<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/07/08/the-court-fight-against-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:27:18 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Court Fight Against Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[A three-judge panel of the federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia today unanimously reinstated a challenge by residents of Kinston, N.C., claiming that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.  They sued after the Justice Department objected to a referendum that changed its city council and mayoral elections from partisan to nonpartisan.  In 2008, Kinston voters approved the referendum by a two to one margin, including a majority of the town’s black voters, who constitute 65% of the registered electorate.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:49:00 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Hans A. von Spakovsky]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/hans-a-von-spakovsky/2011/07/08/the-court-fight-against-section-5-of-the-voting-rights-act-n150053</link></item></channel></rss>