Comments on: The Nobel Disgrace: But Who Will Write Obama’s Acceptance Speech?

By: Ann

Ann — Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:17:56 +0000

Oh, a wonderful description! I have no clue how you were able to say this text..it’d take me weeks. Well worth it though, I’d suspect. Have you considered selling ads on your website?

By: after breastfeeding

after breastfeeding — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:45:28 +0000

I’m very impressed, this is a very a excellent web page, with some great subjects for conversation. The webmaster of this internet site has carried out a really very good job here and I will be back on a regular basis for new topics.

By: discount tiffany jewelry

discount tiffany jewelry — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:41:54 +0000

This Ayers obsession has gone too far….that’s a pretty tenuous connection to Ayers:

Obama wins award…

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:31:51 +0000

This Ayers obsession has gone too far….that’s a pretty tenuous connection to Ayers:

Obama wins award…
…award winners give a speech…
…speech will be written by…the guy that only the insane think wrote Obama’s book.

Give your heads a shake, or get out of the basement, folks.

By: Martin Pal

Martin Pal — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:27:11 +0000

P.S. to Mr. Radosh:

What is “The Nobel ‘Digrace’ “?

By: Martin Pal

Martin Pal — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:24:49 +0000

“No, you are the one compelled to provide the evidence. The burden of proof is on your shoulders.”

DT, just because YOU shout “fire” or “cry wolf” does not mean the rest of us are required to go find out whether there’s a fire or not. Or a wolf.

And really what is all of this speech designed to do? It’s all designed to bring down someone who’s on a pedestal that you somehow don’t feel is deserved or justified. So making up unsubstantiated hypotheses or hypotheticals is your way of dealing with something you can’t accept. Okay. I can accept that, but you must have better and more productive things to do with your time. Really, don’t you?

By: Martin Pal

Martin Pal — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:07:01 +0000

Thank you, Nobel Prize Committee. You have offered up another occasion for Obama haters to spew their geysers of vitriol and shout the word “idiot” again. It does give them something to do. And I wonder why teleprompters have suddenly become an enemy of theirs. When I heard the news I couldn’t wait to hear the sounds of all those popping heads–sounded something like–gop!

By: Professor Guvinoff

Professor Guvinoff — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:06:51 +0000

The only thing that will kill 100% of the ball’s bounce in the rethorical ping-pong between Recruiting animal and David Thomson is the smoking gun, which we don’t have, yet.

In the meantime, the topic of plausibility is all we have to play with, so the examination and discussion of probabilities is quite reasonable. In my view, the farthest-fetched theory so far is the spontaneous generation of literary genius.

The other conceivable theories are disturbing, because they have a conspirational dimension: Even if the selected ghostwriter was not a leading practitioner of dynamite-enhanced nihilism, he was still an advocate of the internal subversion variety.

Those who profess the benevolence of our president have still plenty of explaining to do: Why can’t we see any of his academic records? Why did he gather more than a half-billion dollars of campaign money, some of which from abroad? Has a president even been so deeply beholden to stealthy and unidentified actors (with the exception of George Soros) ever before? Why is he professing to have received his Christian inspiration from a volcanic pastor of black liberation theology? If all these questions have good answers, why have we not seen them, yet?

So the ball continues to bounce, and the definite answer still awaits revelation, and the tea partiers continue to discover new partners in the effort to derail the gathering train wreck.

By: forked tongue

forked tongue — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:30:13 +0000

“It is the Left that seems obsessed with the possibility that Bill Ayers may have been Barack Obama’s ghostwriter.”

I would like to nominate this as the funniest post ever written in the history of the Internet.

By: David Thomson

David Thomson — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:27:19 +0000

“If he had no public record of writing ability, it’s fair to suspect a ghost writer but to jump to the conclusion that there was one and that it was Bill Ayers is unfair and unfounded.”

The possibility that Bill Ayers is Barack Obama’s ghostwriter is merely an interesting theory. Logically speaking, however, it is simply not that important. The main thing is that Obama has zilch writings to show the world other than his two allegedly self authored books. This does not make a bit of sense. It is therefore rational to assert the overwhelming probability is that the works were ghostwritten. If one were to go to Las Vegas and place a bet the bookies would probably declare the odds are no better than five percent—and likely closer to one percent that Obama was the sole author.