Lost in the Labyrinth of Race
But here again we get lost in the labyrinth of race. I know dozens of Punjabi immigrants who are far darker than South Americans. Many Filipinos I taught were more easily identifiable as minorities than many half-African-Americans in my classes. Yet none qualified under the racial rubrics of affirmative action. Indeed, if a Bobby Jindal were to be President, I don’t think the Left would be much interested in his “special” story, at least as much as they are now with that of Sonia Sotomayor’s.
If America is still a racist country, and if we still overtly discriminate on the basis of physical appearance at odds with supposed white norms, well then it is a funny sort of racism. Are we to assume taxi drivers, landlords, and employers supposedly examine nearly-black Indian-Americans, dark southeast Asians, or Spanish-speaking Cubans, and say, “Hmmm, you’re OK,”-and then make it hard for Costa Ricans and Guatemalans because they have accented names or trill their r’s, or more closely replicate the status of Mexican-Americans?
Is there a racial Czar somewhere who has clay tablets that say:
“Only those with 51% demonstrable African-American blood or Mexican-American heritage-or those from Africa, the Caribbean, and South America who can best emulate them-whose present incomes are less than the American mean, and who can cite three recent examples of racial discrimination, are equal for preferential treatment”?
If neither past collective, nor present individual, racism is a logical guide in adjudicating who receives affirmative action, then perhaps we can consider three other criteria. And here we begin to find our way a little through the frightening labyrinth of race.
There are, I think, some unspoken rules of race and racial advantage in America today.
Does Poverty Qualify?
One, you must have some claim, even if the most flimsy one, to a minority group whose average per capita income is below that of the so-called white norm-on the theory that racism, not cultural practices, entirely explains success or failure in contemporary America.
Indians, Basques, Greek-Americans, Arab-Americans, Japanese-Americans, and Chinese-Americans-regardless of their appearance or superficial distance from the dominant “white” tribe” -are probably not going to receive special consideration to trump strict criteria like GPAs and test scores when applying to medical or law schools. American-Indians, Mexican-Americans, and African-Americans are. That any individual of the former group might in fact be far poorer than any member of the latter group matters not at all. That any of the former cadre may also be more instantly recognizable as non-white matters likewise not a whit.
Is It Politics, After All?
How else can we explain why the son of a light-skinned African-American general or orthodontist receives extra consideration and the dark daughter of a Kurdish taxi-driver does not? I had a Coptic student with an Egyptian name from a poor family who tried to suggest that he really was “African-American”-and was laughed out of the university’s affirmative action office.
Second, the claimant at some point during his cursus honorum should clearly identify himself as proud of his tribe and liberal in persuasion. The conservative TV newsreader named Joe Lopez, who does not trill his r’s, and is politically inconspicuous, will not be given as much preference as the ‘Latina’ who pronounces Spanish-names with Spanish accents, adds accents to her own name, and is prominent in liberal causes. Consider the antithetical treatment accorded to a Miguel Estrada versus Sonia Sotomayor, or a dark conservative Clarence Thomas versus an Eric Holder of Barbados ancestry. Estrada, remember, was targeted by the left precisely because he was Hispanic.
Leftwing minorities apparently are seen as authentic-in the sense of being thankful and obliged to their liberal patrons for their heroic efforts at ‘leveling the playing field’. Right-wing minorities who do not consciously embrace racial identification are typecast as being bitter, unappreciative, and perhaps a little crazy.
Do We Just Make This Stuff Up?
I had half-Mexican-American students who had Hispanic first names and fathers-something like a Horacio Dominquez or Jacinta Guzman-who were fully assimilated, upper-middle-class, did not speak a word of Spanish, but were active in La Raza-like groups and, presto, were seen as authentic enough to be given the benefits of unspoken affirmative action. In turn, I also had trouble convincing graduate schools to give affirmative action consideration to those like a Bill Smith or Larry Butler, who had Mexican-American mothers and spoke Spanish. In California-given the mixed ancestry of Cherokee intermarriage of many in the Oklahoma Diaspora-a sort of parlor game among white students was to claim, often accurately, 1/4, 1/8, or 1/16 “Native-American” racial heritage.
Churchillism-As In Ward…
So affirmative action, as the chameleon-like scoundrel Ward Churchill demonstrated, can easily devolve into a conscious and often artificial construct of careerist self-identification. Take away his locks and beads, and his mumbo-jumbo chants, and Churchill was more or less a poorly educated white male teacher that had no refuge in the university as recompense for his questionable scholarly pedigree.
Half-Hispanic and very affluent William “Blaine” Richardson, former Presidential candidate, had he a Hispanic pedigree on his father’s side, or had he used his mother’s name, or, better, had Latinized his first name, could have much more easily reinvented himself as Guillermo Marquez-a more authentic minority -despite his family money and rather exclusive prep-school background.
Had Barack Obama kept his assumed name Barry, and used his mother’s maiden name-logical, given the Dunham family’s exclusive caretakership of young Barack-a Barry Dunham might have appeared far less exotic and authentically black than Barack Obama.
Do the ‘Okies’ Count?
There are even more absurd incongruities. Poor white grandchildren of the Oklahoma Diaspora in places like Ceres or Bakersfield have still not attained parity with other groups. Yet, the fact that they are “white” ends discussion. Their race ensures that they are not due any of the exemptions accorded other minorities-despite the fact that poverty, grammatically poorly-spoken English, and cultural stereotypes against “Okies” , can ensure that they are discriminated against as much as Latinos and blacks-especially from the white elite classes. The abjectly poor, straight-A son of Oklahoma-accented cesspool-pumper Travis Thornberry from Tulare, California will probably find it far harder to get into Stanford than the B+ children of affluent, highly-educated African-Americans.
Instant Victimhood
Illegal immigrants likewise reveal the absurdities of the government entry into racial spoils. A Yolanda Trevino who crosses the border at sixteen illegally; by eighteen is eligible for federal affirmative action when applying for college-even though she has had no prior pernicious experiences in the United States-on the dubious theory that entering America in 2009 guarantees the same subordinate status as those who came in 1920. Again, the illegal alien will get deferential treatment not shown the second-generation Chinese-American.
What Are We Left With?
Note here I am not arguing that in many cases affirmative action, the diversity industry, and identity policies do not result in some sort of understandable corrective action, or draw on the logic of recompense. Instead, I suggest that in far too many cases they simply do not-and that the exceptions, distortions, and inconsistencies associated with affirmative action and identity politics have now reached enough of a critical mass to end this once utopian experiment once and for all.
Elite White Guilt
Indeed, creating, recreating, and emphasizing racial identity, especially among elites, currently involves so many contortions that it has descended from the absurd to the outright pernicious-and is becoming a sort of racism itself. One gets the uncomfortable feeling that the perpetuators of the present system-mostly elite whites-find some sort of psychological absolution in such a system that allows them to alleviate guilt without living among poorer people of color, or sending their own children to the “diverse” public schools-two concrete steps that might quickly indeed ensure better neighborhoods and better education for the “other.” In any case, most white elites count on their own connections, wealth, and education, to find exemptions from the unfairness of racial identification. A Ted Kennedy, after all, had affirmative action well before it was based on race.
Unfortunately, unlike a Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, or Alberto Gonzales, President Obama has embraced identity politics in unprecedented fashion-and we are reaping what he has sown. In these first days of the Sotomayor nomination, we are not discussing Justice Sotomayor’s judicial competence as much as her Latina identification-and the political ramifications of such tribalism.
But then only in these race-conscious times could a Barack Obama have entered the racial labyrinth as a well-educated youth of mixed and foreign ancestry, and middle-class prep school lineage, and exited as a representative totem of the African-American underclass.
By virtue of that metamorphosis it matters not at all that he once subsidized the racial hatred of Rev. Wright’s Church, carelessly tossed out the epithet ‘typical white person’, stereotyped the white working class as ‘clingers,’ had his privileged Attorney General call Americans “cowards” on matters of race, and nominated a candidate for the Supreme Court who, despite all the tortured exegeses of exculpation, declared that white males could not possess the judicial wisdom and temperament of someone of her own race and gender.
You see, in matters of racial politics, we deal now only in fantasies rather than reality.







“…a Barry Dunham might have appeared far less exotic and authentically black than Barack Obama.”
Barack Obama subconsciously, if not even consciously, sensed that “Barry Dunham” would be a serious handicap. He would get far more in return if he became an “authentic black.” Taking this sort of nonsense to task is a winning issue for the Republicans. Most American voters disagree with the Democrats—if you clearly explain the absurdity of racial preferences to them. Politically correct GOP politicians like John McCain should not be fearful. This is totally illogical. The odds are on their side. And yes, I am quite aware of the race card sliming of the MSM and its leftist allies. But so what? We just need to take the first few punches and then proceed to calmly and succinctly punch back. Never forget that the Michigan voters of the very liberal state of Michigan resoundedly defeated a racial preference ballot proposal. If the left-wingers can’t win in Michigan—where in hell can they win?
