Comments on: The JFK Assassination: Your Theories Please

By: James Sarver

James Sarver — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:28:24 +0000

The deaths of JFK and RFK were both cospiracies.LBJ was the head.The CIA,FBI,Mafia,Dallas police,and others were involved.Cord Meyer shot and killed JFK from the grassy knoll.THE LIMO TURNED and LBJ WAS IN AIR FORCE 1 WITH A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE TO SWEAR LBJ INTO THE PRESIDENCY.These 2 facts make it clear that it was a conspiracy When Sirhan Sirhan started shooting Cord Meyer ducked down low .He shot RFK in the back of his head,piercing his brain.THE KEY HERE WAS THE FACT THAT RFK AND HIS BODYGUARDS SPLIT. The deaths of Joe,Jr.and JFK,Jr. were also conspiracies.It was said that Joe,Jr. rode the bomb to the ground.JFK,Jr. was investigating his father’s death The deaths of all of the Kennedys were Conspiracies.Something was done a long time ago to make low people in high places extremely angry. JFK and LBJ used illegal voters to defeat Nixon.Many times I cry myself to sleep wondering how great this country would be if Nixon had won.Six days before the election they made Nixon and Kennedy sign an agreement that neither wold contest the election.This turned all of the illegal voters loose

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:01:33 +0000

Let us assume that LHO acted alone. It still does not explain how he acted so rationally from June 1962, on returning to the US with a wife, small baby and then suddenly changed, probably with ordering the first gun in January 1963 under a false name.

Between June and January he was able to get a job in Fort Worth, renting a house there, then moved to Dallas for a better job and saved enough money to pay back his brother and the US government for passages to the US for himself and his wife by the end of the year.

Then there are a series of unexplained events..buying the mailorder rifle, shooting at Walker, getting himself fired. Some things may not be so strange. His wife applied to the Russian Embassy in February with monthly correspondence thereafter, after finding herself pregnant in February (possibly hoping for Russian health care for the delivery).

I think that someone should try to explain LHO’s thinking processes, not calling him a “nut”. Read his speech on the radio in the summer of 1963. He has a grasp of the economic effect of the blockade on Cuba and includes China in his comments.

While this is not an explanation of what happened, it is simply amazing how few “degrees of separation” are between LHO and so many well known Americans, including intended correspondence with the former Secretary of the Navy who the shooter (assuming it was him) really did hit, and others. He put himself in line of so many agencies including the CIA, KBG (monitored for almost 3 years on a daily basis) and of course the FBI.

By: Milton

Milton — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:31:47 +0000

It seems the LHO was a contract agent or at least an informant for the FBI or CIA or both.
LHO didn’t kill anyone,not JKF or Officer J.D.Tippit. He may have infiltrated the organiztion that killed JFK but did not pull the trigger. If he had infiltrated that group then it would have to appear that he was going to take part in the assassination. That would probably explain the so-called “curtain rod story” where he told his friend that he had curtain rods when hs friend, Leslie Frazier dropped him off at work on the morning of the assassination. It had to appear that he was involved so he ostentatiously took a rifle into the TSDB on the morning of the murder,( in case anyone was looking from afar to make sure he would play his role). After the shooting, LHO realized that the people that he had been reporting on and the people he had been reporting back to were working together. Afterwards, both the CIA and the FBI claimed he did not work for either of them. Oswald then had to be elimnated because he had “dirt” on the organization that killed JFK and the CIA/FBI. A pristine bullet that passed through two men with no blood on it?

By: Charles Drago

Charles Drago — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:26:10 +0000

Oswald was arrested in New Orleans in the summer of 1963 during what likely was a staged confrontation with anti-Castro activist Bringeur.

The cop was very perceptive.

By: robert forte

robert forte — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:46:41 +0000

I read few times that the Dalls cop who arrested Oswald for street-fighting w/anti-Castro Cuban Carlos Brigeur (or a simiar spelling) put in his arrest report the fight seemed phony & he suspected it was staged. It’s supposed to be in the WR but I can’t find it. Anyone know anything about it?

