Thoughts on My 75th Birthday
My adoption of communism and a belief that it was the key to all truth stemmed from what I was taught by my high school teachers. I recently talked to the school’s official historian, now employed by the institution and teaching there now. He told me that virtually every member of the faculty when I attended the school from 1949 through 1955 was an actual member of the American Communist Party. Recall that this took place during the so-called McCarthyite reign of terror in the 1950s. And here, in the heart of New York, communist teachers were employed by a private school based on the pedagogical theories of John Dewey (who was on its original board of trustees) and no one threw them in prison. Some were indeed good teachers, but the truth is that impressionable young people like me learned that being decent meant being a good leftist. The school, Elisabeth Irwin High School, was the upper division of The Little Red Schoolhouse, the elementary school we referred to as “The Little Red Schoolhouse for Little Reds.” It is not surprising that in their big anniversary book published some years ago, they noted that for a period in the postwar era, the school stopped teaching American history and taught only Soviet history, since that was the future of the world it wanted its students prepared for.
Most of my readers also know that what got me in trouble with the Left when I still considered myself part of it was writing The Rosenberg File, published in 1983. That book came from the same motivation that led me this week to write about the Stone film. The difference is that when I started, I believed that the Rosenbergs were innocent, and that as a historian, I could prove it. As I began my research with my friend Sol Stern, it quickly became apparent that they were guilty as charged. Seeing that the evidence did not square with the views I believed, I went with the evidence, and began to reevaluate the left-wing mythologies I had always thought were true.
Although the period I considered myself a communist was thankfully a very brief one, and decades ago, I realize how if someone skillful had been around to counter the misinformation I was regularly fed, I could have avoided taking such a path that led to some wasted years. Today, equally idealistic and well-meaning young people, who now as before crave a better world, join movements and organizations that espouse a totalitarian mentality because they believe they are promoting social justice. They too think their oppositional stance will lead to the utopian future they think remains possible — not understanding that no such utopia exists for them to make possible, and that their actions will only make things worse. How else to explain the alliance in Europe, especially in Britain, between the old New Left, the remaining old Communists, and the various Trotskyist splinter groups with the Islamists and Salafi fundamentalists?
As in the past, these folks on the Left have a double standard; they want to end the patriarchy and espouse feminism but remain silent on the real war on women by radical Islamists, since to criticize them is to attack the West they believe is responsible for all evil, and to say anything is to be ethnocentric and to criticize their chosen ways of behavior, which is itself coming from an imperialist perspective.
A few years ago, Joan Wallach Scott of Princeton’s Institute for Advance Studies exemplified this attitude. As The New Yorker reported,
Scott, a feminist scholar, was asked by the moderator, Jacob Weisberg of Slate, about the treatment of Muslim women and Ramadan’s views on the subject, including his call for a “moratorium” in Muslim countries on the Islamic criminal code, including stoning of adulteresses. Her answer came in two parts: first, she said, the whole question is just a distraction from the plight of unemployed Muslims in Europe. Second, who are we to criticize? Let them work things out according to their religion.
Scott, by the way, is also a leftist I knew well as a fellow student during my UW-Madison undergraduate and graduate years.
So, let me return to the theme of thoughts on being 75. The way to keep going is to do what gives your life passion and meaning, and to continue to do so as long as possible. In my personal case, it is to hopefully provide the kind of wisdom that will allow some to avoid taking the path of utopian fantasies that can never be realized, and to write works as a historian that give my readers a real perspective on our country’s path — rather than the kind of ideologically motivated “history” of an Oliver Stone, that takes material out of context to fit it to his preconceived, communist world-view.
So I will carry on, keeping-on keeping-on. Therefore, dear readers, you can look forward to more from me at PJM and elsewhere. And now, I’ll go out and celebrate my birthday!
****
Image courtesty shutterstock / Robyn Mackenzie






Happy birthday, and please continue writing.
Absolutely! And a huge “thank you!” for what you’ve done so far!
Ron,
I learn the most from your columns, so keep on churning them out.
Happy birthday, Mr. Radosh! Fighting is exhausting, but I’m glad you’ve chosen to keep at it. I hope I have your courage of conviction when I’m seventy-five.
More joy in heaven over one sinner and all that. Happy birthday. Would that more had trod the path that you and David Horowitz did.
Happy birthday Mr. Radosh.
Ron, you raise an interesting question. Can the truth be anything other than the truth?
“Instead, I find myself angry and as motivated as I ever was to try and tell what I consider to be the truth, and to take up and challenge all the charlatans that surround us.”
