bud — in a world like this, you mean? http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/07/22/184944.php,

that helpfully explain to us dimwits that “Mr. Berger took a copy of a well-known and readily available document out of the National Archives to help him prepare for the hearings…”

There are many different potentially damaging threads to be pursued here: (1) that the army’s MI was blocked from use by a white house lawyer or lawyers and others (who, exactly?); (2) that those people purportedly relied upon ‘the wall’ in doing so; (3) that specific people — including a 9/11 commissioner no less — were largely responsible for that very ‘wall;’ (4) that those white house individuals (who, exactly?) opted not to share that information with the commission (or others); (5) that neither did those lawyer(s); (6) that certain commission staffers (who, exactly?) either deliberately or negligently failed to pass on details of the DOD briefing from 2003; (7) that certain commission members (who, exactly?) either dliberately or negligently failed to include the details of the DOD information in their report after the 2004 briefing. Its only then, that we add (8) Berger may have tried to cover this up at the behest or at least with the knowledge of others (who, exactly?).

Where’s deep throat when you need him?