Comments on: Lockerbie Doubts Break Into the WSJ/A Blackberry From David Samuels http://pjmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/2009/10/08/lockerbie-doubts-break-into-the-wsja-blackberry-from-david-samuels/ Fri, 02 Apr 2010 00:15:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Robert Black http://pjmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/2009/10/08/lockerbie-doubts-break-into-the-wsja-blackberry-from-david-samuels/#comment-6074 Robert Black Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:23:24 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/?p=1069#comment-6074 Here is a link to the WSJ article: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125448302641459133.html Here is a link to the WSJ article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125448302641459133.html

]]> By: Frank Duggan http://pjmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/2009/10/08/lockerbie-doubts-break-into-the-wsja-blackberry-from-david-samuels/#comment-6069 Frank Duggan Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:26:41 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/?p=1069#comment-6069 There is not a shred of evidence that would prove Syria or Iran had a role. There are theories and speculation but no evidence. Libya, on the other hand, was involved with the conviction of its employee Megrahi based on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Frank Duggan <strong>You have either not read the London Review or New York Review stories or you are not competent to evaluate what a "shred of evidence" or "reasonable doubt" are. Have you read the 800 page Scottish judicial review which called the prosecution a "miscarriage of justice'? The evidence, in fact, is in shreds. That doesn't mean we have an answer. It does mean we have doubts. </strong> There is not a shred of evidence that would prove Syria or Iran had a role. There are theories and speculation but no evidence. Libya, on the other hand, was involved with the conviction of its employee Megrahi based on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Frank Duggan

You have either not read the London Review or New York Review stories or you are not competent to evaluate what a “shred of evidence” or “reasonable doubt” are. Have you read the 800 page Scottish judicial review which called the prosecution a “miscarriage of justice’? The evidence, in fact, is in shreds. That doesn’t mean we have an answer. It does mean we have doubts.

]]>