Your perception of the truth — what you consider to be the truth — is not the truth. You either know the truth or you don’t.
And Happy Birthday!!!
Ron, as I recall it, your troubles began with your first trip to Cuba and your discovery that it was not a worker’s paradise after all. You took a lot of flack for that! The Rosenbergs came later.
You’ve demonstrated that it is better to be an honest man than one who enjoys a certain popularity as the result of following a prescribed line.
Congratulations!
Alonzo Hamby
” another a player in Democratic Party circles and a lawyer of renown”
Well, three out of four ain’t bad.
Happy birthday Mr. Radosh and may you enjoy many more.
Mr.Radosh:
Happy Birthday and many many more. I hope this reaches your eyes. I first stumbled across you via a Mona Charen Column where she cited your “New” book Commies and referenced the line uttered during your Cuba trip when somebody declared the difference between a Capitalist and Socialist lobotomy. I thought it so funny I decided to get your book as I thought it would be full of anecdotes in similar vein. When ordering it at B&N they printed out a list of your books and I saw “The Rosenberg File” and ordered it as well. They came in together but I decided to read Rosenberg first. It was captivating and my new found respect for J. Edgar Hoover came from realizing through your research how thorough he was. Not the slip shod power grabbing person we’ve been led to believe. Upon reading Commies afterward I had no idea that at the time you wrote Rosenberg File that you were not only a member of the “New Left” but one of its founders. This gives you high marks for your integrity as a historian over your ideology at the time. I further stumbled across you here at PJ while following a link to a Victor Davis Hanson Column. I’ve read every column you’ve posted here since and am grateful for my discovery. My Father was a domestic Cold Warrior. I grew up surrounded by the Dan Smoot report, Dr. Schwarts books, and many many lecturers about communism to which it is some miracle that I never did join the communist party after high school graduation in 72. Through yours and a few others work I was able to tell my Dad that he was correct many years before he passed away. Roy Brewer attended my dad funeral and my stepmother has said she fielded calls from David Horowitz, just to give my dad some cred. Thank you for your work, I hope you opened many eyes with solid research and analysis and that there is more to come.
Sincerely, RNF II
Ron, Happy Birthday and as others have stated, please continue to write.
My father and I had a wonderful time reading “Commies…”, he being a fan of Dylan and Guthrie and me being a fan of political history. The book allowed us to bond on a semi-intellectual level, an occurrence very rare for us and for that I thank you kindly.
Congrats on your birthday! I am grateful for your writings exposing the facts about such things as the Rosenbergs and the communist activities that Boomer students and policy makers were so quick to dismiss.
What a beautiful cake! Enjoy, and Happy Birthday.
Happy 75th, Ron.
You are a gem in the crown of American patriotism. May you have another quarter century to gift us with your wisdom and defense of our ideals.
I hope you and your family have a wonderful time celebrating your milestone birthday.
Best wishes from the bottom of my heart…and thank you…for being you.
Happy Birthday Ron and thanks for a fantastic article. I completely agree; there are just too many people out there overzealous to take a stance they know little about. Ignorance is never bliss. Just dangerous.
Happy Birthday!
Congratulations on having got this far. I hope to do the same. If I’m lucky, I’ll be able to work well towards my nineties as did my mother’s father.
I’m a bit surprised that you found it important enough to reflect upon and recall past years’ activities rather than anticipated ones, though your journey has certainly been interesting. I expect it will remain so.
I wish you continued enjoyment of your chosen work, as well as the pleasure of your family and acquaintances, which, as you say, is most gratifying.
Regards,
Gary
Happy Birthday.
WRT your blood pressure rising when exposed to charlatanry, I respectfully suggest that this condition might perhaps be mitigated by (a) a low carb diet and (b) assuming a superior attitude: getting into the habit of smirking at charlatans and the dupes who listen to them.
WRT your high school experience, you might be interested to know that in an Italian high school, my teachers included fascists, Christian democrats, and communists. (And they all got along btw.) But of course, Mussolini got to power by championing the class interests of white-collar public sector workers: see The Road to Serfdom, last few pages of chapter 8. The commies championed blue-collar private-sector workers.
… and btw I look forward to reading your article in the Weekly Standard, especially since I have no idea what kind of history Oliver Stone is peddling.
Happy Birthday, and many more. May you be healthy and contented as the years accumulate, and may you have the opportunities to pursue your work and enjoy seeing the younger members of your family live joyfully. Thank you for your fine work, and we appreciate reading your contributions here at PJM
Happy birthday Mr. Radosh. And God bless you for valuing truth over dogma.
