<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2012/01/16/second-thoughts-on-the-plight-of-judith-clark-an-answer-to-my-critics/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:07:22 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Second Thoughts on the Plight of Judith Clark: An Answer to My Critics</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Nothing I have written in some time has aroused so much passionate and often informed comment than my last column on Judith Clark. I have, in addition, received a great deal of private e-mails from people who preferred not to post comments online. One prominent legal expert replied that his head agrees with me but his heart sympathizes with those who favor harsh punishment. This lawyer also, like David Horowitz, does not believe her repentance. Another former public official replied that he believes all those convicted of killing police officers &amp;#8212; including someone like Clark who was guilty of felony murder &amp;#8212; “should suffer the death penalty.” That is a response even more harsh than any of those who commented on my post made.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:35:08 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ron Radosh]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ron-radosh/2012/01/16/second-thoughts-on-the-plight-of-judith-clark-an-answer-to-my-critics-n184012</link></item></channel></rss>