Learning from the Election
7. Attack Ads
The winning Democratic ground game this year, as was true for the Republicans in 2004, was a mixture of a get-out-the-vote ground game and negative advertising. We rarely saw Romney ads hitting Obama as racially divisive, as a jet-setter, as a flip-flopper, or as squandering opportunities to find new gas and oil. I don’t think that magnanimity won any accolades from the press. In truth, Romney relied on mostly upbeat TV ads and some mildly negative commercials — while Obama organized Americans by tribe, got out the vote on Election Day, and sold America on the lie that Romney was a near felon capitalist outsourcer and veritable killer of the uninsured who destroyed jobs to pocket money for his elevator — all as Barack Obama kept preaching about “civility” and “the tired old Washington politics.” Somehow the Republicans have to break the lose/lose label of being dubbed negative when they are soft, while liberals are declared civil when downright nasty.
8. Stuff Happens
John McCain was four points up in mid-September when the Freddie and Fannie meltdown hit; a week later he was four points down. The media took the news of a financial collapse, brought on by government warping of the subprime loan market, hand in glove with Wall Street greed, and turned it into George Bush’s Republican plot to enrich old white rich guys — as if a Barney Frank or Chris Dodd had never hammered for overpriced government guarantees for the unqualified. Romney in some polls was five points up when Hurricane Sandy hit. A week later, after nightly shots of bomber-jacket Obama, D-Day-style on the front-line beaches, arm in arm with Chris Christie, the polls had the candidate dead even, and Romney’s surge was ancient history. Katrina doomed George Bush’s second term, even though a good argument could be made that the incompetents in Louisiana turned a disaster into an abject catastrophe in a way Mississippi state and local officials did not. The point? Republicans better have contingency plans, media strategies — and bigger leads — going into Election Day, since even high tides will be viewed as tsunamis for conservative challengers, and for liberal incumbents tsunamis will be mere high tides.
9. Beware the Cocoon
If one read the Drudge Report, looked at Rasmussen polls, listened to O’Reilly and Hannity on Fox News, and hit the radio talk shows, then it was natural to think that Romney would win with 300 electoral votes. But we all must realize that the country, while center-right, is subjected to a left-center daily barrage. Next time, we must channel surf NBC and CBS, check on the Huffington Post, follow the left-wing polls, and study Reuters to see what the opposition is doing, planning, and thinking — and react accordingly. The right-wing media is serving as an alternative to the bias of the mainstream news, but also as a sort of religious outlet where the depressed and pessimistic can find some shred of hope in a bleak world — understandable but not always empirical. I thought Romney might win by one point given the RCP poll averages, but I wanted to believe, but just could not, what Dick Morris preached in the evenings. We think the first-time-sex-is-like-voting-for-Obama ad stupid; and the black garbage collector’s whine that Romney did not come out for coffee and chat on each delivery silly. Most voters, however, apparently found them “compelling.” Take in a Castor Oil’s dose of Chris Matthews or Andrea Mitchell for 30 seconds to learn why.
10. There is a 47%
Last night I went late into the local drug store. The guy ahead of me carefully separated his groceries: in one small pile was baby formula and milk that he paid with a California food card; in the other pile was a huge heap of regular Mountain Dew, three snack packs of Snickers, expensive Beef Jerky packs, and jumbo bags of M&M’s. He held up the line for 10 minutes while he went through the two piles and checked out twice. But he did apologize for the delay. I offered to pay cash for his milk and formula to expedite his cash purchase of 20,000 calories. I don’t think he voted for Mitt Romney.
Nor did the other guy at the Selma Save Mart the day before who got into a new Honda Accord (6-cylinder, no less) after buying 2 cartloads of subsidized food. It may be callous and rude to say that lots more Americans look to government after 2008, but it happens to be true. What Romney said before and after the election may have seemed insensitive and in some details inexact, but his basic drift was correct. What to do? The Republicans should make deals on spending cuts. Perhaps they could daily offer $5 billion in cuts from their constituents for every $5 billion they want from the Obama gravy train. Start with agricultural crop subsidies and ethanol supports, and go down the sweetheart loans and investment breaks for big banks, in exchange for paring down food stamps, welfare, and green subsidies, until we are back to 2006 levels of spending.
A final take on the election: Mitt Romney was a glittering Sir Galahad who, given his impressive horse, armor, and lance, along with his decency and piety, assumed that he could win a joust in a fair charge against the other team’s knight. Instead he waded into a sudden fray where he was swarmed, mobbed, cut off, pulled off his magnificent steed, had his matchless armor yanked away by a mob of foot soldiers, and then, once stripped clean, was clubbed and maced beyond recognition.
Also read: Gun, Ammo Sales Skyrocket in Wake of Obama Reelection







Yesterday’s WaPo had a story about Carroll County, MD’s proposed law to make English the official language.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/proposed-english-law-divides-carroll-county/2012/11/25/ed076b2e-324c-11e2-bfd5-e202b6d7b501_story.html?wpisrc=nl_headlines
The comments that followed moved almost immediately from immigrants must learn English to Hispanics are a local minority of good hard-working people who want to learn English. Anyone supporting the legislation became a bigot. I am always amazed that the left fails to note that many immigrants are not from Mexico. Nor do they acknowledge the fear that the California experience with Hispanics may spread under the radar.
I am so sick of being called a bigot by provincial do-gooders.
Our condition is as bad as VDH and vb paint it. Our country is fracturing before our eyes owing to identity politics and irredentism. See http://clarespark.com/2012/02/09/glee-goes-la-raza/. When a popular tv show can echo the political aims of the most anti-American radicals, what else can we do? All we have left is the House of Representatives and Republican governors. We should support them and urge them never to cave to the dependent class, who are not beholden to the welfare state, but are likely to riot if and when their benefits are removed, benefits and other scams.
I left out the word “only” in a crucial sentence. Sorry. The Democratic voters who are dependent on the welfare state are a frightening mass.
What I “learned” from the election is that God wanted President Obama to win re-election.
If you beleive God wanted Obama to win then you don’t under God. He doesn’t concern himself with what is done here. He gave mankind free will to choose the righteous path or to choose the path of evil. America is making it choice to lose the blessing of the Lord. We will reap what we sow
Kevin, you failed to notice the sarcasm in Cynical’s comment.
Or to put it more succintly: Obama’s Alter Ego confirmed his desire to reign over us all.
Chinese should become the official language of the land. Unlike Spanish, Chinese is a difficult language to learn, and we may as well get a head start. Democrats are spending taxpayer money to import the world’s welfare-for-votes crowd. But it won’t be long before the Democrats will run out of taxpayer money and then the Dems will sell the whole country to the Chinese, just to pay for Obama’s excesses. The Chinese are hard workers, they are thrifty, and most importantly they have money. They would do well in Manhattan. There are also a lot of them, and in Hitler’s phraseology, they are looking for Lebensraum. Siberia is big, but it is not enticing in terms of quality of life, and the Russians are very tough customers. If I were a young American, I wouldn’t learn Spanish, I would learn Chinese.
Well, yes and no. Yes in the short term, but not so much in the long. The Chinese government now requires that English be taught in all public schools and that all students learn it. It’s now a country in which very little English is spoken, but that will change. And, since China has 56, I believe, different dialects and most people only speak their own, I can foresee a day when it won’t be unusual for the Chinese to communicate with each other in English as it will be their common language.
Meh. I spent over twenty years as a Democrat. I went through many “why can’t we win?” post-mortems. Then they abandoned principles and focused on winning. In the process they turned into a party I want nothing to do with.
Now I’m an independent.
While I can understand anyones distaste for American Politics, either you are with U.S., or against U.S.
Remaining an observer benefits one of the two recognized Parties. Whether you like it or not, they have you factored into their calculations.
For example: Minorities, or non. Once the government has you classified, try changing.
The big reason to go to large college campuses (such as Ohio State, which you were alluding to) is to show the radical fools that those events bring out, which helps you win center-left independents because they do not want to be associated with the lunacy of the far left. Also, the racism charge is going to have a very negative effect on relations between people of different backgrounds, because as it has in the past, every political use of the term dilutes its true meaning, and whenever it is used to censor free speech, it becomes a term that loses all meaning.
Whether you know it or not, you defined the problem. The problem is, scorched earth political campaigns only succeed under very specific circumstances.
iow, vilifying everyone and everything, w/o offering anything better for everyone is certain route to failure.
Viciously, directly and personally attacking one hundred and forty-seven million Americans during a very difficult economic downturn, w/o offering them any alternatives to their present circumstances, is not a route to electoral success. This is what the right has done and continues to do. Another way to put it: You’ve poisoned the well and now you can’t understand why the water tastes funny.
Yes, you’ve got problems with the MSM, with your ‘mechanics’, with your ‘campaign staff, with your politicians and all of the rest, ad infinitum. Ayup, that all needs to be fixed or dealt with. No argument.
Telling one hundred and forty-seven million American citizens that we’re all screwed and that *they’re* the reason why we’re screwed? Declaring this on a daily basis, from conservative news/talk shows to blogs and websites? It’s not only logically unsound, it’s un-true…and it’s not helping conservatives and Republicans to get elected.
In the artivle above, even VDH took a couple of extreme examples and extrapolated from those extremes. You, conservatives and Republicans, base your attacks against one hundred and forty-seven million Americans upon a few extreme examples??? You don’t articulate any alternatives. You just attack them. Everything that’s wrong American and the world is all their fault. Period. Dot. End of discussion. Then, you wonder why they and other Americans don’t vote for you?
What the hell is wrong with you people?
How much antacid does it take to make your vote feel better?
“What the hell is wrong with you people?”
Say, don’t you know any other songs? This one you continue to insist on singing has sloppily written lyrics and a monotonous melody. It has also been played way too often on sing radio.
Why do you have to be continually reminded that Obama:
(1) maintained that America needed to be fundamentally changed. Didn’t…doesn’t that set off alarm bells in your head?
(2) claimed that American doctors routinely operate on Americans just to make a few more bucks?
(3) called residents of Pennsylvania bitter clingers to guns and religion?
(4) said American city police were racists who persecute African_Americans, like the professor who jumped ugly with the police who were trying to protect his home?
(5) has often said that Americans who work on Wall Street and in large American corporations are all bad, greedy people?
For God’s sake, man, give this BS a rest. This is America. The only thing Americans should really want is opportunity, which Obama seems to care absolutely nothing about. Your song is titled :”Sweet Bribes for Dimwit Voters Under the Golden Leaves of Autumn” and I’m sick of hearing it.
The problem is, scorched earth political campaigns only succeed under very specific circumstances.
It worked pretty damn well in November, 2012.
iow, vilifying everyone and everything, w/o offering anything better for everyone is certain route to failure.
It worked pretty damn well in November, 2012.
Viciously, directly and personally attacking one hundred and forty-seven million Americans during a very difficult economic downturn, w/o offering them any alternatives to their present circumstances, is not a route to electoral success. This is what THE DEMOCRATS did for all of 2007-2008 and continue to do now. Another way to put it: You’ve poisoned the well and now you can’t understand why the water tastes funny.
And what a racially poisoned well it is – Race relations are FAR worse than they were, and will continue to deteriorate, under a governing party that DEPENDS, NEEDS, BENEFITS FROM racial disharmony.
Look at today – the very IDEA that, in 2012, a proposed African-American for Secretary of State… STATE, mind you… named Rice… RICE!!! for God’s sake, can be questioned on grounds of competence and ideology, and allegedly intelligent politicos and “journalists” can accuse the questioners of racism for it….. and people will buy it!!!!!!!! is something neither Jonathan Swift, Monty Python, or even Saturday Night Live could ever consider, as it would go beyond absurd into just plain too stupid to even propose satirically. And yet, here it is, the living breathing world we live in.
So spare us the whining about the right “poisoning the well”. Oh, it is poisoned all right….. two straight years of dumping raw sulfur into it, followed by Bambi eyes and batting eyelashes…. “who, little ole us???”, while millions say, “See, see?? Look at those doe-eyes, how can anyone think they did anything wrong.. it HAS to be the other guys….” can spread one hell of a lot of poison.
I liked the way you put that. Bambi indeed. I think we have come completely through the door into Orwell and Huxley’s vision. Brave new 1984. The propaganda ministry, like the Empire’s death star, is complete and fully operational. The darkness is now free to ore spread the land. Indeed the whole West. And of course the East was lost decades if not centuries ago.
Who is you people? Mitt Romney was out of touch and couldn’t even relate to a NASCAR crowd, and what he said was pretty stupid for a guy trying to win in places like Florida,Ohio, and Wisconsin. So he lost. None of those you call “you people” said that. Technically though, Mitt Romney was correct about 47% of Americans drinking from the government trough. Since 47% of Americans pay no income taxes, it is pretty certain that 47% of Americans are benefiting from government largesse without having to contribute a dime towards that benefit. And I am not talking about old age Social Security or Medicare benefits, which most everyone do pay in for. So, although I am not one of your “you people”, I am not offended by politicians who tell the truth even though, by doing so, they can’t get elected dog catcher in this country of collectivists. Appealing to these collectivists is the least of my worries. Getting the Communists out of our schools, government, labor unions, and news media is what I consider a serious problem. And, with deference to Dr Hanson’s usual well written column, I would say that we are losing that battle in a way that will only become clear to us all after it is too late.
It IS too late.
It became too late when the Warren court decided that it was unconstitutional to bar known communists from teaching in the schools. Thus began the decline and perhaps, fall of the Nation. We allowed the enemy of freedom inside the country…
“Viciously, directly and personally attacking one hundred and forty-seven million Americans during a very difficult economic downturn, w/o offering them any alternatives to their present circumstances, is not a route to electoral success. This is what the right has done and continues to do.”
In fact, Romney’s statement, made to supporters, was a statement of the circumstances he faced, not an attack. It was circulated as an attack by the Democrats who well knew how true it is. What he said was that 47% of the voters would not vote for him because they were dependent on government and saw themselves as victims. Absolutely true. He offered alternatives and the side you voted for did not. We will see the results.
“What the hell is wrong with you people?”
What’s wrong with me is that I belong to the only identifiable group where it is illegal to get special treatment. I could only hope to convince others to acquire wealth, power, and prestige by appealing to a sense of responsibility that is essential to the continuation of a system that works. Now that most voters have shown that they’re not falling for that line, I will do my best to cheat, take from others, and harm others so that I can get an advantage, and will teach my children to do the same. They’re pretty smart and are already learning that on their own so it shouldn’t be difficult.
And Warren Bonesteel, before you react negatively to this, please understand that I don’t disagree with you. This is what I have gotten from the 2012 election results and national demographic trends. If you see another logical choice for me, I respectfully ask for your opinion.
So, you are all defending and promoting conservative collectivism, then. Only approved group think is allowed. Dissenters will be crucified.
Good luck with that.
I’ve got to ask, though…how’s that ideological purity thingy been workin’ out for ya lately?
It seems to be working rather well in places, more Repub State Governors, still holding the House in DC.
to the contrary, groupthink is your side’s MO. To with, Susan Rice; no sooner had the first hint of criticism about her Sunday lies come than the left began hearing dog whistles.
Moving on, Obama and his fellow travelers blather on about raising taxes on a few rich folks will solve everything; no one dares to question Fedzilla’s spending and if it has any role in the growing debt. What is ironic is how the left constantly uses the thought of raising so-called sin taxes as a means of curbing behavior that may be bad, but the higher-taxes-as-disincentive tautology never extends to income and productivity.
Just stop, Warren. You voted for a continuation of what round 1 of The Obama did. Others voted for a Repub House as a check on him. Meanwhile, even Pravda is laughing at POTUS because its editors have knowledge of what happens when a massive central bureaucracy controls everything.
Bonestealer,
Russia has a lot of problems, but at this time, even the Russians are saying that “American ignorance elected Obama”.
That should tell you something.
I have no problem with one-hundred-and-forty-seven million Americans being stupid. I have a problem with the fact that they can not be educated. You can bring the horse to the water, but you can not make it drink.
So, instead of trying to ‘educate’ them, you continue to attack other Americans, instead of promoting and advocating the positive aspects of individual freedom and oersinal liberty.
Warren,
The conventional wisdom seems to be, and the VDH article agrees, that Romney/Repubs ran an upbeat campaign relative to the Obama/Dems campaign. Romney ran on improving our economy, offering a very different vision of America, opening up energy, balancing the budget, reducing government regulation. Romney had an 87 page detailed explanation of the budget plan alone, easily available on his website. Obama had no plan, and his last budget did not even get a single _Democratic_ vote. But Romney had been previously painted, effectively, as a greedy, corrupted felon whose policies would cause men’s wives to die from cancer. Yet you imply that one 47% comment, which was an opinion on political strategy, makes all the aforementioned untrue. It may have been an unwise comment, but as a former Dem turned Independent who is disgusted with dishonest politics, you can see through that.
Your point is that “we” should have educated the public? How? “We” can’t even point out violation of the law (Fast & Furious, voter fraud, Solyndra) without the media either burying it, discrediting it, or finally making the racsim allegation. The leader of the United States Senate Harry Reid made completely baseless and ultimately untrue allegations about Mitt Romney, and the media chased it like a dog with a fresh bone, but not to expose Reid’s lies, only to trumpet them. That is not truth, and that is not integrity.
I can’t quite decide if you are a troll, but if you are not, rather than make your quick accusation go ahead and make your case. Make your case, point by point, of how the Obama campaign did the upright things, presented an upright vision of America, and did so more often, more substantively, and more truthfully than the Romney campaign.
Three former colleagues of mine emigrated separately as young adults from greater Moscow to the United States in the early 1990s. They were unanimous in their assessment of The Great Divider early in his first term: “We came to America to get away from this. Now, it’s followed us here.”
Those experienced in the ways of Communists see right through this charlatan. It’s just too bad a critical mass of today’s Americans are so willing to serve as useful idiots without even realizing what they’re doing.
Warren,how many times can you repeat “one hundred and forty-seven million Americans” in one comment?
America might be better served if you gave some thought to how Obama and the Democrats are attacking the Constitution of more than three hundred million Americans.
Sometimes, like 1773/74, you just have to forget what the majority wants and go for your goal. The Dems are the party of non-whites. The GOP might think they can compete, but it’s impossible. The Dems are the party of welfare, affirmative action, hate-crime laws, quotas, and open borders with the third-world. There’s literally nowhere for Republicans to go, even if they wanted to. I would think the glaringly obvious question might occur: why doesn’t the GOP become the party of white people? Answer: because whites have no right to representation; they are second-class citizens. Illegal immigration, English as official language, ending affirmative action — these are still 80-20 issues with the 2/3 of Americans who are white. Yet neither party will take their part. Third-party time!
What the hell do you mean we don’t articulate any alternatives? Practically all we do is articulate alternatives. You just don’t like them.
If we say we want the southern border brought under control and want to reform immigration to admit more people versed in skills we need and fewer people lacking skills and education, you say we hate brown people. If we say that spending on social welfare programs has run amok (over a trillion dollars in the last fiscal year) and needs to be reined in, you say we hate poor people and minorities and want to destroy the safety net (we’re long past safety nets here) all so the rich can get richer. If we say government can’t mandate that religious institutions participate in programs contrary to the tenets of their beliefs, you say we’ve declared war on women and want to take away their contraceptives. If we say we want to work towards a smaller, less expensive, less intrusive, less centralized government, you say we’re government-hating hypocrites who don’t understand the enormous, necessary and positive role government plays in all our lives and personal achievements (we didn’t build that). If we say Barack Obama has been a miserable failure as a president and a miserable failure as a leader, that his policies stink on ice and we think we have better ideas, you say we just can’t stand to see a black man in the White House.
