hollywood

I would suggest picking a subject close to the thread subject and sticking to it. You tossed in so many different contentious ideas that we could have the entire national debate just discussing them.

Also, posting long rants by as obviously a partisan source as the PFAW is inappropriate. They won’t get read, and they waste bandwidth.

Just because you tempted me, I’m going to mention the independent counsel Ken Starr.

The Democrats did an outstanding job of smearing an honest man, one who was simply doing his job. From the tone of the Democrat defense/attack, it would appear that they were not at all interested in the rule of law, but rather only in sex. They painted Ken Starr as a sex-crazed man. In fact, he investigated law violations, not sexual pecadillos. We have a member who may or may not join in today who happens to know Starr and also Bill Clinton. If you want the truth, ask him. He will tell you that Starr is a decent man who was doing a tough job. Everything else was vicious character assassination aimed at him. I have yet to hear a Democrat explain why Susan MacDougal spent all that time in prison simply for refusing to answer a question about Bill Clinton. Perhaps you can enlighten us.