<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/01/09/whats-missing-from-gallups-party-identification-numbers/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:22:52 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>What's Missing From Gallup's Party Identification Numbers</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[If the 63-seat House swing in 2010 &amp;#8212; accompanied by the rise of the Tea Party and the obliteration of the Blue Dog/Lindsay Graham contingent &amp;#8212; didn&amp;#8217;t already make this abundantly clear, party affiliation or independent status is not sufficient information to capture the leanings of the electorate. Gallup has found that a record 40 percent of Americans identify as independents, which is interesting, but we can&amp;#8217;t and shouldn&amp;#8217;t draw responsible conclusions based on this data alone.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:30:58 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[David Steinberg]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/david-steinberg/2012/01/09/whats-missing-from-gallups-party-identification-numbers-n159077</link></item></channel></rss>