A Ten-Step Reset Regimen for the President
I offer a ten-step healing program for our president in the spirit of our therapeutic age.
I am trying to be disinterested here, with no particular interest in what follows of either seeing his recovery in the polls, or even watching them sink further. My aim is only to point out how and why he is turning off thousands by the day.
1) Impose a moratorium on all the racial talk. After the beer summit, the “stupidly,” the “stereotyping,” the “cowards,” the Van Jones rants, the “wise Latina,” the suing Arizona, the exempting the Black Panthers, the al-Qaeda-as-racists (e.g., nine years after 9/11 we at last have a reason to really hate these terrorists), etc., we get the message that race permeates the presidential worldview — and that all issues, from those of terrorism to policing to immigration to the environment, are seen largely through racial us/them lenses. This obsession has turned off an increasing multi-racial nation, and is reaching the point of caricature. Take a deep breath, Mr. President, and promise to go through one day without self-referencing yourself as black, without speaking to an identity-politics group, and without reviewing the American past in terms of race. Just one day …
2) I’d quit the golf for a while — and for two reasons. The left made the argument that golf is an aristocratic waste of time, our version of upper-class fox-hunting, as a perquisite to the narrative of a carefree Bush — alligator shirt, shades, bright slacks, colorful cap, swanky loafers — on the links while the country was mired in crises. OK, we got that message. And so now, fairly or not, a polo-shirted Obama putting around amid the spill, two wars, and depression-like economics seems, well, narcissistic and self-indulgent. And whereas Bush quit teeing off, Obama won’t, and has already trumped in 18 months his predecessor’s aggregate links outings. Will we hear a “Bush did it” on golf too — as if the evil W. cleverly created a paradigm in which presidents are now forced to play golf when they should not? Try bowling instead.
3) Don’t make any more appointments. Simply quit while you’re behind. These offices are better left unfilled. After Van Jones, Anita Dunn, Steven Chu, Hilda Solis, Eric Holder, Charles Bowden, and Donald Berwick, we got the message already: Illegal immigration is OK; farming is not. We are all racial cowards and should feel bad; Muslims in contrast should be made to feel good. Redistribution is good — Mao was even better; and George Bush was in on 9/11. In short, Obama is incapable of not appointing someone who is both hard left and unhinged in his expression of such ideology. It would be safer simply not to plant these figurative liberal land mines, since they will all inevitably go off at one time or another. Empty seats are better than empty suits.
4) With all due respect and in complete candor, I would not send Michelle Obama out anymore. After the “downright mean country,” “never been proud of my country before,” and “raise the bar” tropes of the campaign, we thought she would, as did past first ladies, speak about literacy, or her own interest in curbing childhood obesity. But now she’s been unfettered twice on the political circuit: once to speak on behalf of Sonia Sotomayor when she immediately went into a “poor me” riff on how hard it is to go to Princeton on a full ride (“And for me, the voices came from people who at first told me, ‘Don’t bother applying to Princeton, not a school like that,’ because they said I’d never get in. Then when I got in, they told me not to go because I wouldn’t be able to compete against students who would be more prepared. And then when I decided to attend, they told me that I shouldn’t go to a school so far away from home because I would have a hard time making friends; I would feel out of place and I wouldn’t make it through. Voices of people sowing seeds of doubt in my head.”). And now she revs up the NAACP on the eve of its slander against the tea party movement. Fairly or not, the image of the first lady is of someone who vents deep-seated anger, partly over her own unease that she has not quite earned her laurels, partly as a way to enhance career advancement. In short, if one were worried about the president’s tendencies to blame others, sending Michelle out is homeopathic quackery.
5) Just do not mention America in the abstract anymore. After 18 months, we know that the president simply cannot reference our founding without a “but.” He seems to have forgotten that 600,000 killed each other or died 150 years ago over slavery. The Argonne, Okinawa, and Inchon are not in his lexicon. Nor is the greatest economy and defender of freedom in civilization’s history. Edison, Bell, the Wright Brothers — they might as well be Martians. If it is a question — and it sadly always is — between evoking America as dropper of atomic bombs, genocidal hegemon, enslaver, racist, anti-Muslim, etc., and not evoking America at all, then please stay quiet. Our grandmothers tried to teach us: “If you can’t say something occasionally nice, then don’t say anything at all.” He should heed that. A simple truth that we all learned in kindergarten escaped Barack Obama: America’s sins are simply those of all humankind; but only in America is the sprit of self-critique and collective betterment such that we daily strive to address and solve our innately human shortcomings rather than accept them or give into them. Instead, Obama seems to have been taught that if America alone is not perfect, then it is essentially not very good. Millions of us wince now when the president starts in on the U.S. in the abstract, since we know anything positive will always be qualified by “nevertheless,” “however,” “yet,” and “but.”
6) Either stop living up the good life or stop demonizing others who do. OK — if you believe Vegas is bad, doctors are greedy limb-loppers, insurance people are con artists, and the tea partiers unwholesome “tea-baggers,” then please no more jetting around on your private jumbo jet in times of economic crisis. Don’t serve aristocratic meals and bring in celebs for private shows. In short, the president is figuratively trying his best to talk of two nations and still live in John Edwards’s house, to lecture down in the fashion of Al Gore from his nice energy-guzzling nest, and to be a John Kerry man of the people from 11 estates. The high life and blue-collar rhetoric don’t mix. In these tough times, if Obama wants to sound like Harry Truman, then now and then live like Harry Truman rather than some zillionaire Silicon Valley geek. If he wants to sermonize like Jimmy Carter, then at least get the props right of the cardigan sweater and dialed down thermostat.
7) Please, no more “Bush did it.” Stop the daily two-minutes of hate against our new Emmanuel Goldstein. Bush is 19 months gone; no one forced President Obama to borrow $3 trillion, to nationalize health care, or to scare business with the neo-socialist talk of income-, FICA-, and health-tax increases, and government takeovers that helped send unemployment from 7% to 10%. Bush reacted to 9/11 by going into Afghanistan and passing the Patriot Act without daily blaming Clinton for his appeasing of radical Islam. Nothing so diminishes a president as the trait of scapegoating a predecessor; nothing so erodes his stature as the teenage habit of blaming someone else for one’s self-inflicted problems. Enough already. We’ve gotten to the point now that the audience cringes when Obama cites what he has done, as it mutters to itself: “Here comes the ‘Bush did it.’” And, of course, it always comes just as we feared.
8 ) No need either for more of the Muslim thing. We learned on day 1, 19 months ago, that the president would reference his Muslim heritage (e.g., “I have Muslim members of my family. I have lived in Muslim countries.”) to al Arabiya in a way that was taboo during the campaign. And after the Cairo mythmaking, the rantings of John Brennan, the new euphemisms, the “America is the problem” (e.g., “All too often the United States starts by dictating — in the past on some of these issues — and we don’t always know all the factors that are involved.” ), and the NASA lunacy, we understood that the problem is our purported not being nice to Islam rather than radical Islamists trying to kill us out of existential hatred. I would cut the Muslim therapeutics out; there is simply no need to cite your middle name as the real reason Israelis are not fond of you. None at all.
9) Don’t mention deficits, debt, spending — anything to do with money. Three trillion dollars in new debt cannot be explained or blamed away. Better simply not to mention it, and talk of cutting $10 million here and there. Every time the president speaks of the debt, he does so in the context that Bush’s $500 billion last deficit forced him to borrow $1.7 trillion, or that “stimulus” is somehow not borrowing, or that deficits seem to be good since they will gorge the beast and force higher taxes, an intrinsic redistributive good in its own right.
10) Take a breather on the green agenda. Al Gore imploded, both from revelations about his personal life and the labyrinth of his financial machinations. Climategate discredited academic finger-pointing. Promises about “skyrocketing” power bills don’t go well with a recession. The old “millions of new green jobs” wonkery is a bad joke from a college bull session. Nuclear, natural gas, clean coal, and drilling in ANWR have more resonance than subsidized wind and solar jobs at a million or so in federal subsidies each.
Will Obama adopt any of my suggestions? No, of course not. Why? Because he is pushing an agenda that 55-70% of the American people do not want, and so it is necessary to evoke the kitchen sink to get it across: Bush did it, the oil cadre did it, racialist America, Islamophobia, “them,” a cool hip president, raise the bar — all that is a desperate (albeit doomed) way of venting, threatening, pleading, and pushing a blueprint that on its merits goes nowhere.







A grand slam, Dr, Hanson.
SO IN OTHER WORDS DR HANSON. Barack Obama should hide who he is? He should
hide what the Far Left is about, what “Globalism” really means, what “MulitCulturalism” really stands for. As for me I TREASURE Barack
Obamas glorious stupidity. He is educating the public about the lies
of the past 40 years as no one else could. His election was a Godsend.
And the last thing I want is someone intelligent giving the Obama Team
any bright ideas about how to spin out better disguises. No..no far better
to unleash Michelle!
Rehire Van Jones, Sic em Eric Holder!! And, guess what, this is exactly what will happen.
I HAVE FULL CONFIDENCE IN BARACK OBAMA to do the right thing.. BE HIMSELF.
God Bless Stupidity and Incompetence..it is the cleansing agent by which
America will be saved.
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001815.html
This is the best blog.
So you are asking Narcissus to look away from the pool?
Good luck with that.
Love your question!
