<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Van Jones Again: Is he Toast?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: collect bag</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-7685</link>
		<dc:creator>collect bag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-7685</guid>
		<description>Joyclin Elders apparently never took any lessons from the Alinsky crowd. She was too brutally frank and willing to blow the minds of middle of the road Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joyclin Elders apparently never took any lessons from the Alinsky crowd. She was too brutally frank and willing to blow the minds of middle of the road Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4569</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Saul Alinsky taught his adherents not to behave in an iconoclastic fashion. He encouraged them to adopt the speech and mannerisms of those they desired to radicalize. Van Jones only get this right about half the time&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What was that that Obama said about not being threatening to whitey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Saul Alinsky taught his adherents not to behave in an iconoclastic fashion. He encouraged them to adopt the speech and mannerisms of those they desired to radicalize. Van Jones only get this right about half the time</p></blockquote>
<p>What was that that Obama said about not being threatening to whitey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pee Wee Herman, Community Organizer</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4568</link>
		<dc:creator>Pee Wee Herman, Community Organizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4568</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Joyclin Elders apparently never took any lessons from the Alinsky crowd. She was too brutally frank and willing to blow the minds of middle of the road Americans.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Testify! She was my kind of woman! Ahead of the curve, and proud of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Joyclin Elders apparently never took any lessons from the Alinsky crowd. She was too brutally frank and willing to blow the minds of middle of the road Americans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Testify! She was my kind of woman! Ahead of the curve, and proud of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucydrake</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4483</link>
		<dc:creator>lucydrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4483</guid>
		<description>Glenn will not fall: Glenn has a lot to say and it&#039;s for the good of Freedom. We are a free nation and anyone who is trying to turn us into a communist country...I do not stand for-Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn will not fall: Glenn has a lot to say and it&#8217;s for the good of Freedom. We are a free nation and anyone who is trying to turn us into a communist country&#8230;I do not stand for-Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>&quot;...and thinking that anyone who looks like that has to be harmless.&quot;

Saul Alinsky taught his adherents not to behave in an iconoclastic fashion.  He encouraged them to adopt the speech and mannerisms of those they desired to radicalize.  Van Jones only get this right about half the time.  Obama&#039;s unofficial czar can&#039;t help himself when he speaks in front of friendly crowds.  He gets downright crazy and forgets that inexpensive video and audio recorders are readily available to the masses.  In this day and age---there is virtually no such thing as a private audience of people exclusively on your side.  One must always be on their guard.  

Isn&#039;t Hazel O&#039;Leary a woman of color?  I think she might be half black.  O&#039;Leary knew how to be subtle and &quot;professional.&quot;   Joyclin Elders apparently never took any lessons from the Alinsky crowd.  She was too brutally frank and willing to blow the minds of middle of the road Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;and thinking that anyone who looks like that has to be harmless.&#8221;</p>
<p>Saul Alinsky taught his adherents not to behave in an iconoclastic fashion.  He encouraged them to adopt the speech and mannerisms of those they desired to radicalize.  Van Jones only get this right about half the time.  Obama&#8217;s unofficial czar can&#8217;t help himself when he speaks in front of friendly crowds.  He gets downright crazy and forgets that inexpensive video and audio recorders are readily available to the masses.  In this day and age&#8212;there is virtually no such thing as a private audience of people exclusively on your side.  One must always be on their guard.  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t Hazel O&#8217;Leary a woman of color?  I think she might be half black.  O&#8217;Leary knew how to be subtle and &#8220;professional.&#8221;   Joyclin Elders apparently never took any lessons from the Alinsky crowd.  She was too brutally frank and willing to blow the minds of middle of the road Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4471</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A white man would have been forced to quit sometime last week.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


3, then why&#039;s Holdren still there? Because he looks like a nerdy white scientist with his coke-bottle glasses and beard? 

I really don&#039;t like to presume racism, but I&#039;m seeing a pattern going back the Joyclin Elders of the crazy people being a political liability only when they&#039;re black. The only one who managed to hang on long enough to do any real serious damage was Hazel O&#039;Leary, but eventually, she was shown the door. 

Don&#039;t get me wrong; Jones needs to go. But somehow, we have a way of looking at a Holdren (or Ayers, for that matter), and thinking that anyone who looks like that has to be harmless. Eventually, these guys are going to figure out that they can get the worst kinds of radicals in power by making sure they have that white professorly look.