It’s you who are constantly on the attack, pal. It’s impossible to have a conversation with people who purposely and with malice of forethought mischaracterize every position we take and accuse us of every prejudice known to man. What the hell is the matter with you?!
“What the hell is wrong with you people?”
What do you mean by “you people”? I see how it is, “you people”…racist.
An Independent, huh? Are you the cute one. Too wimpy to pick a side? You think there’s no difference between Pelosi or Boehner as Speaker? Sheesh.
the more I see of Nancy and John, the more I believe the only difference is in wardrobe. Sorry, but entrenched Repubs gave us big govt largesse, too, or have you forgotten Medicare Part D? And No Child? And DHS/TSA? And a POTUS who hailed the necessity of TARP? Or, more importantly, the budget non-deal of last year.
On active duty as a US Marine, I stopped voting Democrat when Carter got my buddies killed and/or imprisoned for no military, political or economic gain. A few years later, I stopped voting Republican when Reagan got my buddies killed for no political, military or economic gain.
Oh, I’ve still advocated for some conservative causes and candidates after Reagan, but I stopped supporting and voting for people whose primary policies limited personal freedom and individual liberty…or whose policies got US service people killed for no political, economic or military gain.
Along the way, I ruthlessly re-examined my own assumptions and premises wrt politics.
If it doesn’t promote and advance individual freedom and liberty, I’m against it. Which means that I’m against personally and viciously attacking one humdred and forty-seven million Americans just because they happen to b poor in a nation whose policies has come to promote poverty over individual freedom and libery and self-sufficiency. Both sides promote and advance such policies, limiting entrepreneurs and opportunities for all of us.
Both sides now promote, endorse and legislate forms of collectivism that limit freedom and liberty. The left is worse, but that makes no excuse for the right.
Warren,
I did not see this note until after I had already posted to your previous comments. BTW, Romney was not “vicious” in his discussion of the 47%. Knock it off.
If your committment is to personal freedom and liberty, can you please post some links to your similar discussions on liberal/progressive sites where you are making the case to educate the uneducated. Remember, they are the ones in power now/still.
Devil Dog, coming here and saying “You didn’t do enough” to promote personal liberty isn’t cutting it. You want to invoke the memoery of your dead comrades, well they were my dead comrades too. What did you do to promote the cause of personal liberty during this campaign season? Post it here. If you do, I will post my link of what I did. Then you can come and lecture me or anyone else. The duty of a Patriot does not end at the completion of your miliary service.
It’s a little tiresome hearing about “the 147 million”. What Romney referred to were 47% of voters, not 147 million, who rely on entitlements to some degree, who would vote for Obama in their own self interest. That’s why you often hear about politicians wanting to buy votes by increasing entitlement spending. It works. The problem with such voters is that they are politically and economically illiterate. They are one issue voters.
As far as your compassion for “poor” Americans, I am touched, especially when American poor are the richest poor in the world, many owning cable TV, cell phone, cars, air conditioners, own homes, etc. And, again, the reason the Democrats seem to be so ready to increase social spending is to “buy” votes from the “poor”. When Romney voiced that he would approve the Keystone pipeline to create and open up drilling on Federal lands to increase jobs and opportunities, it went completely over the heads of most Obama voters. He stated he would cut taxes to grow the economy and create jobs, etc. Apparently neither you or the average Obama voters took notice – all single issue voters, economically illiterate, the great 47%.
It’s a little tiresome hearing about “the 147 million”. What Romney referred to were 47% of voters, not 147 million, who rely on entitlements to some degree, who would vote for Obama in their own self interest, no matter what. That’s why you often hear about politicians wanting to buy votes by increasing entitlement spending. It works. The problem with such voters is that they are politically and economically illiterate. They are one issue voters.
As far as your compassion for “poor” Americans, I am touched, especially when American poor are the richest poor in the world, many owning cable TV, cell phone, cars, air conditioners, own homes, etc. And, again, the reason the Democrats seem to be so ready to increase social spending is to “buy” votes from the “poor”, compared to the Republican philosophy of creating jobs not only for the poor, but for all classes by growing the economy. When Romney voiced that he would approve the Keystone pipeline and open up drilling on Federal lands to increase jobs and opportunities, it went completely over the heads of most Obama voters, those 47%. He stated he would cut taxes to grow the economy and create jobs, etc. Apparently neither you or the average Obama voters took notice – all single issue voters, economically illiterate, the great 47%. Romney’s message was out there, except many single issue voters, yourself included, did not listen.
Romney’s comments {my own remarks inserted in curly braces}:
“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it — that that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what. … These are people who pay no income tax. … [M]y job {i.e., Romney’s job as Republican nominee for the Presidency} is not to worry about those people {i.e., during the Presidential campaign}. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”
Would someone please point out the “vicious” part of Romney’s comments?
You didn’t see where he said we must starve all brown people and single mothers? Look really close. It’s in the fine print.
The “vicious” part is the part where Romney dismisses the people currently receiving government benefits–like unemployment–as being motivated solely by fiscal interest. How this Marxist idea became prevalent even in the supposedly “conservative” party mystifies me.
I spent almost 2 years on unemployment, while searching for work via internet BECAUSE MOST COMPANIES WON’T TAKE “IN PERSON” APPLICATIONS including our local supermarkets for “checker” jobs; and took the most promising part-time offer only to have the “small business” job disappear after 3 months as many small business jobs do ’cause small businesses can’t afford to carry employees until things pick up again.
The disrespect of Pennsylvania voters by Obama was absolutely equalled by the disrespect of people who have no choice but to accept government assistance by Romney. And there is no such thing as a private gathering for a politician.
Republicans so absolutely ignore conditions “on the ground” that I have begun to believe that they really don’t want to win the presidency.
Obama isn’t against the rich, who but the rich could afford his fund-raising dinners? It’s his rich against the “conservative” rich and devil take all the rest of us.
Who owns the “main stream media” conservative commentators rail against? Who funds “public” radio and television? It’s not the little five-dollar donors, or the government, it’s the companies and foundations who provide “matching funds”, isn’t it, who’re reassured that their line of bs is being accepted by the number of little contributions? Why aren’t the “conservative” rich using their fiscal muscle? Poor foolish Romney thinks he had the backing of his peers? Isn’t an ignorant, ranting Obama easier to manage than a partly-savvy Bain Capital alumnus?
How convenient!
You forgot fraud in key swing state precints. Why were these precints reporting last? Why was the Dem campaing run like victory was in the bag? Why did the dems send communications to supporters on the morning of election day telling them to not panic when early returns were going to show a R lead, but to keep hope as the count would turn and victory would be theirs? Too many questions.
And if there were only one precinct in the entire U.S. that had zero votes for Obama, we would be without an elected president to this day, because the Supreme Court would still be involved in the debate and recount.
There were multiple precincts in Cleveland, Philadelphia and Chicago that did not record one vote for Romney. There was one precinct in Texas that recorded only 10 votes for Obama. Where do you suppose CNN sent it’s “investigative” team??
There is but one answer, a one day, purple thumb election of only documented US citizens.
Agreed.
Although that purple thumb will have us Americans join the lowest common denominator Third Word “country” election-day-trust-image, that of itself might just give us Republicans an edge if we don’t actively campaign against Inked Thumb Day. Maybe we could push for a Green ink.
To those uppity liberals who will take umbrage at such a distrustful Third World Voting Practice, we might argue that, “Hey….this is inclusiveness and purely democratically inspired”.
Yes, why isn’t rampant electronic fraud among the top ten? Is it a taboo topic, like birtherism?
I think that Obama was born in Oregon or Washington State, and that his birth certificate(s)(?) and the Hawaiian newspaper announcements were then produced by his commie grandparents, just to keep the future manchurian candidate’s options open. So, my birtherism is a little different.
actually the real Obama was aborted. The announcements in the Hawaii newspapers were a cover-up to hide an illegal abortion. There is no birth certificate because the fetus was never born.
6 years later the coverup continued by buying s baby overseas and living there with it until mama learned to be mama.
I say Obama is our nations first bastard son President. He met the person who was supposed to be his father one time in his life. His being half black and his carrying of a Muslim name are only small parts of his persona, by comparison.
Actually, all you need to do is see Dreams from my REAL Father. It will answer all your questions.
It apparently is taboo.
These pundits would rather look like they had no idea what they were talking about before the election, than risk getting called names now. Cheating is unseemly, so it can’t have happened. Calling out the cheating is being a sore loser or a conspiracy theorist, so they mustn’t do that. Besides, we’d have to DO something about fraud. Talking up conservative principles wouldn’t be enough, if the other guys cheated. And talking is what pundits do. So.
Until we fix the fraud, we will lose. All the rest is useless.
Even with the MSM overwhelmingly flying air cover for him, someone with the record of ‘achievement’ like Obama could not have won the election if the electorate was like that of 20 or 30 years ago. Consider also that despite an abominable record, the democrats actually increased their hold of the senate and gained some seats in the house.
We’re no longer a center – right nation. Those days are gone. We are now distinctly leftist, especially in the 44 and under group. That’s why the election was treated by 52% of the voters with all the seriousness, careful consideration, deep analysis, common sense, thoughtfulness and judgement as picking the winner for American Idol.
We are no longer a nation whose majority believes in the individual, personal achievement and personal responsibility. We are a majority collectivist country who actually believes that the government has its own money and should be taking care of us & regulating what we do, say and think “for the greater good” in order to create a Better Human/New Socialist Man as the standard for an average citizen.
This majority does not believe in Equality, but Egalitarianism.
It does not feel bound by the rule of Law, but by the rule of Men who are deemed sufficiently devoted to Social and Economic Justice (which is why no illegal, unethical, immoral or outrageous act by this administration over the last 4 years – the Libya war, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, the GM & Chrysler union-driven bailouts, the extortion of BP for oil spill damages, the many associations with racialists even to leadership appointments for federal departments, the 50% increasing in food stamp recipients, the explosion of people on the disability entitlement rolls, the Trillions in new debt, the Trillions in Wall Street bailouts that have brought no jobs but skyrocketing food and energy prices, the voter fraud perpetrated by the SEIU and ACORN, etc etc etc….has had any lasting effect.)
The Majority publicly professes to be willing to pay more in taxes, while quietly avoiding tax burdens in every way they can, including illegally, and enthusiastically agreeing with demagogic calls to tax those who have more than them.
We’ve crossed the threshold to becoming a European state with a socialist economy and a soft fascist political and social environment. And we’ve made that crossover at the worst possible moment – when the nation’s private consumer finances are a disaster (with a huge percentage of mortgage holders underwater, a $1T and growing student loan burden and unemployment at least twice the ‘official’ rate), it’s private financial market finances are an apocalyptic catastrophe (Nearly all the top 50 banks insolvent by strict GAAP rules and carrying a minimum $760T in liabilities from the derivatives trade, in addition to 10′s of Trillions more in the shadow banking system), and it’s state and federal finances on the edge of Armageddon ($16.2T federal debt, with additional uncounted GAAP liabilities of $206T and rising, and state debt rising above $11T.)
Whether you’re an adherent of Toynbee’s theorem on the rise and fall of civilizations and their patterns, a believer in the Fourth Turning pattern, or don’t have any interest in history whatsoever, even a cursory analysis leads to the inescapable conclusion that we are on the edge of a great precipice, and there is no way to avoid tumbling into the abyss below.
The emergence from that abyss simply cannot take anything less than two full decades, and the earliest we might see light at the end of the tunnel would be 2030 or thereabouts. But that light is not guaranteed to be a welcoming beacon, because history shows that collapsed and ruined societies – especially democratic ones – most often transition to a militaristic authoritarian regime.
Face this. It will make things somewhat less painful along the road we must travel.
I still cling to the faint hope that there is a future, and that it may still be a bright and promising one. That possibility, faint as it is, does exist. But if in that future, the Union is still whole, I will consider it a bona fide miracle.
You may find my comments on this and other topics at http://ayearningforpublius.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/preparing-for-dictatorship-questions-for-the-younger-generations/
Sadly, I agree with everything you have said in your excellent post. I worry about my two children, both of whom are graduating from college next semester,with so many hopes and dreams. I fear they are part of a lost generation, caught in the prime of their lives just as we all go over the precipice.
We’ve had Presidents and successful CEO’s that have not made it through high school.
Many illiterate people ran successful businesses after the Depression. My uncle for one, God rest his soul.
Dr. Hanson is a unique example of how a college education can project a dedicated and disciplined individual into the elite intellectual stratosphere. But, he is one in several million, and he has no degree in Racial Awareness for Caucasians.
I’m sure you agree that someone like Dr. Hanson, would have made an upper class individual of himself without the extensive schooling, and it’s not because of a disproportionate inheritance.
Our government is making it more difficult, but, anyone with drive and determination can be successful at their chosen pursuit without becoming an indentured servant.
“anyone with drive and determination can be successful…” may be true, Cyber but, those people are quickly becoming outnumbered by those that do not or channel that drive into getting as much from the government as they can.
The lax welfare state is at the bottom of it.
At one time it was humbling to be on the dole, whether it be welfare or food stamps, with case workers showing up at all hours to make sure that, if you are going to take money from the rest of us, your car had better be more than 10 years old and you only had one black and white TV.
These days, well… you could show up at the welfare office in a Bugatti and they wouldn’t bat an eye!
If it takes one case worker for 10 recipients (and one supervisor for every three case workers) it would still be cheaper than the course we are on now! And I’m not strictly talking about saving money here. Actual lives would be saved.
This from a guy whose family was stuck in the welfare culture for many years.
You’re correct. I never thought anyone with a record as bad as Obama’s could be re-elected but then, I grew up in a world where results mattered. Now, apparently they don’t. To me, this means that something is broken and will not be fixed by normal means.
Multiculturalism + Political Correctness + Dumbed Down Education/Indoctrination System + Affirmative Action = The reason we are in this fix. Note that all have been foisted upon us by progressive “elites”.
“If the light within you is darkness, then how deep is the darkness!”
America shall be punished—along with her unAmerican President.
Thank you.
Very, very, well said.
Interesting points,Stallion.If God himself had been running against Obama,he wouldn’t have done any better and probably even a few points worse.
The real tabboo topic is the fact that the buffoons at the RNC and the R establishment shoved ANOTHER RINO down our throats. It’s really that simple. No 10 point essay needed.
Mark
Your comment is bloody nonsense and you are part of the problem. No one shoved Romney down your throat. We chose him. He was exceptionally qualified and would have made an excellent President. None of the other contenders would have come as close.
The GOP Primary went on too long and Romney had already been defined by the time he clinched the nomination on May 29th. Calls for a brokered convention – as if you could organize a successful campaign in 2 months – were nothing short of clueless.
As incompetent as their leader is, Democrats rallied around him – to a man. As qualified as Romney is – people like you quibbled.
I disagree with the contention that America is a center-right country. If that were true Romney would have been elected.
Great answer. Hits it on head.
I disagree. The Republican primary didn’t go on too long. The problem is Mitt Romney failed to start the general election soon enough. Mitt Romney became a much better candidate as he was forced to compete for the nomination. By the end of the campaign he was capable of beating Obama in debates and delivering a good stump speech to huge crowds. He was winning back the suburbs. He sounded like a winner. The problem was by the time Mitt Romney started to fight, millions of white Americans had already tuned out. Between negative ads defining Romney as a bad guy and way too many phone calls, potential Republican voters abandoned the political process. If Mitt Romney had achieved even John McCain’s support level among winnable groups rural working class whites and military members, Romney would likely be president.
George B
With the exception of the 2 debates in SC where Newt beat up on the Moderators, the Valedictorian from BYU, who went on to achieve a 3.97 GPA in combined Law and MBA from Harvard, followed by a brilliant career in business, won every debate.
Though not as idiotic as her call for a brokered convention, Palin was also wrong to encourage a lengthy Primary. Romney did not need to be strengthened by battle. He needed time to find better speech writers, spokespeople and organizers. It’s not easy to make speech after speech, day after day. Romney, not being glib, is not a natural politician, and he could have used a Hanson or Steyn in his corner. Running against an incumbent President who has the backing of 90% of the corrupt media and entertainment industries is not easy. Romney would have made a terrific president. It’s too bad he didn’t get the help he needed.
You’re right, Basils, the way for a Repub to win (unless he or she has finely honed qualities already) is to stop choosing from the pool of “speech writers” that you hardly ever see with a body of work outside of speech writing.
A connection with the common man would be a prerequisite as well.
Hanson, Steyn and, most particularly, Whittle and and Zo could all contribute.
Bill Whittle did a video recently that addresses this lack of communication.
He suggested that, if asked about the Second by reporters, he should say, “Here’s your Second Amendment right here!” and pull out his Glock. (paraphrased of course). He or she would only have to do it once (not be an idiot and do it at every campaign stop) but, always make sure the press knew his position.
Sure, the media would step back in shock and write about the uncouth candidate who would do such a thing. That’s what the parlor boys, bleeding hearts do.
And they would underestimate their audience. The majority would admire the man.
Another thing is to make every speech fresh while carrying the essential message. That is what keeps one in the news and promotes national attention on every high school gym speech in every small town the candidate visits.
In any event, I think Mitt could have won had he pressed the attack in advertising and, particularly,during the last two debates.
His basic sense of being a gentleman killed him.
It’s too bad.
Mitt Romney was forced to spend most of his resources beating back the likes of preposterous candidates like Pawlenty, Bachmann, Cain, Huntsman, Perry, Santorum, Gingrich, and the Libertarian with two first names. Of course, had Romney been a better candidate himself, it wouldn’t have taken until May to dispose of that gang of losers. Next time we will have a far better group of politicians to select from.
Gingrich wasn’t absurd. Who was the libertarian with two first names? Gary Johnson? Ron Paul? I don’t get it.
Oh, come now. Anyone with a memory and a brain can see that the Republican party did itself no good by condoning the attack ads that the several Republican nominees did of one another. They forgot Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment (‘Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican’) and they suffered the consequences of that failure. The general impression from watching the melee was that the whole crew of candidates were a bunch of Punch and Judy clowns, battering one another with charges of ‘flip-flopper’ and ‘fat-cat’.
And while I voted for Romney, it was with the feeling of ‘lesser of two evils’ against the Great and Powerful O, rather than with the belief that I was getting a choice other than what Rupert Murdoch, Karl Rove, the Koch Brothers, and the usual suspects of big money contributors had decided on.
And, no, I DIDN’T get to choose who would be the Republican candidate. By the time nominations had come to California, where I live, the nomination had long been locked up.
My point in saying all of this is that while I agree with Dr. Hanson in his assessment of the factors that lost Romney the election, one factor which he did not address, and which was an important one, was the division within the Republican Party, and the tendency of Party leaders to diss the several parts of that party (e.g., the Tea Party, the Libertarians, the followers of Ron Paul, etc.) instead of attempting to work in cooperation with them, to achieve some sort of coalition. As Jesus, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan have said in their various ways, ‘A house divided against itself can not stand.’
Maybe next time the Paulbots and the Libertarians and the Tea Party should get together and toss out the Republicans first. We got Rubio in, and Cruz, now let’s see how far we can take it over.
I wasn’t a Ron Paul follower, but was very embarrassed about how he was treated unfairly by the Party, especially during the debates. I wonder how many of his disciples just sat out the election for those reasons.
I know two. Myself and my wife. We didn’t exactly sit out the election though. I voted for Johnson and she wrote in Ron Paul.
