Get PJ Media on your Apple

The PJ Tatler

Matt Vespa


March 8, 2013 - 5:28 am

So, this story will make you chuckle.  Politico reported yesterday that the White House has basically told anti-gun groups and their allies in Congress to sit down, shut up, and let the White House drive the push for new gun control.  Centralization of power when it comes to messaging has been a core characteristic of this administration, and when it comes to an issue as delicate as gun control – this is a tightly run ship.

Ok, so here are the rules:

The implied rules, according to conversations with many of those involved: No infighting. No second-guessing in the press. Support whatever the president and Vice President Joe Biden propose. And most of all, don’t make waves or get ahead of the White House.

In exchange: a voice in the discussions, a role in whatever final agreement is made and weekly meetings at the White House with Biden’s chief of staff, Bruce Reed — provided they don’t discuss what happens there

In short, Reed:

forced a major change on some of Washington’s noisiest advocates: the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Third Way, Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns and Americans for Responsible Solutions, the organization founded by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and her husband, Mark Kelly. In past fights, gun control groups sparred with each other and got used to dictating the agenda to allies in Congress.

There’s also punishment for those who don’t abide by the rules.  The Violence Policy Center was forced to walk the plank when they fought for more restrictions on gun rights, and argued that the failed renewal Assault Weapons Ban in 2004 didn’t go far enough.  They’ve been cut out of the loop, and relegated to the “kid’s table.”  The Obama administration wasn’t going to entertain a bull in a china closet.

Concerning anti-gun members of Congress, they’ve been very closed mouthed about how the negotiations are going, especially since they’ve virtually collapsed this week.  Only tougher gun trafficking laws seem to have enough votes for passage:

 Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), who hasn’t made a headline since warning the night of the Newtown shootings that “the gloves are off” with the White House if it failed to act on gun control.

McCarthy is holding her tongue on the White House gun control strategy, even though the major push has been for background checks and gun trafficking, not the ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines she has championed for years.

That’s because she is happy enough that the White House is finally backing a gun control push.

If this is how Obama treats its allies, with the shut up or die approach, then we know why this administration can’t govern effectively on anything. Not that we’re complaining or anything,.

It should be fascinating, however, to see if more media outlets start exposing the White House’s heavy-handed manipulation of its left-wing allies as the second term wears on and Obama fatigue starts to set in, especially if the Obama White House strategy bears little fruit in terms of policy wins.

Matt Vespa is a web editor at and occasional writer for Hot Air, RedState, and Townhall Magazine.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Here, in a nutshell, is the problem with most of the advocacy groups in the United States. They are far more interested in power, or being close to power, or participating in the process, than they are in their ostensible principles.

What is the point of falling in line? None of the policy proposals advance by this White House have any chance of lessening gun violence. An "assault weapons" ban would reduce the number and type of guns available to Americans. But it doesn't have the ghost of a chance of passing the Senate, much less the House. Same for the "high capacity" magazines. The only thing that has a shot is universal background checks. Are they really willing to sacrifice all their independence for this small legislative victory? Apparently, yes.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
It's not that the two sides disagree. Obama knows if those groups say what they REALLY believe, it will prove the 2nd Amendment supporters are RIGHT. By only putting out the "we don't want to take ALL of them" message, they try to look reasonable.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Ladies and Gents, it's time to start drumming up fake press releases. Let's see if we can get some infighting going on.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
They voted for Hope&Change! and now they're getting getting it hard and rough.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
They brought them to the White House and forced them to drink the Kool Aid.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “How The Obama White House Got Anti-Gun Advocates To Shut Up and Get In Line”