<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/03/24/new-scientist-and-the-wall-of-zeros/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:49:52 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>New Scientist and the Wall of Zeros</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I usually really enjoy the New Scientist, and I&amp;#8217;ve had a warm spot for them since they interviewed me back in 2005.  Fun magazine, but they sometimes let their enthusiasms get in the way.  (If you followed Climategate, you may recall that a poorly-sourced story became the basis for the since-debunked IPCC conclusion that glaciers in the Himalayas would be gone by 2035.)]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:09:38 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Charlie Martin]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/charlie-martin/2011/03/24/new-scientist-and-the-wall-of-zeros-n144647</link></item></channel></rss>