Robzilla, you admit that you and your wife voted for Gary Johnson? It still hasn’t occurred to you that Gary Johnson’s best play would have been to help Romney get elected. Four years from now, we will be lucky if we are even allowed another free election. You voted for a Libertarian to help a Communist get re-elected because you didn’t think Romney adhered closely enough to your principles, or what? I am just saying that I probably would never be able to admit that I voted for Gary Johnson, knowing the outcome. It is a little soon to start with the “I told you so, crap”. All you look like to me is someone who couldn’t see the forest through the trees.
Rarely do I see a blog comment that gets it so very right — not to mention efficiently and concisely. Thank you.
Many conservatives did not trust Romney because of his implementation of health care reform in Massachusetts, his flip flopping on issues of abortion and gay marriage and his milk toast debate performances after the first debate where he refused to challenge Obama on the issues of Libya, Solyndra,fast and furious and lots of other issues deemed off limits by his handlers. Like McCain, the fear of being called a racist prevented Romney from attacking Obama’s personal character, which needed to be attacked. Instead, Romney played a nice guy wishing Obama a Happy Anniversary in front of tens of millions of people. The Republican Party did not learn the lessons from the last election that Democratic light Republicans will never win. The movers and shakers in the Republican Party establishment like Rove need to change their strategies or else get out of the way for leaders that have the guts to stand up for classical liberalism and limited government as well as attack when attacked and not shy away from talking about issues no matter how many times
Romney was destined for defeat when he did press back against Obama in the spring and summer months. The most vicious, partisan attacks were left unanswered by Romney. Also, lots of Americans who were not receiving entitlements like food stamps prior to 2008, obtained those entitlements during the following four years and frightened that our economy was not recovering, voted for Obama fully aware that they were voting for a terrible president, but knowing that their goodies would not be taken away.
Your comment is utter nonsense. YOU may have chosen Romney but the rest of us didn’t. If you had watched closely during the primaries it was like clockwork. Every time any republican candidate other than the golden boy got ANY traction whatsoever, the so-called conservative media, and Karl Rove establishment went after him/her like a pack of pit bulls. It was scorched earth canabalism to get obomney nominated.
Exactly! Romney was a decent man and would, hopefully, been a better President than he was Governor. But face facts, he is a northeastern liberal who when elected installed “Obamacare” in Massachusetts and was subsequently disposed of in the next election. I think the communists called them “useful idiots. I can’t think of a single issue other than Obamacare that he ran on and to top it off he blew off the Tea Party while taking their money.
Face it, it’s what the RINO’s always do, stick us with a McCain or Bushies. The first Bush stuck us with Clinton, the second with Obama and “No child left behind”.
I agree – this is what I said six months ago, that the GOP again went with Democrat lite and the guy whose “turn” it was to run. As I said then, don’t believe there would be much difference between an Obama administration and a Romney administration.
I guess you saw someone, in that gang of fools, who would have done better than Romney? I didn’t. It looked to me like all the heavyweights were afraid to run against Obama. Things will look better in 2016 if the Communists are forced to allow another free election.
Knock off the Obama-esque “No one could have done any better” excuse. It’s lame, whiney and false. Mittens was such a lousy candidate that the lefty GOP Establishment, aided by the worst economy in a century, could not drag the father of Romneycare across the finish line.
And who could they have dragged across the finish line? Gingrich? Bachmann? Cain? Paul? Santorum? Huntsman (the guy Obama was really afraid of)? Not bloody likely. Rick Perry looked good on paper, but he couldn’t handle the big pond and chocked. Sorry, but as deficient as you might consider Romney, he was the best (as in most electable) of the bunch. And in my opinion, he would have made a fine president.
So, you have managed to call me a whiner and you have told me to knock it off, but you haven’t answered my simple question. Who, among the people that ran, would have fared better than Romney? It wasn’t a whiny question, it was a question directed at the incessant baseless whining about Romney for no other reason than he lost. Had he won, the world would have looked much better to most of the posters on this blog site. As we know, there are a thousand fathers to every success, but every failure is a bastard.
Here in Texas, RINOs in our state government (e.g., Joe Straus and David Dewhurst) and leftists in the court system successfully delayed our primaries from 4 March in 2008 to 29 May in 2012. Those of us who opposed Romney and could have negatively impacted his national campaign in early March with our large number of electoral votes, couldn’t vote until Romney was Mr. Inevitable by 29 May. In Virginia, Larry Sabato commented that the Virginia state GOP was exceptionally vigilant in discrediting all but Romney and Ron Paul nominations for the Republican Primary there. How many other states have similar stories? Romney was stuffed down our throats indeed!
Oops! My first sentence was not intended to indicate that the Texas Republican Primary election was delayed from 4 March 2008 to 29 May 2012. If you don’t get it, you won’t!
That is my point exactly. I love how now that this year’s punching bag lost, they all want to write the rest of us in on the loss. Conservatives called this one correctly over a year ago, and now no one in the establishment will own up to what they did. It’s everyone’s fault now. BS!! We were force-fed obomney, with the all-too predictable results.
This is a fair assessment. I especially like number 5. The Latino Voter Obsession. This is obvious but some still don’t get it.
But when you get right down to it, Obama, for some reason, combined with the effects of the hurricane (thanks a heap Christie!), Obama just came off as more likeable to the low information voter. Not enough voters on the right came out to vote, Obama’s voter’s did not show up. This election was decided by those who at the last minute, for some reason, decided they liked Obama more than they liked Romney. This is a tiny sliver of the voting population. There is plenty of blame to go around but God save us from the irredeemably stupid.
One last thing. First impressions are important but what about last inpressions? I did not see the first two debates but I did see part of the last debate. Romney was obviously trying to run out the clock. But something else caught my eye. There was something not quite right with Romney that night. At least that is what I observed.
It was a “media” victory.
Romney didn’t have enough sound bites for the “social” media, nor an obsequious press at his disposal working overtime.
I agree something was not quite right with Romney during the 3rd debate. I was just getting over a severe upper respiratory viral infection at the time and I believe he had something similar going on. His eyes were sunken a bit and his voice sounded a bit raspy. He also was sweating more than usual. He was probably heavily medicated just to subdue the symptoms enough for him to go thru with the debate. If he was feeling anything like me he was surely struggling jus t to make it through the debate. Great timing huh?
“Great timing huh?”
A lot of things went Obama’s way at just the right time. I think Obama was as surprised as anyone that he won. Romney certainly felt the election was his. Now we get to pay the price.
Thanks for confirming what I saw in the last debate.
You are correct, for what it’s worth at this point. I believe Obama and his campaign were as surprised as anyone that they pulled it off. Sure, they implemented the plan, but I don’t believe they thought it was working. Too many smart people–Krauthammer, Barone, even the over-the-top at times Dick Morris confidently predicted a Romney victory. Even liberal newspapers that supported Obama in ’08, most notably the New York Daily News, switched to Romney. I remember seeing both candidates at the Alfred E. Smith dinner, and Romney looked like the president, Obama like a loser. It was the hurricane–the timing, the size of it, the Christie hugfest–it stopped Romney’s momentum, and moved the needle of Obama’ support ever so slightly. If Sandy had hit a week and a half later, President-elect Romney would have been on that that beach getting Christie’s love…..
Think he would have been wearing a bomber jacket?
I liked and agreed with much of what you said Mr Hanson.. Although there is not a lot of distinction put on the differences between Conservatives and the GOP Establishment Republicans, aka RINOs..
Reagan was not a GOP establishment Republican, but a Conservative, who was the only Republican Presidential candidate to unseat a sitting incumbent Democrat.
He did so because he knew his enemy, he knew their tactics, he knew their history, and he knew how to counter them with his vast in-depth knowledge of the opposition ideology-socialism/marxism. In addition to his articulate charismatic ability to communicate Conservative values, principles, and ideals of what brings prosperity to a Nation and a people.
He was not one to capitulate, appease, and give in to those he knew were corrupt, subversive, and ideologically driven, as the GOP establishment and GHW Bush soon found out.
This is the kind of leadership in a candidate that we must have to defeat these hordes of progressive corrupt elements, now in power and office.
RINOs are definitely good at destroying their party base structure, and appeasing and capitulating with and to the enemy of Freedom, Liberty, Democracy, Free Market Capitalism, aka the Obama-rats.
Their self-destructing self-serving interests have only made the Republican Party weak and ineffective.. which they could care less, as all they care about is their holding onto their little lordship power base realm, ie; the GOP power structure apparatus, via leadership positions. This is why Boehner and his sycophants change the rules at a whim, and suppress and oppress conservatives 24/7-365.. As to them, and is why the GOP permanent political class elites, with their arrogant indignant contemptuous attitude, are not going to allow a bunch of grass roots Tea Party folks- aka We the People, to take their power from them.
This is why they must be removed from office and power as soon as possible, so we can then concentrate on getting rid of Obama and his crony henchmen and women, and his army of anti-American liberal socialist maxist sycophant useful idiots.
As a lover of liberty and a tea party person, I really liked Reagan’s successful opposition to communism. But, to be historically accurate, Reagan DID capitulate to both the Iranians (who committed an act of war by taking our Embassy personnel hostage under Carter) and to the Iranian/Arab surrogates in Lebanon (who blew up our Marine barracks there, killing 241 people). The US could have easily punished both countries severely but chose not to do anything like that. Again, overall I liked Reagan, but love to try to be as realistic as possible. We are all humans and thus none of us are perfect. Not even close!
I liked and agreed with much of what you said Mr Hanson.. Although there is not a lot of distinction put on the differences between Conservatives and the GOP Establishment Republicans, aka RINOs..
Reagan was not a GOP establishment Republican, but a Conservative, who was the only Republican Presidential candidate to unseat a sitting incumbent Democrat.
He did so because he knew his enemy, he knew their tactics, he knew their history, and he knew how to counter them with his vast in-depth knowledge of the opposition ideology-socialism/marxism. In addition to his articulate charismatic ability to communicate Conservative values, principles, and ideals of what brings prosperity to a Nation and a people.
He was not one to capitulate, appease, and give in to those he knew were corrupt, subversive, and ideologically driven, as the GOP establishment and GHW Bush soon found out.
This is the kind of leadership in a candidate that we must have to defeat these hordes of progressive corrupt elements, now in power and office.
RINOs are definitely good at destroying their party base structure, and appeasing and capitulating with and to the enemy of Freedom, Liberty, Democracy, Free Market Capitalism, aka the Obama-rats.
Their self-destructing self-serving interests have only made the Republican Party weak and ineffective.. which they could care less, as all they care about is their holding onto their little lordship power base realm, ie; the GOP power structure apparatus, via leadership positions. This is why Boehner and his sycophants change the rules at a whim, and suppress and oppress conservatives 24/7-365..
This is why the GOP permanent political class elites, with their arrogant indignant contemptuous attitude, are not going to allow a bunch of grass roots Tea Party folks- aka We the People, to take their power from them.
This is why they must be removed from office and power as soon as possible, so we can then concentrate on getting rid of Obama and his crony henchmen and women, and his army of anti-American liberal socialist maxist sycophant useful idiots.
The choice was, and remains; the Constitution and free enterprise or Socialism. In other countries the Socialists declare themselves; in the US we permit them to get away with calling themselves liberals or leftists and usurp the Olof blue to avoid being called what they are proud to call themselves “Reds”.Never once did any GOP candidate challenge his opponent or. Obama’s team as committed to the Socialist pathway to serfdom. Or even of being radical Leftists. If you don’t have the guts yo boldly confront a deadly opponent, and resort to finding excuses for your gutlessness, you deserve your fate.
Typo in a bove: ……avoid being called what their counterparts elsewhere are proud to call themselves – “Reds”.
There were other typos in your original comment, Stew, and even typos in your correction. ;-)
Don’t sweat it. Your point is well made.
My comments on this and related topics can be found at :
http://ayearningforpublius.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/preparing-for-dictatorship-questions-for-the-younger-generations/
When the country votes as Gary, Indiana votes, we’re doomed.
When the media fellates a semi-literate, affirmative action, Harvard graduate into the Presidency, and lacks the equanimity to know the absurdity of their deed, it’s hard to see the hope.
The Dems won a Pyrrhic victory on their way to transforming America into an upscale version of a Third World country. Political correctness and racism is the centerpiece of liberalism in America today which liberals themselves see as correct justice.
PC is a series of such victories wherein success doubts itself and failure attains a bright sheen of morality. This has been in play for a half century but only in the last 10 to 20 years has PC become institutionalized in our arts, media and educational systems. Failure, the rebellious, the disenfranchised, the unwashed, the oppressed, the exploited are increasingly in charge of the asylum so to speak.
The problem for America is that reality, success, doesn’t really care if you’re transgendered or from the Mayan highlands or the suburbs of Cairo or think every movie before 1965 was racist in some ignorant way. Or perhaps I should say, reality does care. Reality will express itself no matter how much lip service is varnished onto a pig.
There is what works and what doesn’t. What once worked in America on a competitive global scale is unfortunately rejected wholesale by today’s arts, media and educational system in America as the epitome of ignorance.
This Orwellian fracturing of American culture has redefined success as failure and failure as success, but whether or not one knows reality’s rules, reality’s rules know you. Water is wet no matter how much a PC culture says otherwise.
New York City in 1925 was more modern than Cairo is today. Every metropolis outside the West has copied whatever modernity it possesses from the West. No matter how much you polish it up, you cannot come to America, hand me “Pride and Prejudice” and tell me it’s a thrilling new novel.
In this sense, PC and racial liberalism despises success, wishes a final revenge on it. This is the imperative behind the anti-colonialism of Obama and the large run of sheep behind him who either can’t attain to success, or have decided to purge themselves of success’s guilt.
Columbus, Cortes, the Alamo, America itself, must be purged, denied and made clean again. Failure only becomes a sick pathology when it is told it is not really failure, but cheated of success by others. Something we would laugh at as insane were we to apply it to professional sports we regularly hug to our breasts politically. The New York Yankees great run from 1923 to 1962 coincidentally mirrors America’s own great run.
It is as if the Yankees have been dismantled for the crime of success. Turns out they were homophobic, racist, women-hating, Islamophobes. Good luck with having the Washington Senators in first place. They’re still the Washington Senators.
I believe the spirit that rules the global elite has inspired hatred and loathing for everything the U.S. Constitution says and stands for since the moment it was ratified and became public knowledge. The global elite preys on the lives of its serfs and the U.S. Constitution flies into the face of serfdom. IMO, mere political leadership in the U.S of A. is the least of our problems.
I have a couple of important lessons to add to VDH’s list:
1. Conservatism must be a universal philosophy:
An extraterrestrial alien from another planet, monitoring U.S. radio and TV broadcasts, would conclude that conservatism must be a philosophy suited only to married white Christians. Because the GOP and the conservative movement have made almost no attempt to advocate for conservatism among voters who are Jews, blacks, Hispanics, gays, lesbians, atheists, or single women. It just writes them off as unreachable, and concentrates on turning out its (slowly shrinking) white married Christian base.
That was an acceptable campaign strategy back in 1980 when whites were 88% of the population, gays and lesbians lived in the shadows, and atheists were a tiny little minority. Today, whites are only 72% of the population, and married white Christians are rapidly becoming a minority group. We had better figure out how to advocate for conservatism with other Americans who aren’t white, or married, or Christian.
(Oh, yes, the GOP did try to campaign among Jews. But only on the issue of Israel, NOT on conservative economics.)
2. Obama was “Too Black To Fail”:
Liberal columnists and even (according to Michael Barone) millions of decent American citizens believed that even though Obama’s track record on economic issues was disappointing, Obama, The First Black President ™ could not be allowed to lose in 2012 and go down in the history books as a failure. The symbolism of that would be pretty bad. So there was this undertone that “We gotta let The First Black President ™ win.”
If Colin Powell had become President in 1996 and run for re-election in 2000 (for example), the Dems would have had the same problem: How can you have a white guy beat The First Black President ™ and not have that look just awful?
Pander Bear, the very moment you start talking about “reaching out” to minorities, gays, women, non-Christians, you are speaking the language of a spoils system (what’s in it for my group), which is the very antithesis of universal rights.
Either rights are universal and they apply to everyone on the basis of their HUMANITY, or the more equal pigs in government get to decide daily who wins and who loses the “rights” shell game.
We know which version of “rights” the Dems believe in.
It’s a question of *campaigning*, not *favors*.
The GOP runs no ads on Black Entertainment Television or (as far as I know) Univision or Telemundo. The GOP does no campaigning in neighborhoods that are largely black or Hispanic.
At the same time, the GOP is constantly stroking the Christian evangelicals, making impossible commitments to a Human Life Amendment which has absolutely zero chance of passage.
How about we reverse those priorities for a change? Let the evangelicals come to the GOP of their own accord, and advertise heavily in minority districts and on minority media outlets.
In short, the GOP should start acting like black voters and Hispanic voters matter to its electoral strategy. Right now, its strategy for winning is defined by how many black and Hispanic voters do NOT vote.
Another addendum: The academy and education in general must be taken back from the left, which has turned pedagogy into indoctrination. The offspring of the upper and middle classes, specifically, are being targeted to confuse them into voting against their own interests — and in so doing voting against everyone else’s interests as well, because the biggest losers of a broken state will be the poor. Unionized teachers and tenured Ivory Tower radicals are prime sources of the rot that’s bringing us down.
“The First Black President ™ could not be allowed to lose in 2012 and go down in the history books as a failure.”
I cannot help but wonder if this concept helped govern the tone of the Romney campaign’s very soft peddling approach to Obama. If he had gone after O the way he went after Gingrich et al during the primary, he would have won handily. But noooooooo….
So, you just might be onto something here.
You assume Romney would have been allowed to go after the “first half black president”. I say the media would have burned him at the stake as a “racist” had he even tried to be tough on Obama. And, I say Obama has always known that. Do you see the way he treats mainstream media people when they ask him questions he doesn’t want to answer? The race card is always part of his schtick. Obama won. The USA lost.
Yeah, cause he didn’t, and they didn’t….oh, wait, they did anyway. Hmmm.
+1
Yes they did, but Romney played it well enough to keep it from becoming the only issue in the election, which was what Obama was shooting for. I would point more to Obama’s ability to paint Romney as an “out of touch rich guy who only cares about his rich buddies” as a reason for Romney’s demise. Many voters resent smart, well educated, and self made rich guys because they are afraid of them.
Romney knew how to sell what makes free markets work and generate prosperity for the masses but somehow his advisors did not think it was necessary to get him over the finish line. In an election with Fundamental Transformation at stake we left that off the table. Stanley Kurtz had his excellent book Spreading the Wealth out by early August but never mind letting that inform discussing what was really at stake.
So now we have profs like john a powell from the Building One America conference pushing the Regional Equity Movement (Or Metropolitanism to the Brookings Institute) AND Obama’s Transformational Education Policy, K-12 and higher ed, with the vision described and quoted here http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/distributive-justice-is-not-enough-we-must-break-the-illusion-of-the-unitary-self/. Plus he and Obama’s Education Advisor from his 2008 bid, Linda Darling-Hammond, are apparently lobbying nonprofits on what is an acceptable vision to be donating to. With the IRS in the background as a backup club, our charities are now officially directed state weapons.
There was a lot at stake but so little got discussed. One side reference to the Open Mic and flexibility in a 2nd term was not enough.
My point is to survive the Fundamental Transformation being sought We, voters, readers, politicians not just about access to the trough, have to know what is to be restructured, what already has been, and why it matters. If you have never read Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty, that would be a good goal before 2013. You will be startled by just how much we are replicating tragic patterns from the past. We need to be aware of those lessons and see the policies likely effects as they are being put in place.
