<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/2008/09/11/the-line-of-attack-obama-should-take/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 02:17:22 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Line of Attack Obama Should Take</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I think it&amp;#8217;s time the Obama team turns the stategy reins over to me. Ever since the misbegotten selection of the clownish Joe Biden, Obama and the entire Democratic party seem off their game.  (Did I not predict Biden would be a continual embarrassment? What a lost opportunity!) They have no game. They have no line of attack.  It&amp;#8217;s either been conceding that George Bush was right about the surge (as Obama admitted to Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly, rather than focussing on the mismanagement of the war from about Day Three in a way that required the enormous unnecessary loss of life for five years). Or it&amp;#8217;s gotten itself  obsessed with their opponent&amp;#8217;s vice presidential pick in exactly the snotty elitist way that seems to confirm what I believe to be a mistaken impression of Obama.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:04:12 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ron Rosenbaum]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ron-rosenbaum/2008/09/11/the-line-of-attack-obama-should-take-n115525</link></item></channel></rss>