Wow! This is the best description of our current insanity that I’ve read.
Back in August 2008 Kenneth Lamb found something really mind-boggling: “The U.S. Census Bureau changed the definition of ‘race’for classification purposes…. The Bureau now allows an individual to classify him- or her-self by as many, and whatever, ‘sociopolitical self-identification’ classifications(s) appeal to the individual.”
Given a 70% rate of “illegitimate” births in the Black Community, Lamb asks: “… if your lineage is from a series of illegitimate births, as we now have with our multi-generational welfare underclass, with no father named on the certificate, how do you prove your ‘genealogical or anthropological’ characteristics if the father is not listed through multiple generations of birth certificates?”
Obviously, you can’t. So now, because a majority of Blacks cannot prove their race by birth certificate (there’s that hot topic again), we are all allowed to “self-identify” instead.
Lamb again: “You can be African-American today, change your mind and be Native-American tomorrow, add Asian the day following, and toss them all out the next day and classify yourself whatever you please the day after that.”
If you know which side your bread is buttered on, as they used to say, you will self-identify as African American regardless of your birth certificate. As we have all noticed, Lamb reiterates, “… America is now to the point that the truth doesn’t matter anymore.”
Reference: http://kennethelamb.blogspot.com/2008/08/update-on-barak-obamas-and-everybody.html
But, according to the Democrats, it’s REPUBLICANS who crassly promote minorities.
They certainly have boxed us in nicely – on one hand, if we want to put up a candidate for office, or court, or whatever, and they happen to be minority or female, we get labeled “cynical”. So we studiously try to avoid even the appearance of racial preferences, instead trying to appeal to philosophy. When that doesn’t bring in enough people of all types, the left clucks “they’re just not diverse enough!” like Donna Brazile at the RNC last year.
While I’m on the conventions, and the democrats make a BIG show of it, too. In fact, the DNC and the state parties have a strict quota system (the RNC has none) for delegate representation at Presidential conventions – and it goes beyond race and sex to sexual orientation to include such large slices of the electorate as transgendered persons. All in order to “look” diverse. And people take it a face value.
VDH:
Excellent review of the sorry state of identity politics. Reading your analysis, one would think the bankrupt rationale behind affirmative action — that skin color and ethnicity accurately denote past injustice — as well as the logistical nightmare of applying this practice fairly would condemn this whole idea to the dustbin of history. Especially in an America still attempting to realize the vision of our Founders, a vision premised on equality.
But “Diversity” has proven too useful a tactic by our intellectually superior Leftist brethren to abandon, just because it makes no sense. In particular, they use it to keep the younger generation blinded to historical reality and thus separated from their “racist” forebears. And with Sotomayor’s nomination they hope to use it to unblind Lady Justice.
Dr. Hanson -
Thank you for a lucid and sober (summary) analysis of race and affirmative action in America in 2009. No doubt, you will be viciously attacked by those who support, and benefit from, the current system or simply cannot accept the reality of the inherent contradictions in the system you describe.
Stand tall; reasonable people will see who is race-baiting and who is objectively observing the current mess. I only hope you are correct in your assertion that a tipping point is at hand to do away with this racially-charged system.
An example to add to your superb analysis: the Ricci case. It should bring race and affirmative action to the national dialogue in a unique way and will be interesting to watch.
Too bad our supposedly-post-racial president cannot, or will not, talk about race and affirmative action in the calm, objective manner of your above post. I, for one, am not holding my breath…
Your style of drilling into details, looking back to history for context, and shining the light of day on the absurdities of subjects you cover is valiant, vital, and valuable. Thanks, again.
Best regards,
GGA – Dublin, Ohio
I made this comment on one of Another Works and Days posts, but it seems a much better fit here so I will resubmit it. It was an answer to a question asked by a Paul of Hamburg:
“Herr Paul asks:
“Would you care to explain why being “Latina” or “Hispanic” matters at all? Am I supposed to believe that immigrants from a country that speaks Spanish are somehow special and superior to immigrants from countries that speak Russian or German or Chinese or Hindi?”
Paul, Hispanics are immigrants or descendants of immigrants from the island of Hispaniola, or with names similar to those people. Latinos and Latinas are people with at least a reading and writing familiarity with the ancient language of Latin, such as Professor Hanson. A decade ago, or two or three or more, our government in its wisdom decided to grant special favors and rights to these good people.
I really don’t remember why. In fact I suspect there was really no good reason why, except there were more and more of these folks in the country. You know how politicians like to favor a growing population, votes in the bag, see? I hope this helps answer your excellent question.
On second thought, Paul, I may be wrong about an increase in the number of those being able to read and write in Latin.
May 31, 2009 – 6:51 am”
A wise Latina would reach better conclusions about this than you, Professor.
OK, seriously, this is a poignant and telling meditation on our mixed-up, idiotic, counterproductive politics of race.
We don’t have to wonder anymore what people with a constitutional republic will do about race as a political question, do we? This is it.
If you shackle a man’s body with iron chains, you can force him to grow cotton. Far more lucrative for the masters to shackle his mind and cultivate votes. The race business in America is not just a carefully contrived lie as a means to control; it’s downright sinister. It’s no wonder at all that the industry is dominated by so many scoundrels and charlatans. But as Gandhi said, “the truth remains the truth even if only one man knows it.”
“You see, in matters of racial politics, we deal now only in fantasies rather than reality.”
— This is why we can’t even begin to discuss these issues anymore. Americans have become the bread and circus Romans of old…
American citizens and residents of Asian descent are routinely held to higher college admissions standards than citizens and residents with non-Asian last names. This is a blatant example of undermining equal opportunity for hardworking people to ensure “racial equality” of outcome.
On January 17, 2007, the Daily Princetonian, in its annual “joke” issue, published the following:
“I so good at math and science … I the super smart Asian. Princeton the super dumb college, not accept me … My dad from Kung Pao province…. I love Yale. Lots of bulldogs here for me to eat.”
Ho ho ho. Very classy, Princeton. The next thing you know, some Asian firemen will be taking an advancement test, and their results will be discounted by a kangaroo court on the theory that the fire department test questions were “racially” biased against non Asians who did not do well on the test. Nah…. that could never happen in America.
There are two things going on with race.
The dominant factor is about greed not race. Non-whites simply want to take advantage of the club that idiot white intellectuals have given them and grab all the loot they can as quickly as they can.
The other factor is the one driving Obama. He won’t be satisfied until he is able to inflict on white Americans the treatment southern whites inflicted on slaves 200 years ago, when his black ancestors were still in Africa. That is how poisoned the minds of people like him have become after decades of indoctrination by revolutionaries who couldn’t really care less about the issue. To them, racial hatred is just a tool useful to overthrow the country and rule it themselves.
Professor: While I’ve been enjoying the observations of your European journey, your discussion of the new racialism is unfortunately even more pertinent to today’s times.
One of the points you made somewhere in your earlier writings involved college students who were caught up in the movement of denouncing study of “The West” in favor of something less “Eurocentric” – you pointed out that these students “Could not even provide a WRONG answer to the question of what ‘The West’ was” – I saw this same dynamic in my own college years in the late ’80′s, and the whole process appears to have carried over into the current racial dialectic.
In an apparent outright rejection of the teachings of Dr. Martin Luther King, the new hierarchy does not recognize the “Content of character, rather than the color of skin” approach, preferring the elevation of grievance over the old goal of “Colorblindness”, which is now routinely mocked as though it had been exposed as fradulent by its nature.
Instead, we are expected to not only tolerate, but accept, the paranoid fantasies and hysterical diatribes of a Jeremiah Wright as the spiritual backdrop of the man we elect president, so desperate were we to anoint “The first black president”. It was quite bizarre to watch the media going through incredible rhetorical contortions to explain away all this as either irrelevant or understandable. The AP regularly put out stories such as: “Wright’s sermons unlikely to hurt Obama, according to poll”.
We ignored, rationalized, or explained away comments such as “Typical white person”, and the “Clingers” business, and then watched the media further bend over backwards touting as great achievements the exact same types of things they’d villified Bush for over the years (most expensive inauguration ever, way-over-the-top budget deficits, tax cheat appointments, broken promises of no earmarks or lobbyists, and scaring the daylights out of New Yorkers by flying Air Force One around lower Manhattan just to get some flashy new p.r. material)
All of this feeds into what you’ve described, since it follows logically from the bizarre and byzantine racial spoils system that has emerged from our college campuses, media, and other sources of elite thinkery.
Thus we are led logically to the latest realization of Orwell’s visions, the Sotomayor “Better conclusion” construction – I’ve watched the debates here and elsewhere over use of the term “Orwellian”, and those who have made this charge against Bush hardly ever seem able to even cite the connection. With Sotomayor, we are now seeing the endgame of Orwell’s “Animal Farm”, where the campaign slogan of “Four legs good, two legs bad” is subsequently replaced with “Four legs good, two legs better”, and this coincides perfectly with the notion that we have now reached the point where it’s acceptable to say not only that a “Latina” or whatnot can adjudicate as well as a white man, but that the Latina can do so BETTER than the white man.
