Parson Obama
Puritanism 2.0
Puritanism can grate even more once its practitioners have lost their god. If 19th-century liberals were courageously at the forefront of abolition, religiously inspired college education, and the notion of American budgetary parsimony — in accordance with their notions of religious piety and soulful duty — their descendants have substituted Lord Logos for God. Still, they are now just as zealous in condemning the sins of the supposedly less educated and poorly informed, but on the quite different premise that they are simply smarter, better educated, and more enlightened. In the past, the premise was that they were the more true Christians.
Americans do not like being lectured at, much less when those sermons are misdirected and lead to higher taxes, the creation of a preachy, Ivy-League overseeing class, and legions of federal employees whose prime directive is to vote in more politicians that give them more money with less accountability.
Twanging to the White House
For that reason, it was usually a truism of the latter 20th-century (1964 onward) that after the narrow election of the Cold War hawk and tax-cutter JFK, doctrinaire liberal northerners simply could not win presidential elections. Without a southern accent (cf. LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore), Democrats fell under the suspicion of being sanctimonious liberal Northerners. And as far as the presidency went, that meant electoral suicide. (Ask Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Mike Dukakis, and John Kerry).
Thundering from Olympus
Sometimes liberal candidates were quite honest about their sense of self-importance, what Michelle Obama described as her husband “deigning” to run for office for our benefit. Long before John Kerry lamented that “we have an electorate that doesn’t always pay that much attention to what’s going on, so people are influenced by a simple slogan rather than the facts or the truth or what’s happening,” he once blurted out about his failing effort against George Bush: “I can’t believe I’m losing to this idiot.”
Barack Obama, for the reasons outlined last week (e.g., the novelty of the first African-American president, anger at Bush/Iraq, the 9/15/2008 meltdown, an orphaned election without incumbents, a stealthy centrist, money-laden campaign, a weak McCain effort, etc.) disproved that truism. But he did not thereby change at all the fact that, like a Kerry, he had a certain disdain for average folks, which eventually would come back to haunt him. We saw Nemesis at work with his self-destructive dismissals of yokel police, xenophobic Arizonians, and Islamophobic Ground Zero mosque opponents.
Clingers Redux
Sometimes Obama was quite explicit and rechanneled his infamous condescending campaign putdown of rural Pennsylvanians (e.g., “So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations”).
So for example, the Tea Party, far from having legitimate grievances, actually owes Barack Obama’s a favor: “So I’ve been a little amused over the last couple of days where people have been having these rallies about taxes. You would think they would be saying thank you.”
Are you disappointed with Barack Obama’s leadership so far, and worried about building an Islamic center near the site of the 9/11 attacks? If so, you are, well, captive to your fears: “At a time when the country is anxious generally and going through a tough time, then, you know, fears can surface — suspicions, divisions can surface in a society. And so I think that plays a role in it.” We have here a reincarnated Massachusetts churchman railing about the sins of those south of the Mason-Dixon line, but this time without either a god or a noble cause.
Lashing Out
Perhaps you are worried about record annual deficits, federalized take-overs of everything from health care to the auto industry, or the specter of 10% unemployment, and therefore might question the present policies. No problem, you simply do not “always think clearly” when “scared.” Note the following: “Part of the reason that our politics seems so tough right now and facts and science and argument does [sic] not seem to be winning the day all the time is because we’re hardwired not to always think clearly when we’re scared. And the country is scared.” (A confession: actually I am scared. The Obama deficits are unsustainable. I think health care will be ruined. The demonized job-hiring classes are in hiding. An entire generation of young people is relegated to second-class employment status. The world abroad is heating up in expectation that the U.S. is tired and through. And race relations under the divisive Obama have worsened.)
re: fact and science. Don’t look too closely but few in leadership are other than lawyers. Who would not understand the scientific method if it bit them in the @ss.
Looks like the Club-of-Rome cabal (which must include Mr. Soros) is finally being exposed for what it is – Hal Lewis calls AGW (climate change and most recently climate disruption “the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.” And of course he’s now being attacked for decades old support for environmental research and the soviet ~ “he’s so old he’s likely demented and needs professional care.”
I also see that Michael Crichton’s passion for getting the religion out of science has totally disappeared from his web site. I wonder who put the arm on his descendents (or publisher) to do the lobotomy? Which is a pity since it may well be Michael’s greatest work and contribution to civilization.
Even with a sea-change election I don’t know how to fix D.C. We should disestablish it for all things domestic (so that we don’t ever face again the terrible result of 50M+1 deciding day-to-day issues for 50M-1, and commiting the 50M-1 morally to decisions they don’t or can’t support.. and need not support if local communities govern, not a remote, at times what must seem foreign, central government).
It’s not that we conservatives want smaller government entirely, we want a much smaller central government in all things that can/could be managed locally.
“he’s so old he’s likely demented and needs professional care.”
The Left implied the same thing about Freeman Dyson who also dismissed AGW as unscientific. The Lewis letter where he resigns from APS is devastating. Small wonder it received so little media attention.
The perfect storm that is changing the political climate in this country was formed in part by the fraud perpetuated by the AGW “scientists”. They were thoroughly discredited, as are now the Leftist hacks and politicians who backed them.
Do you think he might be setting the stage, a lawyer’s trick, for an insanity plea ? So he doesn’t have to pay the piper. Oh, forgot he is the Piper piping the country to the mountain cave into whence Americans / the children, disappear never to be found
Obama’s first instinct is always, always to attack. Tea baggers, CEO’s, bankers, talk radio, oil companies, the Supreme Court. There are hundreds of examples. A hefty percentage of the thousands of droids stuffed in office buildings in DC and the suburbs must spend full-time searching for scapegoats. What a job. What do you do? Oh, I find scapegoats for the president. It pays well.
But on second thought, attack mode is really his ONLY instinct. Has there been a single reconsideration, change of direction or even a lean in another direction. Can’t think of one.
There has never ever been somebody this rigid in high public office. Forget the presidency, our only so-called representative of all the people. You would be hard-pressed to find anybody in any office as rigid as this idealogue.
It’s ironic that the guy who ran as a blank slate upon which millions etched their own vision has turned out to carry an ideology so etched in stone that he can barely say hello to someone who doesn’t agree with him.
Or, now that millions of Tea Partiers are etching their vision on that blank slate, Obama wants to take it back and not play.
Apparently, he ain’t got no game.
It’s “ideologue” not “idealogue.” (You spelled “ideology” right a few lines later.)
Grammar Nazi.
No ideas of your own to cite, so you pick apart what someone else has said to make yourself feel better. What kind of ideology do *you* have, or do you not know what the word means, but just how to spell it?
