten thousand dollars a year.” Ten grand was grand in the 30′s.
The Manhattan Project really messed Oppenheimer up. He was an astrophysicist by training, not a nuclear physicist or a bomb maker. He was asked to build a super weapon to win a war, and he did just that, but he wasn’t psychologically prepared to deal with the horror his weapon unleashed.
“Secretary Sebelius (HHS) released their “Standards and Certification final rule,” an expansive 228-page declaration of authority where, on page 61, they expound on their power to monitor every American’s body mass index, or BMI — a measure to estimate healthy body weight.” (From an article at The American Thinker)
We keep finding out what all the new Obama legislation actually entails. Apparently our betters are moving to have access to our electronic healthcare records and intend to monitor (and intervene ?) on things such as BMI. As a joke Dr. Krauthammer thinks they won’t ration healthcare. They’ll just ration how much we’re allowed to eat.
No doubt, obesity is a major medical problem in this country. However, direct intervention by Leviathan is not the way to fix it. If the D.C. elitists persist, we should demand full BMI-accountability from everyone drawing a government paycheck. Frank, Wrangell, Dodd and all the other hogs at the trough (including a ton of Repubs) could find themselves downsized out of a job. Gives a whole new meaning to trimming the fat out of government.
We already gave the government control over our finances, freedom to fly etc. I guess now that they have control over the health care and our bodies, they can just prescribe our daily rations. So from one of the foremost champions of liberty we have come to emulating third world countries that ration basic services!
Beautiful. Almost as classic as A Thug’s Primer:
http://article.nationalreview.com/399058/a-thugs-primer/victor-davis-hanson
Great article! However, I would have titled it, “Pity America” because we are being ruled by clueless, hypocritical elites.
That chicken any of you might have had for supper started its life in a great long chicken “house” that could hold eight to ten thousand adult chickens. Of course, when the chickens were tiny yellow fluff-balls called ‘biddies’, they had to be fenced into one side of the house with corrugated cardboard, so that they were kept close to the brooders, big multi-sided flying saucer-looking things that – dropped by pulleys down to stand on short legs – kept the “biddies” warm using propane burners.
Large, flat cardboard feeding trays were set around the outside, about eight to ten per brooder, low enough that the biddies could easily access the chicken feed. (Each tray came in “flat pack” and had to be folded open properly – a job that results in sore hands and paper-cuts.) Watering was achieved by means of upside-down mason jars screwed into wide diameter lids, one for each leg of the brooder.
The trays and jars had to be refilled twice a day for a week or so. This meant wheelbarrows full of feed wheeled and hoses dragged the length of the chicken house. A scoop of feed slung into each tray was a fairly tidy job, but each water-jar had to be flipped over, refilled, the lid banged free of sawdust and manure, replaced, and the whole contraption flipped fast so as to not let much water escape. Imagine doing all this for two chicken-houses, and then getting on the school bus and then getting off the bus to repeat the same job every evening.
I was very happy to get a few dollars a day for it, though. It paid for some decent school clothes; not expensive or cool, just decent. Of course, thirty-five dollars went a lot further in the early 70′s than it does now, and there were Five and Dimes to shop in.
That job was at one uncle’s farm. He had emphysema and couldn’t go into the chicken houses. Once the biddies got tall enough, the automatic watering and feeding troughs could be dropped from the ceiling.
Another uncle had two houses also, but there I was just working with my cousins, so no pay. He had automatic waterers for the post-infant stage, but no automatic feeders. The consequence of that was when the biddies were grown large enough to start smothering each other, and the cardboard fence was taken up to give them more room, the still cute biddies could then enter wheelbarrow territory. Inevitably, the wheel hit the odd biddy, whereupon critical mass made a critical mess that could only be resolved by taking up the poor thing by its feet and banging its head hard on a support beam. (This may help explain one or two of the prescriptions I’m on now.)
The lack of electric feeders also meant meant scooping feed into great long troughs twice a day for six to eight weeks. We often went barefoot for this job simply because we often went barefoot. Manure rinsed off under the outside tap.
I won’t even describe what it was like getting the grown pullets ready to “go out”. Suffice it to say that we coughed up chicken manure dust for two or three days afterward. (This may explain other of the prescriptions I’m on.)