It is the Mind itself that is under attack via Education and the Media. And now charitable giving. The Crony Schemers do not want perceptions to reflect reality or Axemaker Minds that anticipate what is coming. It is up to us not to grant that wish for ourselves or our families.
Whatever happens that Axemaker Mind will come in handy even if reality can be frustrating.
Good analysis. I’m still having trouble processing the fact that 61 million people voted for this charlatan. Take away the hard-core leftists, blacks, white-guilt liberals, teachers, Latinos, Muslims, and sundry assorted blocs, and you still have millions upon millions who thought the country was on the wrong track and still voted for Obama.
I don’t blame Romney, his team, the GOP establishment, etc.; the onus is on a great swath of the electorate–ignorant, misinformed, uninformed people–who were clueless about what was at stake. I’m not saying they were stupid, just detached enough to make a decision they will rue.
I know several people who voted for Obama. They are neither stupid or partisan. They are average people just trying to get by and working their tails off in the process. After a long hard days work, they relax in front of the TV. They may watch a sitcom which does a sympathetic story about a gay couple or a story slandering the Catholic Church. Then they might watch some news and see basically the same stories, now presented as “fact”. Then they go to bed. They simply do not have the time or energy to investigate issues for themselves, and so this becomes their reality, one in which the choice is between a humble grass roots liberal or a rich capitalist conservative.
Thing is, you have a duty as a citizen, no matter how crazy your life is, to vote, um, responsibly. That means keeping informed by doing more than reading headlines.
Many who post on this site are political junkies who spend hours every day surfing to try to get a sense of what’s really going on. People like those you mention cannot possibly do this. I’ve told relatives and friends who say they have no time for the news that they don’t have to quit their jobs to be reasonably well-informed. Watch the first half hour of Bret Baier when you can; or spend 15 minutes every day or every other day looking at one conservative site (this one, NRO, hotair.com, etc.) to get a glimpse of the other side and what they’re not being told by Brian Williams.
I really believe that had millions of voters–or non-voters–overcome their apathy and invested minimal time in learning about issues affecting their future, Romney would have won.
I worked my ass off for 40 years and I came home tired every night. I watched TV every night, too. But sitcoms were never my reality. You are describing stupidity and calling it intelligence. I submit that we are a nation of stupid people and that we deserve what we have gotten for it.
You make an excellent talking point for progressives that people like your friends are either too ignorant or too lazy to run their own lives so they need a bunch of elite bureaucrats to make decisions for them. Being tired or too wrapped up in ones own life is no excuse.
Obama was attending to the huge debt and regulatory fire that is burning our nation by pouring gasoline on it. Romney/Ryan were proposing to address this fire by using a garden hose on it. The difference: negligible. The truly stupid people in this country are the huge majority who do not recognize the emergency that we are facing. They seek tepid solutions and worry about being called racist and are generally easily distracted by shiny objects.
Let it burn…you might as well enjoy the spectacle.
Republicans running “pretend conservatives” don’t do well. Romney was a pretend conservative who had never actually advocated any conservative policy until this election.
Conservatives understand that the enemy must be taken on directly. And the most vociferous enemy of conservatives are the “pretend conservatives” in the Republican Party. Look at how the Republican elite engineered the primary process, even using vote fraud, to get wins for Romney. Conservative candidates were all running against not only each other, but also the “machine” being run by Rove and company.
The Republican Party demonstrated with absolute clarity that it is not hospitable to conservatism. It only uses conservatism to get elected. Going forward there is no realistic way for conservatives to operate within the Republican Party. You don’t need to look further than the RNC treatment of the congressional races of Michele Bachman and Allen West to see how hard the establishment will work for the defeat of real conservatives. That is just the factual situation. Conservatives are left with no choice but a third party.
And can you imagine what a circus the meeting of Rice and McCain is going to be? Too bad we won’t see a video of the mugging.
McCain can’t use a keyboard, but he inserts his head up his butt very adroitly.
Hey a$$hole, McCain cannot use a keyboard because the communist a$$holes in North Vietnam tortured him. Do you enjoy abusing people who were crippled due to no fault of their own? Scumbag!
Since you liked it so well; I repeat the original comment with no reservations.
Ditto.
Sorry, Ceteris;
It looks like I’m in an argument with an intellectually challenged individual. I quit.
The only pure conservative the Republicans have nominated in the last 80 years was Barry Goldwater in 1964. How did that work out for us? Real conservatives are a shrinking minority in this country. How do we reverse that trend?
How is the presidency of Mitt Romneycare working out for you?
Can you name someone from the group of Republicans who ran, that would have done better than Romney did? In answer to your question, it isn’t working out worth a damn, and it won’t work out worth a damn for any of us. I blame the Democrats, who mindlessly follow their Communist leaders, for the outcome of this election. They are the real enemy.
Nominate conservative Catholics like Santorum.
I am pretty sure John Kennedy was a conservative Catholic. Opposed abortion. Did not support gay marriage. Favored tax cuts. Told citizens to not ask for stuff from the government. And he is now a Saint. So, if it was good for Kennedy then it is fine for Santorum to hold those same positions.
The only thing I see that has changed is the attitude of white people to ram their heads up their rears, over and over again, in order to display they are not prejudiced.
They will stop at nothing to create fools of themselves in order to show they are trying to appease another race.
And the result is the races getting even more belligerent as they see their glamour exalting.
Beneath the veneer is the same old $h!t, that will never bow to any depth of regulation nor appeasement.
It really is too bad our ancestors didn’t pick their own cotton.
Guess who’s picking our citrus.
Just another up and coming oppressed racial group to be dealt with by our obsequious government through legislative penance.
If anything this last election proved the power of appearance over substance. We all knew that the election would be close and it was lost in my opinion by two main reasons. One, the Demorats were able to bring ridiculous subjects into the election and the Republicans played right into their trap, aka Akin and Murdock and their stupid take on rape and allowing the media to bring up and discuss abortion as if it were on the table. This made the single women angry and actually motivated them to vote when they probably would have not. Two, Romney’s image was mostly unknown by the majority of the under thirty crowd and his image to the over forty crowd was mixed at best. Then you throw in his inexplicable performances in the final two debates and you were left with “Who the F**k is this guy”? I even had a hard time trying to understand his last two debates and told my wife that he just lost the election with that last one. To sum up ONE, NO MESSAGE by Romney that was clear and coherent and was distracted by nonsensical attacks from the left and TWO, IMAGE of Romney that was at best obscure and incomplete so that any criticism or description of him would stick because of no public knowledge of him or his history. Romney is decent man and would have made a great president but in today’s world it takes more flash than hash!
Yes; Romney successfully talked over the heads of the Obama tribe.
He used too many multi-syllable words.
He should have shown up on The View, Leno & Letterman. This would have gone a long way towards the goal of introducing himself to the mindless masses that eat up these shows daily.
Hey Bob, every vote counts no matter the content of their heads.
My car is always among the smallest and oldest in the grocery store parking lot. I am among a probable minority who pull out a bank card, rather than a government benefits card, to pay for my food. My groceries contain fewer expensive pre-packaged items. I am among a probable minority in speaking only English. I have received angry stares and open outrage if I am caught loking at a cart of food as the (always obese, often fake- nailed and well – coiffed, frequently talking or texting on a cellphone) purchaser hands over her government card to the (always thinner, often white and elderly) cashier.
I suspect that the other older and small cars in the parking lot belong to the store employees. You work and have little or you live off the government and spend your own money ( gained by one or more male live-ins at the Section 8 estate doing occasional work for cash) on cars and fake nails.
I wonder how many of these people voted, and I wonder how many of them are qualified to vote, but I don’t wonder how they voted, if they did. You would have to be a hopeless fool to wonder that.
The RNC and the staff of every single amnesty-spooked conservative should be required to shop in my grocery store until they can begin to discern the faintest outlines of reality.
My unemployed neighbor In addition to a dole of $400 a week and $200 in food stamps, received free insulation for his condo, a free furnace, a free refrigerator, free low energy light bulbs, subsidized heating, and a free cell phone. He could only get low energy perks, if he could convince two other neighbors in his condo to also apply for help. I estimate that the government spent at least $10,000 on the three tenants in his building.
I asked one of the insulation workers if he was going to vote for Romney. No, he said, I have a job because Obama is subsidizing this company, How many time has this senerio played out through out the country and how many votes did Obama buy with the 800 billion stimulus (aka slush fund).
And this laborer had to vote the Democrat ticket, or his union would have him fired.
The “stimulus” is working; Stimulating unions to create larger Democrat voting blocs.
VDH in sum: The GOP is just stark raving mad delusional
Subplot: And they’re infantile in assessing campaigns.
Sub-sub-plot: Nice moderates get killed at the polls by Dems.
Fact is, anyone that was breathing and thinking prior to Mitty the Kitty’s nomination knew what he was heading into. Doh? Obama WANTED Mitty. Gee. It’s like Hitler going to England and campaigning for Chamberlain. How’s all that working out for moderates these days.
“The fact is that the liberal press is insidious. The worst network news anchors still have larger ratings on most nights than does The O’Reilly Factor. NPR, with 900 stations, draws more listeners than most right-wing talk hosts. It does not matter much that no one watches MSNBC if they watch NBC. It matters nothing that Air America went broke without an audience. When you tally together the cultural influence of the NY Times, Washington Post, NPR, PBS, CBS, ABC, and NBC, and then consider the slant of a USA Today or People magazine, it all adds up.”
I also think that the Republicans are ignoring the power of the liberal mass media culture at their own peril. There was a reason why Obama did not give a press conference for 8 months but he DID go on shows like The Daily Show, The View, Letterman, and The Tonight Show and gave interviews with magazines like Us magazine and Rolling Stone. There also is a reason why Obama went on a Florida radio program called “The Pimp with a Limp.” Think about that, an American president going on a show like that bottom-feeding for votes. Well, I guess if you act like a whore, you end up on a show called “The Pimp with a Limp.”
Obama and the Democrats are not stupid. They know that most Americans basically get most of their information from shows and magazine articles like that. You think Americans make their decisions based on political debates with candidates discussing the major issues of the day? Dream on. I saw a video of a bunch of college-age kids on election day and the reporter asked them where they got their news from. Several of them said they got their “news” from Jon Stewart on the Daily Show. A comic on a fake “news” show was actually telling young people how to vote. It’s bad enough to have the mainstream media allied against you in an election, but to also have the entire popular culture against you can be impossible to overcome.
And you don’t think the popular culture is that important in an election? Just ask Sarah Palin about that. Here was a woman who in 2008 had more executive experience than Obama ever had and accomplished much more than Obama ever did, yet she was literally destroyed by the left-wing popular culture. What do people remember about the 2008 presidential campaign? Did they remember John McCain’s speeches? Not on your life. They remembered how Saturday Night Live made fun of Sarah Palin on a weekly basis. They also remembered how comics like Bill Maher and David Letterman all but called her an ignorant slut. Here was a succussful governor in 2008 with a fine family, a son going into the Army, and a handicapped child she decided to keep rather than have aborted, and she was compared to an waterfront whore. Shows you how “open-minded” liberals are. They will tolerate anything except people that disagree with them.
So how do you fight this? You have to have backbone and take the battle to them on the popular culture. You have to be A LOT like the late Andrew Breitbart, who took the battle to them by appearing on their shows and calling them out. Liberals look very foolish when trying to defend their indifensible big-government ideas, and Breitbart was the master at making them look foolish on their own shows. He was utterly fearless and made his opponents look small and feeble-minded in comparison. Also, if possible, creating more conservative programming would be a huge help, too. You may not agree with them on everything, but people like Glenn Beck, Greg Gutfeld, and Bill O’Reilly draw huge audiences. We need a lot more shows with people like that if we are going to make a dent in the far-left culture in this country.
You also need way more outreach to schools, especially to universities. By giving up on college kids you are allowing yet another generation of far-left liberals to grow up and vote for Democrats when they get out of school. Show them that if they really want a JOB when they graduate so that they won’t have to stay on their parent’s insurance until they’re 26 or have to live in their old bedroom, the party most likely to get them that job is the Republican Party, not the Democratic Party, which is now the party of perpetual poverty and dependency. If you think 8% unemployment and pitiful government subsidies are the new norm and the way to go, keep voting for people like Obama. If you want a real job paying real money so that you can have a real life, then vote Republican. THAT is the message you have to get across to young people today, especially the ones in college.
Finally, the messenger for all of this is of huge importance. Romney was a dear sweet man and a great guy, but he didn’t have a huge amount of charisma. A major reason why Ronald Reagan was so successful was because he was AN ACTOR. He instinctively knew how to manipulate the media and the popular culture. Being a celebrity in politics is of HUGE importance today, especially when you’re dealing with voters who get most of their “news” from The Daily Show. Even in far-left California, Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected to TWO TERMS as governor, even though he didn’t get much done and California was in even more debt after he left office. But he was a celebrity who knew how to manipulate both the mainstream media AND the popular culture. Many voters actually believed that “The Terminator” could simply take over in California and make everything turn out OK. Wrong. But it shows you the value of having a celebrity who knows how to keep his friends close and the popular culture even closer.
If Republicans are to win in 2016, we have to do a better job in winning the popular culture. If not, if we allow the far-left loons in the popular culture like the Lettermans, the Jon Stewarts, the women on The View, and even “The Pimp with a Limp” to influence the “low-information voters” in America, we’re done. We need a candidate that can sell his conservative ideas to a liberal popular culture in an entertaining way. I’ll bet you anything that if we had a conservative George Clooney he could be president tomorrow. And tell me, don’t you think a lot of college kids would vote for a George Clooney over a Joe Biden or a Hillary Clinton? In a heartbeat. Why? Because the popular culture would tell them to, that’s why.
Romney was on the right track when he spoke before the NAACP at their convention; he should have appeared on The View, Letterman & Leno. He should have secured interviews on NPR, with Rolling Stone, Playboy & others. Republicans need to get over the misguided notion that they can win by ignoring the audiences that watch & read these media outlets. Our side can hardly defeat their “team” if we’re not willing to get out there on the field with them & engage them.
“Obama and the Democrats are not stupid”
yet their entire lives are spent making sure their voters are
Two quick points, since the pain still lingers. First, Romney was a fine candidate, an exemplary and accomplished individual who understood the economy probably better than any candidate in recent history. It should have been his time, alas. That he didn’t win is in large part a verdict on an electorate addicted to the free lunch. Second, both parties, in their continuing lust for re-election, have encouraged an electorate addicted to the free lunch. Our political class, through its constant dodging and dissembling, has effectively severed the link between spending and taxes. Which is to say, Americans have very little idea of what government actually costs, or of just how much red ink covers the ledger, or of what that debt means in concrete terms or why it matters. Why was the Republican establishment, from Priebus to Rove, unable to come up with a clear and compelling explanation of our fiscal crisis, and of what we owe, as individuals and as families, given our current indebtedness?
You make an excellent points and a simple answer to your question;
If the power brokers behind the republican party were to explain the true cost of government and make a compelling argument for why the federal government needed to be reduced, they would have to stand on principle and thus cut their own source of power.
Who needs “power brokers” to do the job those fabled job-creating small business owners should be doing?
There’s nothing stopping every employer who wishes to educate America’s low-information voters by putting the total cost of a given employee right on her paycheck. And then break it down by that employee’s portion of the business’s overhead, capital equipment allocated to that employee, regulatory costs, employment taxes, employer’s share of so-called “benefits” and employee compensation. That last item is then further broken down in the manner customary for pay stubs.
When repeated 52 weeks per year, something should begin to sink in to the heads of the proles.
All it takes is a few software tweaks to the payroll program.
You could be on to something, except……
What VDH just spelled out, and I personally don’t think he went far enough in depth in regards to the education chasim that exists between the thoughtfully engaged and those who take mere glances at politics and why there has been an ideological shift in who is gaining the power in the federal political spoils system.
You think employers would not be crucified beyond what just happened in the last campaign cycle? Class warfare was on parade and many jumped in with full support. Some opposite others jumped for the weeds hoping the crest will hit peak and subside to live a better day. Both are dreaming the day of reckoning will not arrive in their time. Both are foolish.
So when you speak of fables, I can’t help but think of the greatest fable ever created. The fable of;”It’s all free”. Here is your phone, you medication, your health checkup your government-tax subsidized contract for; (name the comodity of your choice ) It’s all free!
The proverbial; “The check is in the mail”
Meanwhile back in reality, business all over the US will spend 70 million man hours this coming year attempting to comply with the newest-latest-greatest entitlement. Nevermind what is already on the plate.
You have attempted to simplify what can’t be made simple in the age of entitlement and the ensuing greed which always occurs from the very plans that entitlements will spawn.
“Why was the Republican establishment, from Priebus to Rove, unable to come up with a clear and compelling explanation of our fiscal crisis, and of what we owe, as individuals and as families, given our current indebtedness?”
Most people don’t have a deep enough understanding of the dynamics of economics to be able to explain it to others. That’s my take.
You are correct. Romney was a far better candidate in terms of accomplishments and character. His instincts on how to get the economy going again were correct too: increase employment, versus, raising taxes on a few in a knee jerk, divisive way. But you can’t fix stupid and in my opinion that’s what he ended up fighting against. I think it was much easier for the Dems to convince low-information type voters that Romney was bad news. By demonizing him they got away with not having to explain why their policies hadn’t worked so well.
I am convinced that at the national level, elections will be won or lost on single issues and the Dems will take advantage of this and they will tailor their messages to the uninformed.
Fraud matters, pretending that it doesn’t or that the multiple layers of fraud weren’t there in the Obama campaign, both times, will only allow it to be repeated.
Racial polarization and tribalism are inevitable, and they are not going away. Non-elite whites- elite whites are well aware they are a tribe- can deal with it, and possibly help themselves, or stay on the handcart to “color-blind” hell.
All true, but there does not seem to be any way out.
As Lenin put it, What is to be done?
“What is to be done ?”
Reality must play out.
The Israelites spent seventy years in exile in Babylon, the Russians spent about the same time living under Communism. The Iranians got the theocracy they wanted and now despise Islam, by many accounts.
As H. L. Mencken observed
” Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard. ”
But it is the elites who led them into this. It will end when the old establishment, who have led the common man down this path, are overthrown, possibly in violence.
Don’t forget Chris E@#!ing Christie and his late in the quarter felating of the President. I have no doubt Christie wanted to sink Romney (lots of reasons why he might have done this) and successfully did so. If Christie had come out against the President, it would have helped. If he had simply been neutral and denied the photo ops, it would have been helpful. Instead, he basically suckled at the government teet offered in person by Obama and the press spun it so even a fiery republican like Christie was overwhelmed by Obama’s compassion.
In some ways it is rather remarkable that the GOP has done as well as they have over the last 20 years. The democrats, being the urban snob party, with the near universal support of Hollywood, academia, and the entrenched media, have every advantage possible. It is not cool to be decent or normal, whereas you have Ward Cleaver losing to Malcolm X.
It would appear the democrats have the youth vote wrapped up for the foreseeable future thanks to our union controlled government teachers, and marxist professors teaching the young what to think rather than how to think. Too many parents show no concern with what is being taught in our schools and universities. The brainwashing continues unabated.
My first vote as a young man was for Jimmy Carter, and I was so disappointed that I did not vote again until 1992. I was bascially non-political until I watched the Clarence Thomas hearings with interest, and realized how truly pathetic the democrat party is, but unfortunately too many americans were not paying attention, and we got Slick Willy for eight years.