That’s a very nasty and unhelpful comment. Also….it’s directly ad hominy and too gritty……
That is a very nasty comment. It’s also gritty ad hominy.
Hominy times are people going to criticize the criticism of this critical comment?
Ad hominy? That’s a corny comment.
Charlie Griffith –
You can say that again! (And you did!) Thank you.
Charlie Griffith –
You can say that again! (And you did!) Thank you.
Think of his ‘IDEAS’ as sinking ‘logues’
Maybe it is his lack of service to his country, his marxist views, his sense of entitlement,his narcissistic arrogance, his preferential treatments, his anti-colonialist father, his anti-American preacher, his financial illiteracy, his disdain for the ‘lesser folk’, and a giant chip on his shoulder?
NahnCee and FSM47:
Morbosi pariter, gemelli utrique,
uno in lecticulo erudituli ambo . . .
One’s as sick as the other, twin diseases
in their little bed, with their little minds . . .
Nah, it can’t be that. Must be something else.
“There has never ever been somebody this rigid in high public office.”
Hello, Cheney?
Some men see things as they are and ask why.
I see things that never were and ask Why Not.
…. Robert F. Kennedy
.
Some people see things as they are and ask why.
I see things that never were (but as they should be) and ask why not force everyone to adhere to my vision of the world.
… Barak H. Obama
.
See, Obama Knows Best!
Like I’ve said before: Obama is all about “Getting even with Whitey!” and nothing more…
I’m a great admirer of Mr. Hanson’s writings, but I have to quibble with the premise of this one. While elements of puritanism may be present in a highly modified state among today’s “progressive” leftists, a much more recent ancestor we should look to for understanding is the Social Gospel movement of the late 1800s. Those were the founders of the nanny state (as opposed to the nanny church).
The puritans also believed in freedom of conscience and localized congregational polity; those are key contributions to the great tradition of American liberty. To connect them too closely to modern leftists is a bit like claiming, say, that modern conservatives believe in hereditary aristocracy because that’s what conservatives believed in 400 years ago.
You know, I’ve lately seen other people trying to connect/compare Puritanism to Leftism and also Islamism lately. I wonder when email went around that we haven’t seen?
The only part that comes close in actuality, is that the Pilgrims [i]were[/i] extremists who wanted a religious tyranny–a totalitarianism–where their religion was in charge instead of someone else’s. Thing is that lasted for about one generation, and they didn’t look back.
Quite. The pseudo-religious framing of the piece presents but an ill-conceived construct that falls very flat. It seems Mr Hanson has some trouble with religion, although I should not begrudge him to liken Obama to a Marxist preacher. He needs to realize there are beliefs, and there is faith. Different things altogether.
I don’t know that I can agree that a meaningful distinction can be drawn between faith and belief in this context.
What I am certain of is that leftism believes there is no higher power than what is the collective will, as long as it is “progressive”. The Puritans certainly beleived in a higher power than anything man could do, and I believe–I have faith–that attempting to live as Christ would have us live will lead to a life which is classically liberal; the Nicene Creed notwithstanding–Christ predates it. Progressiviem leads away from the Enlightenment and denies the relevance of classic liberalism.
Progressivism is the Endarkenment, not the Enlightenment.
I’m scared. And I’m pissed.
Excuse me, I have to go and vote now.
I imagine that Obama said something similar when confronted with his teaching evaluations when he was a law school lecturer.
He’d have been better off saying, “The voter are speaking, the bastards.”
By definition, that would make the left what I call Neo-Puritans. Different from the original, but with the same hair-shirt mentality. Innumerable new and constantly updated pieties for thee to engage in (but not for me) enforced by new and equally innumerable neo-bishops and neo-cardinals.
…and to go with that fine hairshirt, a matching cat-o-nine tails is on the way to you!
I’ll go have my cake now.
Nice.
…and to go with that fine hairshirt, a matching cat-o-nine tails is on the way to you!
I’ll go have my cake now.
Nice.
Victor Davis Hanson, do you ever sleep?!
Your comprehensive and concise columns help keep me sane in the Age of Obama Hype.
Thank you!
Much like Chuck Norris, Doctor Hanson does not sleep. He waits.
Reagan praised America but Obama ignores it or apologizes for it.
The Chilean miners would not have been rescued but for a small American company. NASA helped out, but the special drill was made by an American company.
That company should get a special award from the President, but he doesn’t think that way.
Professor Obama from Harvard and the Univ. of Chicago is in charge and if you don’t agree with him, you are a dope.
“[Obama] is telling us that we, the disenchanted with him, are scared, frustrated, and simply are not able to fathom his arguments or even basic science…”
Like everything else Obama says, those are lies. In this case, calculated lies, not inadvertently blurted lies. Obama knows that people attend tea parties because they wisely object to increased government powers, taxes, and debts. He knows that his vague or illogical arguments for his programs and policies are believed only by mesmerized idol-worshipers or by idiots. He knows that Keynesian economics is a fraud, that anthropogenic global warming is a fraud, that energy independence is an absurd goal, and that calling China to task for linking the renminbi to the dollar is beyond stupid (over two dozen nations link their currency to the dollar). But, Obama cannot speak the truth about anything if he is to achieve his goals of converting the USA to a fascist-socialist-corporatist economy, destroying our international alliances, emboldening our enemies, and ensuring that we become a second-rate power.
I think you give the man too much credit re: his understanding of Keynesian economics being fraudulent, or AGW. He isn’t smart or wise or leader-like when it comes to those specific issues. In fact he is just seeing these issues as part of a political ploy to advance the leftists’ agenda of punishing the productive elements and redistributing wealth. But of course it matters little whether he actually understands the concepts, the damage he perpetrates is killing the economy and our rights nevertheless. The results are the same.
I’m not giving Obama much credit. My best guess of Obama’s IQ is ~110.
One doesn’t need to be brilliant to realize that massive deficit spending by government can never fix a broken economy. One doesn’t need to be brilliant to know that AGW is a fraud when mean global temperatures haven’t gone up in twelve years and mean sea level hasn’t increased in decades.
I think you all “give Obama too much credit”.
I’m sure you are all aware, but it bears repeating that Obama is a mannequin, the window dressing, the figurehead. Not an independent creature, as evidenced by his performance when not managed by his puppeteers : this great orator’s 12 year old locutions and use of the English language, the national language of the country of which he is the President.
The major blame ought to be for his puppeteers / string pullers. I refer of course to the DNC, the Clintons, the Kennedy and Kerry, i.e. the left wing flanks of the Democratic Party, and ALL those Congressmen / Senators, of both major political parties who have assured these final steps of an unlawful takeover of the USA. The icing on the cake DECORATION — FEINT.
