<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>PJ Media</title><link>https://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2008/12/01/but-is-it-artand-ed-koch-on-radical-islam/feed/</link><description>PJ Media is a leading news site covering culture, politics, faith, homeland security, and more. Our reporters and columnists provide original, in-depth analysis from a variety of perspectives.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:39:04 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>But is it Art?...and Ed Koch on radical Islam</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I have written many times in various places about the Rosenberg case, most recently in The Los Angeles Times, and in Frontpagemag.com. I argued therein that today, after their co-defendant Morton Sobell&amp;#8217;s confession that he the Rosenbergs were Soviet spies, that  almost everyone except the dwindling group of true believers know that a pillar of the left-wing culture of grievance has finally been shattered. In the latter article, I asked the question of what kind of parents would saddle their orphaned sons with the burden of proving their innocence, when the Rosenbergs knew they were lying to them when they wrote &amp;#8220;Always remember. We were innocent,&amp;#8221; knowing full well they were really guilty?]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:35:04 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Ron Radosh]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://pjmedia.com/ron-radosh/2008/12/01/but-is-it-artand-ed-koch-on-radical-islam-n182678</link></item></channel></rss>