Young people are no longer taught about, and warned of,
the basic human psychopathologies by hearing cautionary
tales, such as the myth of Echo and Narcissus:
http://www.echo.me.uk/legend.htm
Now, we all know who Narcissus is, but who is Echo ? :)
The myth of Narcissus has been deployed by various ideologues, mostly to discredit the questing individual seeking truth (i.e., science and its adherents, especially 19th century capitalists). I wrote about this myth here: http://clarespark.com/2009/11/16/panic-attacks-and-separation-anxiety/. Readers of Moby-Dick have often followed Ishmael in stamping Captain Ahab (bearer of the Promethean impulse) as a narcissist. For Ishmael, Narcissus was “the key to it all.” Anti-Americans and antisemites alike have affixed the diagnosis to any “rugged individualist”–said to be the key to “the American character.” (See the Stalinist F. O. Matthiessen for one.) In other words, Narcissus is deaf to the claims of “community” and today everyone in power speaks in that lingo–”community,” acceptance of racial “diversity”–the whole megillah of PC. I would say that POTUS is more of an oracular devotee of “Echo” than of “Narcissus.”
Those who conflate narcissism with individualism have an agenda, and it is neither a good one nor an intellectually honest one. Your Echo allusion does seem liek a better fit. The One We’ve All Been Waiting For does appear to like the sound of his own voice. Even when it isn’t his own.
Ward,
I bookmarked this long ago, from Newsweek – right after the inauguration.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/06/newsweek-editor-obamas-cult-of-personality-slightly-creepy-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comments
So, it’s not only the voice…. and it’s been long known.
I did an index for all my blog on race and black power: the language of Echo is found throughout the propaganda turned out by black liberation theology and their white enablers. http://clarespark.com/2010/07/15/index-to-black-power-blogs/.
I have been thinking about these various psychological explanations for Obama’s behavior all day, and think that they all ignore the ideological predisposition of POTUS, which needs no shrink, professional or otherwise, to identify his modus operandi or strange, contradictory positions and lying. One explanation: the incoherence of the Democratic Party coalition (mentioned in my blog Is POTUS Crazy? The other relates to black liberation theology and Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, which he and his machine seem to follow religiously. It also matches Michelle’s Princeton thesis that was entirely in hock to black power. Just look at her bibliography. I am a great admirer of VDH, but his irony in this piece does not point to the underlying problem. Whatever purpose POTUS has served in furthering the aims of the Democratic Party and their program of redistributive justice, he seems to me to be above all an adherent to the Malcolm X types whose goal is a complete reordering of the racial hierarchy, world wide, and that means the defeat of the white race (race being their core category for sorting people out). Read James Cone and weep.
I did a follow up blog to the index of my black power blogs here: http://clarespark.com/2010/07/18/white-elite-enabling-of-black-power/. It has its comic moments in material I doubt that Pajamas readers have ever seen, such as the proposal that abusive language referring to blacks be confined to the dinner table. We are talking about very highly placed persons, in my view, responding to the urban riots of the mid to late 1960s.
It’s quite clear that “Echo” is what used to be called the Main Stream Media.
I am going to take a guess. Is it someone who loves to hear himself/herself talk?
We could go on & on, good Doctor.
But here is another I would have included in the top 10: Stop acting as if you are some kind of wonder-boy commander-in-chief. We have already seen your best game & it isn’t good enough; not even close. We all know we’re really screwed on this one so just keep your mouth shut, do your best to sweep it under the rug and start withdrawing forces from Iraq & Afghanistan quietly so no one will notice. It’s really the best we could hope for until we return a real man with an ass in his britches to the White House.
Ouch. But touche!
or woman
Bolton/VDH will always be my ‘dream ticket’. However, I think both of these gentlemen are just too smart to even want the job. A guy can dream though…
Hey Navin, I like your dream ticket a lot. I’d like it even better in reverse. Commenter #57 I believe it is asks if Dr. Hanson would consider a run for President in 2012. That has been my question of the day for weeks now. What a wonderful thought, a choice, not an echo.
Folks like Dwight and David Thomson who comment here frequently deride, or downplay the notion that a real american from among the people rather than another political insider, left or right, might be able to begin to kill the cancer that has invaded the body of America. I disagree. And I don’t believe that David Thomson in particular speaks for Dr. Hanson.
Read his books and watch some of his taped presentations and then get back to me with opinions as to whether or not he exudes “quiet” qualities of leadership.
Navin, for today, you are the man. Join me and help drum up some support for potential candidates who might represent America rather than working full time to build personal empires and continue down the path to UNTOPIA.
I suggest that Dr. Victor Davis Hanson is such a man. So is John Bolton. Foremost of their qualifications is that neither is a political animal from inside the Washington D.C. Zoo.
Victor Davis Hanson for President in 2012. Bolton would surely be at his side.
Nice, as Mr. Hanson is a must read and check daily for any new articles on this and other sites.
I’ve said it often to friends I believe the next nominees should announce the Cabinet BEFORE the general election. (Mr. Obama a pass if up for re-election). After all the eyebrow rising appointments made by Our President, I will want to know who and where. It could only benefit all contenders to let us have a look see at the Company they keep, no? Fool me once…we you know.
Just think how enthusiastic you would be if Mr. Hanson was included in that group – sure would swing my vote.
I believe Mr. Hanson is way too intelligent to want the POTUS job, and too patriotic to refuse an appointment that would benefit this Country.
Announce the cabinet in advance? Now think about that for a second or two. Would the people named have to agree? Have their security checks etc run on them? Hell, maybe it is no goofier than the current stuff which passes for campaigning, but there are so many practical, organizational reasons why this will not be done.
No to elected positions. VDH for Secretary of Defense. VDH for United States Representative to the UN. Ok Ok…Dick Chaney for President and VDH Vice President…one artificial heartbeat away from the presidency.
Great prescription although I disagree on the golf issue. It is a good old boy aristocratic game but I’d rather see Obama out in the fresh air commingling with the powerful than hunkered down in the oval office with a couple packs of cigarettes brooding about his victimhood. We went through that with Nixon. George Bush was an athletic fellow, he had plenty of outlets to blow off steam, Obama likes golf and basketball, so be it. As long as he is known for extending olive branches around the world, while he is at it, why not play a few holes with Rush Limbaugh instead of telling him to go play with himself? Might do us all some good…
Heh heh heh, you’re right. Golf away Mr. President! We’re, uh, right behind you…..
Given the quality of this President’s decision-making, we should actually be encouraging him to spend more time on the golf course, not less. At least he’s not doing any harm there.
Let’s not kid ourselves here, folks. 0bama’s
puppeteers“handlers” are calling the shots and writing his teleprompter ‘speeches’ (speeches that he can’t even properly pronounce at times [i.e. 'orion' and 'corpsmen']). It may be cold comfort to think if 0bamafiddlesgolfs then Rome won’t burn [as quickly], but, I’m afraid it’s not so simple as that. The whole administration is downright TOXIC and borderline insane and/or EVIL. :(Yeah, drop the “if only we would have been nicer to muslims” trope.
Orthodox islam can be summed up as follows- kill the infidel, and when you have robbed him, raped the infidels, and conquered their land, you commemorate it by building a mosque there, in formerly infidel territory. Like at the site of the word trade center, now ground zero.
Bin Laden comfirmed as such, when he said “if doing these things makes me a terrorist, then by that definition I am a terrorist”. Orthodox islam.
Alot more clever people than I have already crushed all the comedic irony out of Obama’s recent denigration of Al Qaeda as not having enough respect for African life. “Tone down that racist crap, you idiots,” he said “or we can’t bond as fellow Muslims.” Can’t recall. Did Obama or anybody with a Muslim name, ever say the 9/11 bad guys did not have enough respect for North American life, or American or Caucasian life in general? Not my point though — My point is, as ridiculous as it is to discuss this on BO’s terms, is that, as a scion of a long line of Islamic Arabs in Africa, Obama should have rememebered that for the last 1000 years or more, the Arabs in Africa were able to make alot of money enslaving and selling the Africans they were battling with into slavery, which if you read a book, you would find out greatly shortened the Black Slaves’ lives. As late as 1750, the life expectancy of a Black youth who survived the Middle Passage was about 9 summers in the Caribbean sugar fields.
Is it possible that Barack Hussein Obama, the proud descendant of a 100 generations of Muslim slave dealers in Africa, does not know that history? “Not enough respect for African life” indeed. If BHO had any respect for African life, and the 7% of his blood that is Black, or of the purer Black blood of his wife and children, he would immediately renounce forever all ties with Islam, forever, or risk being “tarred with the same racist brush” as most Arabs generally are. Fat Chance.
That makes about as much sense as someone renouncing Christianity because souther slave owners were all Christian. Sorry, dry well, here.
Oh, and another thing, you might instruct the “new” “black” panthers (I thought panthers were already black? blacker than you, anyway, oh well, stupid is as stupid does…) to ask voters in black panther districts to query white voters as to how they plan to vote, because really, what’s the point? of excluding democrat voters from voting the only way you’ll permit? It’s a two-fer too, because you’ll end having to stuff a lot fewer ballots that way, and you can save your violence and intimidation for, oh, the teabaggers, republican voters and conservative non-potential voters to turn away.
Just a thought. Try it and see if that works for you. Take care, bye-bye then.
Ah….if only we had elected Buchanan in ’92 and ’92. We wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place.
It’s so tough trying to maintain an empire with a collapsing/imploding economy.
Buchanan is a racist and anti-semite. How would that be different from what we now have?
