<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2012/10/13/can-stalinist-be-good-historian/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:37:58 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Case of Eric Hobsbawm: Can a Stalinist Be a Good Historian?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[At first glance, the question of whether a self-proclaimed Marxist historian, a member in good standing of the Communist Party, can be a good historian seems self-evident. After all, anyone who in this day and age still defends the Marxist-Leninist project and the reign of Lenin and Stalin in the the 20th century must be somewhat self-deluded.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ron Radosh]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ron-radosh/2012/10/13/can-stalinist-be-good-historian-n184211</link></item></channel></rss>