In this latest development, I have also watched Sotomayor’s defenders on the left proclaim that if we quote her “Wise Latina woman = better decision” line, we are “Taking it out of context”, and we should “Read the whole speech” before making any comment whatsoever. For a good illustration of this, read Ramesh Ponnuru’s discussion thread at the Washington Post’s website – none of the defenders will explain what the “Context” reveals that the statement doesn’t, and the entire defense of Sotomayor, as it was with Barack Obama, appears to be that the minority status trumps all other considerations – but once again, the candidate’s views had better relfect those of the left – otherwise, one can expect the same treatment afforded to Miguel Estrada, Condoleeza Rice, and even Sarah Palin (first female vice-presidential candidate? Should have been a slam-dunk of positive news; instead, we had a media thrashing the likes of which I’ve never seen).
So we have now arrived at the point where it’s perfectly okay to rate everyone according to a racial scheme that will be determined by political alliance:
1. minority-and-leftist: top of the heap.
2. White-and-anything-but-far-left: bottom of the barrel, and furthermore, you deserve it.
Thanks, as always, for articulating what I’ve been seeing develop over the years.
Dave the Kapampangan:
“I so good at math and science … I the super smart Asian. Princeton the super dumb college, not accept me … My dad from Kung Pao province…. I love Yale. Lots of bulldogs here for me to eat.”
You see, Dave, by the logic of the Left this is not a racist joke. There is no universal standard for what constitutes racism. Regardless of how outlandish and derogatory the statement, it’s only racism if the stereotyped Chinese student in this instance says it is racism. And he/she is probably working hard to get ahead and won’t notice or complain.
By extension, there is no universal concept of what is fair, just, or even logical or wise. I happen to think a wise Latina summa cum laud graduate of Princeton would not have said what Sotomayor said in 2002. But what do I know. I mean, I think the Princetonian joke you site is incredibly racist. How ridiculous of me.
It’s real simple. The current system is rigged to favor near hereditary elites (like Al Gore, son of a Senator) and non-Whites who act as “blocking pieces” on the chessboard to upwardly mobile poorer Whites.
It was sustainable in good times, when there were lots of entrepreneurial opportunities that did not come with racial and other barriers to admission, success, promotion, hiring, and so on.
Now times are hard, government runs everything, Affirmative Action prevents non-Elite whites from being hired, there are no pressure-releasing entrepreneurial opportunities, and it’s a winner-take-all society outside government-run jobs. Along with murderously high taxes down the road, and no opportunities for the majority, it’s a perfect populist storm with yes, racial discrimination against the majority by elites allied with non-Whites.
As such, it’s likely to explode absent any pressure-releasing happening. If the economy improves and people can make money OUTSIDE the Affirmative Action preferences that punish Whites, well things will be OK in the present system.
Otherwise, it’s not sustainable in the long run. Certainly we’ve never had a lasting, deep recession with increased taxes, no jobs outside government, and Affirmative Action that shuts out Whites.
There are two simple reasons for the continuation of affirmative action:
1. Yet another way for our ‘federal’ government to intrude in all businesses and display its power. To business people, the EEOC is nearly as scary as the IRS (unless, of course, you have a minority-owned business that is free to discriminate against everyone else).
2. To maintain various racial and ethnic groups who owe (at least in part) their success to our ‘federal’ government. These groups realize that only the interventions of NannyState got them into college and into their undeserved jobs. A side benefit is that non-listed groups will plead for the special affections (affirmative action status) of NannyState. The Democrats are NannyStatists, and they garner the votes of these groups.
All the rationales given by NannyState for her continuous ‘affirmative action’ meddling are bogus. NannyState doesn’t care about past discrimination or victimhood. NannyState doesn’t care about ‘diversity’ on campus or on the job. NannyState only cares about power and votes. When NannyState becomes a dictatorship in ~10 years, she’ll care only about power.
Amen! The sooner we quit focusing on a person’s ethnicity the better. 3 of my 4 grandparents were full blooded German. the other was a real mongrel; Scotch, Irish, Cherokee and god knows what else. The mother of three of my children is from a family that has been in the South for generations, not a clue what their ancestry might have been, last name Smith. so what are our children, Americans I believe and quite frankly they are not much interested in what their ethnic roots are. My brother married a woman from Ecuador. His children do not think of themselves as “Hispanic-Americans” anymore than we should try to figure out if the president is anything other than what is now a very typical American!!!
Same with Sotomayer, there is nothing unique about her story in this country. My dads parents came here with nothing more than what would fit in a steamer trunk.
The task of deciding who deserves affirmative action and who doesn’t is, as you point out, impossible. Yet the left persists in believeing that it can be done. Just as they persist in the fantasy that economic outcomes can be equalized without destroying free enterprise.
What gene do these people have that they are unable to see the fallacies of their utopian quests? And I do believe it is genetic because no amount of facts seem to deter them. Such persistence of belief in utopian outcomes cannot be accounted for any other way.
Is Victor suggesting that affirmative action should be based on financial need alone? If so, I agree.
Warren Beatty said it best in Bulworth, “All we need is a voluntary, free spirited, open-ended program of procreative racial deconstruction. Everybody just gotta keep f**kin’ everybody til they’re all the same color.”
Outsiders dexterously game our profligate government by observing closely how it now works. They see its generosity with services and money, its complacency in restraining fraud, its inability to stop a program when it has succeeded or failed, and its deception in the presumption that all of this is free.
Having a stake in the community, being an insider, gives one an incentive to perfect it. One can only guess a life lesson Clarence Thomas learned in his youth is that we have a great society to have a part in and that he could too.
Identity-grievance advocates must stay on the outside to earn their pay. They litigate to keep their clientele out of the melting-pot. Once, the other became the same: an American. Now, they stay the other.
The Indonesian upbringing, the high-school communist influences, the Sunday blame-America-first adult ritual, cohere and lay otherness in the mind of our historic first Islamic apostate president, who picked a Supreme Court justice capable of spreading the otherness.
Divide et impera, playing groups one against another.
And as general backdrop of this sorry spectacle, the Democrats’ relentless drive to change America’s demographic makeshift by any means, in order to insure their grip on power.
BI-LINGUAL
———-
Another laughable absurdity in the Affirmative Action firmament is the treatment of what consitutes “bilingualism”.
This is especially important in the employment field where, according to job descriptions, bilingual applicants are preferred.
But seldom, for some reason, is the actual language mentioned. It’s like there’s a mind-set that there is only 1 foreign language – or – even more absurd, that if you know ONE foreign language it means you know them ALL. Believe me, this is really true. I’ve run into this mind-set many a time.
(I admit this is changing somewhat as our bureaucracies have woken up to the fact that there really are a lot of languages out there).
In some locales in the USA, for example, bilingualism means ONLY English/Spanish. particularly in our Southwestern states. However in the San Francisco Bay area, the most sought after “native” language is Cantonese, in some areas of Wisconsin it’s Hmong.
In any of these areas, if you happen to speak German, well, you’re “not bilingual enough” or some such. You wouldn’t qualify for the job. This is not what they “really meant”.
I once worked for the Immigration Sevice and was specifically hired because I was already fluent in Spanish (and met the other qualifications)
In my application, I mentioned other languages I knew, but they were dismissed as unimportant and were not even entered in my official record – nor would they help me in “promotions” in the future. Only Spanish fit into that category.
It was only after 9/11 that this dramatically changed. By then, I was long gone from the Service – me and my fluent Arabic.
The whole racial spoils system, in my mind, traces back to the days of Jim Crow. In those days, the system was obviously somewhat competitive, except if you were black. The black community, therefor, never bought into the idea that everyone was allowed to compete fairly for a position, or anything else, because they weren’t allowed to. So when Jim Crow collapsed and was driven away, the only thing that could be “fair” to black people was a quota system, which would give them jobs *without them having to compete against other groups*. Once this system was in place, of course, the logic for removing it or actually trying to be impartial has been very hard to push. If person A received preferential treatment in 2008, shouldn’t person B (from the same group) receive the same benefits the next year? Thus the whole foolishness becomes a self-perpetuating machine, with an ever-growing bureaucracy of functionaries who do things like examine tests to make sure they are race-neutral, and hold seminars on “racial consciousness” which everyone sleeps through. I’m pretty sure that at this point we’ve gotten into this far enough that we won’t be able to get out, no matter what we do. We may be screwed, inevitably screwed.
One theme that stands out in this VDH piece is that of inter-marriage or relationships resulting in an increasing number of Americans of diverse, truly diverse, ethnic backgrounds. So much so, as VDH points out, that the term race is and has begun to lose much of its meaning especially in America. And this phenomena extends to many parts of the globe as well (gene flow at jumbo jet speed). I walk Tokyo and see so many more diverse peoples and mixtures of peoples nowadays (I want to see more!) and I consider that a good thing. It is not color that counts in this emerging world so much as culture. Identity politics is a poor game to play, given the above. Eventually, given the increasing number of children of complex ethnicity growing up in America **(especially) identity politics will eventually become a useless tool for the Left. As for now, it still remains possible for the Left to grasp at identity politics, barely grasp, mind you. All that aside, Sotomayor clearly made racist comments (in context, not out of context) and has associations with La Raza(VERY racist organization making silly territorial claims).