Happy Birthday. Please keep up your important work. I am about half-way through your SPAIN BETRAYED. Your unmasking of NKVD and GRU documents during the Spanish Civil War is quite an eye- opener. Please continue tearing away the masks of those who would steal our freedom.
Happy Birthday.
The Truth is like gold. It is precious only because it is so rare.
Happy birthday Mr. Radosh, and Mazel Tov. You are fortunate to still have old friends, as very few denizens of the left tolerate apostasy. A friend who sticks with you despite personal political disagreements is a rare treasure.
Incidentally I just two days ago finished reading Spain Betrayed. I had long wanted to study the Spanish Civil War but refrained, for I knew how thoroughly it had been mythologized by the progressives. Your book not only verified much what I had already suspected (because as a veteran of the Cold War I knew that the Soviet Union was absolutely not altruistic and therefore they must have expected something other than gratitude from the Spanish Republicans) but pointed me towards historians to follow up on for a more balanced view of that war than I could find from the likes of The Nation editorial staff. I would never cheer on the likes of Franco, but it seems that if nothing else he was, if not the best, the least worst outcome for Spain.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY RON. After this weekend I will post my song to you – to the tune of “Tam Pierce” an old Burl Ives folksong. Reading the other posts here has been very inspiring. A lot of folks really get what you are saying, what you are exposing – how important it is to learn from history – learn the right lessons not the left-wing reading back into history and creating black and white cartoons. All your books have been illuminations on the past and therefore the present. And now catching up with Theodore Draper and his volumes on American Communism, its hard to understand that some still keep up the romantic-false vision of commies. I guess foolishness is always with us – but you have gone beyond the call of duty to wake us up from these distortions and lies. God Bless, Shalom, Cantor Bob Cohen
Happy Birthday Mr. Radosh. We are all beholden to you for your unyielding pursuit of truth. May you enjoy many many more years in the fight.
Sincerely,
Woodsman
HERE’S TO YOU PAT: A LIFE WELL LIVED…MAY IN LONG ENDURE IN HAPPINESS
“WE SALUTE YOU—FRIENDS OF FREEDOM!”
We sing your praise, our unseen friends,
Who labor with us in these days.
And though, at times, our path seems bleak,
We now perceive God’s better way!
Our message brims with faith and hope
A voice of love that is God’s own!
And if chill fears should shade our hearts,
We seem to hear, “You’re not alone–
“Be still and know that I AM GOD,
“With sacred blessings held, reserved,
“For those who love COLUMBIA*,
“A nation I raised up to serve
“This world to which I gave MY LIGHT
“That Freedom’s Power be preserved!”
Then let us strive toward what-should-be,
With all who share our troubled days.
That by God’s grace, throughout all time,
With you, we’ll sing COLUMBIA’S praise!
* Columbia = United States; new Latin from Christopher Columbus; first used 1775.
SO MANY UNSEEN FRIENDS LABOR TOGETHER…AND WE WILL WIN…NEXT TUESDAY!
Happy birthday, Ron, and many more ad mea v’esrim. Thank you so much for sharing your insight with all of us!
Well Ron, at least YOU figured out the sick murderous joke that is communism – though it took you a while.
By about 1950 or so, it was very clear that Stalin had murdered about 20 to 30 million souls (vs. about 12 million that Hitler had exterminated), and it was an historical fact that Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler and it was also a fact that Stalin invaded/took over Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland and of course, as part of the Hitler Stalin Pact, he invaded eastern Poland about 10 days after Hitler had invaded from the west.
It was also true that by about 1965 or so it was very very clear that E.German border guards would shoot IN THE BACK anyone trying to flee into W.German and FREEDOM, and leave those shot in the back left to die atop the barbed wire barriers.
Apparently NONE OF THIS MATTERED TO YOU !!!!
Did you not ever stop and think , “why is there a wall preventing people from leaving a country if that country is a workers paradise.”
Did you ever stop and think “if the USSR is utopia, then why are people not free to leave and return as they are in that imperialistic, capitalistic, dog-eat-dog, hell on earth, USA?”
I just cite a few very obvious examples.
And now you write about a friend who is a major force in NY democratic circles. Let’s see, is this not the party that IN EVERY SINGLE INSTANCE HAS BLOCKED SCHOOL CHOICE AND CHARTER SCHOOLS for those trapped in the inner city schools???
Let me guess, your democratic party friend had HIS KIDS GO TO GOOD SCHOOLS. Why does this not surprise me?
