Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Rick Moran

Bio

April 12, 2014 - 3:44 pm

Hit and Run’s J.D. Tuccille calls the practice “feudal” — requiring the children of parents who owe money to the federal government to pay the bill years later. If so, don’t be surprised if the Obama administration brings back the rack. Or perhaps they won’t go all Medieval on us and just reinstall the stocks as corporal punishment.

One of the truly unique and exceptional things about America in the late 18th century was that the sins of the father could not be visited on the son. That tradition stood — until now. And as Tuccille explains, it was a two step policy change that brought this stinkburger about:

The new multi-generational debt collection practice required a two-step policy change. One was the elimination of the 10-year statute of limitations on debts to the federal government. The other involves the Social Security Administration insisting that if tiny tots indirectly benefited from public assistance collected by adults decades ago those now-grown ex-tots are responsible for any overpayments the feds may claim.

The elimination of the statute of limitations may, on its face, allow the government to go after individuals responsible for incurring debt, but the longer time horizon means accurate records can be hard to come by. According to Fisher, “Social Security officials told Grice they had no records explaining the debt.”

How do you collect a debt that you can’t prove exists? Through the sheer grinding weight of the state, of course.

Going after the next generation—which never made the decision to incur a debt to begin with—really is a massive break from previous policy.

Most financial websites advise heirs that they are responsible for parents’ debt only if they cosigned loans, held joint accounts, or shared community property with the deceased. Beyond that, the debt adheres to the debtor’s estate and may devour any inheritance. The estate belonged to the debtor and passes to heirs only after bills are paid. But the debt stops there.

What’s interesting about this policy is that other federal agencies aren’t following it; only the Social Security Administration and Treasury Department seem to be engaged in this generational theft. Others, like the FTC, aren’t enforcing the change.

In a Washington Post article, one victim of this astonishing policy tells her story:

A few weeks ago, with no notice, the U.S. government intercepted Mary Grice’s tax refunds from both the IRS and the state of Maryland. Grice had no idea that Uncle Sam had seized her money until some days later, when she got a letter saying that her refund had gone to satisfy an old debt to the government — a very old debt.

When Grice was 4, back in 1960, her father died, leaving her mother with five children to raise. Until the kids turned 18, Sadie Grice got survivor benefits from Social Security to help feed and clothe them.

Now, Social Security claims it overpaid someone in the Grice family — it’s not sure who — in 1977. After 37 years of silence, four years after Sadie Grice died, the government is coming after her daughter. Why the feds chose to take Mary’s money, rather than her surviving siblings’, is a mystery.

Across the nation, hundreds of thousands of taxpayers who are expecting refunds this month are instead getting letters like the one Grice got, informing them that because of a debt they never knew about — often a debt incurred by their parents — the government has confiscated their check.

I couldn’t find anything on this issue published before today. And yet, it’s apparently been a rule for 3 years. Why hasn’t this issue been challenged in court?

Grice found a lawyer willing to take her case without charge. Vogel is exercised about the constitutional violations he sees in the retroactive lifting of the 10-year limit on debt collection. “Can the government really bring back to life a case that was long dead?” the lawyer asked. “Can it really be right to seize a child’s money to satisfy a parent’s debt?”

But many other taxpayers whose refunds have been taken say they’ve been unable to contest the confiscations because of the cost, because Social Security cannot provide records detailing the original overpayment, and because the citizens, following advice from the IRS to keep financial documents for just three years, had long since trashed their own records.

In Glenarm, Ill., Brenda and Mike Samonds have spent the past year trying to figure out how to get back the $189.10 tax refund the government seized, claiming that Mike’s mother, who died 33 years ago, had been overpaid on survivor’s benefits after Mike’s father died in 1969.

“It was never Mike’s money, it was his mother’s,” Brenda Samonds said. “The government took the money first and then they sent us the letter. We could never get one sentence from them explaining why the money was taken.” The government mailed its notice about the debt to the house Mike’s mother lived in 40 years ago.

Are you getting the feeling that we’re living in Venezuela or some other banana republic rather than America? No due process. No explanation. Just intimidation and the realization that you would probably spend your life savings to fight for a couple of hundred or thousand dollars.

Welcome to the Transformed United States of America.

Rick Moran is PJ Media's Chicago editor and Blog editor at The American Thinker. He is also host of the"RINO Hour of Power" on Blog Talk Radio. His own blog is Right Wing Nut House.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
We don't care about yo 401k, yo daddy's 401k, or yo grand daddy's 401k!

We are going to take your money because you owe retribution. And you can't do a damn thing about it.



Build the gallows. Treason is a high crime and deserves the harshest punishment.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (15)
All Comments   (15)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Sooner or later we are all going to have to clean up this mess and it is going to get worse.... Soon an unborn child will enter the world with a debt from his dead grandmother two generations back...... This is a bureaucracy gone nuts, the next thing we know Obama's relatives will be living in Boston and receiving government checks from us.....
OH, excuse me, that is already happening..........
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
The current regime ignores the Constitution at will, and literally rules by decree with no opposition. Why should we expect that the prohibition against Bills of Attainder and Corruption of the Blood to hold when Article I in its entirety is gone?

Subotai Bahadur
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
Who says the Democrats aren't Religious?

"The Sins of the Father..."
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
Oh, these debts only began with Obama? We've been hearing about passing debts to our descendants since Thomas Jefferson.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
In the Third World where Hussein al-Obama was raised, this is known as "debt peonage".
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
As with the IRS, you owe what they say unless you can prove otherwise.

That said, as usual the reporting on this is abysmal. The payments involved were in fact paid to the children but through an adult. I suspect the statute of limitations have, catch-22, run out on the available remedies. As usual, the citizen is limited where the government is not.

As with so many things, Congress screwed up and should fix it ASAP. Also it's a safe bet that only certain people are targeted. Agencies of intimidation should be shut down- Congress. Stop funding tyranny. Now.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
From what I've read, the Soviets under Lenin and Stalin also punished the families of those they considered enemies. Perhaps Obama is making use of that philosophy in his latest policies?

I'm not sure if this is a very telling clue on the inspiration for this move or just a coincidence but I stumbled on this article earlier today in "The Week", a publication that is unfamiliar to me: http://theweek.com/article/index/259887/speedreads-obamas-press-secretary

Maybe this is just one of those spoof newsletters like The Onion. Or maybe we've just proven that Carney - and presumably many of the higher-ups in the administration - openly admire all things Soviet, possibly including even the punishment of succeeding generations for the actions of their parents.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
The Federal government seems to be going out of it's way to make itself unpopular with Americans.

That's fine with me. Piss off enough people, and we can begin pruning the federal government back down to the size it should be.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
We don't care about yo 401k, yo daddy's 401k, or yo grand daddy's 401k!

We are going to take your money because you owe retribution. And you can't do a damn thing about it.



Build the gallows. Treason is a high crime and deserves the harshest punishment.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
Get back to us when the Establishment GOP wants to change the direction of the country, not the Forward speed.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
1 2 Next View All

2 Trackbacks to “Obama’s America: Children Liable for the Government Debts of Their Parents”