Sick of war, Europeans mistakenly, grasp on to anything or anyone willing to shun even the concept of war, no matter how wrong and dangerous this position may be. In steps “osama the first”; the MSM, and European media’s choice to be the first “anointed” US President. Of course they would prefer that he be the first “royal” leader of the United States. The reasoning behind their choice to have a “royal” leader is that it would forever eliminate the chance of a Conservative US President.

Another reason Europeans have such a hatred for President Bush and a love for “osama the first” is religion. For decades Europeans have walked away from their religious heritage. President Bush not only acknowledges his faith, but also proudly lets others know that he IS a Christian. “osama the first” follows the Europeans model to a great extent. CLAIMING to be a Christian, attending a “christian” church, but in reality a bastion of hatred toward the US, “osama the first” seldom mentions his religion. The question of his religion sticks in the minds of many, wondering, is he really a Christian or is he a msulim in hiding? Europeans would prefer a muslim-in-hiding President to an overtly Christian one.

“osama the first” follows the Europeans concept of national defense, especially when it entails going into the land of the enemy, DON’T DO IT. “osama” prefers, as do the Europeans, to sit back allow an uncontrolled influx of muslims, many of these being extremists, and wait for them to attack us in our own homes, places of work, military installation and infrastructure. After capturing them, reading them their “miranda rights”, providing them with attorneys (aclu types), tried before activist judges, beg them to forgive our “transgressions”, set them free to attack us again.

European media has been on a tear since the 2000 election. algore was their choice, as it was with the US MSM. When he and the dnc failed to steal the election via numerous efforts, it was not a flawed dnc candidate, flawed efforts, and insufficient votes, but a flawed US Supreme Court that kept their candidate out of the White House. After all, algore WAS “Eurpoean” in beliefs and that made him the only logical choice. When kerry, again THE choice of the European media and the US MSM failed, the attacks on President Bush were unrelenting. Vowing not to loose again, the European media teamed with the US MSM to ensure that nothing negative about “osama the first” appeared in print, on the screen or on the air.

These two groups may well have coordinated the recent “pilgrimage” of “osama the first” to Europe. After all, the talking heads of the major networks in the MSM have NEVER before accompanied a US PRESIDENT on such a tour. The unprecedented coverage of “osama the first” by the US MSM and European media cannot be attributed solely to “public interest”, but far more likely to a determined effort to brain wash the American voter and to control his/her opinion on who is the best qualified to be the US President. After all, if “all the world” wants “osama the first” wouldn’t the average US voter think that he/she must be wrong if he/she doesn’t have the same opinion?

The staged events where “osama the first” appeared with NO critical comments about the staging, the softball questions the talking heads and others in the media with their “oh, he’s so great” comments. Where is the “critical eye” of the media? Oh, it has been reserved for President Bush and John McCain; “osama the first” has no flaws.

Al Gore’s recent goal is to have 100% of utility electricity production be C02 free in 10 years. That is actually achievable by increasing nuke plants from 100 to 500. (Frightening, but doable.) WSJ has an article “Virginia Is Sitting on the Energy Mother Lode” which points out Virginia is sitting on the 7th largest undeveloped uranium deposit in the world. It is illegal to get at it.

Energy is somewhat fungible. Using nukes for electricity frees up oil, coal and LNG to be used for other things.

Every project is easily shot down by some nit pick environmental excuse, so we need a proposal which expands 20 different energy sources simultaneously. Focus on the big picture.

McCain should cut a deal with the people: Sure we will do all the green projects, even Al Gore’s and T. Boone Pickens’ cockamamie schemes, but only if we move full blast now to tap all abundant sources in the US. Because we have to.

I haven’t heard anyone suggest how aircraft will be powered without burning petroleum.

“Biofuel” won’t work; the amount of fuel required would consume a huge part of the food crop. (Look at Richard Branson’s publicity stunt with biofuel-power.)

I suppose someone will remember that the US Air Force tried putting a nuclear reactor aboard an aircraft (a B-36), but that wasn’t for propulsion and it didn’t work worth a darn anyway.

So how will Al Gore jet around to his latest harangue if there’s no fuel?

I’m just asking.