Ron, I read your book COMMIE many years ago and it came as a shock to me to see how disgusting, how reprehensible, how arrogant, how elitist, how UNCARING, how cold, how NARCISSISTIC , leftist ideologues are. They are no different today. Frankly, they are literally worse than NAZIS.
It is simply beyond comprehension that to this day, in Manhattan, exists the headquarters of the CPUSA; espousing an ideology that has resulted in more intentional deaths than any other ideology in world history. (Imagine the KKK or Nazi Party wanted to establish a NYC headquarters; it would never get off the ground due to protests, etc.).
It appears that because your “friends” tried to stop you from writing the truth about the Rosenberg case, that was the impetus you needed to break from the lefty-Nazi-commie crowd into which you were born and raised.
So, please tell us, why did the intentional deaths of millions and millions of souls under communist tyrannies not convince you MANY YEARS EARLIER of the evil that is communism??
Why didn’t the MURDER of civilians, shot in the BACK, and left to die on the barbed wire along the E.Berlin border – and shown in magazine pictures ALL OVER THE WORLD – not convince you that communism and Nazism were one and the same.
Why was it that something that happened to YOU, that affected YOU, was the impetus that convinced you to re-think your ideological leanings?
Perhaps you can enlighten all of your readers and provide a response.
You should be the one writing The Untold History of the United States.
Happy Birthday!
Happy birthday, Ron. I was shocked you’re 75, then thought of-course Dylan is 71, so it makes sense. I guess 70 must be the new 40, so good luck with middle-age. And keep up your superb and important work.
Happy Birthday! Happy, happy, happy birthday!
Happy Birthday Ron. But one issue in your journey from Communism to the present I think needs to be clarified. While it is apparent that your desire to remain truthful to the evidence in your excellent book about the Rosenbergs damned you in the eyes of your fellow leftists, it was the active and purposeful campaign against you in the historical profession by such former close friends of yours led by Eric Foner of Columbia University that was the source of many of your trials and your subsequent political conversion.I wonder if Foner and others on the left had been less active in trying to undermine your career by seeking to block your appointment to various history faculties whether your ideological journey would have taken the path it did. This is not to doubt the sincerity of your conversion — a conversion, by the way, I applaud — but simply to indicate that I often find that in many people’s lives the personal strongly shapes the political.
Perhaps this is one answer to the question of a previous commentator: why, given all the evidence of Stalin’s crimes that was available to you and others did it take you so long for the scales to fall from your eyes?
Actually, you have your timeline all wrong. If you read my memoir, you will see, as Lon Hamby accurately noted, that I began to shift after my trip to Cuba. The attacks on me from people like Foner only helped me realize their true colors, and was more evidence that truth was not something they respected. The attacks angered me, of course, but were not responsible for my change of views. Awareness of the reality of the world was.
Also, when I was on the Left, mainstream schools blocked me from hiring because then they didn’t want leftists. It worked both ways. Things changed when the Left took over the faculties, as part of their long march through existing institutions.;
As for the evidence of Stalin’s crimes, I knew of them through reading Isaac Deutscher, who for STalinists, was a bridge away from communism. That was a step I took long ago, in my brief sojourn as a communist. Then I learned the entire world-view was wrong, andgave up socialism as well. So I never was a denier of Stalin’s crimes, as previous generations of Communists had been. As David Horowitz acknowledges in his writings, the New Left thought it knew the truth about Stalinism but whlle standing against it, justified the crimes of the new Third World Communist regimes like Cuba, hoping that they werre something different. I hope that answers your question.
“Also, when I was on the Left, mainstream schools blocked me from hiring because then they didn’t want leftists.”
This simply does not ring true.
Academics have always been in the fore in supporting left wing causes and colleges/universities have long had on campus radical organizations – mostly leftist.
It simply appears that when you were warned not to write the truth about the Rosenbergs, it just got you so pissed off that you told your fellow radical, elitist, arrogant, Stalin-wannabes to F off.
What do you think your reaction would have been if you were encouraged and supported by your fellow lefty travelers to write the truth?
Do you think you would have “broken” with the left crowd?
Yea, maybe the horrendous crimes that about which EVERYONE KNEW (committed by Stalin, Castro, Eric Honecker, etc) disturbed you slightly, but clearly, not enough for you to even question your basic ideological beliefs.
I am convinced that those folks who wish to rule, control, command, attain power, etc., are folks who truly believe that they are entitled, by virtue of their intellect, or social standing or birthrite, to rule over what they perceive as the ignorant, stupid, undeserving, unwashed masses.