The only suggestion I have is to stop feeding the beast, which means cancel your cable, and newspaper/magazine subscriptions. I have had cable for 30+ years, and it is being cancelled at the end of the year for a fresh start. There are so many other avenues of entertainment, so why give MSNBC or CurrentTV even a dime?
That’s a start, cancelling the media coming into your home. But only a start. If you have children of an age where they can absorb facts about politics and the economy, (high school age and older I’d say) then I think conservative parents have an obligation to do some home schooling on the problems that progressive gov’t policies have created.
It takes work. Beginning with an understanding of the problems we face and the solutions that would lead to a more robust economy. I’m doing that with my children, ages 24 and 22.
This is one of the author’s best articles. Leftists should read it, but they probably won’t because they know which conservative authors to avoid in the same way that vampires avoid sunlight. It’s likely it wouldn’t do them much good anyway.
My question is: will the DNC drop a billion plus on dem races in 2014 or was all that money better spent getting the Bamster reelected? I suspect that their donors are pretty tapped out. So, does this mean that O saves his very, very worse for 2015-16 or does he try to pull it off earlier?
Obama is an extreme leftist. His campaign positions him a little left of center. There is no way to know Romney’s philosophy except that like both of the Presidents Bush ‘he plans to do the right thing’.
Romney’s campaign positioned him as being solidly a litttle bit to the right of Obama – what we used to call a mugwump (mug on one side of the fence, wump on the other side). Today we call Romney’s position ‘OBAMA LITE’. Romney has no philosophy except he promises he won’t screw up like Obama does.
Who wants Lite when they can have the real thing? They vote Obama.
Who wants Lite when they hate the real thing? They stay home.
Of course Obama won.
There is no way to beat the liberals using this strategy.
The liberals wanted secession in 2004. Lets give them their own country. Two countries competing will prove whether free markets are better than the nancy state. I suggest divide up tomorrow. Obama has abandoned our allies because he thinks it is morally wrong to be the world’s policeman. So secession does not harm our allies.
Obama won because he was able to paint a picture of Romney as being far to the right of center. How does that square with your assertion that nobody wants a fence sitter. Romney may have lost your vote with his attempts to appeal to the center, but that would be your problem, not mine, and I am farther to the right than Barry Goldwater was. I saw this election as a simple choice: Do we want a guy whose beliefs we aren’t sure about, or do we re-elect a committed Communist whose beliefs we are very sure about? I thought the answer was a no brainer, but I guess an awful lot of people had more trouble with that question than I did.
Dr. Hanson –
“We rarely saw Romney ads hitting Obama as racially divisive, as a jet-setter, as a flip-flopper, or as squandering opportunities to find new gas and oil?
“Mitt Romney was a glittering Sir Galahad who, given his impressive horse, armor, and lance, along with his decency and piety, assumed that he could win a joust in a fair charge against the other team’s knight.”
Indeed.
What is missing here and in the comments is the fact that Romney is LDS. This is mentioned a bit here and there, but there is almost nil on this subject in any analysis on this election.
Most might think of the religious bias first, that Christians (and others) would not vote for Romney because of his beliefs, but then some people would vote for him too because of that. Leave that question aside for now.
Read Dr. Hanson’s statements carefully. These images are consistent with what the LDS church would like to project from their well known church members, and their leadership. This image projected may or may not be in line with a member’s personal lifestyle, but if you do not fall within certain behavior patterns, you will not touted by the LDS church at the level that Romney is.
This is not meant as a criticism of LSD culture, that’s just the way it is. Romney is not a robot either, with strings connected directly to the First Presidency of the LDS church, or the church leadership. But the church remains a major influence in his life.
Romney grew up in LDS culture, and no doubt the values that he expresses in words and deeds follows that ideology closely. Romney is not a fake or anything, it’s that his LDS upbringing and present world view most likely precluded him from being “nasty” to Mr. President. That would be in direct opposition to what he is as a person at his core. And he knows without question that he represents the LDS church on the biggest stage yet achieved by a church member.
The Sir Galahad persona is precisely what he is and should be. The fact that Romney got as far as he did is very important to the LDS church, a win for them in any case. Winning the Presidency would have been the biggest boost yet. This all confers legitimacy on the LDS church, which has been a major focus of their PR efforts in recent years. The ’02 Olympics was such an event.
Believe or not, Harry Reid is there too. Any such achievements church members are touted, and most LDS church members know who’s who with any high profile LDS personality.
Again, this is not meant as a criticism. Any group will rally around their achievers, that’s human nature. Romney going “dirty” or overreaching, it’s just not his worldview.
With the Republican Party in such serious disarray, there is only one viable way to counter the Communist in the White House. It is the same way to deal with a festering pimple. Bring it to a head so it can be removed.
The Republican politicians have only one weapon they can use, and actually that weapon is to give our Communist-in-Chief absolutely everything he wants so as to cause the total collapse of the US economy and the total horror of those Whites who voted for him.
Republican members of Congress must agree to every tax increase he demands, and also agree to every new entitlement he demands so as to hasten this economic collapse. This will result in patriotic Americans coming together when they actually see what it means to have a marxist/leninist/communist in the White House.
Then if the economic collapse comes quickly enough, he will be impeached before the US is totally ruined beyond recovery, and his legacy will be so deep in the garbage that it will discourage others like him for a very long time.
Meanwhile Israel will disappear under a sea of Muslims, and the Jewish people will meet their final solution – which was also orchestrated by our same Communist-in-Chief; but that discussion is for one of my later offerings.
I did not vote for my representative to “give our communist-in-chief everything he wants” and play avoid-the-blame-games with the democrats. I voted for him to do what’s proper and right for the country and myself. Don’t worry-it will all come to a head anyway because of the economic and internationally volatile circumstances we are currently in.
When it all comes crashing down – and it will – I prefer to fight back to freedom knowing My elected representative was doing the right thing from day one in opposing this usurper in the white house and his totalitarian goals.
Won’t work. The propaganda ministry will make it the pubbie’s fault. Anybody’s fault except the exalted leader’s. Now maybe collapse and chaos could actually bring about a better situation. But really a military dictatorship would not be good either. They’d just eventually return us to another social justice ameritopia.
“Meanwhile Israel will disappear under a sea of Muslims”
No actually, they will not. There is a better prognostication than yours extant. The muslim sea seen will be red and five feet deep across and the entire length of a large valley.
And radioactive.
If the whole election came down to the hurricane, Cristie’s hugs, and two mediocre debates, then imo Romney was just not a contender to begin with.
The whole past 4 years should have done Obama in, but Romney was not the candidate we needed. Serious guy, family man, able manager but he still came up short.
I’m convinced the better, more affable personality wins now and will going forward….Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush 2, and Obama. Every losing candidate was a less likeable personality. Solution: Nominate only very likeable ‘talk show host’ types.
Agreed, however pathetic it seems.
Dr. Hanson:
On. 5, we cant really say because a true deal (e.g. DREAM in exchange for closed borders, expedited targeted deportation, and heck, I’d be game for a re-write of the 14th amendment), has never been offered in concrete terms. California is a special case anyhow, I doubt Mexicans as you go further east would be so bold. One thing in your favor, Eisenhower split if not won that likely sub-1% of the electorate vote in 1956. I’ve probably heard “pinche Obama” more than “pinche Eisenhower”.
On the Italian-American negation theory, I do think Mr. Petrucci would vote for Giuliani, or even a Santorum or Arpaio. Thats the Republican ticket to relevance in the northeast, pandering or not. Again, we’ve never seen that tried. Thank god for Argentina, or there would be more than just the Italian-American sports hall of fame (a good one, btw) and BASTA for the obligatory mob-movie protests.
It’s time for white men to borrow a page from the Marxist playbook and call a general strike. Until the politicians step aside and put us in charge, we’ll work just enough to feed ourselves and any women and children living under the same roof. Minorities and single white women supported Obama on November 6; now they can support him on April 15 too.
What will the Democrats do when millions of their voters are starving or moving back to Mexico? Arrest all poor white men, like they do with “deadbeat dads”? My own income has gone from $80000 to $5000 in the last ten years, yet I’ve done nothing violent or illegal.
No, they will win the election and use the government to steal more from us. Isn’t “social justice” a wonderful idea?
The Treason Triumvirate (mass media, Hollywood, academia)assault the culture on a daily basis.
They weaken morale, spit upon patriotism, revel in betrayal. It is a divide and conquer strategy and it is unrelenting.
Those who recoil at the utter lack of honor in “countrymen” who have the scruples of a Medieval bazaar do ourselves a grave injustice each and every time we “explain” away the nefarious deeds of “those darn LIBERALS”.
WE…keep the disguise in place and the masquerade alive by “defining” leftist traitors as the costume they wear. These are NOT “compassionate pacifists” interested solely in helping “the little guy” nor are the protectors of “oppressed”.
When we lazily adopt their terms and phrases they use to fraudulently define themselves and then try to debate away their incongruities, we have lost before we set foot on the rigged playing field.
Allowing 40 years of unfettered propaganda, slander and treachery against our nation, we then try to armchair analyze why this election or that vote went awry. This is beyond ridiculous. The Democratic Party sold its soul and the stability of the nation in exchange for seizing the country by the throat.
I’m so sick of this imbecilic drivel about “RINO’s”. It not only misses the point it is antithetical to the point. Only a dribbling idiot would suggest that a MORE conservative person would have garnered the “difference making” votes in this election.
That isn’t the problem and fails to even sniff the problem. Republicans have been brand damaged by the barrage for 40 years. We are living in a nation of lies. And the Republican Party is simply not very good at fighting a severely rigged game. They suck at messaging. They can’t get the truth through the mountain of lies and slander and treason.
They fear confronting the truth and won’t tell it to the American people. So, they fight the alligators in the water…in the worst possible element that favors the enemies of truth. Unless and until they recognize THAT as the problem, nothing will change, nothing will be solved. We will march inexorably toward the Bandana Republic. Hippies and OWS (One World Socialism) will rule us and our fiscal health will move from our present Stage Four malignancy into collapse.
But, we insist on being lazy and stupid and weak. We seem to love the costumes of those who mean to destroy us too much to change.
Your commentaries are so intelligent and you always make perfect sense. Except you are blind. You are blind because you think you see. There IS Truth. You hunger for it. Why not surrender to Him?
As I recall it, He was a little more than ticked off Himself at the liars and cheats and self-serving scum of his era.
Yes, but when he confronted them he still said “follow me” at the end of his teachings.
cfb,
I am also a long-time follower/admirer of your posts. nueces has it right. There is no hope in man. I have discovered after this election that I love my country far more than I realized, that I have been placing my trust in our country and our constitution. Grief still hits me at odd times. I was wrong however to have worshipped my country and its constitution. I will still fight for my country with all I have, but my trust and my hope do not lie there.
WE…keep the disguise in place and the masquerade alive by “defining” leftist traitors as the costume they wear. These are NOT “compassionate pacifists” interested solely in helping “the little guy” nor are the protectors of “oppressed”.
The scuzziest of the scuzzy, these progressives.
When we lazily adopt their terms and phrases they use to fraudulently define themselves and then try to debate away their incongruities, we have lost before we set foot on the rigged playing field.
The first point of order is to reject the playing field.
Bottom line? The great American experiment was not destined to last forever. There is doubtless truth to the saying “The meek shall inherit the earth.” Predators will eat their own. That post-apocalyptic day will come when man gets to start from the proverbial square one.
I can’t find a single point to quibble with in this article. It literally defines just about everything about our culture. It makes it clear and obvious that conservatives will never again win a national election. The rats now have a perfect model with which to control the presidency indefinitely.
Not only that but with a small amount of extrapolation one can see that indeed the conservative ideal, traditional values and even christianity is dying. The lying rats and their immoral society are right now stealing our children from us. They are seducing and brainwashing them wholesale. And we can do nearly nothing about it.
For a while I thought we must secede. It was the only and right way to combat the evil that seduces our nation. But it wouldn’t work. Our children would run off to the blue lands to fornicate and smoke dope. No, once a society devolves to the state we are in the only bright spot is knowing that God does call a few to salvation and the trials and suffering of this life will make them assess their plight and search for truth in all the madness. Some will find it.
I chastise myself regularly for getting depressed about the death of America. I have to stop seeing with my flesh and start looking in the spirit. I am learning to look up more these days.
The fact that “Racist! Racist!” is now a broken record — Eric Holder gets into hot water over his knowledge of Fast and Furious and suddenly his auditors are racists; Susan Rice misleads the country and suddenly her critics are racists and sexists — does not mean that it does not work in deterring critics.
If critics are deterred at the ineptitude of an Eric Holder or the baldfaced misrepresentation (aka lying) of Susan Rice on behalf of her boss, then “critics” are morons.
Also morons are the idiots in the congressional black caucus & their sycophants in “the media” who cry racism! every time you call a melanin enhanced moron a moron.
Take an Elijah Cummings or a John Conyers or a Maxine Waters or any of those assorted 10 Congresswomen who yelled racism! at criticism of babble-brained Rice. Take them all far away, please.
Who cares about intelligent policy anymore when you can just reduce any situation to accusations back and forth and “silence” your critics ?
A white liberal can all but destroy Condoleezza Rice or Alberto Gonzalez and feel very liberal, but a peep about Barack Obama or Susan Rice from a white male is akin to a KKK slur.
Very true (as are VDH’s other examples) but it’s been said a million times. More to the point: the GOP has repeatedly failed to produce a candidate with the verbal skills, core beliefs and courage to deal with nonsense head on and take the fight to the bad guys. The overwhelming urge is always to flee and talk about something else. What’s new?
Elite Republican strategists are, to be candid, unhinged when they talk of support for the Dream Act winning Latino voters
That’s being polite. Of course the hispanic vote matters and of course immigration has to be controlled within secure borders, but the GOP can’t tell its ass from its elbow. VDH’s Italian solution sounds about right — except the fracture won’t be on class lines but will break much like it does for the rest of us, and for the same reasons. ‘Latinos’ are simply the latest wave of immigrants, despite all efforts by the left to victimize them, and they almost always make really good neighbors.
Meanwhile, the average GOP poohbah thinks a latino is something to do with small change, lawn care and babysitting. Take off the rose-tinted glasses and look at the front bench of the Clapped-Out Old Party and you’ll likely see, as Disraeli once saw, ‘only a row of exhausted volcanoes’. Easiest way to deal with ‘em is to head for new pastures. Failing that, duelling pistols at dawn or Semtex.
Does anyone really believe the serial losers in the GOP should be given another chance?
Does anyone really believe the serial losers in the GOP should be given another chance?
There are some good people in the up and coming GOP. Maybe too few. Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz, Mike Lee, Paul Ryan. Some others.
“The media” have already begun their effort to Palinize Marco Rubio, to destroy him.
I don’t know what the average “GOP poobah” thinks about Latinos.
I do know that IF republicans have to reduce themselves to bribes to so called voting blocs, America as I understand it is finished anyway.
Well, IMO there isn’t much functional difference between K-Street lobbyists and tossing out bribes to a voting bloc — the money goes in circles either way, and the motives are hardly altruistic. The current ‘leaders’ often fail to see our major problems, or they don’t care, preferring instead to stick the wrong end of the telescope to the weak eye. If they can’t see the problems, they certainly aren’t the choice to fix ‘em. That applies throughout the upper reaches of the GOP hierarchy. Unfortunately, some who might otherwise be part of the solution often turn into tongue-tied twits when the knives come out (Rick Perry, e.g.). Meanwhile, the MSM now put on a fake serious demeanor and speak with respect about Boehner, McCain and grande-dame L. Graham, playing the rest of us for idiots, to enable the bread-and-circus follies to continue.
Aside from Trey Gowdy, about whom I know zip, don’t have any problems with your list of good guys, though it’s awfully early. And there are surely many more. Jeb Bush, at least as reported to outsiders, often sounds like part of the solution (no, not as pres.!). Ditto one or two Democrats, probably, though digging them out won’t be easy. What about CO governor John Hickenlooper? I know the state fairly well but have never lived there; he seems to be respected for reasons that also appeal to many R’s, and he definitely didn’t fall off the turnip truck (cf Messrs. Mourdock and Akin and most of country club).
The larger point is simple: both major parties are so rotten that the best and brightest still following the party whip can do more good and rise faster elsewhere, within a new party dedicated to the restoration of American excellence. My guess: many agree. What is needed is to show them the way forward.
Palin is one way — the GOP and MSM übermenschen made a fatal mistake when they wounded her but failed to kill her off. If she’s interested in a third party she needs to shit or get off the pot before long. The wailing and derision from the usual suspects are predictable, but how many divisions do they have? We’re not talking about Rushmore-grade steel or iron will (Kristol? Krauthammer?). Bluster, blanks and sparrowfart just about covers it, I’d guess.
As for the big battle supposedly waging in Washington DC right now, all the revenue generated (or theoretically generated) in one year by raising taxes on “the rich” would cover costs of running Jabba the Hutt for something like 8.5 days.
But then it never was about efficiency and common sense in the first place
I agree 100% with your statement about raising taxes on the rich. The problem is that the left will consider it a victory even though it will most likely have little to no effect on our debt/deficit. It “looks and feels” good and that’s all they are interested in.
“Take in a Castor Oil’s dose of Chris Matthews or Andrea Mitchell for 30 seconds to learn why.”
Or just read the modern equivalent of Der Sturmer to get the same material without the whitewash.
The conservatives have to come to the battle, the election was lost because the MSM is a propaganda machine for the Democrats and the solution is easy; stop buying the products that make the propaganda machine of the Democrats possible. Just stop buying the products that are advertised and let the companies know why you’ve stopped buying. The MSM has been taken over by ‘left wing’ ideologues and they can’t be changed, time for the boycott isn’t it?
It will not be a strategy, a change of plan, a different approach that changes the landscape of America. It will be its failure that shakes elections to its core. We should be patient and cautious.
We are on the road to economic destruction. It is imminent and long overdue.
And while doing so, protect your assets, get out of debt, play it safe, and arm yourself. The mob will be coming one day. Don’t depend on our feckless law enforcement. Like the obstinate, petulant child, let these Obama loving fools have their way. We are wasting our time pandering and reasoning – their abjectly stupid, untruthful, possibly unteachable, and completely self-serving. Quit bailing them out and giving them excuse. Tick-a-lock the mouth and fight back tacitly. Don’t hire these bums. Hold your charity, your volunteerism and the Good Samaritan act. No longer allow yourself to be used. Brush off the charges of racism and sexism. Who cares what these imbecilic parasites think?
This is why I am begging John Boenher and the rest of the dimwitted Republican leadership to get out of the way, cave to Obama, meet his demands for higher taxes, take away the excuses of obstruction. Give Obama complete ownership – his solutions are a ruse and guaranteed failure. No longer fight the media – encourage them to scream louder. Let the Progressives have their way with healthcare.
And let the system collapse spectacularly.
I want Obama voters to feel real pain, without the security of their theft. Let their stomachs growl, the house go dark and let them watch their jobs disappear. Attack their liberal academic institutions with charges of gross incompetence and lay the blame for the lack of opportunity on the administration when students graduate and there are no jobs.
Let America be knocked to its knees and let the world follow. Obama has told us that the economy is recovering. We shall see.
And when there is a cry for help, look at your detractors and tell them, “We warned you and you didn’t listen. Obama was your enemy and played you the fool. Now you can suffer the consequences of your vote. Cool won’t feed you.”
Perhaps then, we can pick up the pieces and restore America to original intent. But this pattern of reason and playing fairly is a losing proposition and due to demographics, will only grow worse with time.
