<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/ronrosenbaum/2007/10/29/shocking_inside_dc_scandal_rum/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:40:53 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Shocking Inside DC Scandal Rumor: A Media Ethics Dilemma</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[So I was down in DC this past weekend and happened to run into a well-connected media person, who told me flatly, unequivocally that &amp;#8220;everyone knows&amp;#8221; The LA Times was sitting on a story, all wrapped up and ready to go about what is a  potentially devastating sexual scandal involving a leading Presidential candidate. &amp;#8220;Everyone knows&amp;#8221; meaning everyone in the DC mainstream media political reporting world.  &amp;#8220;Sitting on it&amp;#8221; because the paper couldn&amp;#8217;t decide the complex ethics of whether and when to run it. The way I heard it they&amp;#8217;d had it for a while but don&amp;#8217;t know what to do. The person who told me )not an LAT person) knows I write and didn&amp;#8217;t say &amp;#8220;don&amp;#8217;t write about this&amp;#8221;.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:42:17 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ron Rosenbaum]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ron-rosenbaum/2007/10/29/shocking_inside_dc_scandal_rum-n115038</link></item></channel></rss>