Sotomayor then had no business even being placed on the “very longshot” list for Supreme Court nominee.
**(The changing “face” of America is just another indication of the freedom we have and should cherish. I consider the extreme diversity of peoples to be a strength of the US. BUT, as Americans, we should consider ourselves Americans first and focus, if we will, on our ethnicity second. The reverse only does harm to the nation and it IS doing harm, especially in the educational system.)
**A bit of personal info. here: all of my children are of mixed-ethnicity, so I do have some notion of what I am talking about.
OF COURSE, Victor, IT’S ALL MADE UP.
That’s the game.
EXPOSING that game is the key.
***
Another great article on this:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/31/sotomayors_aversion_to_impartiality_96737.html
Maybe when she gets to her confirmation hearing, Sotomayor will disavow the remark. But her supporters are taking another tack. They say this criticism is unfair, because critics have taken the quotation out of context and grossly distorted her meaning.
Her allies have a point. Anyone who reads the whole speech will indeed find that her comment wasn’t as bad as it sounds. It was worse.
…
Judge Cedarbaum, she noted, “believes that judges must transcend their personal sympathies and prejudices and aspire to achieve a greater degree of fairness and integrity based on the reason of law.” Does Sotomayor share that noble sentiment? Not entirely.
“Although I agree with and attempt to work toward Judge Cedarbaum’s aspiration, I wonder whether achieving that goal is possible in all or even in most cases. And I wonder whether by ignoring our differences as women or men of color we do a disservice both to the law and society” (my emphasis). Which comes alarmingly close to saying:
It’s impossible for female and minority judges to overcome their biases, and it would be a shame if they did.
“” … Does the one-quarter aristocratic Jamaican qualify for American redress on account of his partial blackness? … “”
Why not? That about describes the son of relatively well-to-do British immigrants who spent a lifetime accepting legs-up and cashing feral gummint checks backed by only by the looted wealth of those who’d created it and who owned it. Who maneuvered and manipulated his way into the Republican Party’s and the Bush Family’s blind spots and who, while earning lifetime status as the Peter Principle’s most prominent poster person, was promoted past even perfumed princeling to become the perfect projector of the psychopathology of Foggy Bottom’s post-Frankfurt un-and-anti-Americans.
And replace “Jamaican” with “Kenyan” (and/or with “Frank Marshall Davis”) and it’ll just about perfectly describe the mobbed-up modified Marxist murtadd Muslim at 1600 Pennsylvania.
The absurdity of what affirmative action has become — essentially a self-perpetuating industry for the nursing of continued grievance for the ‘favored disadvantaged minorities’ at the expense of everyone else, including whites from backgrounds of poverty (often termed ‘white trash’ in an earlier day) and members of other minority groups who, though they may have experienced very nearly as much (or, in the case of Chinese and Japanese in California at various times, more) discrimination, have otherwise prospered in our society — is obvious to everyone except (perhaps) the “unusually stupid children of ten” for whose benefit Bertrand Russell called a collection of essays “Unpopular Essays.”
It would be too much to hope for (there’s that “hope and change” …) that the Supreme Court would put paid to affirmative action once-for-all in the Ricci case before Senorita Sotomayor joins the Supreme Court with a clear statement that the Constitution is (now) race blind, that nondiscrimination statues mean what they say (and what the legislative history clearly said) about equality before the law, and that the only deviations permitted would be the specific redress of intentional official racial discrimination in a particular case. No more helping hands, no more ‘diversity’ goals, no more minority and womens’ sent asides or preferences.
Come down hard on violations of any kind – what we call ‘reverse discrimination’ is just discrimination, and it’s not justifiable. Public employment and public higher education should be absolutely race blind in admissions, to the point that the applications should state that any indication of race on an application will be grounds for rejection. Let our public colleges and universities take the academically strongest applicants within their category, with weaker applicants going to the next level down. After all, the community colleges accept everyone and provide a chance for success through actual achievement and transfer.
Once the government got into the racial classification as the basis for benefits business, the dim future was predictable. Mr. Justic Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson, that the Constitution was colorblind would have been a much better basis for the civil rights revolution than the convoluted judicial-sociological gymnastics of Brown v. Board of Education, which have led us to a system of nonsensical counterbalancing “affirmative actions” – race-based preferences that have created a new, entrenched system of racism.
Alas, the racial identity racket Hanson describes is a consequence of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which Hubert Humphrey wanted in order to abolish all discrimination in employment based on race, national origin, religion, or sex. He pushed for the EEOC as a bureaucracy to enforce this law. But the law was an impossible one, since it is impossible for any one person, or group of persons, universally to discern bias, since that would require omniscience. The EEOC then resorted, for bureaucratic reasons, to quotas (by another name), just as Humphrey had been warned and tried to prevent by outlawing quotas. All this requires racial identification, as racial segregation did in the southern states, and is a violation of the 14th Amendment, just as government-enforced racial segregation was. I fear that the EEOC should be abolished. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, should never have been enacted.
I feel as if 2009 is the political and social equivalent of a house of mirrors and distortions. We seek truth and hear only lies. Our tongues try to speak the truth but are hindered by the chains of political correctness.
In this day and age, when all else is crumbling around us, there is only one source of truth.
Prov 23:23. But the truth and do not sell it; get wisdom, discipline and understanding.
“” … Had (B Hussayn) kept his assumed name Barry (Soetoro) and used his mother’s maiden name; – logical, given the Dunham family’s exclusive caretakership of young (Hussayn) – a (B. Soetoro Frank Marshall Davis-Dunham-Obambi) might have appeared far less exotic and authentically black than Barack …”" the Magic Negro (who now) lives in DC, The LA-Times, they called him that, ’cause he’s not authentic like me. Yeah, the guy from the L.A. paper, said he makes guilty whites feel good, they’ll vote for him, and not for me, ’cause he’s not from the hood.
Some say Barack’s articulate — and bright and new and clean. The media sure love this guy, a white interloper’s dream! But, when you vote for president, watch out and don’t be fooled! Don’t vote the Magic Negro in …..
‘Cause he’s a fascist in an empty galabia?
Brian Richard Allen
Los Angeles Califobambicated 90028
And the Far Abroad
Barry Dunham has started a fire he cannot control. I am not trained in the law so perhaps someone who is can answer this, were Frank Ricci’s civil rights violated?
Wow! Excellent article. I totally agree.
The Sotomayor nomination hearings provide an excellent opportunity to address these absurdities. Unfortunately, it is highly unlikely that they will be adequately addressed. Most white people in America, including most of those those on the Senate Judiciary Committee, are afraid of being called racist.
Although I doubt that anyone on this forum will live to see it. The only way to keep this from destroying the country is to get back to being just plain “Americans”. You know like there are no red states, there are no blue states……
oh wait boobama said that nd his lips were moving.
#7: Thank you for answering my earlier question. I have two other questions:
1. If “Latino” means someone who speaks Latin, or a language in the Latin family, would a Romanian also be considered Latino?
2. If Hispanics are descendants of Spanish settlers in the New World, does this mean we are trying to give preferential treatment to people whose ancestors were conquistadors?
3. Since they speak French, is Quebec considered part of “Latin America?”
So much for racial equality. We can thank Obama for taking race relations back at least 20 years. Who knew it would take a black President to bring back racism instead of vice versa? I’m sure he and his minions counted on white guilt but they were wrong. They’ve inadvertently fanned a flame that they are incapable of putting out.
I’m a Scottish/Irish-American and I’ll be giving the back of me hand to all of ye.
I have lived in 12 countries and visited many, many more. The most racist country I have lived in was South Africa under Apatheid, the least racist by a comfortable margin is the USA. The only racism I have encountered in the states within the last 25 years is reverse racism, where Asians and Caucasians are put at a competitive disadvantage to “disadvantaged minorities.” I find the national obsession with racism to be every bit as absurd as the description laid out in Dr. Hanson’s post shows it to be.
Even more absurd is the fact that a sizeable percentage (perhaps a majority) of Americans continue to feel that this is a valid issue. This never ending guilt trip is simply beyond my ability to fathom.
affirmative action is a ploy to secure the Leftist powerbase. The left give preference to minorities under the guise of fairness and in return left expects fielty. When they don’t get in like in Miguel Estrada’s case, Clarence Thomas, or Rice, they viciously attack them.
I worked hard in college to game this idiotic system; when everyone is a disadvantaged minority claiming a grievance of some sort, then no one can be. My angle was to claim homosexuality and then apply for every gay scholarship I could qualify for; I played the gay victim card for all it was worth (to the great amusement of my roomates). I also claimed to be an ancient Cretan; a people, alas, destroyed by avaristic foes (trouble is, our university system being what it is, no one at the college had ever heard of Crete). I’m sure with a little imagination and some geneology, otherwise hum-drum Americans can be turned, presto, into a minority victim group. Truth is, large swathes of people have some portion of Black or Native-American “heritage”, and both can be turned into a trump card in perpetuity. And becoming “Hispanic” is as easy as $25 dollars of research and a name change. We are all protected minorities now.
