Yesterday on MSNBC, California Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein made a startling claim. She claimed that “I think we’ve got all the police,” backing her latest “assault” weapons ban, adding that “we have all the mayors virtually.”
Is that true? Feinstein may have the support of most big city mayors, liberals like Michael Bloomberg foremost among them, but what about police officers?
This afternoon I spoke with former Rep. Sandy Adams (R-FL). Sandy Adams has one of the most interesting backgrounds of anyone in politics. She dropped out of school at age 17 to join the US Air Force. She married at 18, but that marriage turned out to be an abusive one. She ended up studying and becoming a deputy sheriff in the Orange County (FL) Sheriff’s Department. That was in 1985. She served in law enforcement for 17 years, losing her second husband in the line of duty in 1989. Her life and work propelled her to become an advocate for crime victims’ rights, which led her to study criminal justice, and eventually, politics. She spent eight years in the Florida House before her election to Congress.
Fast forward and Adams is elected to Congress in the 2010 Tea Party class. She has a strong opinion, as a former law enforcement officer, on the subject of firearms and an armed citizenry. They don’t square at all with Sen. Feinstein’s take.
“I can tell you she doesn’t have all the police because I just met with a large group of rank and file police and they don’t agree. None of the ones I spoke with were supportive.”
She also spoke recently with Dallas police officers, who “recognized that it doesn’t address the real problem. The real problem is criminals.” In general, Adams says that rank and file officers do not agree with police chiefs and mayors who publicly push for gun control. The reason is simple: Rank and file officers understand that the police cannot be everywhere guarding against criminals, so citizens have to be able to defend themselves.
“Response times are getting longer. You may have to defend yourself until someone arrives to help you.”
She cited the case of the Georgia mom who found herself and her children under attack from a home invader in January.
“She had to defend herself and her baby because help had not arrived,” Adams said. “The woman in Georgia did everything right,” Adams said, noting that the woman called 9-1-1 before retrieving her pistol. “She didn’t want to have the confrontation. She retreated but the bad guy kept coming. So she defended herself and her children.” When the attacker broke into the hiding place where the mom and her 9-year-old twins were hiding and confronted them with a crowbar, the mom emptied her .38 revolver, hitting the assailant with five of her six shots. He was later arrested, and it turned out that he had a long rap sheet.
“When I was on the streets in law enforcement, we just didn’t have the resources to respond to each call,” Adams said.











(show less)
We know that when seconds count we're only minutes away. We know that bullets are unreliable fight stoppers, and that's why we carry 12-17 round magazines, and several of them. We know that rifles are easier to use than shotguns for most women and men of smaller stature, and that they are more precise and safer to use in town. We know that there are enough laws already. We also know that California's AW ban has not made it safer, but it has made it much more difficult and expensive for police officers to seek out advanced training on their own time and dollar as large urban agencies restrict the use and transport of these dangerous issued tools while banning our ability to purchase them for our... (show more)
We know that when seconds count we're only minutes away. We know that bullets are unreliable fight stoppers, and that's why we carry 12-17 round magazines, and several of them. We know that rifles are easier to use than shotguns for most women and men of smaller stature, and that they are more precise and safer to use in town. We know that there are enough laws already. We also know that California's AW ban has not made it safer, but it has made it much more difficult and expensive for police officers to seek out advanced training on their own time and dollar as large urban agencies restrict the use and transport of these dangerous issued tools while banning our ability to purchase them for our own use. We know how this goes, and Diane Feinstein has never spoken for us. (show less)
Gosh, I dunno. Would a liberal Democrat lie to the American people?
Gosh, I dunno. Would a liberal Democrat lie to the American people?
You say "So what?" Well, another fact: The city with the most extreme gun control is Washington DC with Chicago coming in second. In 2010 DC had twenty seven times more murders than the larger city of El Paso, TX where all responsible adult citizens can carry loaded handguns concealed on their person as they go about their day. Chicago's murder rate was nineteen times higher than El Paso's the same year. Source: FBI Crime
Report and US Census for population... (show more)
You say "So what?" Well, another fact: The city with the most extreme gun control is Washington DC with Chicago coming in second. In 2010 DC had twenty seven times more murders than the larger city of El Paso, TX where all responsible adult citizens can carry loaded handguns concealed on their person as they go about their day. Chicago's murder rate was nineteen times higher than El Paso's the same year. Source: FBI Crime
Report and US Census for population data.
Still not enough? Mexico has extreme gun control. Juarez, a medium sized Mexican city had more murders than the six largest U.S. cities, combined. If you don't see a trend, I can't help you. There are none so blind..... (show less)
Additionally, the FEMA camps being established, will NOT be supported by our nation's police.
I personally am very confused as-to who the Feds think will willingly herd Americans? -Is this just a get-rich-quick scheme by a few contractors?
Additionally, the FEMA camps being established, will NOT be supported by our nation's police.
I personally am very confused as-to who the Feds think will willingly herd Americans? -Is this just a get-rich-quick scheme by a few contractors?
The Sheriff is "the top law enforcement official" in each county by law. Does Sen Feinstein consider him not to be Police?
The Sheriff is "the top law enforcement official" in each county by law. Does Sen Feinstein consider him not to be Police?
I just wrote something on this very topic yesterday and it can be found here: <a href="http://joeforamerica.com/2013/02/chiefs-of-police-completely-misrepresent-law-enforcement/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://joeforamerica.com/2013/02/chiefs-of-police-completely-misrepresent-law-enforcement/</a>
I just wrote something on this very topic yesterday and it can be found here: <a href="http://joeforamerica.com/2013/02/chiefs-of-police-completely-misrepresent-law-enforcement/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://joeforamerica.com/2013/02/chiefs-of-police-completely-misrepresent-law-enforcement/</a>
(show less)
We know that when seconds count we're only minutes away. We know that bullets are unreliable fight stoppers, and that's why we carry 12-17 round magazines, and several of them. We know that rifles are easier to use than shotguns for most women and men of smaller stature, and that they are more precise and safer to use in town. We know that there are enough laws already. We also know that California's AW ban has not made it safer, but it has made it much more difficult and expensive for police officers to seek out advanced training on their own time and dollar as large urban agencies restrict the use and transport of these dangerous issued tools while banning our ability to purchase them for our... (show more)
We know that when seconds count we're only minutes away. We know that bullets are unreliable fight stoppers, and that's why we carry 12-17 round magazines, and several of them. We know that rifles are easier to use than shotguns for most women and men of smaller stature, and that they are more precise and safer to use in town. We know that there are enough laws already. We also know that California's AW ban has not made it safer, but it has made it much more difficult and expensive for police officers to seek out advanced training on their own time and dollar as large urban agencies restrict the use and transport of these dangerous issued tools while banning our ability to purchase them for our own use. We know how this goes, and Diane Feinstein has never spoken for us. (show less)