My point in telling all this is that I am certainly not ashamed of this experience and am happy to relate the story whenever the occasion calls for it. I have often thought that a stint in chicken houses or pig farms, etc. would be good or the average juvenile offender; it might be even better for the average teenager in general. Barefoot.
I may not have a college education, but I know how to FEED people. And in a crisis, what does a nation need – intellectuals or farmers?
Dr. Hanson’s analysis is excellent, but here’s another perspective on the liberal “cultural elite.” Intellectual hedonism is at the heart of liberal elitism, thinking and behavior. Liberals believe what they believe because it feels good.
The cultural elite typically perceives themselves as caring, generous, fair, free-spirited, intellectually superior and open-minded. They believe they are an elite, and they disdain those they believe do not possess their qualities. They derive pleasure from these convictions.
Liberals instinctively avoid facts or logic that threaten their feelings of moral superiority. They become evasive and emotional when the flawed logic of their political philosophy is seriously challenged. They resort to rhetorical tricks like anecdotal evidence, ad hominem attack, slogans, changing the subject or dramatic appeals to emotion. Dr. Hanson characterizes this as dishonesty. Perhaps so, but often they sincerely believe their wrong-headed convictions.
Liberals instinctively base thought and action on emotion instead of logical discrimination because an emotional response not only feels better; it is easier than a logical response. To discriminate honestly and fairly requires fact checking and intellectual discipline. Addressing the world’s complex problems requires knowledge and understanding of economics, science, risk assessment and math. Logical rigor is work, and it can be unpleasant, especially when it conflicts with what makes you feel good about yourself. The liberal elite prefer decisions and action based on emotion because gratification comes sooner and more easily.
Most liberal policies involving technology, economics and the environment rest on bedrock of emotion, junk economics and junk science. Nowhere is this more apparent than their belief that human activity is causing dangerous global warming. Anthropogenic global warming is a weakly substantiated theory at best, but liberals present it as scientific fact and advocate draconian solutions to combat it. Conveniently, their solutions require exercising long-standing liberal initiatives like more taxation and government. In character, instead of engaging in serious logical consideration of opposing data and theories, liberals quickly tag scientists skeptical of global warming as crackpots or evil and suppress their arguments. It is easier. It feels better.
The liberal elite are often morally corrupt as well as intellectually lazy. Unfortunately millions of well-intentioned Americans share their convictions. The innocent liberal often sincerely believes liberal precepts. The less innocent are dependent upon liberal generosity with other people’s money.
Liberalism in America is epidemic, and firmly established as fashionable in our culture. It pervades American academia, Hollywood and the mainstream media. Like an opiate, it is ultimately destructive – but it feels good.
The truth is that even writers who write about the snobby elites are snobs themselves-the Soviet dissident Solzhenitsyn talked and wrote about this phenomenon – he truly stayed close to the ‘tree trimmers’ and had no use for the academic intellectuals and elites who were speaking out against the tyranny but would no more have a janitor over to their homes to one of their A-list parties than the President.
Tough penalties can spur crime.
Think alcohol prohibition. Or currently Drug Prohibition. Price supports for criminals. And not just American criminals. The Mexican criminals are cleaning up.
“I fear now, in contrast, that we all worry more about the BA certificate and well beyond, or the job description and status, than whether the daughter or son helps out with the dishes, changes the tire, or carries the groceries in.”
I tried hard to teach my children over and over that it is better to be good than successful. I worried that I was alone in that.
Where did gay men fall in the hierarchy of “get a manly voice free of sighs and overexactitude or get lost”? I’ll take the current standards of society, thanks, where I can be myself and not get fired, persecuted or bashed for no good reason. Guess my desire to be an equal human being makes me an elitist.
Good point. But VDH does not really care about YOUR plight, he misses the tough guys. Now some tough guys are heroes and some tough guys are bullies, and in terms of survival, I always wanted my kids to be tough, but had they been gay (not that the too are mutually exclusive, but they often are), I would still want what was best for them. I’m afraid that part of VDH’s problems with modern society is that he sees too many people like you around and not enough “manly” men.
Never mind the fact that one of our basic elites consists of the handsome, athletic, confident guys who get the beautiful girl and the good job. Why? Because we EARNED it! Part of society’s sympathy for liberal ideas in not because they are elite, but because they feel that they protect them from a certain segment of the elites. If I am bigger faster stronger smarter than you, then I should be more successful. Anything else is liberal namby pambyness; just ask them.