Remember, Mr. Hanson, it’s only racism if you are ‘white’.
Great article, typos and all (and, thank goodness I’m not the only one who makes them)! :)
Nothing worse then to watch the white race bow down to the angry black folks whose leadership has manipulated us all while their people continue to fail miserably at achieving anything noteworthy on a day to day basis.
We need to come up with a term like “Uncle Tyrone” and call white people that who continue to justify their liberal viewpoints by giving people advantages simply based on race and perceived slights that took place long before most of us were born.
When does it end? When white people no longer exist? At what point are we Zimbabwe?
No matter what anyone says, white society is what has allowed countries to prosper and thrive while blacks feed off the achievments of whites and use slavery as a reason to justify failure and promote guilt so they can get free stuff. Even the hispanics have learned to do it and see that not following the law does not matter.
Look at Africa. Despite plenty of natural resources, it is a failure of life and those people live not much better then they did when they were being transported to the west to be slaves. If they can get over here, they can do very little and get a lot more, all under the disguise of suffering at the hands of rich conservative elistist white people.
The few blacks and latinos that achieve are only celebrated if they are liberal. They shun their own people who achieve and think as conservatives. To me that is worse then any racist white persons actions. I can only imagine if a white candidate for Supreme Court had said what Sotomayor had said about race and making law, that person would be crucified as racist and lose their current job. Sotomayor gets a pass. She is not even qualified to serve on a jury with those racist views and she is going to be on the Supreme Court?
Ultimately reverse racism and afirmative action has changed everything. The pocket of rich white people are going to section themselves off into a part of the country, likely the Pacific Northwest, and will cause a revolution and a new country will be created. It might take 100 years before we see it, but it will happen. At some point the productive members of society wont tolerate what is going on.
The US was built on a foundation that liberals and race baiters are destroying. White folks who act guilty are only doing it because they are simply weak and misinformed or they are doing it to maintain their power base ie stay in office as long as they can. Eventually the blacks and latinas will put up candidates that will think like the old white limousine liberal and they will take their office. Obama and Sotomayor are the prime examples of where we are going.
It sickens me to see what has happened to this country. A persons race should not matter. Its about merit. There have been too many attempts to right past wrongs and its time for these people to achieve on their own merits like the asians seem to be able to do.
The fact Obama, his wife, and all those other minorities get to go to fancy schools while more qualified white kids do not is not what this country is about. The schools themselves should be ashamed for their admission policies.
I am sick of all the “Uncle Tyrones” out there destroying this country to give it to a group of people who overall cannot sustain success and need tax money from achievers to pay for their six children with six different daddies.
When we become modern day Zimbabwe or South Africa, only then will we understand what happened to such a great country. I hate having to watch all this stuff and wish race no longer mattered. It wont matter when there are no white people left.
Anthropologically, race is a fiction. And like with climate change, the left insists on making a fiction the primary organizing principle of society.
Barry Dunham is white, and Barry would not have won.
I agree with every word, and this is my thoughts for today before I go on my merry way.
The White house lied,
The bow was a sign,
Now they say it never happened,
Still, the cowboy’s eyes did not deceive him,
He thinks of cowardly displays like Benedict Arnold,
It is not a sight to see out on the farm,
It is something that you see happen over in England,
He knows that the Government has lied before,
Such a blatant display is something more,
Now that ole cowboy thinks he is seeing a revelation,
And the coming of one nation,
He wonders if the people will pay attention.
The Saboteurs that bow will sell us out,
The ole cowboy is out working the cows,
And thinking of things that are not said out loud,
He is thinking the change has come,
Furthermore, that our country was dumb,
They voted for a man that bows down to evil.
That ole cowboy has a level head,
He knows, that a cow is just a cow,
He knows a bow is just that, a bow,
Not a curtsy from a little girl,
But a form of obedience in this old world,
He is thinking about the bald-faced lie that they spin,
Surely, people can see the capitals sin.
True story: an immigrant from Romania who I know changed her name to Velasquez when she divorced. There are no Valsquezes in her family (her first name could pass for Spanish). It was done precisely on her belief that an Hispanic surname would be more valuable in navigating the welfare state than her Romanian name.
This thread is one of the best I have ever read.
Yes,Victor Davis Hansen,you have it pat. Barak Obama’s approach to race is not civilized one-for-all,all-for-one,but is tribial–my tribe,my blood–barbaric,divisive.
from today’s Yahoo headline
Obamerick
Campaign promises to Michelle,
Promises to leftists ne’er-do-well,
He made good. You and me,
The American esprit,
Promises,well..we can go to hell.
It was Obama’s choice to focus the nomination on that when he (inexcusably) started touting the “empathy” red herring. I am willing to consider the possibility that she’s not as race-conscious as he is, but her silence implies consent. So in effect, they’re both (actively or passively) beating the race drum.
Here we are. The only issue being discussed is race. Kinda bizarre considering that there is no such thing.
I thought we were founded on the principle one nation under God. To be a part of this once great nation all those who came to this great nation for opportunity it has now become a country to provide an entitlement to all past sins. I am so troubled by the direction we have taken and the dumbing down of values for the sake of affirmation action!
12.proreason.”The dominant factor is about greed not race”
exacty.
“To them, racial hatred is just a tool useful to overthrow the country and rule it themselves.”
one of the oldest tricks,i can’t believe people still fall for it.
Paul in Hamburg. Quebec is part of France, just ask them next time you are in Montreal. :-}
This fresh news event highlighting racist attitudes on the left is just the latest public exposure of the underlying cultural and intellectual rot that drives and motivates the left.
I’m grateful for the blatant self-revealing political exhibitionism that they can’t seem to resist, because it helps us to know them.
I’m sickened by how deeply it’s all entwined in our politics, pop culture and hairbrained assumptions that we all end up fighting.
It occurs to me that I’m a minority: born in the USA, but 100% Danish by heritage and genetics. Where can I go for recognition and privilege resulting from my minority status? (Oh. That’s right. “Minority status” does not mean actually being in a minority. I have to first perceive of myself as an ABUSED person…then, I attach the “minority” to qualify for public largesse.)
Of course, our family’s first screwup was in 1900 when my grandparents homesteaded in the tough farm country of dryland Montana and thought they were obligated to carry their own weight (how silly!), pay their own way (whoa!), learn English (suckers!) and assimilate (once again, not looking out for themselves) and contribute (ultimate suckers!).
Thanks again, Professor, for thinking and writing. You are obviously a admirably self-controlled person as well, considering that you apparently didn’t fall to fisticuffs in dealing with the nonsense in the university setting.
In the future the black panthers will be in uniform at the polling places…it is not illegal under the Obama administration. Whites will be harassed when they show up. The white leftist will wear badges to assure they will be allowed passage to the polls without problems…they will think this is a good thing. Any white objecting will be branded a racist and potential terrorist and possibly arrested. The Obama youth (under another name of coarse) will canvass the neighborhoods in uniform and hand out propaganda for voters to read. Those in gated communities may be excluded from these house to house visits if they fly an Obama flag from their residence. The appointed judges will count the votes (to do so is only for show) and announce the democrat president. There will be no challenges. CBS, NBC AND ABC will report how wonderful the democratic process is and FOXNEWS will not be allowed to report at all. Rush L. will write from jail that he told us so but no one will know because his writings will not be published. Welcome to ObamaWorld left of Eden.
But he had to cut a deal with the power brokers, too. If you recall, when he first showed up, the Jacksons and Sharptons and other rent seekers started questioning his blackness. Somehow, Obama had to persuade them that they’d get a better deal from him than Hillary, or they wouldn’t have granted him his blackness. And without them granting him his blackness, he never would have been able to pull it off.
The fact that the New Panthers who were intimidating voters in Philly were suddenly and inexplicably taken off the legal hook suggests the nature of the deal.
As an aside, I strongly suspect that he actively sought Michelle out precisely in order to adopt a race. Wright was also part of this identity transformation. This wasn’t the story of the making of a president as much as a story of the manufacturing of blackness.
Sotomayor’s no more racist than NY governor David Paterson. Remember this:
http://trackacrat.com/2009/05/01/no-such-thing-as-anti-white-racism/
And a note, not to us, but to any passing trolls. “Reverse” racism is entirely erroneous – that implies that racism is always against non-whites and, thus, always perpetuated by whites.
So please use “anti-white” racism, instead.
#45: Talk about speaking truth to power!
