<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/01/26/d-c-court-decision-could-lead-to-more-gridlock-thats-a-good-thing/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:39:07 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>D.C. Court Decision Could Lead To More Gridlock, That's a Good Thing</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Well, it wasn&amp;#8217;t a good day for Obama.  Besides the March for Life, Roll Call&amp;#8217;s John Gramlich, Lauren Smith, and Ben Weyl wrote that, &amp;#8220;the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled 3-0 that Obama overstepped his constitutional authority when he made three appointments to the NLRB while the Senate was on a holiday break in January 2012.  PJ&amp;#8217;s Stephen Green posted on this development on the Tatler yesterday.  The Constitution allows the president to make such appointments when the senate is in recess, but &amp;#8220;the court says the Senate technically stayed in session when lawmakers gaveled in and out every few days for so-called &amp;#8216;pro forma&amp;#8217; sessions.&amp;#8221;  As Green noted, this was intentionally done to keep Obama&amp;#8217;s pro-union appointees to the National Labor Relations Board at bay.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:14:32 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Matt Vespa]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/matt-vespa/2013/01/26/d-c-court-decision-could-lead-to-more-gridlock-thats-a-good-thing-n176262</link></item></channel></rss>