The population is so distracted by the Obama “mis-steps” that they’ve lost sight of the ball. As they did in the Democratic Administration in the last decade of the 20th century with the entertaining french farce of Clinton’s “impeachment”. So entertaining and he so charming that he was permitted to run for re-election to continue his Party’s progress through governing institutions of the USA, e.g. sub-prime, ACORN, and others of which I would guess we as yet know nothing. As we know none of the details of the oval office tapes made by JF Kennedy and LB Johnson,initiator and escalator of the Vietnam War and its effects on subverting the cohesiveness of the American polity.
All to further the march of his left wing of the “PARTY”. Even now these “Democrats” are seriously bruiting Hillary as the “white knight” to clean up the mess made by Obama. Anyone wonder why, when her ostensible goal was the brass ring she accepted the secondary / consolation prize of Secy of State? Isn’t that odd given her expertise at the game of power with her understanding that she personally was unacceptable to large numbers of potential electors?
They’re good, these lefties in getting populations to dance to their tune, march to their drums and trumpet. They’ve been at it for a long time and are organised world wide. And the CAPOs are always invisible.
Review the development of politics, internal AND external, of the USA that brought us to this place, especially ALL the administrations headed by a “Democrat”.
“It’s only hubris if I fail.”
Keep hammering him Dr. H. When was the last time the stars aligned so perfectly that a political neophyte could make it to the top so easily? Could it be a once in a hundred years honest mistake by the public, or is there more to the story.
How can the President accuse the Chamber of Commerce of violating a law than has been on the books since 1909 with no proof whatsoever. Hopefully, if the republicans take the House, then maybe they can shine the light of day on the administration and at least stop some of the worst excesses of the white house. It seems the tide has turned aginst the President on all levels and the people seem him clearly. He will see his hubris soon and then he can have a talk show on CNN.
VDH:
Now that we have seen Obama in action, we should not be afraid to characterize his performance. I think Obama’s story will be more about his transition from hope to fear than the his ‘accomplishments’. Hope to fear is a ‘common’ story, since many others before Obama have followed the same path, but maybe it is unique because this story was repeated at the level of the Presidency.
Fear is oozing from Obama, and the only explanation for his extreme lack of confidence is that he is uncomfortable with himself. The source of his discomfort may be feelings of inferiority. He is now in a position to be compared to others, specifically Presidents that preceded him, and he must not like what he sees in himself. However, unlike people who are able to internalize and dissect their own personal failings, and change, Obama desperately resists honestly assessing himself.
When one is not honest with oneself, it seriously affects one’s character. This is what we are witnessing in Obama. He is aware that something is wrong, that his rhetoric does not match reality, and instead of trying to embrace the task of reconciling the two he attempts to distract himself from that task. One of the symptoms of this form of denial is to raise one’s voice like children do — when they put their fingers in their ears and yell ‘I can’t hear you’ at the top of their lungs. Obama shows this childish trait in different ways, but the analogy is relevant. Like the child who does not want to change himself, he behaves in ways that he thinks will change others, if he simply holds out long enough.
VDH, I have read many of your posts and I know that you give Obama his due respect as President. It is the only way to communicate effectively as an adult in public — even if Obama is not entirely deserving of the respect. However, his irreverent anecdote might come in useful when considering how to approach Obama. Obama is like a child on the school bus who has just discovered how to use the ‘middle finger’. He sits in the bus and flips off every car that passes, giggling to himself as he treats others with disrespect. As a child, he understands that ‘civilized’ individuals will not do much in response, they will ignore it, or internalize the indignation that they feel. But what is the correct response of the adults that are witnessing Obama’s irreverence? Actually, the correct response is for the adult to flip Obama the bird back. Adults can internalize, but it is not the correct response in the presence of children who perennially do not understand respect. For one reason or another, Obama has not learned this lesson, and he will continue in his ways as long as the adults that surround him internalize their indignation. Obama must be treated like the child that he is before he can begin to change.
I agree with you, Mike, that an adult cannot and should not treat Obama as a child. But…
Obama refuses equal interaction with anyone. You cannot interact with him as one adult to another. Obama’s pathological narcissism requires that HE controls You.
He has used, as I’ve said, three key tactics in this agenda of control of others: misinformation, aka, lying; emotional manipulation…how about his constant exhortations to pass his legislation or The Apocalypse Will Result…(economic collapse, millions dying for lack of health care…).
And – remember his key tactic of accusations of your bias.
Obama has used the bias tactic for years; racism is a basic plank – and he’s used it to prevent any accountability for his actions and words. Criticize him, and you are a racist. So there.
After all, his 2008 campaign slogan, of ‘healing racial divisions’ was an open statement that IF you voted against him, THEN..this meant that you refused to ‘heal racial divisions’; you were a racist. Neat way to get votes.
I don’t think that Obama can change; he’s entrenched in this malignant behavioral pattern of pathological narcissism. But, we can remove him from power. He is destroying America – and he’s an anti-American; you can recognize that in all his speeches and his round-the-world tours of apology for the pre-Obama America.
He’s anti-American in his rejection of entrepreneurship, his rejection of the right-to-work and be wealthy; instead, Obama’s class warfare insists that anyone who ‘makes it good’ has done so by nefarious means and pure greed…and must be punished by having those results taken by the government.
He’s anti-American in his rejection of the rule of law. Why does he support illegal entrants to the US, and refuse to allow the States to confront them? Why does he stand by and watch some people apply, legally, for immigration..pay the fees, submit the papers, and be refused or get in and pay their taxes…and yet allow others to climb a fence and stay without paying taxes?
He’s anti-American in his rejection of exceptionalism. It is a fact that the American empowerment of the individual promotes exceptional innovation. After all, where did the car, the airplane, the computer, electricity, space travel, electronic technology..on and on and on…come from except from within the curiousity and freedom to think..of Americans?
Obama cannot, psychologically, deal with anything or anyone ‘better’ than him, i.e., whom he cannot control and make them his acolytes. He won’t change.
The Democrats have to realize that he’s destructive and must get rid of him. They elevated him as their puppet to get their radical socialism in; they’ve got to get him out.
There have been so many small gestures and concessions he could have made, but didn’t. He could have incorporated a few Republican ideas in the Stick-it-to-us. He could have lowered some minor tax in the same bill rather than just redistributing a few hundred tax bucks per person. He could so easily have incorporated a free-market idea of two in the Obamyscare bill. He could have been generous in the last-minute “conference” held on the same bill. Just acknowledging that Republicans had legitimate ideas could have been done at no cost.
But he has done nothing along those line.
He could have said, as he aligned nearly perfectly with Bush on so many Terrorism initiatives. that he has come to see the wisdom of some of those actions. That would have been free as well. But he hasn’t done so, instead barely acknowledging that Bush had a cogent thought in his life.