55.settle down.
charlie rangel showing his inherent racism…this guy has got problems:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06012009/news/regionalnews/rangel_misfires__mike_171922.htm
The President and his administration have no identity with the enormous self reliance and sacrifice which made America great. Now they, and their colleagues, are bent on remedying what they perceive as the injustices of the past only to create new and greater problems than they say that they have inherited. Race is not a qualification for the United States Supreme Court, or for any other government office. Candidates are extolled as “the first black”, “the first Latino”, the first this or the first that. Where is the scrutiny on the basis of scholarship, and understanding of the law, the Constitution of this country, and fairness of its application to all?
Take it beyond just race and it gets even worse. Even though I am white, of mixed Welsh and N. West European lineage, my “people” are the only ones to have had an extermination order issued against them in the U.S. (much like the Jews in Nazi Germany).
And it gets even better. If the homosexuals can argue that marriage is not between one man and one woman, but rather encompases a wider range of possible combinations, then my “people” need further recompense for being forced to break apart polygamist families when Utah joined the U.S. as a state.
Yes I am Mormon. And my family has been since the start of the church. I had ancestors killed because of the Boggs Extermination Order, and I had ancestors who had to decide which parts of their family to prune in order for Utah to enter the U.S.
Where is our forty acres and a mule?
Much like the Asian though, we have overcome these initial hardships and have higher rates of advanced education (like the Jews and the Asians), higher per capita incomes, higher standards of living, etc. than the general population.
Blacks have been here in the U.S. longer than Mormons (we only came into existence in the mid-1800′s while blacks were here before the revolution) and yet have failed to achieve as much. Why?
If we leave religion out of it for a minute (if we can), my original direct lineage ancestor (the first Davis) arrived in North America in the mid-1600′s. He was a refugee from the English Civil War (Cromwell and those types) and settled in the “Catholic” colony of Maryland. That puts my lineage on American soil for about as long as a good number of the hispanic families and longer than many of them.
Yet where I hunt there are hispanic families that have been around about as long as ours and yet they still are nothing more than small family farm or ranch owners.
Why should I care or pay for the multiple generations of failures that some of these ethnic or cultural groups have produced? Should we not let Darwinian evolution weed out those sub-groups in the U.S. that are not capable or do not want to advance?
Instead we seem to desire to pour more and more resources into keeping those sub-groups viable when they have proven they are not. Sort of like TARP . . .
Elite White Guilt: Call them what they really are…White Racist.
They call themselves white elite liberals who will “take care” of the races who have been mistreated in the past.
In reality, they think that hispanics and blacks are stupid and incapable of taking care of themselves.
Unfortunately for the rest of us, a good number of hispanics and blacks are buying it.
Liberals cherish the race card. Everyone else is sick of it.
ET:
I agree with your disgust at the way Sarah Palin was treated, but she was not the first female VP nominee. That was Geraldine Ferraro, and she was (presumably still is) a democrat.
In California-given the mixed ancestry of Cherokee intermarriage of many in the Oklahoma Diaspora-a sort of parlor game among white students was to claim, often accurately, 1/4, 1/8, or 1/16 “Native-American” racial heritage.
Such as my 1/16 “Native American” cousins in LA with Okie parents. Because their 1/8 “Native American” mother was a successful entrepreneur who began her career as a lowly secretary, they neither needed nor requested any assistance from the gummint affirmative action programs.
When does our society stop telling blacks and other minorities that they are unfairly ‘disadvantaged’ simply because of their ethnicity, and when do we stop telling white people that they have an unfair ‘advantage’ for simply being white?
This is insulting to everyone equally imho. Well, I guess that’s one form of ‘equality’.
About elite white guilt: It may be a way of assuaging a sense of guilt, but I’m more cynical; I believe that it’s more like a purchase of an indulgence. Liberal white men can abuse minorities and women (especially women; why isn’t Ted Kennedy in prison?) with complete impunity. It doesn’t cost them anything, and they get a universally negotiable unlimited free pass to rape and kill woman and call people the “N” word, and it even forgives a past as a Grand Kleagle.
I don’t believe that the concept of conscience is applicable to such people.
VDH – excellent piece, Sir.
I’d ‘attempted’ to work with the Department of Commerce years back after the military and college but it was a courtship I couldn’t stomach and lasted but 2 years. As I’m sure most if not all are familiar with or experienced, here’s my run-in when filling out new hire paperwork:
I was told by a woman in the EEO office (BTW, the woman was black. I wonder why there are NO caucasians in an EEO office. I know, that’s racism..) I was required to watch a few videos, fill out a questionnaire and talk with an EEO Counselor to discuss race, sexism in the workplace. I told this woman, ‘No’.
She glared at me and said it’s required. I told her my military experience, overseas assignments, college and being married to an Asian woman more than qualifies me for their indoctrination. I wasn’t going to waste my time with such white guilt-laden garbage.
Suffice to say, after raising her BP for sometime and her failed attempts to find a higher up to dispute my take, I was ‘signed’ off on EEO training.
Call me what you want, I don’t care, but I’ve seen Obambi’s attempt to ‘dance’ on the Ellen Show. He is not ‘authentically black’. Not even close. I am blacker than he is.
Now where’s my check?
Leftwing minorities apparently are seen as authentic-in the sense of being thankful and obliged to their liberal patrons for their heroic efforts at ‘leveling the playing field’.
With the Left it is, ultimately, about all that enslaving gratitude and establishing a very pathetic co-dependency.
You’re really not supposed to “make it” on your own merits, without a leg up from your Leftist puppetmasters. It’s just not sufficiently servile.
Right-wing minorities who do not consciously embrace racial identification are typecast as being bitter, unappreciative, and perhaps a little crazy.
Worse than that, they’re viciously denigrated, mention Clarence Thomas or Condoleezza Rice to any follower of Louis Farrakhan and hear the vitriol heaped upon traitors to “race”, those Uncle Toms.
Is It Politics, After All?
Yes, politics and devices for obtaining power, setting the agenda and controlling the dialogue.
There really is nothing new under the sun.
good article, most of this is common sense to anyone with eyes. the mixing of racial backgrounds is accelerating. it has always been thus. but how long will it take before we reach a point of stasis.
More on elite [liberal] whites -
I think many really do believe that all whites are privileged, because they have never met ordinary white people in their entire lives. As far as they’re concerned, whites living on less that $250,000/yr don’t exist. The demographic makeup in the ivy universities is peculiar – the whites are almost all rich, and then the scholarship money goes chasing pretty much exclusively after minorities.
So they go through college believing that the entire country consists of rich whites and poor minorities, and affirmative action assures that the poor offspring of an Okie is invisible to them as they develop their conception of the country. They’re vaguely aware that there are uneducated people living in trailers somewhere in flyover country, but they’re more of an abstraction. To an ivy graduate, poor Blacks are a tangible reality; poor whites are the butts of jokes.
I’ve had some rather eye-opening conversations with my Princeton-educated significant other, and as many times as I’ve tried to explain the demographic facts to her, she still seems to cling to this cartoonish picture of all whites being rich.
Don’t be surprised that when you raise people in a fantasy world, that they grow up internalizing the fantasy.
45. George Best: “At some point the productive members of society wont tolerate what is going on.”
At some point? What the hell is the matter with right now? What on Earth are people waiting for? BO is busily destroying the foundations of private enterprise, and the Pubs in Congress are doing virtually nothing. It’s ridiculous. The 2010 election cycle cannot come soon enough. I fear though that widespread complacence and lap-dog love for this one-man disaster of a POTUS won’t drive enough people to the polls.
While you people are still working the angle that she hates white people and is an affirmative action queen, there’s this from another decision:
Pappas vs. Giuliani
http://openjurist.org/290/f3d/143/pappas-v-giuliani
In this case, she was the only dissenting opinion on the panel. In contrast to the rest of the judges, she upheld a man’s right to air his political views–even though the Giuliani administration of NYC wanted to fire him for being racist.
I’m interested in seeing how much serious attention this gets from you. Remember, the opinion in the Ricci case is collective and anonymous; in this case, you do get to see the judicial style of Sotomayor and see her opinions on justice and law. If you people have any integrity at all, you’ll have to admit that it comports with the what you’ve been asking for. That is if you have any integrity and your arguments are honest–I don’t believe that, of course.
The White (and other coloUred) Guilt/élitist aspect is definitely in play.
Throw out some bones and some verbiage to those you declare your “lessers” (the bitter clingers and so forth), toss some paeans in their direction, and, voilà, guilty conscience expunged.
You can march forward to the charity balls and complain to your San Francisco councilman about the homeless people defecating in your frontyard and wipe out the cognitive dissonance between your real thinking and the thinking to which you pretentiously attach yourself, all in one fell swoop.
Today’s current crop of Liberal politicians is, by and large, made up of hypocrites of the most disgusting sort.
Anyone trusting them to “have their back” (on race or any other matter) is perfectly insane.
As usual, thanks for the great insight.
Excellent, excellent essay, Dr. Hanson!
What will be the next tool of justice in the US Attorney General’s office under Holder? A skin color chart!
…While you people are still working the angle that she hates white people and is an affirmative action queen…
Wrong on both counts.
The angle, as a function of her own published comments, is that she believes “justice” should be administered as a function of her own (unique) personal experience and that certain people should be granted latitude over other people and the kind of latitude very often has something to do with skin color.