I believe he also had an openly, avowed communist as his running mate.
Buchanon is not the cure. He is the disease.
Your description of Michelle’s Princeton aspirations clarified something for me. What she sought in Princeton was status, not a fantastic horizon-broadening educational experience. Has she ever mentioned a course or a professor that changed the way she saw the world? Has she ever told of seeing a wonderful painting at the art museum or loving the gothic architecture that surrounded her? What did she think when she saw Einstein’s modest house or the alumni photos at the Naussau Inn? Was she amazed that some of her fellow students could simply see complex chemical reactions that she struggled to understand? She may have gotten her Ivy diploma, but there is little indication that she got much more from her time in Princeton.
How sad that in our first lady’s case it was neither the “journey” toward wisdom and knowledge nor arrival at that “destination” that floated her boat. It was, “There, I did it in spite of ……” that impresses her. Does she not realize how shallow that is?
You forgot 11.
Step away from the oval office, and place your hands against the Congress !! ha !!
Nice article, pondering is good for the soul, thanks…
Number 11:
Drop dead. Commit suicide. Become a muslim martyr.
Hey, they have passed the financial reform bill in the Senate. Man, I guess he is kind of like Ronald Reagan. You may not like all the things Obama does, but he certainly has done alot. Even LBJ would have been a bit jealous eh? I just knew you would agree.
In other words, Obama is winning and America is losing. If you doubt that – check out how many Obama’s proposals became law and how US economy is doing.
The problem with that line of thinking is Muslim ‘martyrs’ prefer to take as many innocent bystanders as possible with them which kinda makes them ‘murderers’ rather than ‘martyrs’.
[i]America’s sins are simply those of all humankind; but only in America is the sprit of self-critique and collective betterment such that we daily strive to address and solve our innately human shortcomings rather than accept them or give into them.[/i]
Amazing how you can write for readers of all ages. I hope to be half as good someday.
Hanson is a great writer and observer, but this statement that you quote is simply false and demonstrates that heaps of chauvinism are often found in conservative writings.
Couple of problems with “only in America” thinking. First, it implies that other countries aren’t even trying – that they’re just not interested in improving their conditions. Second, it sounds like other countries with different ideas are just out of luck – that no matter what they do to improve themselves, they won’t succeed because they’re not doing it the American way. Finally, it plays into leftist “social justice” thinking by reinforcing the idea that America is somehow witholding success and prosperity from the rest of the world – that our success comes at everyone else’s expense.
Please explain why this statement is false.
Larry in socio-land, please forgive the good doctor for speaking for most Americans. He obviously was not including you, because you are more, more, more . . . . European! than the rest of us. Thanks for stopping by, though.
VDH:
After nineteen months of this desperate and — as you note — doomed attempt to shove a socialist agenda down our throats, even Soros/Axelrod/Lenin’s ghost (or whoever) must realize that nothing can or will save Obama from himself. One almost gets the impression that for this naif the perks that come with the job of being president make the hassle of governing worthwhile. Obama has always been rather superficial. Now he just appears progressively more supercilious. One way or another, can’t imagine he’ll be around for a second term.
What worries me most is the thought that Soros and friends might come to the conclusion BHO can best serve their cause as a “martyr”, and take furtive steps to make that happen. Shudder.
They can’t do it til they go the Spiro Agnew route and get rid of BHO’s insurance policy, Joe Biden. Not a bad pick if that was his thinking.
I’m not at all implying someone will dx Obama. I think he won’t be re-elected or he won’t run. He may opt to move on to a bigger and better job with more tee time. Of course, 2012 is a long ways away.
Victor, really well done.
I haven’t been posting much for the last two months because , most of the time, my purpose was to try to help make the case for individual freedom, pointing out the leftist takeover of this administration and trying to keep my business hanging on until Novembers election to see which way the tea leaves would be pointing.
Obviously, from the last weeks, everybody gets it. Your article today should be printed out by all Patritots and shared with everyone. “Hold on”, my friend. It won’t be long now. The clouds are gathering, the wind starting to rustle, an oppressive smell is in the air. A Power stronger than all of us is on the way. We will have our freedom again.
PS, I will be on your mountain hike next year, if I have to walk to get there! (from Tennessee!)
1) Declare victory in all fields.
2) Get the shot out of Dodge.
3) Live on your billions in some small, african state.
There – fixed it for you.
Dr. Hanson: you sir, are a national treasure. You, Thomas Sowell and Rush Limbaugh are three men whom I would love to meet someday just to have the honor of shaking your hand, buying you a beer, and thanking you in person.
Now that is one beer summit I’d love to see!
Well Professor… Your path is complete. You are now a comedy writer as well. Military History and Yucking it up… I love it. This one has to be one of your best pieces, and that is saying much since I haven’t seen you write a anything less than excellent.
What this says to me is, “After all of this, how bad could Joe ‘The Gaff’ Biden actually be?” At least we could call him an idiot without having the racist flag flown over our heads.
The first act of the new Republican Congress should be to zero base the White House budget, and salt it with only enough money to keep the lights and heat on in the White House. Tell The One that he is now on an OPM standard Per Diem rate and charge him rent. If he wants to fly somewhere he’ll have to expense his tickets like any other Peter Principled useless do nothing government employee. The VC-25s could be converted to KC-33′s (the Air Force desperately needs tanker aircraft).
Hey.. if you can dream, so can I. ;-)
Cheers, there is er…. hum… hope,
The Mighty Fahvaag
All of what you say is very true, Victor Davis Hanson. But what really got to me was your No. 5.
The major problem with Obama is that he never, ever, believed in American exceptionalism. To him, we are always no better than any other third-rate nation, be it Egypt or France. To Obama, the United States is always bad, the United States is always the problem in the world, the United States is a selfish, hedonistic, racist, power-hungry, empire that needs to be dismantled.
He never talks about the sacrifices we’ve made for other countries, such as all of Europe during World Wars I and II, let alone what we did for South Korea and even Muslim countries like Kosovo, Kuwait, Iraq, or Afghanistan. No, no, we’re always the bad ones. We should be more like the “enlightened” Europeans, don’t ch’ya know, the people who gave you the Belgian Congo, South Africa, Algeria, the Sudan, and a bunch of other dirt holes that were the waste by-product of real, oppressive, empires. But no, here we sit almost two years later after this empty-suit takes office and one can still feel the contempt he has for this nation.
The American public should be ashamed, ashamed, that they elected an embarrassment like this into office. They believed the hype and ignored the facts of what this fraud really was, a European-style big-government socialist. Although we are stuck with him for another two years, we can at least STOP him from implementing more of his crazy agenda by electing a conservative Congress in 2010. It’s the best we can hope for now, but at least it may stop the bleeding until a real adult with real accomplishments in life is elected in 2012.
Hence a previous poster – he needs to golf with Limbaugh. Talk about an education.
The mindset of dear leader is a direct result of the upbringing by a dysfunctional mother. Oh she was “intelligent” and “educated”, she just wasn’t very smart. And in her case she passed those traits on – in spades [no offense intended] – to her pride and joy. And wow we’ve got a nation even fuller of single-mom mothers raising dysfunctional lads. And most of those mothers take a perverse pride in their plight. Go figure.
It is disturbing that Obama is establishing a White House with a strong racist emotionalism. I think it’s in large part due to the anti-white perspective of Michelle, many of the Obama appointments and indeed, of Obama himself. But it’s also being used now as a manipulative tactic to confine and reject voter dissent.
Defining anyone who objects to illegal immigrants as racist is a tactic for hispanic votes.
To have the NAACP, without a word of dissent from Obama, declare the Tea Parties as racist is an act that states that anyone who objects to Obama’s agenda..is racist.
Then, to suddenly declare that Al Qaeda, rather than being caused by Islamic fascism, is instead ‘racist’ brings in yet another group into the fold.
So – we have three groups, all defined by Obama as racist: those who object to illegal immigration, those who object to Obama’s policies; and those who are anti-American terrorists.
Is Obama trying to link all three?
On another point, I’d add that Obama should stop manipulating Americans in his Either-Or apocalyptic scenarios. These include: Pass the Stimulus OR economic collapse will occur; Pass the Health Bill OR greedy doctors and insurance companies will cut off everyone’s limbs. He has a new Either-Or mantra.
‘Forward with Obama or Backwards to the people who got us into this mess.’
I’d reword this. “Forward to socialism, trillion dollar deficits and massive governmental control..or..
Back To America, to American values of individual freedom and responsibility, the free market, limited government and..The Constitution”.
<>The Beer Summit Intervention by the President of the United States was a “teachable moment”, too. The invectives hurled at the officer that night were probably no-less ghetto than what one might hear in other parts of town where PhDs are a rarity. If he (The One) was attempting to ‘fix’ something, it should have been obvious to all that his toolbox and the skills to go with it are akin to what parents often buy for a child under the brand name Playschool.
The oil gusher served to pull the curtain back for the people to see that, not only was he not at the ‘knobs and levers’ controlling the smoke, but was spending inordinant amounts of time on the golf course, while invisible (to the media) pelicans died.
For all the prep he recieved in Prep School, he certainly doesn’t demonstrate the skills necessary for a Leader of The Free World. We will suffer future episodes where his honed organizer skills will be tested again and again, while things get broken- as those tools he reaches for in his Playschool toolbox will ultimately lead him to the plastic hammer for which there may not be a matching sickle. Give Nancy Pelosi time and she’ll see to it that sickles are included, even if you have to buy the damn thing to find out.