So why would anybody think he will change in the least, no matter how brutal November ends up being? He will still have the veto pen, with which he will protect his country destroying programs. He will revel in blaming everything bad that happens on his enemies (us), while boastfully claiming credit for any good thing that happens.
I don’t think it is so much that he is unable to change, but that he is 100% convinced that he has set the table and that he has set it as perfectly as it can be set. L’etat, c’est moi. This despite the fact that the details of the major legislation were all written by the congressional criminals. He doesn’t even know the details.
So I disagree with the central permis of Mike CO’s comment. The moron ain’t changing. ETAB has the correct analysis.
Yes, but will the Congressional Democrats sign the suicide pact, or will they instead vote to override Obama’s vetoes to save their own skin? It takes 290 votes in the House and 67 in the Senate to override a veto- can we do it?
So basically speaking we have had elected to the office of President of the United States an perennial adolescent! One that in his own mind is invulnerable but his vulnerabilities are being exposed and he will eventually either have to resign or be impeached or committed to a mental institution, it is also possible that some crazed individual might assassinate him!
It is sad that we have made the mistake of voting such a man with little if any experience in any real workplace or executive position, and even as a lawyer, much less a professor of law. The man is a FARCE and should be gotten rid of as he is clearly not qualified or even eligible to hold his office!
It will nice to see the meltdown and hopefully the throwing out of office for being mentally unfit to continue this charade he has placed on the American public.
Has no one ever taught him that there is always someone smarter or stronger or faster or just better than YOU at whatever it is you do, just ask Tiger Woods about his golf game right now.
No one is ever 100%, and now that reality is hitting him squarely in the face he should realize that he is just a yuk a puk and probably not even as good as most common citizens. His God Status has been revoked and he is a flawed individual as well as the rest of us.
Oh heck…we’re just not “hard wired” and panicking..the little people aren’t thinking straight, we’re scared!! damned right we’re scared, of Obama and his cronies!!
A dime store novel could not be cheesier than the present administration and how they talk down to us.
We still need the next two weeks to help the republicans in the close races. Give what you can.
It’s fourth down and goal.
re: Crichton’s call to put the method back in science, and remove the religion from environmental issues.
Did some more digging. His site still has an area where pointers to the videos of some of his talks can be found, but the text of his articles and the transcripts of his speeches are gone. And there’s a moderator’s note to avoid the topic in his discussion groups. A pity since so much research now is done using web-search tools, especially by the young.
For those interested in his ideas and arguments, see the “Internet WayBack Machine” archive at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071002031116/www.crichton-official.com/speeches.html
Either Crichton or you need to get the terminology right: It is not about religion in science but misconceptions and iterated falsehoods. In fact, Francis Bacon dealt with the issue of scientific method comprehensively long ago (Novum Organum), this despite his Church of England religion. Time to get this straight instead of pandering to atheist vocabulary. Come to think of it, some areas of current science could easily be branded as pre-Baconian, which just shows what sort of skids this civilization has hit.
“without either a god or a noble cause.”
Pretty much describes most Leftists, doesn’t it?
VDH: Obama does have a god; a god whose permanent future residence is the dark pit of hell. So go the rest of the “clingers” of the great philosphy of Hell on Earth if they don’t let go. Every lie exposed, every dead body unearthed, nothing hidden anymore. Now is the time. We have seen an amazing revealing of dark secrets over the last two years that is now reaching back centuries and really, unbelievably, it has only just begun. Perhaps we should “thank Obama” but I would rather thank the one true God for the 2 x 4 upside the head instead. This is all a result of seeking the truth. Keep it up everybody and thank you Dr. Hanson.
My avatar or photo is a picture of one of my 9MM pistols. I practice the use of my second amendment daily as well as the first amendment which I back up with Smith & Wesson and Keltec as well as Glock!
I think that Professor Hanson (whom I admire greatly) is describing Obama’s motives and driven by those motives behaviour, I’d say with some embarassment, in ludicrously benevolent terms.
Obama’s actions, his entire narration, his argumentation, his reactions to criticism, are typical for a quasi-human, or even I’d say sub-human being that we call a PARASITE.
There is NOTHING sophisticated in hallucinations produced by his dark, poisoned mind.
Parasitic being will put any mask whether it is a communist, socialist, social-democratic, islamofascist, national-socialist (or whatever we can think of) in order to build a socio-political construction that would enable him to live his PARASITIC life at the expense of the people of SMART AND HONEST WORK.
Obama is just that; a perfect PARASITE who has NEVER soiled his hands with any useful, wealth producing work.
He doesn’t even understand that it is SMART AND HONEST WORK that is producing wealth he has such an atavistic drive to steal.
Therefore, it is one of the elements of his “strategy”, as primitive and evil as that strategy is, to destroy the very fundaments on which that SMART AND HONEST WORK can be proceded with.
He is so evil that he doesn’t even grasp the fact that in the process he is also destroying the very future of his own daughters, who shall be forced to live in the world that is less prosperous, less peaceful and less safe, and above all less free.
Although he hasn’t managed to kill anyone yet, he resembles Mao, the Chinese communist despot who didn’t care at all about his numerous offspring’s lot.
And like Mao he seems to enjoy the destruction he is doing to the country that has created for him opportunities, he would never find in any other part of the world.
He is a DEGENERATE being and represents EVIL in its entire purity and there is really no point in musing about whether his motives are being driven by his religious or political affiliations.
The only positive elements of BARBARISM he unlashed on America is that he proved to be much more inept in fullfilling designs and plans ascribed to him by his mandataries, whether they are KGB or some shadowy Islamo-fascist operatives.
He hasn’t managed to destroy America entirely and failed to anticipate the ferocity of the backlash that is building against him and his masters.
One is also certain; He doesn’t deserve and shouldn’t expect any forgiveness or mercy when he is finally deposed and brought to justice.
Not only him. His entire treasonous, communo-fascist mafia as well…
I agree. But I always say the same thing as it’s my take on this scene.
The entire “liberal” / left wing hierarchy of the “Democratic Party” is at the base of this fiasco. They have worked long and hard, at least a half-century, insinuating their troops in pivotal position in ALL the civic institutions of the USA. Exploiting the population with bread and circuses, and their destructive pitting citizen against citizen for “fairnesss and equality” using as the primary weapons the race and gender cards. Their glamourous frontmen, Kennedys and Clinton, all of whose integrity only to the pursuit of power and joy of destruction of the social bulwarks of the hated “common folk”. Kerry, a feeble wannabee, and his ilk and now the star of stars / THEIR Messiah Obama.
There’s a lot of comment about the possible demise of the Republican Party with the growth of the Tea Party (dare one call it the awakening of the People). Somehow however very little, if any, talk about the demise of “Democratic” Party, so destructive of the hopes and dreams of its members. AND so insultingly dismissive of the members. Its survival ought to be an eery phenomenon.