She doesn’t seem to especially value that mainstay of judicial process, impartiality.
Taanstafl. You’re allergic to facts. Resist reading what I posted all you want. Its there and black and white.
Excellent essay Dr. Hanson. A labyrinth is the perfect descriptor for the mess of political racism.
What everyone needs to understand is that the creation of a “victim class” is one of the most essential components of political correctness. The victim classes are the voting base of the Modern Liberal (neo-Marxist), who must perpetuate the illusion of racism in order to maintain and grow their victim classes of voters.
As a few others in this forum have said: it’s all about power and control.
They cannot accept that race is not an issue, and even if it started to look like it was becoming a non-issue, they would need to create a new class of victims – perhaps the “mixed-race” card will be the next one.
If the citizens of the United States were to proclaim in unity: “There is no more racism. There are no more diverse races here. We are all Americans!” – the Modern Liberal would have no more voters.
Thanks, Captain Obvious! That slipped my mind…guess I meant “First non-leftist female VP candidate”; I guess all the “First” articles on Ferraro had the appropriate gushing.
Palin should have had essentially the same treatment, though, and it is of course part of the point that she didn’t!
I guess I can go read all the glowing stuff on Ferraro from that campaign as my punishment.
This post reminds me of the time Theresa Heinz-Kerry declared that since she was born in Mozambique that she was actually an African-American. As far as I know, that’s the only thing she’s ever said that I agree with.
A Mexican-American family of my acquaintance has had experiences that confirm Hanson. The married names of the daughters are no longer Spanish but are names like Donovan, Nagy and Audet. The children are “hispanic” in name only. The sons married non-latina women and their children are blue-eyed blonds named Rodriguez. A grandson is French-German-Vietnamese-Mexican.Only his surname is Spanish. Doing away with all the categories may discourage liberal Democrats who still hope to make political hay out of ethnicity but let’s simply call them all Americans.
#78
She doesn’t seem to especially value that mainstay of judicial process, impartiality.
Ah–tanstaafl–don’t you realize that impartiality is a “white male construct” that is designed to keep wymen and people of color down?
Mhr. So you’re saying once Latinos become Blonde and blue eyed and change their names, they can be Americans. Wow. That’s pretty open minded.
In any case, if any of you can explain how Disney has managed to be around for fifty years as the premier producer of family entertainment and is only now producing a major movie with black characters, have at it. I can’t imagine that this is the fault of the non-white and their grievance grinding.
In this case, she was the only dissenting opinion on the panel. In contrast to the rest of the judges, she upheld a man’s right to air his political views–even though the Giuliani administration of NYC wanted to fire him for being racist.
I’m interested in seeing how much serious attention this gets from you. Jo Mama writes:
Remember, the opinion in the Ricci case is collective and anonymous; in this case, you do get to see the judicial style of Sotomayor and see her opinions on justice and law. If you people have any integrity at all, you’ll have to admit that it comports with the what you’ve been asking for. That is if you have any integrity and your arguments are honest–I don’t believe that, of course.
I have no idea what Pappas’s ethnicity was, or whether the record in the case reveals it, but if he was Hispanic it tends to undermine your position. The real mark of the racist is that its all right when my people do it, its just not right when you (place racial epithet here)’s do it.
85.jo mamma.”In any case, if any of you can explain how Disney has managed to be around for fifty years as the premier producer of family entertainment and is only now producing a major movie with black characters, have at it.
profit?
The present state of racialism in the U.S. seems to have developed along a fairly standard path. The initial efforts a redressing actual racial inequities began in the 1950s and 1960s. There were self-evident legal obstacles to black advancement which had to be removed and were. This was possible because the U.S. white population had awakened from a century long slumber to reconnect with the words “all men are created equal.” Fine so far. Then the barriers to irrationality were breached, the fires of white guilt were stoked, and a new “industry” was created to arbitrate for and deliver government largess to the “victims” of past discrimination.
Well, we’re now at least 40 years and several generations into that effort with the expenditure of vast sums of taxpayer money, not the least of which was the late, great “War on Poverty” to the tune of $6.6 trillion, and the creation and staffing of vast bureaucracies of government, quasi-government, non-profit institutions and related hangers-on whose “objective” is to deliver “social justice.” This industry, as would any other industry, will do everything in its power to enlarge its “market share” of government resources and private contributions.
The issue now has nothing to do with whether the continued existence of this machinery serves any larger societal purpose. It has everything to do with a small group of people justifying and protecting their professions and incomes. Thus, given the “dispersed costs, concentrated benefits” problem, racialism and its infrastructure will be very difficult to eradicate, no matter how logical it would seem.
Hey, I’m a Belgian American…wait, is there any such thing?
This is a subtle form of misogyny.
Right-wing minorities who do not consciously embrace racial identification are typecast as being bitter, unappreciative, and perhaps a little crazy.
In my case, what I’m told is, “you don’t even look Puerto Rican,” even when I was born & raised in Puerto Rico of Puerto Rican parents.
#15:
Right. The last time this level of government domination was tried, FDR’s programs were shutting out Blacks. That was bad. But this is going to be explosive. We’re rapidly heading for apartheid South Africa in reverse, with the oppressed majority armed to the teeth.
Damn interesting times…
The founders of the American democracy did so with a precedent of JUSTICE, I think above all things…This administration does so with more of an inclination towards “natural selection”…because their precedent of “justice” is rooted elsewhere’s and diametrically opposed to those foundations.
There are many odd parallels that could be drawn in this sense of “might makes right”…Ricci, the fireman is being deprived the fruits of his labors because they threaten a social order just as the North Koreans are being deprived the fruits of theirs because it threatens a global order.
But both achievements are fruits of self-reliant abilitiy and labor…which can be considered in self-defense.
The California Hollywood Liberal contingent seems almost far too evident as parrots of Madam Mao’s, Gang of Four…and China’s Cultural Revolution…in their, basically), “preferences” over true and even legally sanctioned, social merits concerning endorsement and entitlement.
Here is a good example: Major League Baseball is going through all kinds of guilt trips because the numbers of blacks in baseball have gone down so much. Sports Illustrated ran an entire expose on the subject. Here’s the catch- MLB is not allowed to count any hispanic black player as black. So if a team is chock full of black players named Ramirez, none of them count at black. Hense MLB has to be shamed for their racist ways, and infuse tons of money into the inner city to try to get blacks back into the game(despite the fact that a large percentage of blacks don’t see baseball as cool, so they prefer to focus on football and basketball). Could you imagine the NBA being forced to set up special basketball camps in the suburbs in order to attract more whites to the game? Unbelievable.
OK, jo mama, I’ll bite…
re: S’s dissenting opinion in Pappas v. Guliani-
the following is also from the link you posted :
(http://openjurist.org/290/f3d/143/pappas-v-giuliani )
Judge Sotomayor’s final point is that the Department should not be permitted to discharge Pappas because, absent the Department’s decision to bring disciplinary charges, no one would have known that these offensive materials were being distributed by a police officer. Judge Sotomayor argues in essence that, upon learning that Pappas was violating its rules by disseminating bigoted racist materials, the Department should have swept the matter under the rug hoping no one would ever learn the facts; and if it chose instead to bring charges against Pappas, it has only itself to blame for the resulting harm to its reputation, and may not discharge Pappas for his misconduct. In our view this argument is seriously misguided as a policy matter, and is premised furthermore on a misunderstanding of the law.
Also, her opinion in this case does not alter her ‘latina v. white male’ comment.
My ancestors were burned at the stake for their religious beliefs, and fled their home country for a place were they could be free to worship as they please.
They were Huguenots, and came to America, the land of hope and change.
Can I have my check now, Your Holiness? I feel really, really, bummed out. And persecuted and discriminated against.
I’ll take a reparation check of $1 million, and them I’m going to run out and buy gold. Coins. And keep them hidden. Well, some more guns, too.
Remember the Race controversy started because that is how Obama introduced her. He focused on her ethnic background and gender before stating he had good legal qualifications. Why did he do that? To create the frenzy? To hide her legal opinions of the past?
We know that he – and George Soros (The Shadow Party) have both advocated changing the Constitution – which Obama has said needs changing – indirectly through rulings rather than through Amendments. That alone scares me. He was NOT a Constitutional law professor as some have been told. He did cover it but he claimed it was out dated. Of course, he has been a member of the “New Party” (now Working Family) and is a champion of Saul Alinsky’s socialistic ideals. So, why should we really believe he will protect and defend the Constitution if he wants to destroy it?
Of course, my friends watch main stream networks and think I’m over the edge because I’ve studied the man since reading about him in the August 2008 issue of the New Yorker. What I read chilled me and unfortunately, all of my fears are coming true.
I call it the “Frogging of America”. We are all in a pot of cool water upon a hot burner of Socialism and won’t jump out until we are thoroughly cooked. I doubt we will make it until 2010, never mind 2012.
there are black Hispanics and white Hispanics, there are even mestizo Hispanics. how many generations before you can call yourself American? i’d rather not have the color of my skin define me as a human being.