“In short, money, privilege, and status create in the cultural elite both a fear of mixing it up with others that might jeopardize position and placement, and yet guilt for that very sense of entitlement and exemption. All that, in turn, only heightens the shrill and sanctimonious rhetorical demands on less blessed others to prove their morality.”
Mr. Hanson, you have completely hit the nail on the head with this statement. Thank you. Ditto for the part about getting into college, marrying into this or that family. Basically, saying one set of things and living by another set.
It is not really their fault. You see most of those self characterized as “elites” are products of schooling where the overriding consideration was to PROVIDE the students with self esteem with no effort on the part of the student. Sadly they will likely send their children to similar institutions.
Dr Hanson,
Excellent article.May I recommend a link to another article along these lines that helps to bookend the failed and backwards philosophy of liberalism:
http://spectator.org/archives/americas-ruling-class-and-the
Just a link that will prove to be a complementary bookend to Dr Hanson’s article:
http://spectator.org/archives/americas-ruling-class-and-the
The article is 22 pages long but worth the time.I highly recommend it!
Another wonderful essay by Mr. Hanson. Basically it looks like the Elites do not want to be like their fathers – strong manly voice, work ethics, do as you say etc. Though I sometimes feel pessimistic that this will lead to slow erosion of the American spirit, I tell myself that 2008-2009 economic downturn has made people look inside to discover their values and spirits instead of being tempted by government handouts.
This article is just propaganda, its not even about anything real, its simple “us v them” scape-goating & conjecture.
Agreed. That and enough (unintentional?) subtext to put Freud in a coma.
Do you really believe that, or do you think you stand a chance of fooling us? Not even 0bama himself would disagree with this article – see his comments about “bitter” people in rural areas prior to the election, and his subsequent support for ideals that he & congress exempt themselves from (less energy usage for the masses while they jet around the world, health care plans that Congress does not subject itself to, and so on). If you want to pretend that anyone aware of the elites’ Feudalist scheme is “scapegoating”, then go ahead – keep fooling yourself. We’d appreciate it, though, if you wouldn’t insult our intelligence with weak apologetics.
You’re just unable to see the reality.
myth buster:
click-click
OMG, this man has been drinking the coolaide again! Someone get him
some ipicat. Cultural elites! Just a label used to bad mouth those
who have invested in the “American dream” of a college education, a nice
home, a decent paycheck and the ability to send your kids to a good
school.
Lots of people fish who are well educated. Lots of people drive 4 wheel
vehicles who are not well educated. Lots of people invest in Nature,
our rivers, streams, forest, etc., and if you bother to ask them, it is
because those things are beautiful and they want their kids to have
this in their futures.
“In short, money, privilege, and status create in the cultural elite both a fear of mixing it up with others that might jeopardize position and placement, and yet guilt for that very sense of entitlement and exemption.” Sounds like the average middle class white family to me!
This article is a piece of pomp and not worth serious consideration.
A great example of the elite entitlement attitude was on display this weekend at our neighborhood pool. A fancy Volvo station wagon was decked out with liberal bumper stickers (pro-Obama, impeach Bush, green this, green that). The kicker: they were parked right in front in a handicapped spot. I walked around the car looking for a handicapped tag, but to no avail.
“Some call you the elite. I call you my base.” — George W. Bush
Something tells me that he wasn’t addressing a group of liberals in that speech.
Elitism is by definition snobbery. I’ve been dealing with snobs all my life. Snobs are impressed with things and appearances of affluence over character. Ironically that makes them diametrically opposed to Dr. King’s hope that his children would be judged not by the color of her skin but by the content of her character. With the new order, three things give a free pass. First, paper trumps. Ivy League paper trumps all. So even if you are dithering fool, if you have the right papers you are golden. Secondly, rhetoric must be correct. Even if you do not act in the prescribed way, you must always express the politically desireable verbal rhetoric. Third, blind allegiance to the group. In this case the group is dominated by a smaller leadership of bullies. Their actions direct the actions of the group and if they choose to mislead or bully others, which alleviates the need to think for fear of having the group turn upon them. You can witness this in action as various people have been thrown under the bus.
To #104 Ellen K
I liked your comment “Snobs are impressed with things and appearances of affluence over character.” Yes, that just fits.