Ten steps??? I thought you’d advise Barry, when you take those last ten steps to the podium, take a deep breath, be a man, and say “I’m very sorry. I have no idea what I’m doing. I resign. Thank you.” That’s my favorite dream right now.
I did like the Narcissus comment though. Good stuff!
Asking His Transparency to be a man is asking a bit too much. Last I heard, Michelle wouldn’t give up the Big Boy panties to him.
Your usual fine job, Dr. Hanson, but why didn’t you mention the “some would say” set up for the straw man Obama knocks flat in every speech?
While I’m at it, word leaked from the West Wing that Obama insists on writing his major speeches these days, one reason they seem so flat. I think it’s time Bill Ayres was brought back in for the final polish. That man knows how to get the job done.
Well, that sure was a fun read. I suppose Joey the Balefull will be here soon to add his spite and venom like salt and pepper to a good fillet. Well, what the heck, it is good to keep your eye on the inmates at all times. When you don’t hear or see them, something bad may be on the brew, something like a new Journolist or a new coffee party maybe. Oh yeah, they’re already working on a new coffee party, aren’t they.
As a reminder to the “we inherited the worst…” crowd: Obama wanted the job. He campaigned for it. His supporters wanted him to have it and deliberately supplied the fortune it required for him to get it.
And while Obama, personally, was no doubt naive (and shows himself to be a slow learner)as to the seriousness of some of the issues that were dumped on his lap after the inauguration…few in the Legislative branch have the same excuse. After all, if Obama inherited a mess from Bush then he also inherited the same mess from Kennedy, Reid, Pelosi, Rangel, and the rest of the entrenched Democratic wing of Congress. Despite Bush-era accusations to the contrary, we don’t live in a Monarchy. The President can do little that doesn’t pass through Congress.
Spot on, sir.
I certainly don’t disagree with the thrust of your comment, but I would like to add a few remarks. Not only did Obama want the job, he spent around 3/4 of a billion dollars to get it, and flip-flpping on his campaign finance promises to do so.
Second point: Obama may have been ignorant of the complexities a president has to deal with, but this was not due to naivety. It was due to pure unadulterated arrogance. If you look at the Guantanamo issue, you see it. He condemned Bush and promised to close the prison with no alternative. Within days of his inauguration he made international headlines and led TGV newscasts with his ostentatious executive order signing. A few months later, he learned it was a tough problem. I think there were people talking about this a few years earlier, but Obama never listens to people who upset his fantasies. He knows better.
Guantanamo is just an example to illustrate a pattern. Obama has clung firmly to the platitudes he heard as a child and teenager. Yet he tries to psychoanalyze gun owners and churchgoers he has never met. If that’s not arrogance, I don’t know what is.
Then he’d never say anything.
I have a 2 step program I’d like to see initiated in November of this year.
1. Take back the Congress and as much of the Senate as we can get in the November elections.
2. Bring a bill of indictment against President Obama, for the purposes of impeachment, early in the 2011 session.
Try the case in the Senate or allow him to resign. At this point, I’ll accept Biden as a lame duck idiotarian in a position not l;ikely to do further harm.
I second that! I’m praying every day that conservatives win the House so there will be enough votes for impeachment.
This article is a total waste of time. IT’S NOT ABOUT OBAMA! It’s about the people writing the script for his teleprompter. Who are those people behind the curtain? Where’s the stand-in for the “Edgar Bergan” moving the mouth of this Charlie McCarthy dummy? Is anyone there???
We know that, Jim, but we have to rail against someone.
Bingo! This could be the motto of PJM.
When demonstrated incompetence intersects militant ideology, the results are usually quite messy. I am talking about congressional Democrats just as much as Mr Obama.
What almost always happens in such situations is a retrenchment to demagoguery and thuggery. Here I’m talking about numerous other similar situation I’ve seen outside government, but the pattern is the same, whether it’s a harshly micromanaging supervisor who hasn’t the first clue about what she’s attempting to manage or a member of the local school board, in way over his head.
All the post-modernism is nothing more that a transparent cover for incompetence and cluelessness. You can usually get away with it in a university, but rarely in the private sector. It’s becoming obvious that it doesn’t work very well in government, either.
The tragedy is that this particular affirmative-action hire is so manifestly incompetent — and has chosen to surround himself with other rage-besotted affirmative-action hires — that I suspect he has already set race relations in America back by at least a generation.
Now we hear-
“Republicans drove our country into a ditch!”
“Do you want to put them back in the drivers seat?”
Getting out of a ditch is no problem.
But Obamaugabbie and the democrats have missed the ditch,
continue driving 120 miles an hour,
drinking beer, and singing,
as we plunge into an abysses.
November is only 3 months away and we better get these drunken stooges off the road.
No offense to ‘The Three Stooges.’
At least they had licenses,
drove slow,
and knew how to drive.
11. Announce he is not running for re-election in 2012.
And make it easy for Hillary?
As to those millions of American citizens who still look up from the feet of Obama: How will they behave once his game comes crashing down?
Learning how to play “victim” takes some time; giving up that role may be damn near impossible!
This ain’t over by a longshot!
10. Ivan. That word empire does not mean what you think it means.
Is it too early to say Obama has wrested the title Miserable Failure away from the previous president?
The previous president to whom you refer would be Carter
I presume?
What makes it hard to maintain an empire, ivan, is that its always ’92, and we want to bill Murray for the national debt.
But my point: Dr. Hanson is so totally off-base with this it’s hard to take him seriously. For example, saying that we ‘cringe’ when The Light Bearer speaketh –we do NOT, sir –we only ‘cringe’ when we can’t get to the mute button fast enough, as for example when our neck, back, knees and elbows are already sprained, lacerated, and bunged-up from the previous running dive over the living room suite to get to the o-god-shut-up button.
Excellent suggestions… IF they were offered to a rational individual with a rational agenda.
Unfortunately, narcissists who are controlled by their addiction to power over others need something more along the lines of a Twelve-Step Program.
“Unfortunately, narcissists who are controlled by their addiction to power over others need something more along the lines of a Twelve-Step Program.”
More than that, I’m afraid. Those with an addiction to power over others become mass-murdering monsters when they acquire control of the apparatus of the state. For such, the best prescription is the end of a rope. Or a firing squad, otherwise known as “Romanian term limits”.
I can shorten the article for you, Dr. Hanson:
Keep your mouth shut, President Obama, lest you remove all doubt.
I must say, I am beginning to like Obama. His screw ups have awakened us citizens. The house to switch to fiscal conservatives in November. With control of the purse, they can start cutting. Thank you Obama for so quickly moving us back to sanity.
Claude,
I share your view and chalk it up to eternal optimism.
God Bless America
How do you think we have survived from Washington to Obama?
4. PM
So you are asking Narcissus to look away from the pool?
You could have used a typo there… More like asking Narcissus to look away from the FOOL.
Hopefully I will end up in the same re-education camp as Dr. Hanson.
Excellent analysis Professor Hansen. What you depict is a nation on the verge of splitting in two or three or four. The unity of a country is a fragile thing which has to be held together by a so called civic religion;however Obama is destroying all that. We are now a federation of warring tribes which Obama gleefully rules over but for how long. The split is coming better to dust off an old “stars and bars’ banner and prepare for battle. omnia gallia divisa est.
On a side-note: Edison, sure. A.G. Bell—less certain. As all good Italians know, the telephone was invented by Antonio Meucci. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meucci
Thank you Dr. Hanson for your insighful list. Obama and his statist cohorts remind me of the movie “Bucket List.” They know their demise (in this case political) is at hand. So what do they do? Spare no expense to ram through Congress as much of their leftist wishlist as they can before their end.
Obama hustled the keys to the nation’s treasury from the American people to claim as his own personal booty stash. But how could anyone realistically expected anything else from a inner-city community organizer with a silver tongue and a racial chip on his shoulder.
What many feared has now been proved true. Obama’s true vision has been exposed as a radical national wealth redistribution scheme to vindicate long-festering racial grievances. Or as Obama’s spiritual mentor so famously declared, “The chickens have come home to roost.”
Most disturbing has been the desecration by the Democrat party of the legacy of John F. Kennedy. Sadly, the Democrat party’s new mantra is “ask not what you can do for the government, but what the government can do for you.”
I had a revelation in the shower this morning. The morning news was about the President denouncing the terrorist because they are racist. It occurred to me that perhaps the President is growing tired of Al Quida re-buffing his attempts to reach out to them. For this President, that can mean only one thing. Their racism leads them to oppose the good things he would like to do. For Obama all opposition to him must be rooted in racism. He did hear the Rev. Wright’s sermons.
I don’t really get that. I know a lot of the AQ leadership are Arabs, but from the mug shots I’ve seen it looks like the foot soldiers come in all different colors. And they definitely kill people without regard to race or national origin.
Very well said. He will do none of it.
He could also:
1. Cancel the closing of Guantanamo.
2. Stop the ‘investigation’ of CIA interrogators.
3. Stop smoking.
Come on VDH; this is purely duplicitous partisan snark. The duplicity comes from the tone of supposed “neutral advice.” OK, obviously people here are suckers for all Obama bashing, granted; but it is such low-hanging fruit, recycled so much that it is virtually rotten.