Pain is a wonderful teaching tool.
Gad…they are abjectly stupid
“We warned you and you didn’t listen. Obama was your enemy and played you the fool. Now you can suffer the consequences of your vote. Cool won’t feed you.”
John Galt/Atlas Shrugged
“This is why I am begging John Boenher and the rest of the dimwitted Republican leadership to get out of the way, cave to Obama..”
Me thinks John won’t disappoint you there. Heh.™
I never believe Dick Morris. He has a track record of being wrong.
bonestealer,
“Educating” presumes that there is someone listening. Romney said everything that needed to be said for the people to understand where/how is the way to prosperity.One-hundred-and-fourty-seven million Americans desided that it is better to stand on their knees and eat from the trough, rather then eat their own food sitting at the table.
Obama got some 61 million votes while Romney got some 58 million votes.
Those were (at least) the official numbers.
And as good Americans we should do all we can to make sure that food is very bitter to the taste.
What a real President would say
You missed two biggest ones, prof.
1. Republican don’t mind losing even one little bit. Just as long a they keep their position at the feeding trough. That’s why you didn’t see any negative ads against the guy who is dismantling the greatest country in world history.
2. Democrats cheat and Republicans are just fine with it. See #1
And that 3-4% edge you talk about for the media. Make it more like 15%.
In a fair fight, conservatives win by 20% (15% for the media. 5% for cheating). 60-40, just like the polls say the consevative liberal split in the country is.
Bottom line…the country is swirling in the toilet bowl because the Republicans are more interested in their cushy incomes than they are in preserving the republic.
I tend not to agree with the broad brush sentiments that “Republicans don’t care when they lose”, but have to reluctantly admit having that very unsettling feeling on election night.
Living in California, the race had already been called relatively early in the evening. Still, I made the 30 minute drive with my wife to the downtown Romney/Repub election HQ gathering. I intended to try and meet some people, offer my support for the gigantic task ahead, etc… To be fair, my wife and I were is shock. Having said all that, wandering around that crowd was very different than what I expected. It was like a subdued cocktail party. I felt like our Republic was probably lost forever. The thinning crowd seemed more like disappointed football fans whose team had just lost. “Oh well, we lost this one” was the vibe.
Those people had been “in the arena”, as Teddy Roosevelt once put it.
Where were you when it counted?
I had been “in the arena” and went there looking for fellow conservative warriors. I found a cocktail party.
To be more clear, by “don’t care”, I was referencing the professional politicians and the consultant blood-suckers. Many individuals who call themelves republicans care a great deal.
We have to have a new party and new leaders. There may be a handful of salvageable leaders from the loser party, but not many. It’s clear that Boehner, Mitchell, Rove, McCain and 90+% of the rest don’t even consider the state of the country to be a problem, much less something worth fighting for.
I believe The Federalist Papers #10 warns of the dangers of ‘factions’ to your Republic. This splintering rather than assimilation (sometimes known as ‘diversity’) splits you Americans into the tribes VDH mentions. The amalgam created by assimilation is much stronger than the weak factional veins left in the Republic’s structure…moreover, such can lead to internecine fighting.
As to Mr. Romney: I hear that Hewlett-Packard is in need of a good turn around artist and that the current crew isn’t meeting commitments. Again. Maybe the BofD should look to him…
Why can’t the Republican “leadership” see what’s wrong with their operation? Also, too many Republicans think, as long as they stick to their convictions, it’s OK to lose.
Yes, the Lefties won this one, but they only see hierarchy and not process.
I think they will end up like the fox who tried to romance a skunk: he didn’t get what he wanted but got way more than he bargained for.
The Left is setting up forces with which they cannot deal. They keep promising us violence and the like if they don’t get their way.
If they don’t understand, that they have not gotten any yet because their is little opportunity but if they get the breakdown they want, there are many people who want to settle with them once and for all. Knowing them from Hopkins as cowards and weaklings, the results will not be pretty, but it will be quick and final as the fox learned to his chagrin.
Just regarding point 10: nothing new there. That kind of gaming the system has been going on for decades. In the 1980′s they’d show up in big cars and divide up the purchase as described. Today around here it is a little different: the cars might not be so big or new, but they have the latest iPhones and such which they are constantly using to text or a few times I’ve seen streaming porn in the middle of the grocery. Here the taste seems to have gone from cars, jewelry and fancy duds (or at least what is wore to the store, but then shabby is a style and has expensive clothes to match) to the electronics and such they can carry around.
That’s not saying that some might not actually need the help. I’ve seen some who probably do. However, in my observation they are outnumbered by the gamers.
But reform will likely never happen when one considers that the welfare state bureaucracy is effectively Middle Class welfare. It is a make-work program which creates middle class government dependents who will never vote against the system since they might cost them their job.
” I offered to pay for his milk and formula to expedite his cash purchase of 20,000 calories. I don’t think he voted for Mitt Romney.”
Now that was funny…
Good article, Thank You.
47%. Romney was absolutely right, That’s why no Republican will be president again until the system collapses. Most people are complete math idiots. That can’t understand the basic fact that raising taxes on the wealthy as Obama proposes will do absolutely nothing to control the deficit since it is such a small percentage of the spending. They can’t understand that SS is a Ponzi scheme. Hell, most of them don’t even know what a Ponzi scheme is. Most of them can’t understand that the Fed can’t keeping buying our debt indefinitely now that China has come to its senses. The electorate only understands gimme. But as sure as the sun will rise, the system will collapse on its present course. It’s just numbers.
Not a single person under 30 has a clue what living under a Conservative President is like. People like Victor and us cannot save them. We know, but they can only save themsleves.
The election told me a couple of things. (1) People will vote for the welfare programs over values. They don’t care that O’Dismal is for unlimited abortion, gay marriage, or the gaying of the military. They don’t care about Fast and Furious nor Bengazigate. Just gimmie the free stuff.
(2) People employed by the government (excluding the military) and those retired from the goverment will vote pretty much along the lines of the free stuff people. Just keep the money comin’.
(3) Liberals not covered under points (1) and (2) love Barack even if he’s wrecking the country and our finances. He’s the poor little black guy who was beaten down by “society” and made good. And he’s exotic with his background of livin’ in Indonesia and Hawaii. White guys need not apply.
(4) Liberals, really regressives, will use any and all means to get their people elected. Voter fraud is not a problem for them because the ends justify the means. Rules are for suckers. And they will drag any homeless, welfare recepient, derranged, or imbicile down to vote for their slate. While Karl Rove was runnin’ ads, the Dems were runnin’ numbers. And get out their vote they did. The manager got beat by the community organizer. Grit and dirt won.
(5) The Republicans and conservatives have seeded the big media, big Hollyweird, big Music, big Education, big University, big union, and big Legal.
And they have seeded half the churches. Too many churches have fallen in love with the welfare state under misguided thoughts of gov’ment benies as charity. Really its a wonder that we win any elections!!!
And the horse that pulled their big wagon dropped dead from exhaustion.
Their solution to the problem will be to vote for a bigger whip to beat the dead horse with.
Pinochet 2016
Mr. Hanson:
As I’m readiing your piece, I’m thinking, “Please, please, please, don’t blame the weather.” But you did eventually.
The storm within the Republican party keeping us Ron Pauler’s out is much more powerful than Hurrican Sandy. That and the antideluvian platform making gays second-class citizens.
I was hoping for serious introspection from your loss and I get weather analysis. Get ready to lose in the mid-terms.
That was soooo stupid.
I have no interest talking about gays. Their sexual preferences do not interest me. No one in republican party or conservatives or tea party is talking about gays. What? We have solved all other problems? Balanced budget, entitlements, union out-of-this-world benefits? Was I asleep? When did that happened. Or when did liberals/democrats established a budget for entire country? 4 years – no budget.And there isn’t one in the making either.
Get ready loosing in midterms, you say? MORRON!!! Didn’t your mama teach you not to cut the branch you are sitting on???
Exactly!
Nothing makes the individual a second class citizen faster than poverty.
So ok, we audit the fed. Then what?
I love Ron Paul on about 60% of what he stands for. The rest? Who can explain where those thoughts comes from? His followers are mostly kooks. That explains why the establishment wants to shut them out.
Inspite of electing the Republicans to the House, it really doesn’t matter. John Bonehead was out there negotiating with himself, grovelling before the Marxist Media, while Barack left and went overseas.
The corrections will NOT COME OUT OF WASHINGTON. PERIOD! Its too corrupt and its beyond all hope. Put your new money into state elections and turn the rest of the conservative states completely red.
the best advice yet.
Washington is far far too broken to be fixable. Obama proves it.
But maybe our communities aren’t hopeless and maybe they can become the monasteries in the Dark Age.
I just wanted to talk about #9 “Beware the cocoon.”
During the election I thought Romney would win North Carolina and Florida while Obama would win Ohio and Pennsylvania. I wasn’t sure who was going to win, but I did say that whoever took Virginia would probably be the winner.
All in all, I was much more right than wrong. Whenever I wrote out my predictions I would have many people respond by saying “You idiot! Romney is going to win 300 electoral votes. He’s going to win in Colorado, Nevada, all the battleground states and maybe even Minnesota and New York”
Of course there is nothing wrong with sounding confident. I’ve seen candidates talk like they were going to win when they were down 20 points in the polls. But after the election I was shocked to discover that people meant it when they said Romney was sure to win and they were bewildered by the results.
So, who could have possibly seen this was going to happen? Almost every poll not named Gallup or Rasmussen called it pretty well. Nate Silver, a person I had barely heard of before the election, turned out to be just about spot on. Of course Romney’s supporters had nothing but scorn for his predictions before election day and nothing but hatred for him after. It seems as if some people think it’s anti-American to predict an Obama victory even if it was going to happen.
Of course I read everything I can. I read my local (very liberal) paper. I used to watch TV news for information before I realized that it was a waste of my time to try to find truth on my television. I read a lot of websites and blogs from Daily Kos to World Net Daily. I question everything, but I listen to all sides.
It seems the Romney campaign actually believed their own hype. This was a mistake. Their plans and actions were based on them leading rather than having to catch up. I don’t think it cost Romney the election (actually, I don’t think Romney was electable and I never did) but it might have been a bit closer if the campaign had been grounded in reality rather than wishful thinking.
A common liberal accusation against the right is that the right ignores every opinion but their own. The right will discard facts rather than change their minds and that when faced with evidence would rather attack the messanger than hear the message.
None of this is true of course, but the Romney campaign and the people who called for a Romney landslide gives liberals plenty of evidence that they’re right.
My only question is did the Romney campaign harm the GOPs chances to win the Senate or did the poor choice of Senate candidates hurt the Romney campaign? I never thought Romney would be elected, but I did think the Republican Party could win the Senate.
The latter is the case–and the proof is obvious:
In states where Republican candidates were running for the Senate, Romney got a larger share of the popular vote there than those GOP candidates did. Millions of Americans who voted for Romney, refused to vote for Akin, Mourdock, and other GOP Senate candidates.
So Romney didn’t drag down the GOP. Rather, some Republicans like Akin, Mourdock, and Santorum (with his dumb comments about how birth control makes it possible to have sex for fun, how awful is that), dragged down the entire GOP slate, Romney included.
The woman with her ebt card and new Honda is the flip side of the Marine General with his 100 billion dollar Osprey helicopter that doesn’t work. Obama’s genius was to spend and borrow without limit. Free money is a glorious thing.
What VDH learned from the election is that everything he’s always known is 100% right. If it weren’t for the Lame Stream Media, Romney would have won 330 electoral votes just like Fox News, Michael Barone and the rest of VDH’s friends predicted.
and this was just by the media “Instead he waded into a sudden fray where he was swarmed, mobbed, cut off, pulled off his magnificent steed, had his matchless armor yanked away by a mob of foot soldiers, and then, once stripped clean, was clubbed and maced beyond recognition”
I suspect, but do not know that Mitt Romney is a good man. But he was the wrong man at the wrong time, and his campaign was not very good. He may be a good executive but he was a lousy salesman. A President has to be both, he must sell his ideas. There were millions of voters who held Romney’s basic principles; he attract few. He let his opponents define him, in grotesque ways, in areas he could have countered with devastating results. He did not. He was caricatured as a rich old white guy, in a nation financially devastated by rich old white guys. He, and Catholic Paul Ryan were accused of attempting to prohibit birth control access to women. It was a lie; they simply did not want to force others to pay for it. They were accused as racists, black hating, Hispanic hating without a scintilla of evidence. But were convicted by millions of votes. Forty two Catholic and religious institutions are in court claiming the Obama Administration is violating the Constitution. Scores of bishops read letters from the pulpit, that religious freedom is in great danger. Romney was silent. The Catholic vote split, as it always has.
Obama spent $90 Billion among his buddies on green energy. The Republican energy white paper response was a puerile joke.
Anyone who has read on Fast & Furious knows of the corruption and incompetence in the highest levels of government. The MSM did not cover it. Romney said nothing. Most voters never heard of Fast & Furious.
Obama promised to close Gitmo as the first thing in office, a huge issue in the last campaign against Senator McCain. It is still open and we have yet to prosecute the inmates. We can not even call them terrorists. Romney said nothing.
The Democrats are famous for getting the vote out; their ground game, on election day, drowns Republican efforts.
Biden call Paul Ryan’s fiscal ideas, “Malarkey” to his face. Ryan has 40 points higher IQ than Biden and a decade of experience just said it was an Irish idiom. Biden’s grin won.
Basically a rich white guy got into a street fight with Chicago type election warriors, and got beat up. Some 3/4 of Democratic ads were negative. They were successful; they won. Congratulations to the Democrats.
The problem we Americans now face, IMHO, is that the best guy did not win. From Benghazi to Indian, others hold the same judgment, and they are killers. We face near term financial collapse, the cliff. Our energy infrastructure is junk status. And there is wide spread distrust, even hatred, of our central government; gun sales are skyrocketing. Our schools graduate ignorant people. The Post Office is bankrupt.
My usual screw up; the phone rang, and I can not type. I add a closing thought, for Democrats, Republicans and voters. No where is it written in stone that the USA is eternal. Every empire has collapsed. Many hold that ours is in serious decline. Samuel Johnson summarized our leaders position well,”..sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.”
Let us reason together.
Reagan did best when he waded in and confronted those who did not like him.
Reagan understood the true meaning of turning the other cheek. When an aggressor throws the first punch it is with his strongest side. By turning the cheek the target places himself in a position to counter the follow up blow from the weaker side with his own strengths. When done in the finest martial arts tradition the target can make a hulking aggressor look like a complete fool.
The left is open to just just tactics when they toss around their charges of racism, sexism and homophobia. The left talks endlessly of compassion but the urban enclaves they have controlled for decades not only house the worst of the underclass but are spiraling into bankruptcy because the corrupt marriage of overpaid under-accountable public employee unions and corrupt politicians need an undereducated and easy to manipulate voting block to stay in power. Using that against the left takes more than one speech before the NAACP. It requires making all those charges boomerang against the demagogues who toss them.
I cannot deal with this anymore. I have never felt so low and hopeless in my life about this country. I have not gone on Drudge, Lucianne or the Daily Mail since election night and I already do not have cable tv by choice. I have to just live my life daily and pray now. I live in California so I am in the deepest blue failing state around. People don’t even talk about Obama at all anymore. I saw no bumber stickers or house signs. I honestly thought we were going to win. I am really sad and just disillutioned with people who voted for Obama in general now.
I share your sentiments.
Look to your family and loved ones, and batten down the hatches. The storm that is about to engulf this nation will be historical, and what emerges on the other side is guaranteed to be unrecognizable from the one we grew up in.
A top-flight comprehensive article by VDH is accompanied by 52 (and counting) insightful comments with their responders bringing any needed corrections. What a day, this should begin the GOP’s 2014 and 2016 campaigns.
May I suggest one additional thing? This crucial correction would gain victory for Romney (and Senate candidates) even tho all other problems remained unsolved. Romney did not need to attempt more himself, his persona as above was sufficient- a decent and pious knight, on a fine horse, with impressive armor- enough for him to do. Romney’s task would be assuring us he loves America and will hold down government spending so the economy can grow. Romney’s big failure was excluding us from his quest, and also leaving the quest unexplained to outsider voters. In the end after all the other reasons, this caused his loss.
How could Romney include us, and in so doing take voters away from Obama? Romney and the Republicans needed to continue the policy discussions and agenda issues made large in the primary debates, a national teaching exercise funded by political PACs and our donations. First, the lightning rod Rick Santorum should be continually traversing the country until deep in September, explaining Obamacare and campaigning against it. On November 7 the citizens woke up to realize they forgot to vote against Obamacare because they were lulled into Obama versus Romney instead.
Other important policy campaigns were needed on the road separately from Romney’s presidential bid. Newt Gingrich should have been the Issues MVP on Energy Independence and Economic Recovery, campaigning nationally against Dodd-Frank and bad finance, for fracking and natural gas, against the state-planned economy and crony capitalism for rich democrats, against national debt and dependency, for national security and firm borders, for freedom and for inclusion of all Americans who want a fair chance at the good life.
Yes, Romney ran his campaign and he lost for us, for many reasons listed above including manufactured votes. Yet if the GOP and/or conservatives had kept Santorum and Gingrich on the road, campaigning against Obamacare and for a free American economy, then Romney wins the election with 300 electoral votes at minimum. Romney and the GOP failed to run as a team on offense and lost when loss is deadly harmful and not to be excused.
This is a long post. Let me point out that the Democrats DID use a team approach by Bill Clinton campaigning for all he represented, lending his strong points to Obama by associating with him, and of course by team play from the vast media. The Team Concept won against Mitt Romney, who did not include anyone, not really even Paul Ryan, in his team.
There are Americans on our team who don’t even know it, who never read Hanson, Mead, and PJMedia, who haven’t been gentled yet to listen to Limbaugh. We must take it to them, rally big crowds in their towns and cities and tell our message. If we compete as a team, then our team will beat their team and win the country for itself.
Great essay, Mr. Hanson, as usual. Just a quick comment for dejected conservaitves like me: Stop whining and watch what the democrats are doing. What’s their message: We care! Not lower taxes, not cutting social security, not cutting medicare. And where do they tout their message? On The View. On Entertainment Tonight, on The Pimp with a Limp radio show. You know…the shows that averge people actually watch and listen to. What’s the most popular site on the Web? The Huffington Post. Why? cause it has pictures of semi-naked women and celebrity gossip.
Wake up conservatives. You’re called out of touch because you act out of touch.
What an unbelievable waste of commentary. If I had a nickel for every word written in high-minded strategy/tactics/policy terms for why Romney lost….I could pay off the US debt…
The election was stolen; a product of vote-counting software rigged to flip just enough votes from Romney to Obama to assure victory in swing states. And the key to the whole scheme was to have polls tight on the weekend before the election. They were NOT going to be tight if honest, and that’s why Axelrod got Holder to threaten Gallup about 60 days before the election–the tight polls provided the cover for the fraud; otherwise, the people would rise up in rebellion at a more obvious incongruous result.
Think this is just tinfoil sour grapes stuff? Read “Master Plan to Steal an Election” at http://www.brushfires-of-freedom.com/steal-an-election.html It rings true–because it is.