What about ugly people?
What about obese people?
There is plenty of prejudice against the above titled folks too. What about their rights?
Affirmative Action is an insult to minorities. It is patronising. The message it sends is that they need help to get into college or a good job. Deep down, minorities must question whether they got that job becasue of their capabilities or to fill some government requirement. It draws into question their worth. If Affirmative Action ended, then they could be sure that their achievements were made because of their own talents.
Sure there is racism in the US, but the media exaggerates the extent to which it is practised today. In fact, the obsession that the media has over stories of potential discrimination feeds into the problem by making minorities hyper-sensitive. Soon minorities start seeing racism everywhere because they are told that it is so common in the US.
#94
I think the # of american blacks in MLB has simply remained static, not gone down. What is being lost is those power pitcher/catcher types that yes will play defensive end or power forward (or even like the Blackhawks’ Dustin Byfuglien, defensemen). There are still a lot of infielder and center field types. I could imagine CC Sabathia (straight from the hood of Oakland CA) being perturbed in his early years being hounded by “Republica Deportiva” and “Telemundo Deportes”; since because of his “exotic” last name, he was presumed a Dominican or Cuban.
As for an NBA “full court press for the suburbs” I for one would support such an effort. Hell I always cringe when even a native born white players like Wally Szerbiak or Kirk Hinrich turns out to be the son of an ex-player or a coach’s son. You would never see some white accountant or tradesman’s son be in the NBA (the other side would chime in and say the accountant would have filled his son in on the long odds of making it and the tradesman, if he was union, would have got his son at least an apprenticeship).
Title XI is the real “unequalizer” of college sports since white-male dominant sports such as wrestling and swimming tend to be cut in favor of womens sports.
Jo Mama: So you are agreeing with her that the distribution of objectional material is okay even if it violates codified department rules? Then you and she both believe that it is okay if the KKK were to distribute materials in public schools, military, etc??
Her opinion is the real perversion of the First Amendment. But that is typical of a Leftist. The left believes the Constitution is a living document that needs to be modified when possible and obviated when necessary.
Dude, lame try.
97,
Exactly. We still don’t know enough about her to ascertain exactly how much of a racist she is, but this should remove any doubt about the POTUS.
john from cinncinatti
Zero
You are an American when you say so. Period.
There are Americans who never set foot in the country.
Any other point of view is held only by the foolish.
A true story about how racism can go both ways.
My daughter was a cheerleader all through school, and she took lessons from cheer coaches and dance classes growing up. She is a natural beauty, with blond curls that fall into place (I am her mother, but its true). There was another little girl on her high school cheer team with as much natural beauty and she was black. Her Father was black, but his father was white. Her mother was a beautiful black woman and she seemed to be both outside and inside where it counts. She was my daughter’s basketball coach a few years earlier and I liked her. Her father was a man of few words, he would say hi at the games, but that was all, and he seemed to snarl at times. He seemed angry to me.
My daughter became fast friends with their daughter and they really did have so much in common. My daughter started asking if she could stay the night with her good friend, and I knew this was a good family, because the mother had been my daughters coach and she was so pleasant. I told my daughter that she could stay the night with her friend.
My daughter come home and said she would never stay again, and the little girl’s father treated her ugly, at first, it scared me, my goodness what had he done? My daughter said the man hates white people and his father was a white man. This did not make any sense to me, but my daughter said he lost his temper at the dinner table and said he does not like white men. What did you do, why did he say that? My daughter said he started the conversation in anger telling the girl she could not go to the prom with the little boy who she was planning to go with because he was white. The little girl said you are half-white, and the anger raged in him. He told the girls that his father never claimed him, his father was ashamed of him and that he hates all white people. He told his daughter this while my daughter was setting at his dinner table. He might as well have yelled he did not want this whitey in his home. She told me the story and I said well that is fine she can come and stay here you can still be friends and we can show him that we are not like his white father. The little girl never did get to hang around with my daughter and their friendship never was more than cheering on the team, because every time she was invited, she said her father says NO. Racism goes both ways.
Hollywood should do a true to life drama and this would make a good one. The white people disowned this man when he was a boy, and now he has nothing but rage for them.
It goes both ways, and when you think like this nothing will change.
105, your story illustrates something that I’ve observed on many occasions: that biracial males are very often (thought not always) very conflicted about identity (especially if black daddy abandoned white mommy), and become virulent white haters in attempt to reaffirm their own identity.
I strongly suspect that some of that psychology is in play with the POTUS.
Ahhh…if it were only this easy…
Paul & Stevie
Ebony and ivory live together in perfect harmony
Side by side on my piano keyboard, oh lord, why dont we?
We all know that people are the same where ever we go
There is good and bad in evryone,
We learn to live, we learn to give
Each other what we need to survive together alive.
Ebony and ivory live together in perfect harmony
Side by side on my piano keyboard, oh lord why dont we?
Three Dog Night
The ink is black
The page is white
Together we learn to read and write
The child is black
The child is white
The whole world looks upon the sight
The beautiful sight
And now a child can understand
That this is the law of all the land
All the land
The world is black
The world is white
It turns by day and then by night
The child is black
The child is white
Together they grow to see the light
To see the light
And now at last we plainly see
We’ll have a dance of liberty
The world is black
The world is white
It turns by day and then by night
The child is black
The child is white
The whole world looks upon the sight
The beautiful sight
I agree, it is time to stop telling people that they must rely on their race to get them places, and instead we should let them fend for themselves. If we tell people that being black or Mexican will get you somewhere, haven’t we told them that their hard work or talent do not mean as much as their race? How is that a way to get people out of the ghetto. People will wait until the government comes their way because of false promises about how much you can achieve if just the government helps. No doubt there are a lot of people that make it because of quotas etc. Still, how much good comes from holding people’s hand contstantly. I lke Frederick Douglas when he says something like, “If God made the black man to stand on his own two feet he will, but you have to give him the chance.”
Also, if you want to talk about racism, how much does it help a racist person to see minorities being given a free pass. The only thing that will help a situation like that is seeing someone and then beginning to really respect them for who they are inside.
85. Jo Mama wrote:
“In any case, if any of you can explain how Disney has managed to be around for fifty years as the premier producer of family entertainment and is only now producing a major movie with black characters, have at it. I can’t imagine that this is the fault of the non-white and their grievance grinding.”
‘Mama, how old are you? Just asking because unless you are in your 70s or 80s, you cannot possibly have been in any way hurt by the content of Walt Disney’s films, whether the characters were depicted as whites or not. Even allowing for the fact that Disney was white, and created his films from that perspective, so what? Each of us creates from who and what we are. Why can’t you simply enjoy Disney’s classic flims for what they are, masterpieces of innovation and family entertainment, ahead of their time in many ways?
When I listen to Duke Ellington, I don’t sit and stew in hostility that his bands were almost all-black, I simply enjoy the greatness of his music and the guys who played it. I could choose to be upset about it, but why? I’d cheat myself out of the wonderful experience of listening to his genius.
Maybe in Walt Disney’s day, opportunities for minority filmmakers were nil, but that isn’t true now. Some of the most powerful entertainers in the world are black people. If you, or they, are displeased with the content of “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” or whatever, the solution isn’t to complain endlessly, it is to make your own film! Please, feel free to put all of the minority cartoon characters in it you like. I won’t be the least bit offended, though I am Caucasian – and if it is a good film, I’ll pay to see it.
You’d do well to heed Ellington, who was often asked whether people who weren’t black could play jazz. He replied that race meant nothing to him, and that there were only two kinds of music in the world – not black or white, but good or bad. Exactly right.
The other problem with your analysis, and why your age plays a role, is that I suspect you are engaging in what we can call “remembered grievance.” That is, you live in a society as color-blind as any in the world (our President proves it), so in order to dredge up some racism, you mine the past for instances of it (alleged or real) and then get upset about it, even though you weren’t the victim of it. Past race crimes were tragic, but they this is all “water under the bridge,” to dwell on it is counter-productive and serves no purpose in today’s world.
My mistake, strike inadvertent “they” from the last sentence.
Affirmative action is like chemo for cancer. It’s a poison itself, takes a tremendous toll on the civic body, but it may be necessary for a time to combat a non-localized, widespread affliction.
As noted above, the US is not a particularly racist nation overall, despite some localized cases (better suited for surgery), and as Professor Hanson implies — but does not state — much of the lingering “racism” is no longer about “race”, but rather is a side effect of the “treatment”. There is little resentment against a Japanese-American student who got bumped from Berkeley and ended up at Sac State — and quite a bit of resentment against the more politically-favored “oppressed minority” student that got in with a substantially lower GPA.
When — as the good Doctor amply illustrates — it is so difficult to determine which tissues are cancerous and which are healthy, then it is obvious that the “cure” is surely worse than the disease.
As I said, just mark “other” when asked about race and put ” European-American” and let them try to figure that one out. Or better yet, write in ” SOAA” – ” Sick Of Affirmative Action”.