Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

by
Robert Wargas

Bio

March 9, 2013 - 7:35 am

A day after “International Women’s Day,” a femino-fascist spectacle in which pampered nitwits take to Facebook to protest non-existent forms of oppression, I read in the Telegraph that “controversy has erupted over next Tuesday’s European Parliament resolution ‘on eliminating gender stereotypes in the EU,’ meant to mark international women’s day…”:

“The proposal ‘calls on the EU and its member states to take concrete action on discrimination against women in advertising… [with] a ban on all forms of pornography in the media.’”

Proposed by a Dutch femino-fascist ironically named Kartika Liotard, the measure would technically not be legally binding, something that simultaneously proves the ridiculousness of the proposal itself as well as the ugly and oppressive uselessness of the “European Project.”

The report continues:

“Rick Falkvinge, the founder of the Swedish Pirate Party which campaigns for internet freedom and has MEPs, warned that there is ‘a clear majority in favour of this report, much because of its title and a belief that there’s nothing odd about it.’”

It is an odd day in hell, is it not, when a libertarian Swede is sounding the warning bells against the politically correct Eurocracy?

As it happens, I am in the middle of writing an essay on the nastiness of the European Project–its essentially doomed character, its contempt for the people it claims to represent, and its unique ability to fuse the worst elements of the far left and the far right as a result of its tyrannical mission creep.

Also from the report:

“The MEPs are also demanding the establishment of state sex censors with ‘a mandate to impose effective sanctions on companies and individuals promoting the sexualisation of girls.’”

This is what happens, ladies and gentleman, when you allow gender fascism to become a mainstreamed ideology. Men who find women sexy or “hot” are said to be “objectifying” women. The inevitable corollary is that male sexuality comes to be seen as a pathology in need of correcting. As is the case with all totalitarian ideologies, the bar for being deemed pathological becomes progressively lower, for a totalitarian is NEVER satisfied. After pornography, it will be flirting on the Brussels agenda.

Just you wait. Oh, just you wait.

Robert Wargas is a regular contributor to PJ Media. A native of Long Island, he was educated at the City University of New York and Yale University, and has contributed reports and opinion pieces to Newsday and FrontPage Magazine on a range of topics. He also maintains an independent blog at http://robertwargas.typepad.com. Outside of his political writing, Wargas has worked as a professional historian for a large cancer-research institution, documenting the history of biotechnology since the 1970s. He can be reached at rwargas22@yahoo.com. Follow him on Twitter @RobertWargas

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
They told me if I voted Republican, we'd have governments seeking to ban pornography. And they were right! #648,103
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Liberals take the most innocent things and politicize them and racialize them. When you counter that our pop culture, especially older expressions of pop culture, had no such intent, you are told bizarre theories such as white privilege and male power and that of course you are not going to notice the benefits of privilege. In the liberal world, pornography encourages the objectification of women but mass shootings in film doesn't have the same effect when it comes to skewing our vision of dealing rationally with problems rather than with violence. Convenient argument for Hollywood liberals, who other liberals won't touch.

Presumably you can't see these expressions of white male power and privilege because you are too stupid to read between the race/politics lines of culture while liberals are not. Such racial and political eyeballing of culture is the basis of Critical Pedagogy, Critical Law Theory and Critical Race Theory, where one's awareness of the social implications of life and how you educate yourself in this regard trumps the straightforward learning of math, science and art.

In reality this liberal view is a form of paranoia, where you are told nothing is what it seems, or natural and that it's always bad. It's never an unaware act that's good. That should tell you something right there, and about the dangers of overthinking a thing.

A liberal can take The Flintstones and make it a symbol of a decadent male and white centric power structure that must be taken down.

There is an intellectual disconnect among liberals that is delusional. They'll tell you if they're gay and politicized, that if they read literature, they want to see gay characters. They'll also tell you it has been wrong for traditional literature to not have more gay characters.

So what is more wrong: for 97% of the population to unwittingly and naturally write about straight people 97% of the time, or for 3% of the population to purposefully write about 3% of the population 97% of the time. Light bulbs should go off - they don't.

It seems to me if it's wrong for male, white and straight literature that vastly reflects the real and immediate environment, then it's much more wrong to skew the involvement of a culture and want literature that doubles down on what you say is wrong in the first place, especially when you do it on purpose and your purported foe did not. When you mainstream this idea into the educational system and law, it's institutionalizing hypocrisy and even doublethink and pure stupidity.

This is why a modern Flintstones would have Barney and Betty be black and at least one character be gay - out of fear. Fear of offending a tiny minority that have politicized, exaggerated, racialized and radicalized their presence in society, by pointing out the world is racist and bigoted - against them, who miraculously are immune in such matters.

The irony of black science fiction authors complaining about white SF authors writing white characters in a country that was almost 90% white for most of that era while today's black SF authors manage to populate their stories with blacks in a country 87% non-black is completely lost on these morons. They project these political obsessions onto older artists who had no such concerns in a monumental display of provincialism 101 even while they say provincialism is bad.

The short version of this comment is that liberals and stupid and a little mad - mad as in crazy. Mad as in suffering from pathologies where they are targeted as groups even when there is no evidence this is so. They'll simply read between the lines of any given event and say you don't know how to do that because of a fault in your education.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Huh, it's like she's Christian or something!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All