Conservatives never lose. After the election your candidate is not conservative enough/a moderate/ inarticulate or some other excuse. You keep on losing the popular vote, and it is because of bias in the mainstream media. Meanwhile half of your electorate believes that Obama is not a citizen, that climate change is somehow a hoax, that the BLS reports were accurate when unemployment was high, but lies when it dropped to 7.8%, and finally they still believed in Rasmussen and (incredibly) Dick Morris when they predited a GOP victory. You live in your own world, and inconveniences such as science and overwhelming evidence of legitimate polling indicating an Obama victory were dismissed. Until you enter the real world, you will be seen for what you are: defenders of the rich at all costs
Sure. Obama’s wise leadership explains why the economy is booming, the deficit has never been smaller, gas prices are the lowest in history, democracy is growing in Egypt and Libya, and al Qaeda is no longer a threat to anyone – especially in Benghazi.
Oh, wait… uh… war on womyn … er … uh … Romney causes cancer … ah … free condoms … er … BUSH LIED ZILLIONS DIED!!
We conservatives don’t do a good job of explaining how conservatism as a philosophy differs from the GOP politicians, especially those in Congress.
Conservatism is NOT “for the rich at all costs.” It’s for free markets where a startup company formed with little venture capital and no income can eventually grow into a giant company and beat much larger and richer competitors.
Unfortunately, that’s not how many Republican politicians win election and re-election. They win by accepting contributions from super-rich bankers and hedge fund managers (cf. http://www.OpenSecrets.org), in return for which they protect the interests of those bankers and hedge fund managers.
Phil Gramm was one of the worst offenders.
This story is dead on but can be simplified.
The Dumbing Down of America may now be complete. With the re-election of the inexperienced community organizer instead of the seasoned well qualified business executive, it is abundantly clear that people have become addicted to free stuff in lieu of earning earning their living through honest work. Pushed aside are nagging issues such as the terrorist attack in Libya and the human cost involved with Fast and Furious. Accountability in this administration has been virtually nonexistent.
Another troubling point… It appears that many GOP voters stayed home and this tends to point to neocons and the religious right. If true, shame on all of them for enabling a path to darkness.
Never in my lifetime, and I’ve been around for 72 years, did either political party present two more qualified candidates than Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. Both were squeaky clean, very knowledgeable in their field and had a solid record of achievement. Yet, the public chose to retain the worst team ever even eclipsing that of Jimmy Carter for incompetence. At least Carter was somewhat honest while the current occupant of the White House has been a consistent liar that has fostered a culture of corruption which apparently has been accepted by the general public as the new normal.
That bright light that was shining to the path where this country might recover some of its past successes has now been extinguished which will lead to an uncertain future. Take for example that the appointment of one more activist Supreme Court justice who could ensure that all edicts and laws enacted by the administration would be found to be “constitutional.” This does not bode well for the young people who are inheriting a country ridden with spiraling debt in an insecure world. It also could mean an end to the two party system that managed to keep some sort of balance to counter an ever increasing division of opinion within the country.
Where this will all lead is something that I no longer wish to contemplate but I am thankful that I’m not one day younger than I am…
“Without Limbaugh, Hannity, Fox News, the Drudge Report, the conservative blogs, and the conservative dailies and magazine, the conservative cause would be lost. ”
….and there is the problem . What you didn’t learn from the election is that those named above are the main reason that the republican party is a dying entity.
No independent in their right mind would want to be associated with a party that cowtows to this group of hate merchants, yet here you are acting like they represent those who don’t vote democratic in elections.
IN fact they cater to the fringes of the right who will never ever ever get elected to any major political position because 90% of the country pretty much thinks they are nuts.
Once you stop listening to the uber right echo chamber, then maybe you’ll have a chance at the presidency, otherwise, get used to being marginalized – because that’s where you will all belong.
Yeah, because Chris Matthews is such a model of rationality…
You obviously don’t have personal knowledge of the content of this portion of the media but are only relying on what the MSM sources say about it.
I LOVE stories like this. # 9 says “Beware the cocoon” and yet… and yet…
There was a silly episode of Star Trek, The Next Generation where a holographic Professor Moriarty becomes sentient and demands to be allowed off the holodeck. He is fooled into thinking has has left the room, and the ship, when all along he was just inside a larger holographic program.
So long as you folks keep worrying about optics – like carboard armor with a fresh coat of enamel for your white knight – we will keep winning the popular vote.
Oh, and by the way, when you say the following “…given its small share of the electorate (e.g. 10%)…” two comments come to mind. That will grow as both the raw number of Latinos grows and the percentage of voters does as well, and you what really mean is “i.e.” – id est – and not “e.g.” – exempli gratia.
Professor of Latin, indeed!
Actually you’ll keep winning until the money runs out. Then you’ll lose. In fact we will all lose. So enjoy it while you can. I’ll think of you as the ship settles to the bottom.
And I don’t think i.e. is correct either. Just putting the number in brackets would suffice unless you wanted to indicate it was an approximate number. Then some modification could have been used (e.g. ~).
It’s hard to tell what your point is.
Other than condescension and attempting to sound smart.
You’re an Obama voter ?
That makes you ipso facto a moron.
Speaking of Latin.
No, that would be an example of prima facie, which makes YOU the moron. Quod Erat Demonstratum.
But thanks for playing.
Still trying to sound smart, I see.
It ain’t working.
Well I must say I am impressed of you. Speaking in a dead language while condescending to someone who can write a cogent piece of ideas. As well as showing an obvious approval in watching something unique devolve into something less than average.
Then again, not.
Hilarious–You pretty much described exactly why white male crybabies (aka the Republican party) are doomed as far as American politics are concerned, Victor (or should I call you vanquished?).
Three weeks after the main event and you people can’t seem to keep the smug in check anymore.
I marvel at anyone who might brag to have helped re-elect this incompetent guy and his largely corrupt cabal.
Bryan,
Not to worry. Always keeping perceived “fairness” in mind, your kind have arranged for ALL of us to be doomed.
I’m going to presume that you are young. Either that or you are foolish, so I’ll attempt to be charitable and assume young.
As I hit 50 this next month, I want to say “Thanks for all the free stuff that you’ll be giving me over the next 20-30 years”. You and your friends and all of your children will be paying for it over the next 50-70 years, and doing so at a much lower standard of living than I have enjoyed.
Actually, I believe it will all collapse within 6 years.
So if I’m right, we both lose.
If you’re right, I win and you lose.
I can afford your healthcare and your children’s education but I can’t afford your wars. And I certainly can’t afford paying for the rich guy who only pays taxes the year he runs for President (and GOPers wonder why we’re broke…geez).
If you think a prominent Republican target like Romney could get away without paying Federal taxes year after year, you fail to understand how the IRS works. That type of behavior is reserved for Democrat luminaries.
…the rich guy who only pays taxes the year he runs for President
You actually believe that ?
Over the course of his lifetime, Romney has paid more in taxes and given more to charity than the stingy Obamas and Joe Biden have ever dreamed about.
You’ve really fallen for the class warfare line. Barry pumped it and pumped it because he knew “the base” was ill educated enough to fall for it.
FYI, One year’s worth of new taxes on “the rich” (5% of whom already pay more than 40% of taxes) will keep yours and Barack’s government running for 8.5 days.
In other words, all this sound and fury about “raising taxes on the rich” amounts to a pittance when you consider the $16 trillion and the $6 trillion alone under Obama.
It does nothing to address the nation’s real fiscal instability, but it sells well, emotionally, to the base.
Obama ran in 2008 on Afghanistan as the “good war”. His approach to his “good war”, repeated promises of exiting,has the Taliban and sundry corrupt Islamists just waiting in the wings.
You have imbibed so much Kool Aid, Bryan. I don’t know whether re-education is even possible.
“I can afford your healthcare and your children’s education…”
Actually, no you can’t.
In fact, you can’t even afford your own math and economics education.
“YOUR wars”?
Feel free to step out anytime Bryan. Such as maybe Mexico or some other peace loving egalitarian society.
They are, “our wars”, we may not want them but your current secretaty of state voted to authorize both of the most recent 2.
Thanks for another brain dump on the details of what Obama has wrought, as well as your analysis.
It all boils down to a simple fact, it seems to me—
More and more Americans are failing to leave the nest. That is, over time society keeps on adjusting to increasing economic productivity by extending childhood, until as of now, apparently we’ve crossed the tipping point.
I highly doubt there’s any going back, despite all the high falutin word slinging going on by so-called “experts”, the political elites who have perches from which to tell us hoi polloi what THEY think.
I’m 70. My dad finished the 8th grade and at 14 joined the merchant marines in 1929. His sidekick, Red, at our meatmarket, was even less educated, and couldn’t add numbers. But, boy, could they work, and my father was actually very smart—my parents always believed I got my brains from him, and getting an MA in math always made them proud.
I’ll never forget how amazed dad was when I took higher algebra in grad school, when I was 23—he exclaimed, “Haven’t you already taken it three times?” And, to him, when I graduated at 24, he couldn’t help remembering that he’d ALREADY been working for ten years by then!
Fast forward to now.
Even compared to my day, it’s pretty obvious that what used to be a high school education in 1960 is now about the same as a college education in 2012–mostly, but of course not including hard sciences and math, etc.
I’ve long thought that the grade school education of my parent’s generation was pretty much the same as my high school one. One time I found some old homework papers from my uncle’s grade school, and they were as hard as my high school stuff.
In any case, especially with the information revolution continuing, with all the talk-talk-talk gadgets, etc, and the stagnant black “tribe” locked in a dysfunctional state, en mass, and the Hispanic problem, who can seriously expect the trend to change for the better?
No, no Nanette!
The even more dumbed down generation (than mine) coming up is totally ill prepared to cope with the great reckoning sure to happen before long.
Stick a pin anywhere on a world map, and there are probably serious problems happening there, and as they say—what can’t continue, won’t.
I’ve been recently reminded about the water problem, here in the USA. The Colorado River is being wasted on growing grains for cattle in places where it shouldn’t be used, and the consequences will be dire. Then there’s the growing catastrophe of drying up the aquifer under the great plains, another manifestation of fast food nation, basically.
Besides the plethora of Americans who THINK they are adults, but who act and VOTE like children, even the vast majority are meat eaters, and you can’t continue to maintain the whole chain of production of “corn fed” cattle, for example, with the incredible diversion of irrepacable water forever.
Yes—mankind might well be about to go through a big wrenching change.
As you always remind us—hubris is timeless, and nemesis inevitable.
Bon appetit!
I enjoyed your post.
“The even more dumbed down generation (than mine) coming up is totally ill prepared to cope with the great reckoning sure to happen before long.”
Absolutely. The next generation, some yet to be born, will have to be tougher and more astute than their elders in order to survive. They will not honor them or hold them in high regard, but its to be expected.
Even compared to my day, it’s pretty obvious that what used to be a high school education in 1960 is now about the same as a college education in 2012–mostly, but of course not including hard sciences and math, etc.
Absolutely (I graduated in 1964). It’s the reason so many employers want a college degree even when one isn’t technically necessary. A degree offers hope that the applicant is at minimum literate and numerate if not actually educated. A high school diploma guarantees nothing. In fact, a high percentage of high school graduates who go on aren’t in the least bit prepared for college level work and must spend considerable time remediating. Once upon a time, a high school graduate could take an entry level position, learn on the job and rise to levels that today require degrees. That’s how adequate to the task a high school education once was. No more. We’ve been systematically dumbed down. Perhaps a liberal progressive could explain why that is.
Yes, we’re screwed.
The Republicans will never win another national election until they adopt exactly the same tactics as the Democrats: anoint a single candidate as a messiah and confront the electorate with a single set of pre-programmed talking points. The diversity of opinion in this thread alone, while it might once have been representative of a “healthy ferment of ideas” from which “unifying messages” backing consensus candidates might emerge, is no longer a viable model for the future.
If this is what VDH “learned” from the election, and a majority of his Republican brethren took away similar lessons, then the Republican party is certainly doomed to 40 years in the desert. Continuing the tantrums and self-pity, with amplification by the right-wing corporate media, will turn off more and more Americans each cycle, reducing the party to an angry, incoherent shell. Not the worst that can happen for the rest of us!
E pluribus duum.
“That was soooo stupid.
I have no interest talking about gays. Their sexual preferences do not interest me. No one in republican party or conservatives or tea party is talking about gays.”
Skydiver,there’s your problem. That’s why you’re going to lose in the mid-terms. My gay sister and sister-in-law’s civil rights don’t interest you. When this middle class white gun nut was forced to chose between his 2A rights and the civil rights of his family, he chose the latter. Yes, it is more important than the economy.
But hey, you’re soooo smart. If the R’s can’t get me to vote for them, they are doomed.
Which civil rights of your gay sister are being violated?
Joseph,
Gay marriage isn’t the end point of the movement. It is a significant step in the dismantling of all our values. Think I am exaggerating?
- This year in California a Senate Bill included a provision to allow students to determine their own gender, from moment to moment, and based on how they felt at that time they would use whichever locker room and shower they liked.
- California had a bill on the Governor’s desk ( had passed both the Senate and the Assembly) to allow 3 parents for a child. Each one would have exactly the same legal rights.
Marriage is the basis for many, many other laws and legal rulings. You pay attention and see if gay marriage is the end state, or simply a significant stepping stone to other agendas.
Wow! Another navel gazer worried about his navel gazing friend/relative.
It is a dream of mine to be there at the point when the gaze is averted from imward to outward and the narrow minded come to the realization that the building is falling down and they have misplaced their hammer from lack of use.
The Democrats policies that have reduced the Black Race to welfare bondage, with a high crime rate, anti-education, high school drop out rate, high breeding rate, high gang joining rate, high homicide rate, etc. and the most dependable Democrat voters is not a accident!
The Illegal Hispanic,s that Democrats love so much, share and exceed many if not most of the worse characteristics as the blacks, in other words they have the prefect profile for a Welfare Democrat voter!
Normal people thinks no one would be diabolic and sick enough to purposely use policies to reduce the Nation and its population to a state of Poverty, Crime, Misery and Corruption, but you would be wrong!
That is exactly the Democrat plan for this Nation!
The more Democrats can decrease Education achievement,, Reasoning ability and increase the Liberal idealogy, Poverty, Welfare and the Entitlement mentality the more Democrat voters they make and the closer they get to a Third World Socialist Food Stamp Paradise controlled Lock, Stock and Barrel by the Democrat party!
The last piece to achieve their goals is nearly in place. Amnesty for the 12 to 30 million criminals and uneducated invading Illegal Aliens. That with chain Immigration for the ones still left in Mexico and Latin American and with a Prolific breeding rate will assure a Democrat majority forever and a Third World Slum here of Crime, Corruption, Poverty and Misery modeled on Mexico and controlled by the Socialist/Democrat party of Northern Mexico!
It is all about Power, Control and the Democrat party and how to use lies, false compassion and the people,s tax money, to achieve their Sick and Treasonous goals!
I never thought I’d live long enough to see my country commit suicide. It’s a depressing sight.
The GOP has now lost the popular vote in 5 out of the last 6 elections. And yet, articles like this persist. Articles which blame everybody else and don’t address the fundamental fact that people are not buying what the Republican Party is selling.
If no one wants what you’re selling, is it your customers’ fault? Or is it your brand?
Anyway, here’s a few newsflashes for you, since you’re still clearly living in Fantasy Land:
1) Mitt Romney was a bad candidate. Most Americans thought he came off as smug, arrogant, and entitled. He also couldn’t open his mouth without offending entire countries or whole segments of the population. Why would we want a to listen to a president like that for four years just because YOU want a tax cut?
2) The country has changed dramatically. Nixon and Reagan perfected the Southern Strategy of appealing to disgruntled white male voters. That strategy worked a little too well. The GOP has now become… wait for it… the party of disgruntled white male voters. The problem for the Republicans is that disgruntled white males are no longer the largest group in the country.
3) Your side needs to lighten up on the tone of things. Calling the president a “socialist” or repeatedly referring to the Democratic Party as the “Democrat Party” may make you feel better, but it’s lousy p.r. The Republicans of today come across as just as cranky and ineffective as the Democrats of 1970′s and 80′s.
I don’t really care if the Republican Party gets its act together or not. The GOP hasn’t run a decent national candidate since Reagan (or McCain, Version 1, in 2000). If you move to the center on social issues and silence the cranks like Limbaugh (and most of the comment-makers on here), you’ll have a shot at my vote again. If not, you won’t. Don’t bother criticizing me in the comment-section. Any fool can call someone names. I’m more interested in hearing new ideas.
Ronald Reagan was the last Republican to have an interesting, new idea. Too bad that was 32 years ago.
Here’s some new ideas for you. Tax everyone according to their net worth. Tax any government worker or their spouse or children who become lobbyists at 50% of their income plus a tax on their net worth. Kill ALL government subsidies. Eradicate all tax deductions except for charitable giving. Disband the fed dept of education and return all power of education policy to the states. Pass a law that all regulations promulgated by the EPA must be approved by Congress. Institute ‘loser pays’ nation wide. Means test social security and medicare. Consolidate all duplicative departments within the federal government. I could go on and on.
You’re right. Those are definitely new ideas. Get the GOP to adopt them and let’s put them into the Marketplace of Ideas. If people like them, they will eventually become the law of the land.
If you’re a Democrat, you have to welcome this cranky crap.
You know, I remember, before Pajamas media, when I respected some of the writers that are now here (such as VDH) – but they’ve all turned into crazy cranks.
This little virtual world they’ve built themselves is bad for their brains. They were already nuts before the midterms, but the midterms didn’t help. Everyone seemed to have taken the wrong lesson from it.
No one here can take the truth but it is:
1) The tea party is poison
2) the Birchers you stole your paranoid rants from are poison
3) the Ryandians are poison
4) those RINOS that you spend all your time excommunicating were responsible and respectable and the sane part of the public wants them back.
Joshua “Scholar” {snicker}
I’ve never found you terribly bright or perceptive but I have found you incredibly smug. Since you won the election, let me give you a piece of advice for free. Don’t get too cocky.
Whether you realize it or not, winning this election isn’t going to make your life better. It’s going to get far worse. So like rooting for your championship football team who just won the state title, you attending the same school doesn’t mean you suddenly woke up anything but still loser and moron.
This country is going down the tubes and your man Obama will help expedite its demise. Imbeciles like you are going to feel it sooner or later. Trust me “Scholar”, you’re far from bullet proof. And if being like you is what it takes to win an election, then I choose to be on the losing side every time.
+1 Tex !
Steve,
Go buy a Twinkee or a Ding Dong
You are the classic know it all who is going to find out the hard way that image and labeling rarely if ever indicates the true quality of the meal prepared for mass consumption.
Can you explain that Reagan southern strategy? I think if my memory serves me well Reagan won every state but 1 or 2 in his relection in 1984.
Today, the south is growing while your liberal rust belt states are deindustrializing. Caterpillar is exiting Illinois as fast as it can. They have a southern strategy. Hostess is out of business. Bimbo the largest bakers in North America are shutting down operations in California and opening the largest production facility in North America in Texas. More southern strategy.
So you thought Romney was smug? You are offended by the word socilaist?
How do you miss Obama’s smug attitudes?
My 95 year old father, a person I will bet you look down at when he stands in line at the store fumbling for his exact change, reminds me daily that these times look just like those depressing days of his youth and coming of age before he entered the service. If you had a job, at least you didn’t have to stand in line. But there wasn’t much either unless you were well connected.
Obama, although I am quite sure you don’t know it, has not one single new idea. He is a mere regurgitation of old FDR and LBJ ideas that never produced any lasting prosperity. Obama and the current “DEMOCRAT” ideology is nothing more than the clap trap class warfare from the begining of the progressive movement.
So when you hear socialist, and become offended, why do you ignore the names hurled from your “democrat” party. You know, fat cats, capitalist corporate raiders, the 1 %, exploiters of the environment and workers, you didn’t build that?
