Now that the idiots have gone from “authentic” to “accurate” (meaning they admit their journalistic standards include using forged documents so long as they believe the content is “accurate”), how are they going to explain away the signatures and initialing?

Not like DNA?!?! How stupid do they think we are? If, in the days of typewriters, documents could be traced to individual machines to the satisfaction of courst of law, do these idiots really believe that in today’s world documents can’t be shown to have been NOT typewritten? Please.

Where are the originals, CBS? And who did you get the documents from?