All of the creepy radicals have to go. I&#039;ll reserve comment on whether or not the POTUS fits that description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A white man would have been forced to quit sometime last week.</p></blockquote>
<p>3, then why&#8217;s Holdren still there? Because he looks like a nerdy white scientist with his coke-bottle glasses and beard? </p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t like to presume racism, but I&#8217;m seeing a pattern going back the Joyclin Elders of the crazy people being a political liability only when they&#8217;re black. The only one who managed to hang on long enough to do any real serious damage was Hazel O&#8217;Leary, but eventually, she was shown the door. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong; Jones needs to go. But somehow, we have a way of looking at a Holdren (or Ayers, for that matter), and thinking that anyone who looks like that has to be harmless. Eventually, these guys are going to figure out that they can get the worst kinds of radicals in power by making sure they have that white professorly look.</p>
<p>All of the creepy radicals have to go. I&#8217;ll reserve comment on whether or not the POTUS fits that description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Increase Mather</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4470</link>
		<dc:creator>Increase Mather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4470</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile...the big networks, the NY TIMES, and the WaPo are running around with their fingers in their ears yelling:  &quot;La la la la la la I can&#039;t hear you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile&#8230;the big networks, the NY TIMES, and the WaPo are running around with their fingers in their ears yelling:  &#8220;La la la la la la I can&#8217;t hear you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason S</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling we won&#039;t be hearing much more from Van Jones after Tuesday when he gets his pink slip.  Good riddance.  Another inexplicably bad appointment by a man who is in way over his head.  I fully expect Obama to break down in tears at some point in his presidency and admit that he has no idea what he is doing and that he is a smooth-talking poser who is just playing president on tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling we won&#8217;t be hearing much more from Van Jones after Tuesday when he gets his pink slip.  Good riddance.  Another inexplicably bad appointment by a man who is in way over his head.  I fully expect Obama to break down in tears at some point in his presidency and admit that he has no idea what he is doing and that he is a smooth-talking poser who is just playing president on tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>&quot;...whose ranting made it appear that there was somewhat of a conspiracy on the part of the Obama administration to appoint extremist radicals to positions of importance.&quot;

Oh gosh, it appears that Glenn Beck and I are guilty as sin. I am definitely convinced that Barack Obama is trying to sneak &quot;extremist radicals&quot; of the Saul Alinsky variety into his administration. Van Jones seems to go out of his way to attract attention.  He often comes across as a guy who just injected a double dose of amphetamines.  John Holdren, on the other, says a few weird things offhandedly and then proceeds to behave normally.  It will take a few weeks longer until he resigns. Jones should be gone before Tuesday.  He was cut a lot of slack because of his &quot;authentically man of color&quot; behavior. A white man would have been forced to quit sometime last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;whose ranting made it appear that there was somewhat of a conspiracy on the part of the Obama administration to appoint extremist radicals to positions of importance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh gosh, it appears that Glenn Beck and I are guilty as sin. I am definitely convinced that Barack Obama is trying to sneak &#8220;extremist radicals&#8221; of the Saul Alinsky variety into his administration. Van Jones seems to go out of his way to attract attention.  He often comes across as a guy who just injected a double dose of amphetamines.  John Holdren, on the other, says a few weird things offhandedly and then proceeds to behave normally.  It will take a few weeks longer until he resigns. Jones should be gone before Tuesday.  He was cut a lot of slack because of his &#8220;authentically man of color&#8221; behavior. A white man would have been forced to quit sometime last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Ball</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2009/09/04/van-jones-again-is-he-toast/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/ronradosh/?p=1152#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>And then, of course, we have the strange case of John Holdren; eugenicist. I think he made it. He no longer seems to be controversial, when in reality, he&#039;s more of a nutcase (and probably more dangerous) than Jones.

I really hate to bring this up, but I have to. Does the fact that Jones is getting so much more flak than Holdren indicate that we have a lower tolerance of nuttiness from blacks than whites? Is Holdren getting a white pass?

/Ducks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then, of course, we have the strange case of John Holdren; eugenicist. I think he made it. He no longer seems to be controversial, when in reality, he&#8217;s more of a nutcase (and probably more dangerous) than Jones.</p>
<p>I really hate to bring this up, but I have to. Does the fact that Jones is getting so much more flak than Holdren indicate that we have a lower tolerance of nuttiness from blacks than whites? Is Holdren getting a white pass?</p>
<p>/Ducks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