It is obvious that you have little to say, but need to say it anyway; we all know the feeling. What if Obama appointed another Gates or Clinton? What exactly has Michelle done RECENTLY to arouse your snark? Hey, all’s fair in love and politics, but when one has the cachet of the “historian,” I’d say that you have an obligation to come up with something more substantial, and less petty, but that’s just me.
Dwhite, here is an article you will enjoy and gobble up to the last crumb. It explains that Obama is doing everything right but doesn’t know how to talk his own wonderfulness up. I know almost everybody here is laughing, but Harris et al are not kidding. The writers seem to actually believe this.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/39772.html
Good one Fred. The Politico article reads exactly as you described – but note the responses – many from liberals – disagreeing with the “tingle up my leg” meme.
It says that he is doing everything right? Can you read?
What the article does do is analyze, rather than bash. VDH wants to rehash the same tired “Obama is terrible in every way” trope. This writer is talking about forces at work in the current political scene that push the poll numbers. Most people here have such a severe case of ODS that any article that does not tell you in the old ways, (and a new way is always good, too) that Obama is terrible, terrible, just does not cut it for them/you.
I am sick of lefties that think that all bad in the country is caused by righties, and all righties, who think the opposite, because neither seem able to address real problems in the real world. Any problem is useful ONLY to bash the other side. We have two wars, a strong recession, and a terrible oil spill. A righty President would be facing the same problems and would be continually bashed for the left for all of the above, plus whatever personal idiosyncrasies they could observe or imagine. Such blather occupies people, who don’t know the “solutions” either, but they can avoid that problem by mocking and blaming.
I don’t think that either side is THE cause of our problems. I do think that we get by in this country by bouncing back and forth between center left and center right. That analysis does not solve any problems either, but it at least may permit one to look at the problem for the most rational approach, not the most doctrinaire.
it’s really simple and not personal. There are sides and they are not associated with a political party. Here you go:
There are those who believe that America is built on individuals and entrepreneurs, self reliance, responsibility, rule of law and work ethic.
Then there are the rest. That’s the divide.
Well, I think that all of those things are important, but so is community. The side you espouse contain many who think so highly of themselves and what they have or suppose that they have accomplished that it tends to dominate their values and make compassion suspect. We definitely need you guys, but if you ruled the world, it would be a pretty grim place for more than half the world. Not your problem, I know, but still a problem.
See the trouble with Dwhite is that he thinks governments exist so they can be large charities forcing people to do what the government thinks is good for people, regardless of how the people feel. Let’s see. You must enroll in Medicare at age 65. As an employee, you must pay into social security. If you are in a unionized organization, you must join the union and pay dues. Most of the dues may be spent on political activities you don’t like. Sit down and shut up, see. Soon, you will be mandated to buy sick care insurance. Soon, your doc will have to report you fat index to the government of face financial retribution, thanks to the Dem Congress. Dwhite thinks all this is wonderful stuff , unlike we other poor mugs, because Dwhite thinks he is compassionate. We need to get every single Dwhite-like person out of the Congress starting this year.
Fred, Whether or not I think this is “wonderful stuff” is less relevant than if a majority of the population want it, or think they need it. Your “regardless of how the people feel” is a key, if misleading line here. Let’s say that you personally do not want Social Security, but a majority of the people do. You say, “well, then make it voluntary.” They say, “But it won’t work if it is voluntary.” You say, “then we won’t have it,” they vote at least indirectly, “Yes, we will.” I don’t think that this is necessarily great, but it is what it is, and I, personally do NOT feel aggrieved or put upon by it, and so many of you here DO. That would be a major distinction between me as a wishy-washy, but reasonably informed centrist, and you as an individualistic grumbler. I can still express all the individuality I need and survive the government; occasionally it even helps me. You guys whine, moan, bluster, grumble, snipe (ok, I snipe, too)and you know what, occasionally the government helps you too, but you will be damned if you will admit it. Because I can clearly see your “selfishness”, does not mean that non-selfishness is saintly, just that selfishness has a certain odor to it.
We can only cleanse that odor by affirming rational self-interest, and if a majority of the people’s rational self interest conflicts with yours, well…here you are.
Dwrong, you are totally spot on about one thing that VDH got wrong. As many others here have noted the nation would be much better off if dear leader spent much more time on the golf links. Other than that, though, you’ve been drinking too much kool-aid again, lad, and have lost track of reality. As a “historian” the good doctor has every right to opine and suggest, and the nation is better for his efforts. Even if you are not bright enough to recognize it or not, sir.
Great article, Dr. Hanson. Regarding Mr.Obama,s assertion that his middle name might be the cause of the Israeli’s concern; he might do well to remember that Jordan’s King Hussein was the closest thing to a friend that Israel ever had in the Arab world.
Great piece (a bit vicious about Michelle, but hey, she dishes it out so…).
Just one minor correction: It’s deepseated anger (or deep seated), not deep seeded.
Obama is starting to sound like Jim Belushi in the Blues Brothers when Carrie Fisher has him cornered down in the tunnel … the list of excuses would be comical if it were not such a lack of seriousness about addressing the nations problems …
Its John Belushi….
I had an ephiphany in the shower this morning after hearing that the President had accused Al Quida of being racist against Africans. The President is miffed that Al Quida has not reacted as he hoped to his outreach to moderate elements of the Taliban etc. The only reason he can come up with for such rejection is racism. He did not sit in the pews of that church for nothing. Rev. Wright was heard!
Mr. Hanson, you’ve hit the mark on every piece of my disgust with the president. Thank you!
I don’t know if anyone else agrees but I find it reassuring to read Dr. Hanson’s articles. Not only does he get it “right,” he says it in a way that makes me laugh through the tears.
Dr. Hanson, I have it on good authority that you are #4 on Obama’s “enemies” list (which numbers in the thousands.)
Keep up the good work!
welcome to the club … I was banned after a couple of months. I lasted longer than I had expected.
Yep, just another example of the left’s “inclusiveness.”
This is what finally did me in . . . after Dear Leader won, and there were all these self-congratulatory mutual masturbation fests going on there, I proposed that the movie version of Obambi’s rise to fame (and destruction of the U.S.) would be cast as follows:
Coming to a theatre near you, summer 2011 . . . . . the biggest story of our generation . . . . . of all time!
“H”
The story of Barrack Hussein Obama . . . based on his best-selling books and the memoirs of his staff.
Starring:
Chris Rock……………………….. Barrack Hussein Obama
Oprah……………………………… Michelle Obama
O. J. Simpson…………………….. Reverend Jeremiah Wright
Rosie O’Donnell………………….. Nancy Pelosi
Michael Moore……………………. Harry Reid
Sherman Hemsley……………….. Jesse Jackson
Michael Jackson………………….. Al Sharpton
Ron Jeremy……………………….. Bill Clinton
Jennifer Flowers.…………………. Hillary Clinton
Osama Bin Laden………………… Rahm Emanuel
Big Bird…………………………….. Joe Biden
Charles Manson…………………… Bill Ayers
Lynette “Squeaky” Frome………… Bernardine Dohrn
Bill Cosby…………………………… Colin Powell
What you said is entirely correct, and can be summarized by saying that absolutely everything Obozo has done, from day one until now, is flat-out, one hundred percent WRONG. Considering that he won’t make a 180-degree turn and undo everything he has done thus far, the next best thing he could do would be to RESIGN.
Were Obozo to resign, we would be dealing with Biden, who is merely stupid and evil, rather than Obozo, who is stupid, evil, and mad.
Dr. Hansen,
Another home run, this time in your advice to the curtain-hanger-in-chief. Here’s suggestion #11: Do something manly. I still remember the picture of Pres. Bush at his ranch toting some tree stump or log–not afraid to sweat or grimace. (No, golf is not that manly.) And suggestion #12: Admit some mistake–even a small one–and show some humility to your countrymen, not some foreign leader to whom you’re bowing. Your veneer of invincibility is already alligatored with cracks–eating an occasional bite of crow wouldn’t weaken you nearly as much as your thin-skinned narcissism and implied insecurity do.
This is a dream I had; Obama dressed in muslim dress
calling out “Alla Achbar” while blowing himself up
after calling in all the MSM anchors and producers into
the White House Press Room.
Could this be the best beer summit ever?
“With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.” Desiserata”
“all that is a desperate (albeit doomed) way of venting, threatening, pleading, and pushing a blueprint that on its merits goes nowhere.”
Doomed? Don’t I wish! I take a back seat to know one in my loathing for Obama’s philosophy and actions. Still, it simply ignores the facts to say that he has failed to deliver on his goals. Stimulus bill, Obamacare, Fin-Reg, and more, whereever you look he has succeeded.
That is why we are so much worse off than even two years ago. But this emerging conservative trope that Obama has – or will, someday – fail is simply not true, as much as I, too, wish he had. His policies will, of course, fail to achieve their allegedly intended positive results, but that’s a different issue entirely.
Unfortunately, falling poll numbers – and Congress’ that are already in the cellar – have barely slowed them all down from turning America into Sweden (on its way to becoming Venezuela). It does no good to pretend otherwise.
Would you consider a run for the Republican Party nomination in 2012?
Excellent Dr. Hanson. One problem. Obama does NOT read…he doesn’t even listen. He has a narrative in his head and that is all he hears.
