Al-Jazeera Shames the U.S. Media By Telling the Truth About Cuban Repression
One has to marvel at the audacity and bravery of these dissidents, who risk not only imprisonment but the chance that they will even be murdered by the regime. Even a tiny percentage of dissidents who speak out is seen as a threat by the government to its stability. Once the public no longer fears the regime, it could be the beginning of the end. Rodiles began, as seen in the video, by pointing out the surveillance cameras constantly aimed at his home by state security.
The al-Jazeera crew proceeded to Revolution Square, the site of all the mass rallies, and witnessed a brave rickshaw driver unveiling a sign saying “Down with Repression.” This act led to his immediate arrest.
Then, on July 22, an incident took place which reveals the true face of the Cuban regime. Cuba’s leading dissident, Oswaldo Paya, was driving in a car with two passengers. He phoned his daughter on a cell phone to tell her he was being followed by state security. A moment later, a crash occurred. Paya was killed.
His daughter rightfully concluded that his death was not an accident. Hernandez secretly filmed Paya’s funeral, which turned into a demonstration against the regime, which is captured in his video. Soon after, al-Jazeera was unable to reach him. The other dissident they filmed at home, Antonio Rodiles, was arrested. The network’s correspondent writes:
This film, which will probably go to air as Antonio is in a cell for daring to speak his mind, will no doubt confirm the government’s suspicions of him — but like all the dissidents we spoke to in our film, he would not have had it any other way. Only by speaking out, they say, will Cubans bring change to their country.
The repression in Cuba continues unabated. Michael Allen of the National Endowment for Democracy has done a yeoman’s job of reporting about these developments. The NED reports in its Democracy Digest:
Two leading Cuban dissidents have been threatened and attacked, “by people they took to be intelligence agents in separate incidents on the same day,” AP reports:
Elizardo Sanchez said two plainclothes officials stopped him near his Havana home on Tuesday, shouting physical threats and using crude language. That night, dissident Guillermo Farinas was allegedly attacked by a man with a wooden stick elsewhere in Havana, resulting in light injuries.
The regime is keeping rights activists under intense pressure, with more than 5,600 dissidents, journalists and rights activists arrested or detained between January and the end of October this year, writes Ivette Martinez.
The Cuban Commission for Human Rights and National Reconciliation recorded 520 detentions in October alone. For the year, the group says it has documented 5,625 cases, which is “consistent with the high level of political repression in Cuba over recent years.”
The Communist authorities yesterday sentenced a labor union activist to two years in prison for his independent organizing activities.
Ulises González Moreno was sentenced in a trial whose outcome was predetermined, independent journalist Iván Hernández Carrillo reports via his Twitter account:
According to Cuba Sindical, González Moreno is 45 years old and was detained on November 15, 2012 at his home located in Concordia #414 apartment 2 in Central Havana by two plain clothes state security agents who identified themselves as members of the Ministry of the Interior (MININT). The following day when his wife went to where her husband was being detained she was told that he would be tried for “Peligrosidad Social” (Social Dangerousness), which indicates that the activist has a predilection to in a possible future commit a crime against the regime. This law has been used to persecute nonviolent activists.
Their report quotes a recent interview they conducted with Rodiles, who was released after 19 days in detention. The brave dissident made the following statement:
I say to my friends and others with whom I have spoken, that my main experience is that at this moment in Cuba there are a great many people who understand that the country has to change, and that people thinking differently, that people having different views of things, political, ideological, is not a reason for people to hate them or to not respect them but, sadly, there is a group of people who up to now have demonstrated that they have carte blanche to use violence, who are committed to creating situations like this one and I think, what’s more, they are committed to creating even more critical situations.
I think it’s very important that all national and international public opinion support civil society activists because these people are not the preponderance of the people in this country.






There is a famous photo of Ernest Hemingway and Castro in segment 3 of my essay on Hemingway’s famous “spy mission” to China. (See http://clarespark.com/2011/06/30/links-to-review-essay-on-hemingway-spy-mission-to-china/.) But even more telling is the recent HBO movie about Hemingway and Gellhorn that could not be more consonant with the communist line on all matters regarding US foreign policy as told by either Soviets or Maoists.See http://clarespark.com/2012/07/09/hbo-does-gellhorn-in-red/. Though the HBO movie had mixed reviews, no detractor pointed out its ideology.
Excellent!