Finally on smugness and the direction of the republican party.
Are you aware that the phrase “You Didn’t Build That” came from senator elect Elizabath Warren. She ousted the most liberal republican senator in the caucus. Scott Brown voted with democrats quite often. He got along to just get along. Now he must move along.
As for being smug. Success breeds a certain attitude that to the less than enlightened appears smug.
Just what is that makes Obama smug? I don’t see any success be it economics or foreign policy. I suppose growing the government to a point where it is no longer sustainable is a certain sign of success? This country is hurting in many areas you choose to ignore, yet he remains smug. Why?
I know why Obama and the democratics remain smug. Because there is a never ending supply of uninformed voters such as yourself who vote less on ideas and acomplishment and more on labels and images.
I have not read an article this whiny in a long, long time. How embarrassing for the author.
….said the whiny illiterate troll.
Let me guess. You cut your teeth on Cliffs Notes.
The minute the Republicans gain enough power, we should shut down the entire entitlement system, all in one go. Obamacare proved it doesn’t matter whether it is popular or not, as long as you get it across the finish line. Once the administrators have been fired and the lists purged, it will be years before the left could rebuild it.
Frankly, I suspect after people get a taste of life on the outside, they won’t be to terribly interested in going back on the dole. And, even if they aren’t, its still the softest landing they’re likely to see.
All this Monday morning quarter-backing and finger-pointing with no reference to Socialism. The Democrat leadership outlaws the use of the word and their yellow dog propaganda corps comply because it is important the faithful sheep see themselves as compassionate seekers of justice for the victims of the foul oppression of greedy businessmen. At least 50% of those who voted for Obama would be offended if you pointed out to them they had voted for Socialism.
The Democrats won because they never had to defend themselves against the very easily provable charge of a fundamentally Socialist policies and practices. TheAxelrod team kept Romney on the defense against allegations of capitalist greed and disregard for the impoverished, when he should have been keeping them off balance, desperately trying to make the case that they were not Socialsts like the Europeans. We enter a second term of overt effort to transform thrUSA into a Socialist Republic with a revised Constitution more reflective of the Communist Manifesto than our Bill ofRights. The guilt lies entirely with a sclerotic, contemptible, gutless GOP.
The Democrats policies that have reduced the Black Race to welfare bondage, with a high crime rate, anti-education, high school drop out rate, high breeding rate, high gang joining rate, high homicide rate, etc.etc. and the most dependable Democrat voters is not a accident!
The Illegal Hispanic,s that Democrats love so much, share and exceed many if not most of the worse characteristics as the blacks, in other words they have the prefect profile for a Welfare Democrat voter!
Normal people thinks no one would be diabolic and sick enough to purposely use policies to reduce the Nation and its population to a state of Poverty, Crime, Misery and Corruption, but you would be wrong!
That is exactly the Democrat plan for this Nation!
The more Democrats can decrease Education achievement, Reasoning ability and increase the Liberal idealogy, Poverty, Welfare and the Entitlement mentality the more Democrat voters they make and the closer they get to a Third World Socialist Food Stamp Paradise controlled Lock, Stock and Barrel by the Democrat party!
The last piece to achieve their goals is nearly in place. Amnesty for the 12 to 30 million criminals and uneducated invading Illegal Aliens. That with chain Immigration for the ones still left in Mexico and Latin American and with a Prolific breeding rate will assure a Democrat majority forever and a Third World Slum here of Crime, Corruption, Poverty and Misery modeled on Mexico and controlled by the Socialist/Democrat party of Northern Mexico!
It is all about Power, Control and the Democrat party and how to use lies, false compassion and the people,s tax money, to achieve their Sick and Treasonous goals!
You are blatantly completely correct.
What the rats don’t know and can never know is they are puppets. To my mind the irrationality and suicidal behavior of ‘american socialists’ is the greatest proof yet in my life and these times that there is indeed a great powerful spirit moving behind the scenes to destroy mankind. Jesus says there is and that was good enough for me but now I see it with my own eyes plainly.
Thank you, Mr. Hanson, for proving that “Intelligent Conservative” is NOT an oxymoron.
Of course it’s not an oxymoron. What a peculiar thing to say.
We can come back from the 47%’ers. My own state was started by socialists during a heavily progressive era. It is also filled with a minority that was once heaviy subsidized by the fed. government. In this state, it was once more than 47% dependant on federal subsidies.
After moving here, I asked friends what changed the state into the most conservative voting in the nation. To a man/woman, they all said the Billy Graham crusade in the late 50′s. Changing man’s soul changes his view of dependancy. It makes a man want to be the best he can as he journeys along serving God. Some will laugh, others will think that too simplistic, but my friends methodically made the case to my scholatic, legal mind.
Change the hearts of people through Christ and you will change their actions and levels of responsibility. The further we travel from our faith in Christ as a nation, the more irresponsibility we can expect.
Amen.
Unfortunately it would appear that the time is up. The harvest has come in. We are now in the great apostasy and that is the most observable and irrefutable sign. Nevertheless, we should continue our work on His command to make believers of men up till the last minute.
Romney was a fine candidate and one I enthusiastically supported in the primaries and the general election. Strangely, he and Hillary Clinton have a strange thing in common. Both lost to O because of proportional primaries.
Hillary would have locked up the Dem nomination in 2008 right around Super Tuesday had there been a winner-take-all system in place. Instead, the Dems have a proportional delegate apportioning system that divides delegates along voting districts. On top of that, there is an interesting kind of affirmative action that takes place. Nominally purposed as a way to reward loyal black voters, majority black voting districts in many of the Dem primary states are “weighted.” Take Pennsylvania for example. Clinton won by an overwhelming margin in a Scranton district and got one delegate. A majority black voting district of comparable population size was carried overwhelmingly by BHO. He got three delegates out of it. Loyalty, schmoyalty, this practice is obviously meant to produce more African-American delegates for states at the national Dem convention. Even though HRC cleaned O’s clock in PA in 2008, she only netted about 10 to 15 more delegates than her opponent. Same thing in Ohio. That was among the many miscalculations of Mark Penn, that and essentially ceding caucus states. It’s actually kind of funny that Obama won the nom on the strength of winning caucuses in states like Idaho, Alaska and Kansas. States he was destined to lose by lop-sided margins in the general election.
Romney suffered by the GOP adopting some of the same proportional delegate madness the Dems have. Had all of the primaries been winner-take-all from beginning to end, MR would have wrapped things up long before he did.
While Mitt was an excellent fundraiser, he didn’t have a bottomless source of money. It has now been revealed that the campaign was in a bad way in the late stages of the primaries and had to take a loan. Combine that with the regulations about not spending general election cash until the guy was the nominee, he simply couldn’t start fighting the ad war early enough to combat what his fall opponent was doing months and months before the election.
That is something that we have to make sure does not come to pass in 2016. The first step would be to kiil proportional primaries. The guy, or gal, with the most votes gets all the marbles. If a strong candidate catches fire and racks up the wins, it chases the weaker ones out of the field faster, because they have no delegates and little prospect of overcoming the leader, hence will have little ability to keep raising cash and maintaining a campaign.
Though I greatly admire Romney, we must make sure that the standard-bearer next time has a rapport with the average voter. Sean Trende and others have reported some 7-8 million working-class whites didn’t show up at the polls on Nov. 6. Something of that nature is deadly to our chances of being elected, especially when it occurs in states like Florida, Ohio and Virginia.
Add to that the fact that Obama garnered, according to one source, 4 out of every 10 white votes, our side cannot afford to have so many sitting at home on election day.
Ours is not really a center-right country; the RNC needs to accept this as fact & act accordingly. This means hunting for new voters AWA swing voters & minorities.
Voters used to pick their politicians. Contemporary political technology allows politicians to pick their voters. Barack Obama either had more voters to pick in the first place, or his campaign did a better job of picking them. For a couple of decades, political technology has kept the two parties more or less even. With huge and growing blocks of “minority” voters all deciding to vote “all one way” that era may be over. Unless bloc voting by minorities forces ever more whites to do the same. If the Republicans find a new position, one that is more nationalist and labor oriented, that might happen. This kind of racial polarization of the electorate is a little frightening. But it may be inevitable. That, or one party rule.
Bloc voting by minorities is NOT inevitable.
In the 1950s, Eisenhower got roughly half of the black vote. Even Nixon got about 40% of the black vote in 1960.
In 2004, Bush got about 42% of the Hispanic vote.
The GOP today is allowing bloc voting by minorities, when it writes them off as unreachable. It doesn’t even make a halfway serious attempt to run candidates in minority districts. It doesn’t advertise on black or Hispanic or Asian media.
So the Dems keep winning those minorities by default.
While the GOP keeps counting on winning elections with white votes.
And with every passing year, that gets harder and harder, as minorities keep increasing their share of the electorate.
BARACK OBAMA: FROM BEGINNING TO END. Rear view shows what we can expect in future. Intelligent people across the country are asking out loud whether another presidential term for Barack Obama actually will be as bad as we expect it to be. Unfortunately, it probably will be. Because he was as horrible, as disdainful of the … READ MORE: http://bwcentral.org/2012/11/barack-obama-from-beginning-to-end/
The balkanization campaign run by the democrats could very well be self-defeating. Usually the various groups begin fighting amongst themselves over the spoils. This has already started per this article from a black guy in the Washington Post essentially asking “where’s mine?”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/therootdc/post/president-obama-an-open-letter-from-black-america/2012/11/08/800ac31e-29b3-11e2-b4e0-346287b7e56c_blog.html
That said, since we can’t send Americans to re-education camps, the center-right needs to begin a campaign NOW, well before the next presidential election in 2016 to demonstrate how the economic and social policies of the left have failed us. The evidence is clear. If the various outside groups supporting Republicans had any sense they would do what Obama is doing now – campaigning for his ideas.
11> You reap what you sow. When you treat a very popular candidate (Ron Paul) in a shoddy way, you disinterest his voting base, who will just sit at home, write in Dr. Paul, or vote libertarian. The GOP deserves what they got after the way Paul’s delegates were treated in Tampa, as well as the way the talk radio attack dogs treated him. Unfortunately, I don’t necessarily believe that the US deserves what we got. This was a major fail by Neocons desperate to keep power.
Enjoy your power grab boys! You shafted a Constitutionalist and ended up with nothing.
Has anyone figured out what the election would have bee like if you included only people who paid a federal income tax?
I’ve long posited that political participation rates would be within spitting distance of 100 percent if we simply abolished tax withholding. There would be no such thing as socialism, or any of the other nonsense the Gimmedat Party continually spouts, if the law required taxpayers to cut a monthly, quarterly or annual check to the IRS. Withholding was Step One in the socialists’ long campaign to keep the American people fat, drunk, stupid and, most importantly, apathetic.
We have a problem with immigration from low income countries for two reasons. On the one hand, the Democrats do want to encourage low income immigrants who will become dependent on government programs, because they see them as future Democratic voters. On the other hand, Republican business and farm owners also encourage immigration because they want cheap labor. If those low paid workers turn to government for things like health care, big business and agriculture see government as a way to externalize costs. They may complain about the taxes that result, but first they want the cheap labor, then they seek ways not to pay the resulting taxes, or to push the tax burden off on other payers.
Victor David Hansen complains that liberals are all racists, and then not two paragraphs later complains about pre-emptive assumptions that all conservatives are racists.
What the point of him getting all those degrees if he doesn’t even notice that hypocrisy, and if what flows from his mouth is such excrement, such blindly transparent contradiction, and such wounded out-of-touch idiocy, undermining any thoughtful analysis in the rest of the piece? But go on Victor, having offended the majority of your reading audience with your sudden tirade on racism, the 95% of those of us employed here in America who actually WORK for a living would just love to hear who you think we would relate to.
Your logic: VDH says group “A” adds 2 + 2 and gets five, and then not two paragraphs later complains that group “A” pre-emptively assumes that 1 + 3 also equals five. In other words, group A can’t think straight, because it believes too many lies… so many lies, that logic is broken in the telling of them.
Group “A” in this case, are progtards calling all thinkers who don’t think their way: racists, a thing that not insignificantly, actually makes them the racists.
ShadowSD, VDH is in essence saying that the bartender who tells his customer to watch out for other bartenders who water down the libations served, is the one naturally guilty of watering down the cocktails he serves in brazen delight.
Capiche?
You see ShadowSD,
VDH does not revert, or lower himself down, to the level of ejaculating pejoratives (i.e. “what flows from his mouth is such excrement…”) Um, you did that, not he.
The bible explains it this way, “This is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth and says, ‘I’ve done nothing wrong.” Proverbs 30:20, NIV
Perhaps truth is what offends you, ShadowSD. I bet referring to a bible verse offended you! Did it?
Well, in the movie Camelot, King Arthur’s friend said something like “The uglier the truth, the truer the friend who brings it to you.” (And Jesus said, Blessed are they who are not offended in me. Matthew 11:6)
You see, ShadowSD, VDH represents the Old School of “getting all those degrees.” His work consists of at least a dozen of highly proclaimed books, and thoughtful essays produced for various publications each and every week. That and speaking engagements and lecture tours. But perhaps you “pre-emptively assumed” otherwise?
Keep reading, dear ShadowSD. You, like myself back in the day, like so many of us… were sub-taught and misguided. In fact, VDH admits as much about his prior-to-Greek-understanding-of-the-West: mis-directed public school education.
We all can do better, ShadowSD. Think, and carry on… and don’t be too upset with yourself if you grow here and there. Growing causes pain, and pain can be real. Like the knowledge you owe our friend VDH an apology.
You mean that VDH PROVES you progressives are virulent racists and you can’t deal with the reality of it….
Your troll is weak, son. :-)
I see a dissonance here: during primaries Romney did not shy away from negative adds and fighting dirty with fellow repubs (particularly Gingrich), but he refused to do so in an election.
Why?
On a debate floor he did not put the moderator-turned-advocator in her place and refused to go after Obama for the blood of 4 people.
Why?
During entire campaign Romney repeatedly called Obama a “good man” as if being a “good man” solely qualifies one to be a president and never forcefully describe how present policies affect everything.
Why?
May be because the election was fixed behind the scene through an unpublished agreement within the establishment and Romney just played designated role?
It is probably not true, but it is hard to find simpler and better explanation.
Dear Grrr,
Well, the school playground answer is that a Bully beats up lessers, but turns into a Wimp upon meeting a bigger Bully.
Whereas a true Hero can neither be beaten into acting like a Wimp, nor when victorious does he make those he defeats into Wimps. (The Bully-Slayer is a rare find. A true man of war. A poet, like Lincoln. Big hearted. A lion. He actually can turn the Bullies he defeats from their fallen Zombification, into true human beings: Into the converted allies of good!))
Romney sort of made all the other Republican nominees for President appear to be Wimps he beat up. (This was a sign!) But it is undeniable, from a certain perspective, that Chicago-counseled Obama is the Bigger Bully. So he turned Romney into a Wimp.
I rather like the story line of Captain America. Prior to his transformation into a Superhero, when chauffeured around NYC, he pointed out all the places and alleys and corners where he had been beaten up (but not turned into a Wimp.)
Later, when asked if he wanted to kill Nazis (this was during WWII, of course) the proto Captain America said, “I don’t want to kill anyone. I just don’t like bullies.” That’s the right answer, the right spirit, the spirit missing from 2012.
Next time, we need to find a real bully-slayer. A real one.
“Which civil rights of your gay sister are being violated?”
Buckeye Abroad:
She can’t marry her partner in Ohio; I can. If I am permanently injured, my wife can make end-of-life decisions for me. Her partner can’t.
Thats not a civil right issue. She can giver her lover a power of attorney and make her a trustee/receipient of her assets upon her death. See a lawyer about making a will.
You really based your vote, despite all the other more important issues facing the nation, on your sisters homosexuality? Oy.
“…assumed that he could win a joust in a fair charge against the other team’s knight.”
But where did Romney ever get such a crazy idea? Hasn’t he been in this world for the last decades or more?
“Instead he waded into a sudden fray where he was swarmed, mobbed, cut off, pulled off his magnificent steed, had his matchless armor yanked away by a mob of foot soldiers, and then, once stripped clean, was clubbed and maced beyond recognition.”
You mean, he was surprised by this???
Especially knowing that the O had failed in his first term — he didn’t know they’d pull out every lie, every dirty trick that they possibly could — including slandering him?
I knew they would — I’m just an ordinary person — not a “pol.” Why wouldn’t Romney and his team know that?
This sense of unreality about what they will be facing in elections seems to be a disease that’s going around with Republican cadidates.
They ought to over-estimate the nastiness that will be coming at them and be prepared for the absolute worst — not underestimate the possibilities.
I disagree.
If Romney had run the PERFECT campaign, he still would have lost.
He came to the fight well prepared and already highly experienced – which is why he utterly destroyed Obama in the first debate. His ad campaign was excellent – it was the kind of campaign that Reagan used to win two terms.
The simple fact is that the electorate has changed. It’s not centrist or center-left – it’s decidedly leftist. It’s an electorate that believes their rights come from the government, and the government is there to help them like a parent would.
The America our parents and grandparents knew and built is dead. The nation is utterly and irretrievably insolvent in both the public and private sectors, in addition to being morally and ethically bankrupt. Because of this, both parties will soon become irrelevant, as they will inevitably share the blame for the apocalypse that is unfolding.
What makes me afraid is what is likely to replace the two parties.
Some think the Tea Party will rise up and put the nation back on a square footing. I’m a tea partier myself and believe my fellow tea’ers have the right attitude and ideas. But the Tea Party doesn’t actually exist except as a very loose fabric. Those who crave power will be far better prepared and organized to exploit the coming anarchy, and their goals will be the complete opposite of what the Tea party desires.
I give the Union at best a 50/50 chance of surviving intact over the next two decades.
Sad but true. That’s more or less what happened.
I’d add that Obama was a better talker and more adept at convincing people that he was their friend. So many times during the campaign coverage I was wondering if Romney had read a book by Frank Luntz or any of the others on rhetoric. Romney couldn’t be that friend you never knew you had like Obama could.
“Without Limbaugh, Hannity, Fox News, the Drudge Report, the conservative blogs, and the conservative dailies and magazine, the conservative cause would be lost. But with that said, do not quite believe the mainstream media is dead because the New York Times or Washington Post is nearly insolvent or the print version of Newsweek will shortly be defunct. ”
Victor,
I read you daily, and when I do I test my quotidien musings against your scholastic posts, but…
You continue to exempt Academe from your media critique. Education = media. Ask the University of Washington’s regents what purpose the state U’s “media center” serves and you’ll get my point. If a university publishes, it is media. If it’s professors pontificate, it’s media. If a curriculum re-presents movies, books and correspondences to “students,” it is media.
I say it’s high time we stopped exculpating academia every time we criticize “media.” Academia IS media. Period. There is no line between the two, just as the distinction between “documentary” and “fiction” has been blurred. I’d like this realization to perturb Academia. Your continued denial of it only lends spurs to the media that rides us!
Wow. It is VERY hard, if not impossible, to square the man who wrote “The Other Greeks” with the man who wrote this, because the man who wrote this is living in a blinkered reality, filtering out whatever hard facts contradict his fantasy.
Dr. Hanson, it’s pretty clear the only thing you see with 20-20 vision is the ancient past.
The psychological defense mechanism you’re using is called “projection”, son. You’re projecting your pathologies onto someone else who is making you feel insecure.
Perhaps a long, honest look in the mirror is what you need, kiddo. If you can bear to gaze upon your own reflection, that is…