Democratic Party activist and pornographer Larry Flynt is at it again. The man who offered a bounty of $1 million to any woman who was involved with a GOP politician during the Clinton impeachment and again in 2007 is offering up to $1 million for Mitt Romney’s tax returns.
A magazine known for its sexually explicit material is offering a reward of $1 million dollars for a different type of bare-all expose.
The publisher of Hustler magazine, Larry Flynt, is offering the sum for the skinny on GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s financials, the magazine announced.
It is taking out full-page advertisements in two newspapers – The Washington Post on Sunday, and USA Today on Tuesday – “offering up to a million dollars in cash for documented evidence concerning Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s unreleased tax returns and/or details of his offshore assets, bank accounts and business partnerships,” a press release from the magazine read.
Flynt’s announcement could be seen as either an attempt to keep the issue of Romney’s financial documents alive or put himself – and his magazine – in headlines.
Romney has released his tax returns for 2010 and an estimate of his 2011 tax liability, but has repeatedly said he would not release additional years, saying it would be fodder for Democrats to criticize him.
In recent months, various political figures, including some Republicans, have called for more transparency from Romney.
Earlier in the week, an anonymous online poster claimed it was holding stolen tax documents belonging to Romney ransom for $1 million in an internet currency. Should the sum not be paid by later this month, the posting said a key to unlock the documents would be released publicly, while the financial firm from which the documents were allegedly stolen said there is “no evidence of unauthorized access to our data.”
It’s a misnomer to refer to Flyn as a “publisher” only. In addition to Hustler Magazine, Flynt has a media empire that includes the creation and publication of X-rated DVD’s, an X-rated website, a card room in Los Angeles, and an adult clothing store.
The sleazy Mr. Flynt is the perfect man for this black bag job. The anonymous group who claims to possess Mr. Romney’s returns needs a media outlet for their plan and Hustler would be a perfect fit. With the scatological cartoons, sophomoric humor, and air brushed photos, it would seem to be a marriage made in heaven.
Flynt would seem to be a perfect Democrat: An obscenity in a party that grasps for power using the politics of personal destruction.
You stay classy, Larry.






Is it illegal to solicit people to find/steal/divulge a citizen’s tax returns???
Dear Larry, Why not put up another million to answer one of these burning questions:
- Obama’s birth certificate or parents marriage license
- Obama’s name changes or passport info
- College records, any of them
Larry, you have a reputation for keeping it real. Your country needs you.
Have you heard Barry Subarkha and/or Soebarkah? (It may be a variation of the Soetoro surname).
Let’s be clear: I’m certain that Barry and Co. already have copies of Mitt’s tax returns. They’re simply waiting to release something irrelevant -and illegal- the Friday/Saturday/Sunday night before the election.
exactly.
But Zero may decide to grab the million bucks as well, and let the blame for the revelation fall on his fellow con man Larry Flynt.
Well maybe that is too harsh. After all, Flynt has actually done some work in his life.
Not sure if Flynt is the guy to leak the tax returms that The Won already has.
Romney could just say: “Those tax returns are fakes.”
Of course, the MSM would trumpet whatever revelations are in the tax returns anyway.
I agree 100% that the Demos already have all Romney’s tax returns. The leak just needs to come from a better source than Flynt. Although this is a great way to keep the tax return story alive; much better than having to talk about last week’s dreadful unemployment numbers.
I’d pay money to see Obama’s college transcripts.
I hope he gets them and releases them–to show there is no information that you have to give to the government that will stay secured, and that it will almost always be a Democrat leaking the files.
What if there’s an October/November surprise in our favor? Suppose Cardinal Dolan comes out on the Sunday before election day warning Catholics across the country that voting for Obama is a mortal sin, in light of his position on abortion and his persecution of the Catholic Church. Fox News definitely covers it, and so does the MSM if only to spin it. Obama then has two days to react to the highest ranking American bishop telling people they may go to Hell if they vote for Obama. He’ll be flat-footed.
Is this not ‘Soliciting a crime’?
Wouldn’t it be the same to offer money for someone to steal M.Romneys mail?
If this is legal and above board, why not offer to pay someone to steal his bank account numbers, or his pin numbers, or medical records, or passwords?
Why not just pass a bill that the democratic party and its henchmen are not subject to the laws of the United States.
” If you cut a great path through the law to get at the devil, and you corner him, and he turns round on you, what are you going to hide behind, the laws all being flat?” — Thomas More
I would love to see Mittens walk up to Larry with a stack of papers in his hand demanding his million dollars. It would have to be cash in hand though, I wouldn’t trust Larry with giving me a check.