All good points Dr. Hanson but what do we do about the fools who elected Obama. I see that as a far greater and longer term threat. There is already talk of Hillary opposing Obama in 2012. And the idiots that wanted to cast a ‘historical’ vote for the first black president would likely be ready to cast another ‘historic’ vote for the first woman president. And that would be disastrous. She also is a disciple of Alynski and from an idealogoical standpoint makes her husband look like Barry Goldwater – almost. The election of Obama is as much a reflection of our decay as anything. Like the old adage that you as an individual are judged by the friends you keep, we as a nation are judged by the leaders we elect. The cancer started in the 60′s with part of my generation and I foolishly thought it had gone into remission during the 80′s but I was wrong. My personal awareness of how things had turned was during the ’92 Clinton campaign when the media made the case that character didn’t matter. And the people – enough of them – agreed. A people that had not gone into decay would understand – instinctively – that character is the only thing that matters.
AMERICA: AT THE CROSSROADS
In times such as these, we need only to look at world history. The ancient civilizations of Persia and Greece come to mind. One might consider the history of the British or Roman Empires; Napoleonic France or Spain; also the dynasties of the Chinese and Japanese Emperors, along with the Egyptian Pharos, or the Mayans and Aztecs. All of these republics, empires and dynasties have fallen upon the dust heap of history. Do these once great societies have any meaning in our present day? Oh yes! Big time!
The study of these civilizations was the basis and foundation for our Constitutional Republic. Madison, Jefferson, Hamilton, Adams and all our founding fathers studied how these civilizations emerged, evolved and eventually failed. Our founders answered these rises and collapses of past civilizations with the Great American Experiment; The Constitution of the United States of America; our map for continuing success.
Our grand document is based on the creation, evolvement and failure of every civilization in history. It was conceived through the wisdom of all the grand thinkers in world history. (Thinkers and philosophers who knew that their history would be important to some future civilization and they were intelligent enough to write it down or carve it in stone) Our Constitution is a document written to preserve individual liberty and to organize a union of separate states, into a Federal Union; The United States of America.
Why do we now fail our Constitution? Why don’t we teach more of it in public and private schools? Why do politicians and judges say it’s outdated? The reality is that we are at the crossroads between the success or failure of our Constitutional Republic. This Great Document needs to be honored and cherished dearly.
Our Congress; the Senate and House of Representatives, is now failing us by passing legislation that they do not read before they vote on it’s passage. Our President is failing our country by signing this unread legislation into law. We might call this a failure of their Oath of Office. Or we might call it a failure of our national identity. Either way, we can not continue to exist as a nation under these failures in government.
Ancient Rome is a prime example. Senators of the Roman Republic sat in their Coliseum seats, along with the Roman Emperors. They watched as slaves fought gladiators and cheered for blood. They watched as Christians were eaten by lions while the minions screamed for more blood. Those Senators allowed the decline of the Roman Republic by their lack of concern, accession and decadence. Eventually, their appeasements to the Caesars contributed to the decline of the Republic and the Empire. All was lost as hoards of barbarians over-ran a militarily-over-extended, over-taxed, Roman Empire.
That barbarism was unmatched until the 20th century, when Marxist/Socialist/Communism overtook Russia and Eastern Europe, culminating in the deaths of 50 million human beings. All of them murdered and starved by a mentally ill, psychotic-paranoid, Joseph Stalin; along with his secret police.
Adolph Hitler murdered 6 million Jews. Joseph Stalin murdered 50 million of his own Soviet people. The German people were compliant with Hitler and the Soviets with Stalin. They followed those leaders to their graves. The Roman Senators were compliant with the Caesars. Rome fell, as all great civilizations did in time. None of those civilizations had a living Constitution: a map for success throughout the ages. Our nation has one and it’s high time our Congress and our President start abiding by it.
The failure to follow our Founding Fathers’ map has lead America down the wrong road; to the crossroads we find ourselves looking upon. A “fundamental change in America”, we do not need. What we do need, is to return to a “foundation based on our Constitution”. We should command the respect due to us and their Oath of Office, from all our elected officials in city, county, state and federal government. Only that respect to their Constitutional Oaths and to the People, will save this country from the dust heap of history. We, as a free Nation, still have the right to demand that of our elected representatives. This is the duty and the responsibility of every citizen in a Constitutional Republic. Demand it! Vote for it! Pass it on to everyone!!
If you are an American Patriot, then please, remember this on November 2, 2010. VOTE !
God’s Speed America!
46. Dwight
“it is such low-hanging fruit…”
The only low-hanging fruit being attacked here (by you) is VDH’s simple tongue-in-cheek rhetorical device. No one is fooled by Hanson portraying his analysis and opinions as “advice” to our idiot of a president, if for no other reason than the fact that many of us assume Obama will remain a clueless naif regardless of who gives him advice (though, admittedly he still seems responsive to whoever tweaks the puppet’s strings). In other words, get past the embellishments to writing style and concentrate on his argument.
“…recycled so much that it is virtually rotten.”
Hmm, reviewing and recycling previous events and integrating them with later developments is sort of what a historian does, is it not? You seem to have a problem with that, and like your fellow traveler Leftist fools would prefer anything new be assessed in an a-historical vacuum. Obama understood your penchant for thinking only in the present tense, which is why he so easily lied about himself and his policies as a candidate.
I think you are wrong to call Biden evil.
I agree. He’s not smart enough to be evil. Still dangerous at the wheel though…
Is Biden stupid enough to try and act as POTUS,
or will he appoint some competent but colorless centrist
caretaker to be VP, and then resign himself ?
Nice game.
Here is my recipe:
- convert. God is Infinite Love.
- study, marxism has been proven false a long time ago.
- study, nihilism is the fool’s philosophy.
- pray, we all need this, you too
- get rid of the friends who support in any way any form of violence
- learn a job, any job that you can do with your hands
- hang a poster in your office: “There is no superior race”
- reflect daily on the sacrifices of American Warriors, including Law Enforcement, who are the only shield between this world and hell
- pray, we all need to repeat this, you do too
- you are the First African American President, understand the greatness of this
Dr. Hanson:
Well expressed, as always. I have, for some time, been bothered by something about Mr. Obama, but I’ve not yet been able to put my finger on it. You may have helped me do just that.
I suspect that what has bothered me is how extraordinarily ordinary, stereotypical even, Mr. Obama is. He promises the new, the exceptional, the transcendent, and delivers the old, the mediocre and the utterly predictable. You’ve covered a variety of ills quite well, but please allow me to expand on one or two.
We all know the stereotype of the hustler who, through betray of confidence, connections or just plain dumb luck, suddenly comes into wealth and/or power. Does the hustler suddenly become humble and frugal, or do they embark upon an orgy of spending, of ostentatious consumption? Of course, it’s the latter, and never so much as when the hustler is spending other people’s money. Thus do swindlers like Bernie Madoff so justly outrage us.
George W. Bush was and is wealthy, but never did he flaunt it. Weekly command performances by celebrities in the White House? No. Constant talk of golf and constant golf excursions around the world to clubs so exclusive and restrictive that most Americans couldn’t afford the green fees, let alone a membership (and most wouldn’t even try because they have too much common sense)? No. In fact, Mr. Bush gave up golf because he felt that our warriors and their families would think it frivolous in a time of war (and he was right: we do). Constant, expensive vacations to exotic locations, including “date nights” in distant cities? No. Instead, Mr. Bush occasionally traveled to his ranch in Texas where the needs of the Secret Service could be accommodated and all the infrastructure was in place for him to continue to work for America. His frolics? The occasional bike ride and general ranch work. Constantly blaming his predecessor for his failings? No. In fact, even when Clintonistas, behaving like the petulant children they were, vandalized the White House on their way out the door, Mr. Bush was the adult in the room and did nothing. Never did he castigate Bill Clinton, who would have been a more than legitimate target for honest and honorable criticism. The buck did stop with Mr. Bush who never complained about how hard it was to be President, and about how tired and stressed he was. And to this day, he has not responded in kind to the juvenile, pathetic attacks leveled against him by Mr. Obama.
I suspect this is what so bothers me and so many other Americans. Instead of being humbled by his election, instead of being grateful to those who elected him, instead of understanding that the weight of more than 200 years of history and the expectations and hopes of all those around the world who love and long for freedom rest on his shoulders, Mr. Obama consistently behaves like the cheap con man who hits the jackpot and blows millions of other people’s money in short order, ostentatiously living it up at their expense. No one begrudges a POTUS a bit of honest, occasional rest (unless, of course, you’re the Lamestream Media in high dudgeon over a republican president who dares to briefly luxuriate in the Olympian accommodations of a ranch in the garden spot of Crawford, TX) and recreation. We’d just rather they didn’t behave like the European royalty whose excesses led to serial decapitations.
Say what you will about George W. Bush, no honest, honorable person could say that he didn’t love American and that he didn’t do his best to represent and uphold American interests. That same honest, honorable person can, at best, say that Mr. Obama’s dedication to America is questionable. However, there is no doubt about his dedication to himself and his glorification.
I agree with everything you say about both Bush and Obama, Mike McDaniel. Bush’s beliefs and behavior are invested with sincerity, a humility and a deep, very real love for America. Obama has none of these qualities.
Obama is, as I’ve repeated to tedium, a pathological narcissist. He has no beliefs, no humility, no love for America. Obama has instead a deep psychological need to control others – irrespective of beliefs – and control the interactions others have with him. Keep such a person in a marginal position and their effect is confined to those local margins. But put someone with such a pathology in a powerful position, such as President, and the need to control grows exponentially – far beyond the capacity of that individual to achieve such control.