By: donald rush

donald rush — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:35:04 +0000

The fact of the matter is, that after 45 years, not one piece of “evidence” is indisputable. How many murder cases do you know where nothing is indisputable- much less the murder of a US President? The Warren Commission purposely ignored anyone’s testimony that didn’t collaborate the “official” predetermined lone nut explanation. Look it up. So to say that no one talked is absurd. Also, how do any of you explain that EVERY doctor that saw JFK testified that he had a large wound in the BACK of his head? They must have all been quacks, huh? Ask yourself this one as well…how come Jack Ruby- a well known STRIP CLUB owner w/police connections isn’t referred to in that way in the WC? He is mentioned as a “night club owner” and they found NO evidence of him being a mobster (which has since been shown that he was). The list goes on and on and on. LHO may have been involved, but he was where he said he was that day- on the 2nd floor lunchroom w/a coke in hand (he told this to the Dallas police chief). The HSCA proved that there was a 2nd gunman on the knoll. So what is the big question about a conspiracy? It’s been proven already. What we don’t know is all of the specifics and exactly why. People in a position of power can conceal that in the USA you know? Just like in any country in the world. Wake up people!!!

By: joe edmon

joe edmon — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:44:26 +0000

Any possible connections between Jack Ruby and the State Line Mob? (made famous by Buford Pussar)

By: Charles R. Drago

Charles R. Drago — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:23:13 +0000

MichaelH,

“The Mob” is one of the so-called false sponsors of the JFK conspiracy.

For the sake of clarity let’s focus on the early 1960s: During that period the connective tissue linking elements of organized crime, big business, big oil, the militant far right and anti-Castro Cubans, and civilian and military intelligence assets was so thick and so richly engorged by shared interests and profits that to attempt to compartmentalize these forces within this investigatory context is to cite distinctions without a meaningful differences.

The mob benefited from the assassination. And the true sponsors benefited from the scapegoating of Messrs. Giancana, Marcello, Trafficante, et al in the roles of the plot’s prime movers.

(Other false sponsors: LBJ, JEH, the Soviets, the Cubans, H.L. and E.H. Hunt and companies, the JCS, CIA, etc.)

As for the LHO-as-crazed-assassin canard: From day one to the present, pseudo-psychoanalyses of the official assassination patsy (all based on false premises, and thus sophistic) have been offered to deflect attention from valid evidence proving conspiracy and to placate many in the academic/intellectual classes by appealing to their own cognitive infirmities and vaulting egos.

Lee Harvey Oswald’s mental state — whatever it was on 11/22/63 — has ZERO IMPACT on the evidence that proves multiple shooters/killers acted in Dealey Plaza and eliminates LHO as a suspect in both the Kennedy and Tippett slayings.

By: MichaelH

MichaelH — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:15:24 +0000

When a person says that somebody has slipped into their apartment and changed a bookmark in a book, I don’t consider that I can prove it didn’t happen but might consider that their aren’t unusual circumstances in their life that make that a reasonable possibility. That isn’t a psychoanalysis; I’m not considering why they might be making a false assertion which would be psychoanalysis. People don’t decide likelihood of truth on the basis of the logical consistency of a story. There is nothing logically impossible in the vignette I offered. A psychiatrist does however get used to looking for hypotheses that contain an absurd assumption. I am merely offering what to me is a hypothetically ‘absurd’ assumption in the mob theory. People also decide what is worth learning about and what they might stay pragmatically ignorant about. The truth likelihood based on this initial consideration gets the ‘mob theory’ in the category of something I might preserve my present state of ignorance about.

By: Charles R. Drago

Charles R. Drago — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:26:33 +0000

Don’t you just love the psychiatrists who “disprove” conspiracy in the JFK assassination by psycho-analyzing Oswald and/or “conspiracists?”

None of that pesky eyewitness, earwitness, medical, or ballistic evidence — for starters — matters.

LHO was nuts!

“Conspiracists” are emotionally incapable of accepting that a “nobody” killed a “somebody!”

Physician, heal thyself.