Tano

You bring up a series of strawmen arguments and knock them down again. What is that supposed to prove?

The Bush claim was that Iraq was trying to purchase yellocake. That claim seems likely to be true. It was even backed up by Wilsons own report. What specifically do you find “decpetive” about the SOTU address?

To say that Iraq “was not purchasing yellowcake” marks you as a fool or a liar. Nobody has said that Iraq ever consumated the transaction. You are implying that Bush claimed that they did. What grounds do you have for saying so?

Flenser