<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/05/31/heh-we-rate-politifacts-statement-as-half-true/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 04:23:44 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Heh: 'We rate PolitiFact's statement as half true'</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Josh Trevino does a nice job of turning PolitiFact&amp;#8217;s methods of analysis back on themselves. The particular PolitiFact unit he is dealing with is the one based on Austin and run out of the Austin American-Statesman, known as PolitiFact Texas. I had a few episodes with them when I worked for the Texas GOP. They&amp;#8217;re the only PolitiFact unit I&amp;#8217;ve ever seen that can take a story, fail to refute a single fact in it, yet brand it &amp;#8220;Pants on Fire.&amp;#8221; They&amp;#8217;re the only PolitiFact unit I&amp;#8217;ve seen that can take a story, find it true by applying generally accepted standards of logic and analysis, then apply their own special brand of analysis to determine that some part of the story is false &amp;#8212; when in reality, all of it is true.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 07:08:58 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Bryan Preston]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/bryan-preston-1/2011/05/31/heh-we-rate-politifacts-statement-as-half-true-n147994</link></item></channel></rss>