And yet there’s very little comment. Because so many public figures, commentators, pundits, educators, union officials, bureaucrats, lawyers and others are closely publicly associated with it, and they must secure their bases in the event of the stampede when the Party implodes. The resignations of personal advisors of Obama before this November election ? Similar to some survivors of the Titanic who pushed to the front in their flight to the lifeboats?
Oh this waving of arms
This shaking of fists.
On these platforms of fitfullness.
Can no one see the boyish charms?
Watch me close for I am won.
Take my hand my chosen ones.
This music is pied
So sweet in tune.
Follow my children the valley will bloom
Money and milk, love and health
Waters we clean with togetherness
All for one in steady stealth
Come stay the course
We will dragon slay
Drink the drink with no remorse
dance the danse macabre
I loved this! I loved this! I loved this!
#19 Tallgrass
Thanks again…..wonderfully written!
Tallgrass is really talented! This is great!
Good god, what absolute drivel. Overwrought. Underwritten. Just because it rhymes doesn’t make it good. Geez, Lousie. You people’s standards are low in EVERYTHING.
4) When “suspicions and divisions can surface” in America, it becomes possible to scapegoat a) George Bush, b) Rush Limbaugh, c) the police, d) surgeons, e) the Chrysler creditors, f) Justice Roberts, g) Fox News, h) the people of Arizona, i) John Boehner, j) the Chamber of Commerce, k) opponents of the Ground Zero mosque, and l) Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie — suggesting that they all engage in some sort of nefarious activity harmful to the state.
You could also include m) Tea Partiers, n) Republicans, o) capitalists, p) Sean Hannity, q) “the rich”, and r-zz) basically anyone to his political right, which includes some 90% of America.
Again I find myself asking, who are these people who like Obama personally? They like his fighting spirit? His ability to say with a straight face things even he knows are not accurate? His commitment to “what’s mine is mine and yours is too” regarding spending and running up deficits?
Many were bamboozled by a good marketing campaign in 2008. Let’s get out there a vote for candidates who want Americans to be strong and successful and not dependent on a government handout. Strong at home and around the world. America, love it or leave office.
“Shovel ready” sounded so transformative, and the did shovel the money to his union buddies. So credit where credit is due, he can read a sound-bite as good as anybody.
Next bumper sticker for the next election for President “Putz for Prez again you will get even more change…that you don’t like.”
Yes, progressives and the nanny-state have become the new Puritans. There is something in human nature that likes to proscribe, and something else that does not like to be lectured. Others are likely to proscribe hard work, patriotism, the sanctity of clumps of cells inside a mother’s body etc. And God bless the United States of America.
It is also true that Obama has not been able to get above the divisiveness, but those who did, Reagan and Clinton come to mind, BARELY got above it and much of America still despised both of them. Not the same Americans, of course, but similar numbers from opposing sides.
Repubs were explicit from the beginning that they would defeat Obama and his plan; months later they try to point to constructive additions they were TRYING to make. Obama won that battle, but is currently losing the campaign. I guess that argument is that he should have been enough of a centrist to know that it would not be good to win that battle, even if it was something that his side has yearned for, for some time. He may have thought that keeping on Gates and droning away at the Taliban, deporting illegals in numbers far beyond what GWB did, blah blah would win him some centrist cred, but the wind ain’t blowing that way.
After the Repubs win big in the upcoming election we will still be faced with all the same problems. Maybe the business owners will come out of their safe houses and do more hiring and we can avoid a deep second dip. Maybe people with jobs will decide to buy a lot of Christmas presents. Let’s roll out GWB and he can tell us all to buy our way out of this particular 9/11.
In the meantime, everyone can devote their creative writing skills to attacking Obama on this site, or defending him on other sites. Here is MY contribution, “Behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit.” Thought it up myself! ;-)
god im tired of obama
Note, though, how the evening news programs have upped their daily helpings of Obama. It’s Obama on the campaign trail, Obama firing up the faithful, Obama trying to close the deal, Obama joined with his even more popular wife.
I too am tired of him.
Hey guy you are not the only one in this country, but you could download that picture of a fly stuck on his face (as well as his wart or mole on his face) and turn it into a dartboard!
IT SEEMS THAT THE FLY THAT OBAMA KILLED ON TELEVISION AND THE MEDIA MADE SUCH A BIG DEAL OUT OF IS now coming back to bite him and the entire democrat party!
Another great VDH.
I myself am angry – angry that the US citizenry have allowed this charlatan to be elected – angry that I have to watch the destruction of my country and even if after this upcoming election, there is a balance in the representation, to possibly watch it decline some more. I’m tired of the analysis of Obama. He was well analyzed before the election by anyone who cared to do the research. There comes a time when you don’t care about their motives, you base your judgement on the results. Well, the results are here and they are dismal. I just want Obama and his coterie gone.
Terms like “less fortunate” and “the Poor” are deceptive terms used by the Left to buy votes. Both terms include those with medical problems, lack of employment, drug addicts, drunks, the lazy and criminals. Why? to buy votes. I have no problem helping a sick person as long as that sickness is not self induced by long term behavior such as excessive drinking, drug use, and unprotected sex. I have no problem with unemployment benefits and welfare, just not in unlimited quantities. There should be strings attached to all welfare programs and the people that get this support from the rest of society owe that society a debt. They are not entitled to free stuff just because they breathe. They should be a ward of society for the minimum amount of time and the least expense possible. What do I mean? No additional children while collecting welfare, no drugs, no alcohol, no cigarettes, no cable TV no cell phone. Just food, clothing and shelter anything else work for it.
Politicians spend too much time dealing with emotional issues and not facts. Want an example of a fact? OK the current debt will some day have to be paid. Another fact? There will come a day when there is no money or support for dead beats, be they politicians or the less fortunate.
Obama is a pathological narcissist, a psychological state that I suggest he moved into as a young boy. He has only three means of interacting with others.
1. Misinformation. Obama lies constantly; he lives, after all, in a fictional world, a world authored and controlled strictly by himself. He cannot permit any facts, any reality, to enter this text. Therefore, what he says is, to him, reality. The fact that he can tell one audience one thing, and the next day, tell a different audience its contrary – is irrelevant to Obama. What is ‘real’, to him, is what he says. His sole agenda is to control YOU, to control your interaction with him. He has no contact with reality.
Note how his tactic of dealing with Islamic terrorism is by words; he denies it exists, and calls it ‘man-caused disasters’..etc.
His tactic of dealing with illegal entrants to the US (they are NOT ‘immigrants’!!) is to blame the people who reject them…and so on.