Perhaps because Mr Gross was himself a US employee he and his family assumed the Dept of State would act more forcefully on his behalf. Big mistake.The country and that Dept is led by not very bright ideologues who wouldn’t make the appropriately muscular move even if Gross were their own father.
Agreed.
When the fish stinks from the head (the Radical-in-Chief wagging State…on down) up all manner of see no evil is tolerated. Heck, it is even encouraged. And the fact that State is lock-step, with all things radical revolutionary, makes it impossible to glean the truth about Castro’s regime and elsewhere in the third world. It is also the case, due to a veritable joined-at-the-hip media, nothing is off limits.
And this is what happens when radical revolutionaries hold the reins of the US body politic – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/
The fact that Al-Jazeera recognizes its dangers is proof positive that the Obama regime is out-sized in its radical left bent.
Hey Chicago Tribune, what kinda Journalism is that?
http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/12/12/hey-chicago-tribune-what-kinda-journalism-is-that/
At the root of Al-Jazeera’s interest is the deep islamic hatred of Atheism. Atheists don’t get the choice of paying the Jizya. Also, Atheistic Communists are global competitors against the coming Caliphate.
Very perceptive. We should all wonder at alJazeera’s motives in everything they report, it’s safe to assume that they’re well trained and very skillful propagandists, occasionally appearing “balanced”….. but this idea of athiests being competitors of the practicing Muslims is a new twist that should be explored.
Interesting to speculate if a paste of my comment here emailed as a Letter To The Editor of the Washington Post mentioning:
”
by Ron Radosh
Page 1 of 3 Next -> View as Single Page
Al-Jazeera Shames the U.S. Media By Telling the Truth About Cuban Repression
December 11th, 2012 – 9:54 am”
….would yield any response from The Post. It’s worth a try.
Here it is pasted below”
”
To:
Cc:
Subject: Al-Jazeera Shames the U.S. Media By Telling the Truth About Cuban Repression
Date: Tue 11.12.2012 08:34 PM
Attachments
Name Type Save View
Part 1 text/plain Save
Part 2 text/html Save
Editors:
Here’s a subject to be explored by the Washington Post which would be an interesting topic in conjunction with Hugo Chavez’ current hospitalization inside Communist Cuba for another cancer surgery.
Please see the following headline from PJMedia which I’ve pasted here.
“Al-Jazeera Shames the U.S. Media By Telling the Truth About Cuban Repression.”
“
by Ron Radosh
Page 1 of 3 Next -> View as Single Page
Al-Jazeera Shames the U.S. Media By Telling the Truth About Cuban Repression
December 11th, 2012 – 9:54 am”
If alJazeera has such an intrepid and resourceful reporting team with gumption, why not you guys at the Washington Post? I challenge the Washington Post.
Sincerely,
Charles Griffith
tel.301.371.4491
charlieg@emailaccount.com”
END PASTE
…..for some reason the “TO and CC” lines simply will not re-print here, and remains blank, I tried this twice…. as is shown accurately in my original email copied to myself. Anyway, I assure readers here that I did send this as a “Letter to The Editor” via email to the Washington Post.
I was going to comment but vangrungy said it perfectly. Why atheists still hate Christians when a freight train named Islam is headed their way I have no idea.
I don’t care how well it could have turned out: the term “workers’ paradise” is an oxymoron.
Al-Jazeera is just full of surprises.
On all things including the middle east, al-Jazeera is consistently more questioning than any UK based tv news service. In particular their in depth investigation into modern slavery, exposing unsavory practices in north Africa and debt ridden indentured labour in Pakistan was unflinching. Their coverage of the London riots last year was exemplary, unlike local stations which focussed on the few white middle class participants, rather than the gang subcultures involved. In the age of internet, whoever desires a broad perspective should read and watch events from as many viewpoints as possible.
For what it’s worth, I’ve stopped watching CNN, MSNBC and BBC, and for international news only watch al-Jazeera English on my computer. As I see it, three things make AJE stand out: first is their focus on “hard” news, no stories about Paris Hilton or kittens trapped in trees; second is their coverage of areas such as Africa and Latin America that other stations only focus on when there’s a crisis; and third is their opinion shows that tackle topics in an in-depth way. The down side of course is that the slant in the opinion shows is usually far to the left. But they’re only a fraction more left-wing than the BBC’s opinion shows and the hard news coverage is far better. And as the article points out, when they DO break out of the left-wing mold, the results are great. Weird that I’m such a fan of that station, but there it is!