Also, it “clicked” with me in regard to Jesus and the Pharisees:
Matt 23:1-5 “Then Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to His disciples, saying: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. Therefore whatever they tell you to observe, that observe and do, but do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do. For they bind heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. But all their works they do to be seen by men.”
In other words: They want to be seen as moral and superior but they don’t “DO”, they just direct OTHERS what to do and how to do it. They consider themselves so much better than the rest of us that they don’t feel they should be constrained by the same rules they burden us with…
As an undergraduate, I turned in an “ethnography” assignment, covering Technocrats as if they were a cultural entitiy in the Anthro 101 sense, starting from the premise of a group who attempts all problem-solving using the dogma of bureaucracy and the tools of technology. I agree that VDH and David Brooks are on the same page in these two related essays. Much of the dissenting opinions in the comments I have read are related to misunderstandings over the pigeonhole of”elite” is used. A similar misunderstanding prevails when the “technocrat” label is applied. Someone is sure to say “I work in a technical career, but don’t see myself as a technocrat” I think it’s worth taking the time to re-read both the NYT opinion piece on Technocracy, and Dr. Hanson’s “Pity the Cultural Elite” thoroughly, as many seem to be skimming both.
Let’s face it, the real elites in this country are and always have been the social and economic conservatives — the leaders of religious institutions (Pat Robertson, a real working-class guy comes to mind), and the leaders of large corporations (such as Rupert Murdoch, who is so underprivileged). Why do politicians always go to such great lengths to pander to social conservatives and avoid being associated with liberals at all costs? We finally have a country that is governed by moderates, and the social and economic conservatives do not hold quite as much influence as they used to, and all we hear from them is how victimized they are.
Word.
Brilliant Dr. Hanson. Nuff’ said
What gibberish from someone who himself is squarely in the elite he pretends to deride. The self=hating elitist is as old as time itself (as is the elite class). Our country was founded by elite rebelling against other elites – we even restricted voting to the elites of the time as measured by land ownership.
But hey, why not stoke populist scapegoating – it is great right up until the moment when the next scapegoat is you. And if it gets to close we can always just blame the Jews…
As usual, Victor Davis Hanson belled the cat.
But, as to the absence of logic, as I said to him during his “In Depth” appearance on C-SPAN, why is he STILL enrolled in the coalition of scum, slime, filth, vermin and manure that is the Democ-rat Party?
I’m shocked! Shocked! That members of an elite lead insular lives, spend lavishly on their petty whims, send their children to the best schools, assume others will do the heavy lifting and want their social inferiors to practice the virtues that they in their exalted stated have transended. Get over it you guys and stop whining. Yeah, I know it’s not fair, but only liberals profess to care about life being fair.
Our elite class make their decisions based on a static world. They can tinker with it, regulate it, tax it and nothing will change. The problem is, human societies are dynamic and complex. Every individual can and will modify their behavior in response to the aforementioned tinkering of the elites. That, in a nutshell, is why liberalism/socialism fails: it does not take into account human nature and society as it IS. Rather, it tries to remake society into what they believe it should be, in complete violation of human nature.
Another great essay by VDH. Prof. Hanson has written many times about the hubris of the elites. Our society truly does create monsters when we value knowledge over wisdom, facts over ethics. But I am saddened by the thought that after diagnosing so well the problem, the best we can come up with is an ‘us vs them’, ‘wait ’till they get theirs’ kind of thinking. That attitude leads in a straight path to Stalinist style purges and the terror of the French Revolution.
I would never claim to have the answers but here are two practical ideas that might help, at least with politicians: 1) Term limits for elected representatives and 2) Penalties with teeth for ethics violations.
Re 3 – Brian N
I assure you that I have hired and fired more people than you have worked jobs. In light of that, I have found that someone who has “worked many jobs” has left many jobs, many of them involuntarily. I suspect that you have proven useless at any truly productive endeavor – hence your adulation of those in government jobs and ensconced in what nowadays passes for academia.
Senator Lindsey Graham, catching flack for his “yes” vote on Elena Kagan, is now likely to have a primary challenger for re-election — in 4 years. How does his political consultant handle the news?
Richard Quinn, a Graham consultant: “He’s a thinking person’s conservative. I expect him to do well among voters with IQ’s in triple digits.”