2) Emotional manipulation. Ahh, here’s a key strategy of Obama. He MUST control your interaction with him, and besides the lies, he manipulates you emotional. Hope and fear. Those are his two emotional tactics. He cajoles, he smiles, he jokes…and he threatens, he accuses, he attacks.
3) Accusations of bias. You STILL aren’t under his control? You STILL question him, reject his commands? Well, the fault is, of course, not in him. The fault is in you.
You are biased. Politically biased if you are GOP. Or by your religion, especially Christian. Or by your profession (if you are rich you are greedy, if you are a doctor you cut off limbs for money, if you are rural you are ignorant…).
Along with accusations of bias, he claims that your criticism of him is due to your ignorance. You simply aren’t smart enough to understand the greatness of him and his policies. As Obama has said, most people live in the moment..and don’t understand his ‘far-seeing vision’ of the future. That’s why they reject his policies; they are too dumb to see the great results.
I think that people don’t realize how dysfunctional Obama is. If he had been left as a local pontificator, i.e., as a local community organizer – which is about all he can do – then his egoism, his narcissism, and his ignorance and laziness, would be confined to local effects.
Put someone like that in a position of power – where his inability to interact on an equal level with others, his ignorance and shallow awareness of history and economics, his rejection of reality, his inability to accept facts, his exponential need to control, his need for adulation, ..and his entrenched anti-Americanism (because he can’t handle anyone or anything better than him)…well…it’s a disaster.
ETAB, a disaster it is.
And consider that our public education systems are churning out a legion of Obamas: arrogant, entitled ignoramuses, all revved up on red hot feelings, based on such fantasies as Gaia worship and moral relativism.
This total misunderstanding of reality reminds me of what happened when the Sorcerer’s Apprentice dabbled with strong powers he had no idea how to control.
IMO, reining in the Democrats and getting rid of Obama are just a thumb in the dike. Get ready for the deluge!
Then, let’s roll!!
What is the core principle of the United States? I would argue “government of the people, by the people, for the people” Gettysburg Address.
But we have a highest official in the country who refuses the manifest response of an entire country. It’s not an arguable dissent, it’s overwhelming. The louder the people speak, the more he accuses them of….stupidity, laziness, ideology, bitterness, anger, greed, selfishness, racism.
Nobody expects a leader to agree with the people 100% of the time. But this is pathological. And he seems to take pleasure in it.
Surely this is evidence of mental illness. The function of the position is to represent the people, and his reaction to our clearly expressed concerns is to increase the punishment. It is equivalent to anorexia. He refuses to consume the only thing that can save his position. It’s the definition of insanity.
Agreed, proreason. I think that Obama is mentally ill, in the sense that his neurosis, narcissism, is malevolent or pathological. It is deep-seated and untreatable. Obama is incapable of living within reality; he is able to live only in a fictional world of which he is the author and controller of all that happens.
Put someone with that psychological pathology in a position of power – and it’s disastrous. That’s because in such a position, unlike the small time community organizer – he can’t control EVERYONE! There are dissidents! There’s the whole GOP! There’s FOX news, Hannity, Limbaugh, on and on…and what has happened? Obama, in an embarassment to the dignity and role of the presidential seat…has publicly denigrated them, tried to get FOX news declared unacceptable, tried to get people to turn against the others.
He’s sneered at the Tea Parties, actually calling them ‘tea baggers’…and these are American citizens he is denigrating. He’s done the same with the Town Halls; he’s allowed his staff and members to condemn dissent as ‘unAmerican’..and so on.
He’s openly denied that power belongs to the people. He’s rejected the rule of law, both in in insults to the decisions of the Supreme Court, and in his refusal to abide by his constitutional duty to protect the borders.
The Democrats have to ditch him before he destroys, not merely their party, but America. It’s been hard for people to realize how pathological Obama is; his whole campaign was geared around race; elect him and you were cleansed of a racism that you didn’t even know you had! Reject him…and…
Now, people are realizing that there’s something wrong..and it’s not just socialism; it’s a deep pathology and hatred of people whom he can’t control.
Apologies if this shows up twice…
Obama’s a piece of work, and I’ve called him nuts myself, but honestly, I wouldn’t let him off with an insanity plea. He’s not clinically insane, just a garden variety Leftist fool with a penchant for immaturely attacking his detractors. It’s his political philosophy, Leftism, that’s stark raving mad. We’ll need to keep the focus on that, since once he’s out of office there will still be plenty of Leftist clones sniffing around Washington waiting for their chance to ruin our country.
TLM, right on – there are plenty of Leftist clones, with more being made every day. Getting rid of their chief drone is a good beginning, but does not erase the Leftist, marxist peril.
Obama preaching? He says he does not ‘remember’ Rev. Wright; Yet from an interview about his book ‘Dreams From My Father”, he said;
“Reverend Wright, my pastor who I speak about in a chapter of the book, represents the best of what the black church has to offer.”
Could Barracky boy be LYING??????
Any day now, I’ll be reading where the animal rights activists are picketing the White House because Barracky boy kicked his dog.
Mr Irrelevant is not only a football player. To steal from Churchill, this election day is not the beginning of the end, but perhaps the end of the beginning. I hope my grandchildren see Obama’s picture under “miserable failure”, with his reputation accorded its earned disdain.
In New England Puritan days, you were expected to sit in church on Sunday for hours on end listening to one of the few college educated men in the community–the minister. (Remember that Harvard was founded as a school to educate ministers.) If you dosed off to sleep, an usher would wake you so you could listen to the sermon–for your own good. If you skipped church, instead, you would be punished.
Ah! The joys of theocracy imposing a righteous order upon us all—for our own good. Say….is modern day liberalism a religion?
Our failing is that we are supposed to gladly leave all our cash (and a great deal of credit) behind in the collection plate, enthusiaticly sing a chorus of triumphant liberal platitudes, and walk out the church door and say to our Parson-in-Chief, “Such a wonderful sermon today, Reverend. So divinely inspired. God bless you.”
The voter turnout in the Election that saddled us with Obama was 58% of eligible voters. Of that group 52% voted for Obama. That’s a mere 30% of eligible voters who saddled us with that clown. PLEASE VOTE!!!!!!!
The Obama presidency is another real life example of the truth of the saying, “Garbage in, garbage out.” I knew after his first speech that he was a phony.
I’ll have to dispute that what has replaced God is Logos; after all, the Logos is the Holy Spirit. Nephos is more likely, especially in foggy California.
Another False Prophet Looses Audience;
Massive Social Experiment goes Awash;
Americans lose Interest in Guilt;
These are hardly headlines for the news cycle. Let us move on to the next big plan of designing the Obama Presidential Library. Hopefully and changefully it will be grass house green.
