Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ron Radosh

Two Anniversaries and Their Meaning

June 3rd, 2014 - 7:29 am

The Times, which has filed first-rate reports on the subject of Chinese repression, informed its readers a few days ago that on “the 25th anniversary of the bloodshed that convulsed the nation and nearly sundered the Communist Party,  censors and security forces have waged an aggressive ‘stability maintenance’ campaign that has sent a chill through the ranks of Chinese legal advocates, liberal intellectuals and foreign journalists.” At least a dozen scholars and activists whom the government fears have been arrested, and even one person who posted a selfie on the internet of himself standing on the square and flashing a V sign has also been detained.

The Chinese no longer live in the type of regime that held power in Mao’s days, but one thing the government has not abandoned has been the repressive power of the state, which clamps down on anyone its leaders fear might raise the specter of democracy. At Tiananmen, the student protestors had created a statue modeled after our own Statue of Liberty that they named “The Goddess of Democracy.” Today,  China’s president, Xi Jinping, the Times story continues, “15 months into the job, is determined to stamp out dissent amid an ideological assault against liberal ideas that many view as part of a wide-ranging drive to consolidate power.”

When I was in China speaking throughout the country on a State Department program in 2000, academics at a liberal think tank told me that they thought it would take many decades for China to become a democracy like the United States, but that eventually it would occur. Today’s rulers want that day to come as far into the future as possible, and if they can, prevent it from ever happening.

The authorities fear the citizens learning the truth. But it is impossible to erase the memory of so many who were there. It is estimated that over one million people were on the streets the day the army fired into the unarmed civilians, and too many Chinese know what happened. Eventually, the new generation born after these events took place will learn about that sad day.

We who live in a still-free country, where we can speak our mind and criticize our leaders (and even call for the impeachment of our president when we feel he has violated the Constitutional requirements of his post), should take pause this Normandy landing observance day and remember how our nation stands as a beacon of freedom to those who live under repression.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
The guys who fought, suffered and died in WW2 deserve to be honored by us but the claim that they were the Greatest Generation is just nonsense. They were just normal guys - like Archie Bunker. I read that group therapy groups was started by the army when they found that so many recruits had psychological problems. So, they had most of the problems we have now only they didn't talk about it then.
24 weeks ago
24 weeks ago Link To Comment
He missed some.

The liberation of Rome, the battle of Midway, and the final day of Dunkirk, all on June 4
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
Yeah, but what does Tom Friedman say?

And our freedom to speak, does that apply to True the Vote, Dinesh DSouza and Phil Mickelson?

I understand that the Secret Service is going to investigate blog posts for sarcasm against the President.

The people you met in China who told you that freedom was coming. If you talk to our citizens they might tell you that in this land of ours, freedom is going.

We should be aware which way the arrow is pointing.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
And yet HBO can memorialize Martha Gellhorn, a firm supporter of the material progress accomplished under Mao, without shame. See No peeps from the press, only focus on Nicole Kidman's body and the customary tip of the hat to Castro-buddy Ernest Hemingway.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
The Chinese no longer live in the type of regime that held power in Mao’s days...

One post-Mao leader was asked about further liberalizing the country. His reply was that China would not follow the devastating path taken by Russia. It's hard to tell just which path China is on.
25 weeks ago
25 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All