Gotta’ love that one. The arrogance of the elitist factotum. When your water-boy feels free to insult your constituents, you’ve got a problem Senator. Someone send Graham a link to the Codevilla article. Maybe he’ll realize the ruling class may not be around in four years. Start looking for a new gig.
Victor Davis Hanson March 18, 2003:
The fact is… huh? Maybe Mr. Hanson was working with a post modern definition of the word fact.
Victor Davis Hanson April 11, 2003:
Yesiree, we coasted to victory. Iraq was a lead-pipe cinch and the Taliban and terror is a thing of the past. I suppose Mr. Hanson’s post modern mind he was absolutely spot on.
RE: LOGIC
The underlying error of the Academics has a name, taken from the Platonic theology of the original Academy which Plato founded. It is called idolatry.
The error is identified by Marcus Terentius Varro (via St. Augustine of Hippo) as ‘natural idolatry’, that is idolatry without physical idols. These are Plato’s Forms, of Hegel’s Ideals. Abstract notions to which are demanded great sacrifices are, theologically speaking, idols. Liberty, Fraternity, Equality, to list the idols of The Terror in France. Diversity and Tolerance are newer ones. At best they are phantasmata — mental constructs which may be logically consistent but have no bearing on the real world.
Logical systems such as the dialectic or critical theory which rely on these idols produce rubbish. Garbage in, garbage out. At best it is as Neitzsche described, an error in logic. At worst it is the greatest sin.
I wonder if this is why Vivaldi sounds so oddly modern to my ear.
Brian n wrote, “Actually, you are completely wrong. However, thank you for showing me why the right is constantly making horrible stereotypes. I studied biology in undergrad, and now I am going to have something with a doctorate in my title.”
Your self-importance is quite impressive Brian, but you are quite naive if you believe that attending the modern college/university or obtaining a Ph.D. will either distinguish your intellect, or make you a wiser, better person. As conservative talk show host, writer and public intellectual Dennis Prager has noted, universities are places with plenty of intelligence, but very little wisdom. He is correct. I have two advanced degrees myself including one in biochemistry and another in history, and I can verify that the most important “school” in my life, the one that has taught me the most useful lessons – is what used to called “the school of hard knocks,” aka life experience.
The elite are not the Bourgeoisie. Elitism is a virtue, not a vice.
Dr. – First of all you conflate changing gender roles in a modern society with political ideas/ideals.
I submit that I can espouse the advantages of a progressive/liberal idea like…oh, let’s take “smart growth” as an example. If I try to convince you that it would be great to have some government incentives for developers to promote building new homes in the already “built” environments, I can do that with a whiney, nasal sounding voice or do it with a tough he-man gravel but the two things have nothing to do with each other, and if you think you can link them, then prove it.
Looking at a boy’s shoulders vs. his behind? Hmm….again, got some gender stuff going on there…..I’m not sure…..
What you are really against is intellectualism. Careful here because in addition to being smug and snobbish, smart/educated people can also be interesting, kind, virtuous, accepting and humble. You can’t paint them all with the same brush.
According to Marx, the Bourgeoisie are the ones who control the means of production. In today’s society this translates to the rich owners of businesses great and small. In America these are the people whom you should be pointing your finger to as much as anyone else. Lots and lots of money can buy almost anything and promote almost any idea regardless of how self-serving or asinine. Remember that next time you fault a “cultural elite.”
Oh, and most professors and folks in academia are not among the top 5% of wealth owners in the country. Not even close.
Geez. Pity the who now? I am the cultural elite and I say you hate America. America is all about boot straps and social stratification and the bottom of the heap and the top of the heap. You should go ahead and accept the fact that you’re inferior to the cultural elite and continue attacking the poorer classes below you. Good christ. I’m your best theory played out — your parents’ hard work will send you to college where you’ll get a degree that you can use to work a hell of a lot less hard and for more money. Then, you learn a little bit about art, society and grow to love $4 cupcakes. What’s the problem? It’s like manifest destiny or something.
I believe that is one of the so much vital information for me. And i am satisfied studying your article. But wanna observation on few basic things, The website style is ideal, the articles is actually excellent : D. Excellent process, cheers
Valuable information. Lucky me I found your website unintentionally, and I am stunned why this twist of fate didn’t came about in advance! I bookmarked it.
It is actually a nice and helpful piece of information. I’m glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.