In a speech Saturday night…
(Obama) faulted the economic downturn for Americans’ inability to “think clearly” and said the burden is on Democrats “to break through the fear and the frustration people are feeling.”
Oh, I see.
It’s not because of what Charles Krauthammer calls the “ideological overreach” and “incompetence” of governing democrats.
Another excellent article by Dr. Hansen. These help keep one sane in these dangerous times. What is hard to grasp is all those who continue to buy into the nonsense. Facts be damned. Reason be damned. There really are a lot of sheeple out there.
America has always, presumably through divine providence, seemed to have the right leader in place in times of severe crisis. I sincerely hope we don’t encounter a future crisis where a true leader is needed and we are saddled with the feckless community organizer. Can you imaging the man making life or death decisions effecting all of us. Scary indeed.
God save and guide our country through the next 2 years til we get a president who is at least honest and a decent human being who loves his country, regardless of party. The current white house occupant is neither.
Dr. Hanson makes good point after good point about Obama.
However, I’d like to point out one of Obama’s burgeoning nightmares. The reason Joe Biden and Barack Obama few like pixies to Delaware last week to try to save Coon’s hide; the election.
You see,facts about Coons are coming to light that are turning off Delaware voters by the thousands.
While one of Coons biggest allies of the press, CNN’s Christian Ammanpour, constantly browbeats Christine O’Donnell’s desire for a small government and a big economy, Annapour constantly talks up ObamaCare, trillion dollar Stimulus packages and Chris Coons who raised property taxes in Delaware like nobody’s business.
Byron York, the reporter, has the lowdown on Coons.
“47 years of age, Chris Coons is the top executive of New Castle County, home to a majority of Delaware’s population. From a Republican perspective, there’s one really important thing to know about his time in office: In 2004, when Coons first ran for the job, he promised not to raise taxes. Since then he has raised taxes not once, not twice, but three times.
“Coons inherited a surplus. Celebrating victory on election night in 2004, he said his “top priority would be to continue balancing the budget without increasing property taxes,” according to an account in the local News Journal. Yet in 2006, he pushed through a 5 percent increase in property taxes. In 2007, he raised property taxes 17.5 percent. In 2009, he raised them another 25 percent.”(Byron York, Sept. 17, 2010, the right wing liberal)
Doesn’t it make sense to elect the candidate who stands for big economy and little government. Who stands for not a future of food stamps, but a future of pay checks. I know I’m just Rachel Peepers. I’m just a girl, (I don’t care that the leftists like to call me nasty names; I call them bad things, too). But I really and truly think Christine O’Donnell would make a good senator. She gets it. She’s for jobs, not taxes.
Vote for Christine O’Donnell. While you can still afford the trip to the polls.
Obama is not a Puritan. He is just upset and more because he knows there will be a slaughter at the polls in a few weeks. He doesn’t like it. He is not preaching morality, not really; he is merely the very popular student body President who now knows he will be neutered by a bunch of boring people who understand economics and reject his self-ascribed ‘exceptionalism.’ Obama’s message has always been – ‘you’re not exceptional in any way, me and my friends are.’
It’s basically good news. Then it’s up to the Republicans to be responsible and not compromise with him, basically.
If Obama is going to tout clear thinking, he needs to start setting some personal example.
What Obama really wants to say, but doesn’t dare, is that America is refusing to be obedient to him and his ideas because he’s a black man. Otherwise, why does he keep bringing up the fact that he “doesn’t look like all the other presidents”?
You nailed it!
“God save and guide our country through the next 2 years til we get a president who is at least honest and a decent human being who loves his country, regardless of party. The current white house occupant is neither.”
I am with you, jdog.
Obama does not love America. He is the first anti-American President of the United States.
May God grant that he is the last, and that he is not able to do America permanent harm.
President Obama sees himself as the epitome of all that is good, of all that is wise, of all that is necessary for the good of us benighted citizens. He cannot understand why we, the People, do not recognize him as such. Hence he lectures us, condemns his opposition as self centered, and regards us as ignorant or stupid which in his mind are one and the same.
naaaaw…he just hates capitalism/Americans, US.
Although, he made out like a bandit with his book deals.
He is the “evil step-dad”…or the evil bible thumper, “do as I preach, not as I do”
“Substituted Lord Logos for God?” Um, isn’t Lord Logos Jesus Christ? “In the Beginning, there was the Logos, and the Logos was with God and the Logos was God.” -John 1:1
Actually, it’s remarkable how little preaching the president does. No point to it, from his perspective: his arguments are self-evidently true, and we are just as self-evidently NOT going to get them.
Implicit in these little explanations he offers is a touching faith that only high IQ types are fit to rule – he is more King MENSA than King logos, at least in his own mind. It’s the intellectual’s fallacy: that governing means working out the “right” formula, like an IQ test.
See “The intellectual’s fallacy and the November elections”:
http://vulgarmorality.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/the-intellectuals-fallacy-and-the-november-elections/
I’m so tired of talking about Obama that I’m going to differ to somebody much smarter than me and let him say it for me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyTksbkyOng&feature=related
http://jewagainstobama.wordpress.com/2008/04/08/jackie-mason-on-obama/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR4Ea8EQoG0
“Perception IS reality” implies that Obama is the perfect expression of a brainwashed nihilist.
I consider him the manifestation, for REAL, of the fictional character programmed to kill in “The Manchurian Candidate”.
However, since the Universe (including the swarm of humans, working and playing while alive on the crust of this Earth-from-Light, evolved or devolved into its present state) is always what it is, we simply must become able to fully receive everything perceptible and conceptual of Him, The One, Obama!
He is a supreme—LESSON!
In a wonderful book by the woman, Taylor Caldwell, “The Devil’s Advocate”, which I read back in the early 1960′s, the “hero” is a man who’s beocme the leader of a most corrupt America. His ONLY mission is to so screw things up that the people will have to revolt and “water the tree of Liberty”, a la Jefferson.
Obama is the REAL ONE!
Old me, I thought Clinton—the slickster who couldn’t keep his pecker in his pants—was the One, but apparently, as was long ago pointed out, “There’s a lot of ruin in a nation”.
So, perhaps the richer and fatter-with-leisure America has become, the worse the “fool” HERO must be—and, folks, Obama is one REAL fool!
No FOOLING!
Anything similar with Carter, Clinton, or Obama…yes they identify with the democrat party, a disgusting bunch of fools and or incompetents but with one thing in mind control over the populace of the United States only to advance un-american and unpatriotic policies will they are discovered during their administrative duties…all were either liars or outright stupid (sorry Jimmy) and theifs, just think about it!
Our illegal president isn’t an American therefore could never understand how true Americans love their country. He under estimates the power of the working class and will feel it come November!