Thus, we see mass repression measures rapidly put in place, sweeping legislation that binds and confines before dissent and questions can emerge. Criticism is met with harsh emotional rejection – and Obama’s key tactic is to charge any and all who question him with bias, political or ‘racist’.
By his current linking of racism to Islamic fascism, he’s now even suggesting that rejection of Obama’s policies is not just a racist act, it is also a terrorist anti-American act.
Obama’s need to distance himself from others, and a narcissist cannot consider others equal to him or feel any empathy with others, is exponentially heightened in the role of President. After all, in such a role, the individual Obama cannot directly control everyone; therefore, he has to show himself that he operates on a level out of touch with any who might attempt to reach him.
Therefore, Obama will increase his ‘vertical scale’ above others by doing things that the ‘equal man’ cannot afford. His expensive vacations, his constant junkets on AirForce One, his expensive golf, his parties and special guests – all show, to himself, that he is ‘above and beyond’ all those whom he cannot directly control.
He has no dedication to America. America doesn’t exist for Obama. All that exist, for Obama, is Himself and his increasing need to control others and distance himself from any hint of equality. It’s more pathological than hubris, more amoral than egoism, more unethical than selfishness for, in a role with such power, this pathology affects millions of people.
Why does Obama remind me of Mussolini?
He reminds you of Mussolini because there is, truly, nothing new under the Sun. I wrote the following back in April 2009:
It’s been said that those who do not understand history are doomed to repeat it. And so it is that the Obama administration has ushered in not an era of hope and change but, frighteningly, is instead now putting the seal onto the very worst that humans have devised in terms of government.
Consider the two great motivators: fear and hunger. They have always been, and are now, how the calculating turn a temporary crisis into a permanent one. As we look back to the stock market collapse in 1929 and the Great Depression that followed to find a clue about how to solve the problems on Wall Street and with our banks today, it becomes more clear that the roots of both those and today’s ills first took hold earlier in the early 20th century. Self-proclaimed “Il Duce”, aka “His Excellency Benito Mussolini, Head of Government, Duce of Fascism, and Founder of the Empire”, was a high-profile “progressive” (like Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, FDR; and now Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton) and before things went south was admired by the likes of Irving Berlin, Cole Porter, uber-pundit Will Rogers, and praised by the eternally-liberal New York Times: “Mussolini is a Latin Teddy Roosevelt, who first acts and then inquires if it is legal. He’s been a great service to Italy at home.” In the beginning, even Winston Churchill called Mussolini “the greatest living lawmaker.”
Yet for all the fawning admiration of the American “intellectual elite”, Benito Mussolini set Italy on the side of Germany to became part of the Axis during WWII. Eventually, at the urging of his own son-in-law, the Italian parliment ousted Il Duce and restored full constitutional powers to the king. It was Marshal Pietro Badoglio who then secretly dissolved the Italian Fascist Party and negotiated an armistice with the Allies, signed on September 3, 1943. Despite the resulting turmoil, Italy finally declared war against Nazi Germany and the rest, as I shall call it, is common history.
Progressive poster boy Benito was summarily executed in April 1945 by Communist Italian partisans, then his body was hung upside-down in the Piazzale Loreto in Milan for public viewing, to assure people the monster was really and truly dead. Along with his lover and 13 other high-ranking Fascist officials, and some other Fascist hanger-ons.
——-
We are witnessing the same things today. As Joan Baez once penned about Bob Dylan, His Transparency burst on the scene already a legend, the darling of contemporary progressives and as the months have passed we are witnessing his hell-bent sprint to effectively create an unholy alliance with the contemporary Axis (radical Islam). I remain hopeful, however, that because we are still a Republic the end of The Great Teleprompter Reader will be less literally revolting due to the looming torrential backlash at the polls in November.
This is a great summation of all that ails this presidency. I wish that everybody could read Dr. Hanson’s brilliant critique.
Excellent advice, and, you’re correct, Barack Hussein Obama (mmmm, mmmm, mmmm…)won’t take it.
Obama became president with about 30% of the voter population and the independent swing vote. He never succeeded in becoming president of the entire United States and he is losing the independents as he becomes more transparent. He may not even try to be the peoples’ president as he affixes to his base and special interests and criticizes and moves against those to whom he does not agree. He is busy painting himself into a far left corner. History may look back on this presidency as a civil rights victory and polarizing legal fiscal disaster of the first order.
Dr. Hanson,
You truly are the voice of reasonable, common sense Americans.
You are correct that Obama cannot follow your advice. He looks at the world from the eyes of a victim that has finally gotten the upper hand and is going to make the agressor pay. (Nevermind that his victim status and the role of America as agressor is patently absurd).
He reminds me of a woman I once worked with at a bank. She had risen very quickly to a managerial post and was very well paid. However, she constantly railed against perceived inequities in the company, and if anyone dared disagree with her she cried “racism”. This finally came to a head when, at a catered company luncheon, she verbally assaulted a food server because the server dared to give her green leafy lettuce rather than the tough white lettuce that comes from the core of the plant. I can still her screaming “she (the server) is racist, she wont give me the white lettuce”.
She was eventually fired, and in response filed an EEOC claim. While this sounds ridiculous, the woman truly believed that she was the constant object of discrimination, even though she had been consistently promoted and well paid by the owners of the bank, whom were white. She was so invested in her victim status that even bowl of lettuce screamed racism to her.
Obama simply cannot change his world view to help himself, he is too invested.
An excellent article. Would that the President would take even a bit of this advice. We’d all be better off.
Good article. The Emmanuel Goldstein comparison was a hoot. Of course, Obama’s too numerous misfires and misjudgments will come back to haunt him in November when voters plan to make his party a minority one in Congress. But Obama is so self-indulgent it is unrealistic to expect him–even when it is proposed merely as a joke–to rein in what really motivates him (racial politics and dislike of this country) for the purpose of limiting the damage this November-—if that is even possible at this point. Jimmy Carter’s presidency was downgraded by members of his own party and by voters in 1978 and he almost became irrelevant. But this will be Obama’s fate and only a miracle will prevent it.
VDH:
“Will Obama adopt any of my suggestions? No, of course not. Why?”
You explanation is superficial, because it does not attempt to explain why Obama would go to lengths to achieve his agenda, and why he is resistant to change.
Simply, Obama does not perceive himself to be bound by the same vices that others in history have been bound. He is a narcissist, and narcissists cannot fathom themselves behaving any differently. He will not change because he is at the top, and being at the top, almost nothing can supplant this narcissism. The only thing that could change Obama would be the return of his mother from the grave — in other words, a truly spiritual event that would force Obama’s perception of himself to change.
Why are we, and even you VDH, so generous with Obama, given how Obama handles himself? Because we believe that we are imperfect in criticism, so we are willing to entertain doubt, the possibility that we are wrong. The reality is that even while we reach out, Obama has no intent of reaching back. He has never given me the impression that he respects my principles. This is a sure sign that Obama lacks perspective, avoids conflict, and has never learned how to empathize or sympathize with his opponents.
When powerful people lack perspective, and lack the ability to broaden their perspective, tunnel-vision ensues. We should not be generous with Obama because of his tunnel-vision — it is a trait that is un-American, divisive, and often incorrigible. This is why Obama will not change — he is not a scholar as he would like us all to believe, he is only an instigator, a cowardly bully.
I’ve been a professional in the financial feld that bares my name.
The Obammas exhibits a lifestyle that a shares a lot with many of my clients.
Through other professional publications I have learned that the Obammas lifestyle previous to becoming president was one of “living way beyond their means.”
All indications of this family, not unlike the Clintons before them, show that they are bankrupt. In absolute and moral terms also. Unfortunately they are where they can do a lot of damage.
VDH, sooner or later we are going to have to come to the realization that we are being led by folks who don’t particularly want the job, in care of people they don’t particularly like, spending money we don’t have, to solve problems that don’t exist.
Global warming, tea party “racism”, and an array of other faux “crises” are merely foils for the Grand Aim. Redistribution of money from some pockets and purses…into other pockets and purses.
Guilt tripping is the weapon of choice.
En garde, my dear cyberfriend, VDH. Prepare to be apologized about for all your “sins” of birth.
If Obama took your advice, he could upgrade himself into a mediocre President.
I don’t expect it to happen.
The president’s ego will not allow him to follow through on any of the 10 suggestions. Arrogance will kill the soul and Mr. Obama should know for he exhibits this on a daily basis.
Excellent as always Dr. Hanson. Too bad Obama only listens to Soros and Marx.
VDH for president.
Brilliant idea. 180 degree course correction ordered by President Victor Davis Hanson followed by calming seas and smooth sailing ahead. But then maybe not; there’s always Fox News and the preachin’ Chief of the “Little Rockers” to deal with. I don’t think they would be anxious to go along for the ride.
amazing article, as always. Dr. Hanson completes my “must-read” troika of Krauthammer and Steyn.
I am tempted to forward this article to my co-worker, a devout liberal/Socialist who thinks Obama’s great. but I don’t know if she’d get it. liberals have been so besotted with this guy I don’t know if they’re even capable of seeing the truth anymore.
Dr. H. gives us a succinct list of everything that’s wrong with Obama, that explains why his numbers are tanking, but the hard left like my friend replies (and this is a verbatim quote) “I’m glad I’m in that 13% that approves of the job Obama’s doing.” what can you do with people like that?