We see this today when, typically liberal progressives in Congress, desire for all of us to drive electric cars, use less resources, etc, but they themselves either drive (or are driven) in massive SUVs, have multiple vacation homes, take private planes, purchase large boats, etc., and have their assets protected in trust funds and other tax-free/deferred vehicles.
They – the ruling elites – simply believe that ONLY THEY are entitled to the better things in life, because they are simply smarter, more knowledgeable, more sophisticated, while the average Jane/Joe simply does not deserve any of these things.
As for leftist leaders/dicatators, well, look at all the luxuries they allow t themselves – material or freedom of choice-wise – while they prohibit their citizenry from having the same choices and freedom.
Leftism is based totally and completely on contempt and hatred of the average person and those that support this ideology simply wish to be recognized as “special” or “smarter” or “more intelligent” than the average person.
Like a spoiled rotten child who screams bloody murder over being denied that cookie, leftists are spoiled brat children disguised in adult bodies screaming bloody murder to be recognized as SUPERIOR, and they manifest this lack of recognition by seeking to control, to dominate and yes, to murder all those who stand in their way.
You were once part of that sicko crowd. At least you finally woke up.
Thanks for the reply. As Alonzo Hamby noted, and as you indicated in your memoir and your reply, you began to reconsider your “world view” after visiting Cuba. And I may be wrong, but it appeared to me that you were still in thrall to the left until the Rosenberg book came out in the Eighties and Foner and others began to attack you personally and tried to undermine you professionally. This is not to say that you never questioned your previous positions or were ever an apologist for Stalinism before your ideological conversion but, as far as I can tell, you weren’t outspoken in expressing your doubts about the “world view” you later strongly rejected. On the contrary, I remember attending a lecture at Columbia in, I think, the 1980s by a Penn State historian who wrote a book highly critical of how William Appleman Williams and other historians on the left misused and distorted evidence and documents to support their arguments. You and Foner shouted him down, accusing him of all kinds of historical crimes and misdemeanors. It was not until some time afterwards when you became the victim of similar behavior that I began to notice a decided shift in your ideological position. Again, I do not doubt in the slightest your sincerity but I only wanted to point out that oftentimes a persons political views can be shaped and reshaped by personal experiences. As you have written, growing up and being educated in an environment dominated by Communists and leftists affected you ideologically. Similarly, being rejected and denounced as a traitor to “the cause” because of your commitment to historical truth and being embraced for that very reason and others by those you previously disdained might have and probably did shape your later ideological journey — something I applaud you for.
A heartfelt happy birthday from Italy, and a big thank you for your books: too bad they are not translated in my language, leftist history still dominates here with all its distortions. Nevertheless I’ve read most of them in English with great interest.
My dearest wishes to you and your family, I hope your descendants may inherit your honesty.
I too grew up with Communist parents (they always refered to themselves, however, as progressives) and did not fully reject their philosophy until I was in my 40s and was, as some say, “mugged by reality.” People need to understand that leftism is just like a religion in its demand for conformity to its established rituals. And like the Amish, leftists use shunning to keep adherents in line.
So cut Ron a break. I know plenty of leftists who still cling to the utopian dreams and never question them.
2+2=4 was a popular T-shirt in Poland in the 1980′s and the commies thought it was subversive but couldn’t figure out why. It’s elegant in it’s simplicity, an undeniable truth just like everything you have written. Excellent column and I always enjoy yours and David Horowitz’s. Now go eat cake, Happy birthday to a patriotic American.
Happy birthday, Ron!
I’m 54, so I’m a full generation younger than you. I was also a leftist in my youth. I don’t remember exactly what triggered it, but I began to question things in my late 30s, and I started reading Ayn Rand when I was nearly 40. I like to say that “she systematically dismantled my most cherished beliefs and assumptions, and then proceeded to rebuild them on a stronger foundation”.
The funny thing is, I don’t feel any different. It was actually kind of painless.
That should have read “demolished”, not “dismantled”. She took a wrecking ball to them, no question about it.
“I don’t feel any different”
You’re not. Still an ideological crank – I can’t imagine that it doesn’t feel essentially the same, being a true-believing nut of the Left or an Ayn Rand kook on the Right. Apparently there’s no better feeling than being part of a “special” “intellectually advanced” minority that “gets it” while everyone else is walking around with blinders on. Luckily for the country, most folks aren’t that crazy and/or narcissistic.
Happy birthday, Ron. I just had my 57th, which was unexpectedly hard; this reassures me.
Did I hear you once mention attendance at camp at Lake Geneva Wisconsin where you met Pete Seegar? I was there too, but it must have been 10 years later. I also met Pete S. there. My memeories are dim. Please reply if convenient.