Honestly !! In Boston this past weekend Obama looked like a chip off the ol block of Reverend Wright..some of the ol fashioned, struttin , showing off clown preacha boys..haven’t ya heard them on radios sometime passing by accident the ol time preachers..especially the forgive me but BLACK ONES?..at DEAD Deval Patrick in Boston He was a damned clown. Very unPresidential but this is what he wants to do!!! Be on a soapbox ,looking cute, clever and speaking to the sheeples who want him to LEAD THEM INTO HIS DITCH..
Honestly !! In Boston this past weekend Obama looked like a chip off the ol block of Reverend Wright..some of the ol fashioned, struttin , showing off clown preacha boys..haven’t ya heard them on radios sometime passing by accident and catch a yelpin ol time preacher..especially the forgive me but BLACK ONES?..at DEAD Deval Patrick in Boston He was a damned clown. Very unPresidential but this is what he wants to do!!! Be on a soapbox ,looking cute, clever and speaking to the sheeples who want him to LEAD THEM INTO HIS DITCH..
Anyone who calls someone else a ‘Nazi’ for correcting a misspelling is a stupid shit. My mother was sent to a Nazi concentration camp. The little shit who misused this word should get off his mother’s computer.
Hey does anyone know what Barry’s meant when he said:” A democratic government fully accountable to the people must be as transparent as possible and must NOT withhold information for self-serving purposes or simply to avoid embarrassment”?
Affirmative action coming back to bite us. Giving the unqualified an entitlement that they do not deserve has created (at least in this case) a monster out to destroy us out of resentment for all the xpectaions that he can not meet. The only way to cover up for these inadequacies is to pull out the teleprompter and blame everyone available (Bush, businessmen, corporations, foreign interests, Republicans, and even ignorant voters). Too bad that he didn’t have the chops to be a rap star!!!!
2 Books, 2 Obamas, Same Rage
Two books about two different Barack Obamas are hot off the press and, based on reviews, promise to be fascinating reading even if the media have afforded them scant attention. One would not please the president, he may be ambivalent about the other.
The first book, The Roots of Obama’s Rage written by Dinesh D’Souza, who is clearly not a member of the president’s fan club, describes Obama as “a much stranger, more determined, and exponentially more dangerous man than you’d ever imagined.”
According to one book review, in D’Souza’s view, Obama doesn’t give much of a hoot about past civil rights struggles, which would seriously disappoint many of his supporters. On the other hand, those critics who believe he is motivated by Marxism-socialism, as his father, Barack Obama Sr. was, will also be disappointed since the author contends that those “isms” are not his inspiration.
His true inspiration, his motivation, the driving force behind Barack Hussein Obama, is much scarier than any Marxist-socialist philosophies.
That review continues, “What really motivates Barack Obama is an inherited rage—an often masked, but profound rage that comes from his African father; an anticolonialist rage against Western dominance, and most especially against the wealth and power of the very nation Barack Obama now leads. It is this rage that explains the previously inexplicable, and that gives us a startling look at what might lie ahead.”
Furthermore, the president sees his own country, our country . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=2286)
Truth in humor? … does this reflect dialogue in the home and beyond?
You decide:
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7192553/
Parson Obama?
Don’t you mean “Imam Obama?”
Heh. Tell your friends, I’ll be here all week.
Essential vdh. Western Cultural, heavily influenced by Christianity created the human life style high water mark available to the rest of the world. This “ease” of life created divisions of labor and a lazy(human nature) parasitic class with the various inane ideas coming from such slothful idiots. These people gravitate to “Accademia” and politics to gain “respectability”.
The slothful parasitic idiot ideas that have done the greatest harm to humans are the “socialist, Marxist ideas in the name of “Social Justice”. The slothful parasites like BHO’s gang want to use other people assets to solve this problem. It is not their money and or assets they want to control and give away it is yours. It is a simple power grab using words, and when needed murder using vicious class war fare. Theft and bloody war fare on a grand scale the “Haves” against the “Have nots”.
Americans should simply vote against any politician that says the federal government is here to “help you” and “you need help in all areas of your life”. and “Those nasty conservatives (unknown meaning)don’t like you and don’t care about you” and “They want to eliminate our “help” because they are greedy SOBs”.
This simple act of American voting for self preservation could protect America until the work of the current crop of AA, PC idiots is wiped out of the school systems and politics. There maybe enough real Americans left to do this.
To bad it can’t be that easy—as described above.
There’s history here.Don’t forget Obama was dubbed by the establishment media the “New Kennedy” as well as the Messiah.
Now why would the “New Kennedy” garner enough votes for election to the throne of the US/world? What exactly would the association with Kennedy be that would induce people to vote for him?
The same question at the base of the long, life-term, tenure in the Senate of Edward Kennedy. ELECTED by the citizens of Massachusetts again and again, despite evidence that he was more than a merely flawed human being.
Why did, how could the voters of Massachusetts tolerate him as their “representative of the People”? Is it credible that they are as flawed as Edward Kennedy. The last surviving heir to the Dreams of the Father, Joseph P Kennedy, a seriously flawed human, for a Kennedy Dynasty. Whose other sons were after their deaths recognised as true sons of the father (and mother).
Massachusetts, one of the original colonies, the first footing of the pilgrims, and the home of John Adams.
And then there’s WJ Clinton, a Kennedy clone. Governor of Arkansas, with evidence of serious human flaws.
Both stalwarts and models for the New Age “Democratic” Party which prefers the “new age liberal” philosophy in
lieu of the name of statist totalitarians.
The Development from 1960: JF.Kennedy, LB Johnson, both administrators of the Vietnam War and its aftermath in the fracturing of American social cohesivebness. With establishment media lies about the deveopment of that war, the coup d’etat they called Watergate.
The political events of ALL the Democratic Presidents and Congress/ Court in salami slicing rights of Americans, abetting race and gender antagonisms, and the developments of the Advent to the Millenium, in the 1990s in the Administration of the Kennedy clone, WJ Clinton.
And now the “New Kennedy”. Elected after his triumphant rock-star tour of Socialist Europe ( Nuremburg rallies anyone ?) and certain election to the Presidency was threatened by the selection of a dark horse vice-presidential candidate by the Republicans. Reported to have “panicked” the hierarchy of the “Democratic” Party. Et voila the September 15, 2008 announcement of the “economic meltdown”. Assuring the election of this “New Kennedy£”. Pure show-biz.
But it isn’t show-biz. It’s history. It happened, and we now see the results. Planned ? I happen to think it was.
Even if not, its success in the destruction of the Constitutional Republic of the USA is proceeding apace.
AND the quetion is QUI BONO ?
Very good task on an extremely essential topic. I definitely appreciate your work and most pieces of facts within this report are particularly very well put.