It doesn’t matter what percentage of Americans don’t want the agenda. 60% of the congress goes with it – see last spring’s hero Scott Brown welcoming Elena Kagan warmly and then voting for the “Jobs Bill”. Many here were breathing heavily over the guy, and look what you get. Only M. Savage, who is STILL banned in Britain spoke out 2 days later telling you that you were sold a bill of goods.
They’re all the same – only a few – Paul Ryan, Ron Paul and select others are actually people.
Stop being sheeple, as Bill Cooper used to say, before they killed him.
The political spectrum is not left to right linear. It’s more like a circle or a sphere. Go far enough Left or Right and you find the lunatic fringe from both parties meet each other on the dark side. No surprise some of these fringe politicians occasionally hold hands with those of the “opposite” side. For nut cases nominal party affiliation becomes irrelevant.
TLM:
“It’s more like a circle or a sphere.”
Allow me to restate; it’s more like a circle jerk or the shape of a dunce, tinfoil hat. And we all go along. Except for you and me. Now there are at least two of us.
I had attempted to link my comment to the discussion on Pat Buchanan and his communist running partner in the 90′s. Nutcases from either “side” of the political spectrum often find much in common with each other.
Considering the current failure of our political class, the circle jerk analogy may be more appropriate. cf. Angelo Codevilla: “America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution”. I’m working my way through this long article, but at first glance he seems to generally agree with your assessment.
From CNN:
“The hull of a ship likely made in the 1700s was discovered at the World Trade Center site this week. Archaeologists say that it probably was sunk there in the effort to add land to Manhattan in the early 19th century.”
That ought to put a damper on building a mosque there. It’ll (hopefully) be declared a protected archeological site. New construction will have to await excavation, which might take awhile.
Hmmm, ten steps. I’d be happy with just one of ‘em, but I’m not holding my breath. The only hope we have is a major reshuffling of power in both the House & the Senate in November, which will relegate him to becoming like a petulant child, whining and complaining about those “mean-spirited, racist Republicans.” More importantly, it will put the brakes on his agenda, plus, hopefully, keep any more (wise Latina women) Sotomayors and (homophile/heterophobe, take your pick) Kagans from getting on the SC.
“Narcissus” or “Echo”?
Don’t know enough about Greek mythology to choose. But, when Obama speaks you do tend to hear an irritating mind-numbing “echo” of his words from MSM pundits, college pukes and assorted other sycophantic acolytes for some time afterwards, so the “Echo” designation might be more accurate.
Great article!
Humorous related cartoon with Obama titled “The Race Bus” at http://drawfortruth.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/the-race-bus/
AS Always an excellent article Dr Hanson.
…and I would agree the perfect ticket in 2012 is VDH for President and John Bolton VP…..and a cabinet with William Bennett, Dennis Prager, Laura Ingraham and other like-minded conservatives…and Brit Hume as Press Secretary. I like to dream!
Bruce,
I’m not in complete agreement on your dream team, but you raise a very important point. The pundits want us to get into a shooting war over the next Republican candidate for president. We can’t let that happen. We can have primaries to find the best top of the ticket, but that person then has to include the others in the team. We have to learn not to demonize opponents but to recognize the strengths that made them appealing to some voters. Ultimately, the top of the ticket represents the best reflection of our national priorities and the impression we have of that person’s ability to deliver. The Republicans will have a pretty impressive group of primary losers who need to contribute in their areas of expertise. We need a good manager and an all star team.
Bruce:
Another clear eyed American spotted on the ugly political scene. Join the plea, never give in, never, never never.
Victor Davis Hanson for President in 2012.
I initially dismissed President Obama as a well-intentioned fool. I now believe I was wrong on both points. Dr. Hanson’s advice would work if my initial premise were true, but if President Obama is indeed determined to destroy America he’s pursuing a brilliant strategy.
After reading all the comments it is even more clear that while the country faces major challenges, VDH and company choose to address issues of personal or cultural style, snark, and sniggers for frustrated righties. If it floats your boat, fine; but to think it has anything to do with addressing the wars, the economy, or the Gulf, think again.
It is one version of fiddling…and diddling, while Rome burns. And yes, let’s put Laura Ingraham in the Cabinet; now there is a splendid idea.
We faced major challenges under Bush, and as I recall a considerable amount of ink and air time was devoted to his “personal or cultural style” of management (Bible thumper, gut feelings, blah blah blah). It would be ridiculous to ignore certain characteristics of the management style of any president, particularly one with no previous executive experience.
Whatever the issues, a president must enlist the support of the public to make his policies work. Obama’s problem is his policies are unpopular. So is the manner in which he has enacted many of them. Furthermore, both his policies and his management style (same ole okey-dokey politics as usual) put the lie to almost everything he portrayed himself as while a candidate. We knew he was inexperienced. Now we see he is an incompetent ideologue and a liar. So, perhaps, the biggest issue facing us right now is not the wars/recession/environment/energy/etc per se. It’s the man we selected to fix these problems.
Re: #7.
Obama has tried to turn Bush into Herbert Hoover.
Did FDR do the same thing? I doubt it.
FDR did get results. BHO has only bad results.
BHO is no FDR.
It will be edifying to see how many people here will venture a good word for FDR and his “results.” The party line here, I believe, is that FDR PROLONGED the depression.
Dr Hanson, I’m glad that you seem to be done with your despairing melancholy phase. This new approach of criticizing Obama with wry humour works better for me.
This one will be printed and added to my collection of VDH Gold Medal articles.
Robert Gibbs Is Asked About Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8Aahw3NT6E
Obama’s Social Security Number(s) – Jerome Corsi on the Jeff Kuhner Show – 5/18/10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRt64dO0opE&playnext_from=TL&videos=40nsx4e7eKM
I have two emotions after reading this and Dr. Hanson’s most recent other post.
One – WOW! I was recently directed to read VDH and I am very glad I have followed that advice. His posts are great, his points dead on. My first impression was to get some acquaintances to start reading the posts and be changed for the better. These people are reasonably intelligent they are just, somehow, hooked by Obama (even still at 2 A.B) but these points are quick and accurate, they have to see them!
But then.. The second emotion/thought occurred to me -
Even while reading this post or the 2A.B. post, these people will suspend rational thought, throw away logic and more or less do what the articles accuse Obama and those he surrounds himself of doing… I’ll be insinuated to be a racist, I will be reminded of all of Bush’s evils, I’ll be told, “you want the country to fail, you want Obama to fail!” and I’ll be ridiculed for being “fooled by a neocon, big business, evil agenda”.
And that, friends, scares me to my core. Either I am really under some magical spell and I am the moron and I don’t see through VDH’s posts or there are a large number of people, who vote, that just don’t use rational thoughts. I can admit the things I didn’t like about the GWB years. I can admit the things that piss me off with our current Republican minority in the house. I know all of you can and do the same.
What scares me? Why do those 35-45% get tricked so easily? How are they any different than the Germans in the 1930s or the people that actually liked Kim Jong Il? What about Stalin or Mao’s friends? No, I’m not saying Obama is about to drive us to those extremes but those aren’t ancient history lessons. A fooled people who are willing to suspend logic, rationality and thought in exchange for promises, hope and scapegoats to blame keep me up at night. I’d go as far to say as they keep me bittery clinging to some things…
Great post, just wish more would “get” it.
It is human nature to avoid having to admit one has made a mistake. Witness the small child shuffling its feet, stammering out some semblance of what they desperately hope is a believeable lie; adults are most often merely small children grown larger.
It takes a certain amount of both intelligence and honest self-examination, objectivity, if you will, to first understand why we believe something, and to then realize we were wrong and shift our perspective to another direction. To be honest, I’ve come to the conclusion that most people just don’t have it in them and I can’t say for sure whether it is due simply to “human nature” or if this is the end result of so many years of progressive liberal ideology being poured into them through the educational system (as demonstrated by replacing grades with a simple “pass/fail”, contemporary “affirmative action”, etc.)
I know people who still make excuses for poor little Barry and at the end of the day the best consolation I have found is to simply label them as a moron and move on, hoping that eventually the inevitable forces of Nature will either wake them up or put them out of their misery.
The good doctor offers a 10-point plan for Obama to correct his chucklable piccadillos, like golfing every other week.
Meanwhile,
- the federal government is sueing a state for a very mild law to help enforce border security and prevent further beheadings.
- the State-owned press is in a full-throated roage about Andrew Breitbart’s racism for posting an accurate video by a woman who then accused Mr Breitbart of wanting to revert to slave days
- a person who disdains the Constitution is about to be appointed to the Supreme Court
- North Korea threatens nuclear strikes against South Korea. Based on our “government’s” response, one has to assume it approves.
- The full-court press to destroy Israel continues.
- Congress refuses to pass a budget because they don’t want to highlight their criminality before the election
- Congress plots to cram Crap and Tax down the country throat in a lame duck session.
I could go on for weeks.
But your article is nice and clever, Doc. I’m sure the administration is amused that it gives the vdh-heads something to distract themselves instead of thinking about the 24×7 destruction of the United States.
VDH article is very amusing and I appreciate the humor as too little is available these days.
However, we do need to wake up and realize that the political machine that obtained Obama’s election is still alive and well (search the web for we will not be silenced 2008). Our last presidential election was more similar in some respects to packed and illegal elections in Afghanistan and other corrupt political countries. Intimidations were rampant. It is chilling.
I am praying for our country…..
The antichrist will come into power as a politcal person that promises hope; a false christ. Is anyone studying the book of Revelations in the Bible? There is still time to change course and the November elections is one of them.
God bless the United States of America and pray that it stays united.