Scott

To good intentioned Environmentalists. Save the plants and Animals. Increase your carbon footprint.

I think the value of history is to show that humans and humanity itself has not really changed and is subject to many shortfalls. Of course except for the BHOOs and Algore.

Having said that it would be nice if everyone stayed “in the political game” that is now going on and bring to bear some intelligence and knowlege to what is going on.

It will keep us from making stupid statements and judgements simply because history was not needed to pull the lever but knowlege was and is.

This thing about a carbon footprint and reduction of CO2 emissions is due to a lack of knowledge and leadership being ceded to an idiot like Algore and environmentalists who are not.

They would be better described as communist anarchists seeking chaos and eventually power. This would also be described as a liberal left wing Democrat. They believe this can be a lever to bring the US down.

Our very lives depend on a CO2 cycle. The continent of America historically before we “tamed” it would have dumped many times over the current CO2 tonnage into the air simply because all of the plant life, prairies, forests depended on fire to fertilize the soil and the air with nutrients. The animals would have depended on the plant life.

There would have been fires, for example that would have been burning on the great plains that would have covered areas the size of Kansas. Why would they have burned?–Because the prairie grasses would have needed burning to get rid of the choking organic matter that tied up nutrients and sufocated new plant growth.

If the prairie needed burned they burned when lighting hit. If lighting hit a recently burned and rejuvenated section it would not have burned.

After a fire the “growth” spurt and resurgence of the grasses is/was a sight to behold.

The same would have been true of the forests. The red wood trees, the towering Sequoias depended on fire to put nutrients into the soil and to weed out competitive trees that would have stopped them from living as long as they did. It also killed parasites but “not the trees” they liked fire—fire good parasites and competition bad.

People better start pulling their heads out of the sand of ignorance and if an Algore or any other green weenie can take you down the idiot path we will all crash and burn because we will not have a sustainable economy that can grow and create jobs for people to be productive humans.

The burning of carbon fuel does not have to be a bad thing we now have the ability to take out the sulfur and other compounds to make it a “cleaner burn”. Ch4+O2—2H2O + CO2

Cut the kids a break.

At least they had the nerve to want to go off and face the savage mohammedan, and eye to eye, wrest control of the Holy Land away from them.

At least they had courage.

Barry, Barrack, B-Diddy, who’s he willing to face?

Got a revolution Got to revolution
One generation got old
One generation got soul
This generation got no destination to hold
Pick up the cry

Got a revolution Got to revolution
Who will take it from you
We will and who are we
We are volunteers of America

So your brother’s bound and gagged
And they’ve chained him to a chair
Won’t you please come to Chicago just to sing
In a land that’s known as Freedom
How can such a thing be fair
Won’t you please come to Chicago for the help that we can bring

[A bunch of 'Yippies' they called themselves, tried to create anarchy at a Democratic convention and got arrested. There was a trial, Bobby Seale kept shouting profanities at the court and he was bound and gagged. Who's we? ]

We can change the world
Rearrange the world
It’s dying – to get better

[They're trying to rearrange things now. Dying? That sounds like Michelle. Change? That's the catch word.]

Politicians sit yourselves down
There’s nothing for you here
Won’t you please come to Chicago for a ride
Don’t ask Jack to help you
‘Cause he’ll turn the other ear
Won’t you please come to Chicago or else join the other side

[Politicians again. Who's Jack? Kennedy? Join the other side? Mr. Nash must have been talking about Republicans. I joined a few years ago.]

We can change the world
Rearrange the world
It’s dying – if you believe in justice
It’s dying – and if you believe in freedom
It’s dying – let a man live his own life
It’s dying – rules and regulations
Who needs them, open up the door

[ Justice? Freedom? Sounds like 'If I Had A Hammer'. Rules and regulations? I think everybody needs them. Mr. Nash's type of thinking started the disorder that we see today.]

This is not an ad hominem attack. In his book,”The Audacity of Hope”, he discusses his drug use, including crack cocaine.

Why would ANYONE vote for this drug addict to be the man ultimately responsible for enforcing the laws of our nation when he already has shown utter contempt for them by he felonious conduct?

Maybe OBAMA should stand for

Oh
Be
A
Man
Already

And quit whining…………..